If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Policy / Politique
The fee for tournament organizers advertising on ChessTalk is $20/event or $100/yearly unlimited for the year.
Les frais d'inscription des organisateurs de tournoi sur ChessTalk sont de 20 $/événement ou de 100 $/année illimitée.
You can etransfer to Henry Lam at chesstalkforum at gmail dot com
Transfér à Henry Lam à chesstalkforum@gmail.com
Dark Knight / Le Chevalier Noir
General Guidelines
---- Nous avons besoin d'un traduction français!
Some Basics
1. Under Board "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQs) there are 3 sections dealing with General Forum Usage, User Profile Features, and Reading and Posting Messages. These deal with everything from Avatars to Your Notifications. Most general technical questions are covered there. Here is a link to the FAQs. https://forum.chesstalk.com/help
2. Consider using the SEARCH button if you are looking for information. You may find your question has already been answered in a previous thread.
3. If you've looked for an answer to a question, and not found one, then you should consider asking your question in a new thread. For example, there have already been questions and discussion regarding: how to do chess diagrams (FENs); crosstables that line up properly; and the numerous little “glitches” that every new site will have.
4. Read pinned or sticky threads, like this one, if they look important. This applies especially to newcomers.
5. Read the thread you're posting in before you post. There are a variety of ways to look at a thread. These are covered under “Display Modes”.
6. Thread titles: please provide some details in your thread title. This is useful for a number of reasons. It helps ChessTalk members to quickly skim the threads. It prevents duplication of threads. And so on.
7. Unnecessary thread proliferation (e.g., deliberately creating a new thread that duplicates existing discussion) is discouraged. Look to see if a thread on your topic may have already been started and, if so, consider adding your contribution to the pre-existing thread. However, starting new threads to explore side-issues that are not relevant to the original subject is strongly encouraged. A single thread on the Canadian Open, with hundreds of posts on multiple sub-topics, is no better than a dozen threads on the Open covering only a few topics. Use your good judgment when starting a new thread.
8. If and/or when sub-forums are created, please make sure to create threads in the proper place.
Debate
9. Give an opinion and back it up with a reason. Throwaway comments such as "Game X pwnz because my friend and I think so!" could be considered pointless at best, and inflammatory at worst.
10. Try to give your own opinions, not simply those copied and pasted from reviews or opinions of your friends.
Unacceptable behavior and warnings
11. In registering here at ChessTalk please note that the same or similar rules apply here as applied at the previous Boardhost message board. In particular, the following content is not permitted to appear in any messages:
* Racism
* Hatred
* Harassment
* Adult content
* Obscene material
* Nudity or pornography
* Material that infringes intellectual property or other proprietary rights of any party
* Material the posting of which is tortious or violates a contractual or fiduciary obligation you or we owe to another party
* Piracy, hacking, viruses, worms, or warez
* Spam
* Any illegal content
* unapproved Commercial banner advertisements or revenue-generating links
* Any link to or any images from a site containing any material outlined in these restrictions
* Any material deemed offensive or inappropriate by the Board staff
12. Users are welcome to challenge other points of view and opinions, but should do so respectfully. Personal attacks on others will not be tolerated. Posts and threads with unacceptable content can be closed or deleted altogether. Furthermore, a range of sanctions are possible - from a simple warning to a temporary or even a permanent banning from ChessTalk.
Helping to Moderate
13. 'Report' links (an exclamation mark inside a triangle) can be found in many places throughout the board. These links allow users to alert the board staff to anything which is offensive, objectionable or illegal. Please consider using this feature if the need arises.
Advice for free
14. You should exercise the same caution with Private Messages as you would with any public posting.
This afternoon I decided to see how Strategy Games is doing in Google search ranking...well...we are doing okay...but...we could do better :)
Anyway, I thought this was rather...different :)... and I would like to share it with you: http://www.torontostandard.com/daily...an-chess-sets/
Originally posted by Washington Post
By Associated Press, Updated: Thursday, January 12, 12:35 PM
WASHINGTON — Defense Secretary Leon Panetta phoned Afghanistan President Hamid Karzai Thursday and promised full investigation of a video that purports to depict four U.S. Marines urinating on the corpses of Taliban fighters — a video both men condemned as deplorable.
In a separate public statement, Panetta said such behavior is “entirely inappropriate for members of the United States military” and that those responsible will be held accountable. ...
In a roundabout way it fits in with the current uproar about the U.S. Marines who allegedly urinated on Taliban corpses; i.e. it's hard to conceive of how anything worthwhile could come out of something that is so disrespectful. I have no sympathy for the Taliban but if those men died on a field of battle while fighting for what they believed in then they don't deserve that sort of treatment. I'm sure the families of those Marines would be horribly upset if the video showed Taliban fighters urinating on the Marines' corpses.
Anyway, the U.S. is certainly a strange place these days. They engage in torture, directly and by proxy, and there's hardly a ripple of outrage. Their president (Bush) and his cronies subvert their constitution through the extensive use of illegal wiretaps and there's hardly a ripple of outrage. But let a couple of dead Talibanos get peed on and suddenly we have front page news with the Defense Secretary vowing to hold the pee-ers accountable. Sheesh. :(
"We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office." - Aesop
"Only the dead have seen the end of war." - Plato
"If once a man indulges himself in murder, very soon he comes to think little of robbing; and from robbing he comes next to drinking and Sabbath-breaking, and from that to incivility and procrastination." - Thomas De Quincey
Anyway, the U.S. is certainly a strange place these days. They engage in torture, directly and by proxy, and there's hardly a ripple of outrage. Their president (Bush) and his cronies subvert their constitution through the extensive use of illegal wiretaps and there's hardly a ripple of outrage. But let a couple of dead Talibanos get peed on and suddenly we have front page news with the Defense Secretary vowing to hold the pee-ers accountable. Sheesh. :(
In your examples, the logical inconsistency disappears if you posit that outrage depends on who is doing the bad act, rather than on the badness of the act. The apotheosis of arrogance.
What I want to know is whether there is an option to have Rooks and Knights and Kings (for example) have a whiz on captured pawns... (it seemed awkward to include Queens and Bishops in that group, but whatever)
Tweet
Comment