If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Policy / Politique
The fee for tournament organizers advertising on ChessTalk is $20/event or $100/yearly unlimited for the year.
Les frais d'inscription des organisateurs de tournoi sur ChessTalk sont de 20 $/événement ou de 100 $/année illimitée.
You can etransfer to Henry Lam at chesstalkforum at gmail dot com
Transfér à Henry Lam à chesstalkforum@gmail.com
Dark Knight / Le Chevalier Noir
General Guidelines
---- Nous avons besoin d'un traduction français!
Some Basics
1. Under Board "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQs) there are 3 sections dealing with General Forum Usage, User Profile Features, and Reading and Posting Messages. These deal with everything from Avatars to Your Notifications. Most general technical questions are covered there. Here is a link to the FAQs. https://forum.chesstalk.com/help
2. Consider using the SEARCH button if you are looking for information. You may find your question has already been answered in a previous thread.
3. If you've looked for an answer to a question, and not found one, then you should consider asking your question in a new thread. For example, there have already been questions and discussion regarding: how to do chess diagrams (FENs); crosstables that line up properly; and the numerous little “glitches” that every new site will have.
4. Read pinned or sticky threads, like this one, if they look important. This applies especially to newcomers.
5. Read the thread you're posting in before you post. There are a variety of ways to look at a thread. These are covered under “Display Modes”.
6. Thread titles: please provide some details in your thread title. This is useful for a number of reasons. It helps ChessTalk members to quickly skim the threads. It prevents duplication of threads. And so on.
7. Unnecessary thread proliferation (e.g., deliberately creating a new thread that duplicates existing discussion) is discouraged. Look to see if a thread on your topic may have already been started and, if so, consider adding your contribution to the pre-existing thread. However, starting new threads to explore side-issues that are not relevant to the original subject is strongly encouraged. A single thread on the Canadian Open, with hundreds of posts on multiple sub-topics, is no better than a dozen threads on the Open covering only a few topics. Use your good judgment when starting a new thread.
8. If and/or when sub-forums are created, please make sure to create threads in the proper place.
Debate
9. Give an opinion and back it up with a reason. Throwaway comments such as "Game X pwnz because my friend and I think so!" could be considered pointless at best, and inflammatory at worst.
10. Try to give your own opinions, not simply those copied and pasted from reviews or opinions of your friends.
Unacceptable behavior and warnings
11. In registering here at ChessTalk please note that the same or similar rules apply here as applied at the previous Boardhost message board. In particular, the following content is not permitted to appear in any messages:
* Racism
* Hatred
* Harassment
* Adult content
* Obscene material
* Nudity or pornography
* Material that infringes intellectual property or other proprietary rights of any party
* Material the posting of which is tortious or violates a contractual or fiduciary obligation you or we owe to another party
* Piracy, hacking, viruses, worms, or warez
* Spam
* Any illegal content
* unapproved Commercial banner advertisements or revenue-generating links
* Any link to or any images from a site containing any material outlined in these restrictions
* Any material deemed offensive or inappropriate by the Board staff
12. Users are welcome to challenge other points of view and opinions, but should do so respectfully. Personal attacks on others will not be tolerated. Posts and threads with unacceptable content can be closed or deleted altogether. Furthermore, a range of sanctions are possible - from a simple warning to a temporary or even a permanent banning from ChessTalk.
Helping to Moderate
13. 'Report' links (an exclamation mark inside a triangle) can be found in many places throughout the board. These links allow users to alert the board staff to anything which is offensive, objectionable or illegal. Please consider using this feature if the need arises.
Advice for free
14. You should exercise the same caution with Private Messages as you would with any public posting.
Referring to the CFC's 2012 financial statements (specifically, the Statement of Revenue and Expenditure and note 3 to the statements - see link below), in fiscal 2011 and 2012 revenues from 'other programs' represented approximately half of the CFC's total revenues. Note 3 to the 2012 financial statements indicates that nearly all of these revenues from 'other programs' were derived from the CYCC. Further, the text in note 3 (see below) suggests that all of the CYCC-related revenues were used to send players to the WYCC.
It seems unlikely to me that the CFC spent nearly $112,000 during fiscal 2012 to send players/family members to the WYCC. Given the significant portion of the CFC's revenues represented by these monies, surely more transparency is required in the CFC's financial reporting, as to both the source(s) of the monies and how they were expended. (I won't be holding my breath, though :) )
Olympic donations are designated to provide financial support for participation of Canadian representatives in the International Chess Olympiads. The Canadian Youth Chess Championships (CYCC) entry fees cover the cost of sending players to the World Youth Chess Championships (WYCC). The Kalev Pugi Fund was established as a bequest in the
Chess Foundation of Canada. Each year interest earned by this fund is transferred from the Foundation to the Federation to provide travel assistance for junior players. Contributions to these programs are recognized as revenue in the year in which the related expenditures are incurred.
"We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office." - Aesop
"Only the dead have seen the end of war." - Plato
"If once a man indulges himself in murder, very soon he comes to think little of robbing; and from robbing he comes next to drinking and Sabbath-breaking, and from that to incivility and procrastination." - Thomas De Quincey
It seems unlikely to me that the CFC spent nearly $112,000 during fiscal 2012 to send players/family members to the WYCC. Given the significant portion of the CFC's revenues represented by these monies, surely more transparency is required in the CFC's financial reporting, as to both the source(s) of the monies and how they were expended. (I won't be holding my breath, though :) )
The youth financial report was presented during Governors online meeting. You may ask the secretary for the minutes or a copy. Maybe it is even online at the cfc board.
Referring to the CFC's 2012 financial statements (specifically, the Statement of Revenue and Expenditure and note 3 to the statements - see link below), in fiscal 2011 and 2012 revenues from 'other programs' represented approximately half of the CFC's total revenues. Note 3 to the 2012 financial statements indicates that nearly all of these revenues from 'other programs' were derived from the CYCC. Further, the text in note 3 (see below) suggests that all of the CYCC-related revenues were used to send players to the WYCC.
It seems unlikely to me that the CFC spent nearly $112,000 during fiscal 2012 to send players/family members to the WYCC. Given the significant portion of the CFC's revenues represented by these monies, surely more transparency is required in the CFC's financial reporting, as to both the source(s) of the monies and how they were expended. (I won't be holding my breath, though :) )
This is simply a pass through. The "revenue" contains the contribution from the 2011 CYCC and all of the accomodation/food contribution of the families going to the WYCC. Perhaps as many as 50 people.
This is simply a pass through. The "revenue" contains the contribution from the 2011 CYCC and all of the accomodation/food contribution of the families going to the WYCC. Perhaps as many as 50 people.
Fred, I think Alan Baljeu has it right and is in basic agreement with me (feel free to correct me if I've misunderstood your comments, Alan). I believe what Alan is saying is that there is more detail, more 'granularity', required in the CFC's financial reporting in order to create more transparency. There will always be a difference of opinion on the question, how much transparency is enough (or too much)? But generally speaking, more transparency will facilitate a better understanding of the CFC's financial circumstances by the membership, which would then hopefully (!!) result in more intelligent discussion ( :o ) of the challenges facing the organization and solutions with a higher probability of working. Better transparency should also, hopefully, foster an increased awareness of accountability and stewardship by the people directly responsible for running the organization: if the membership knows where the money is coming from and how it's being spent, all sorts of good things could happen!!!
The information already exists. How much trouble would it really be for Gerry L., or an accountant, to add a half dozen or so lines of information to the present financial statement format?
"We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office." - Aesop
"Only the dead have seen the end of war." - Plato
"If once a man indulges himself in murder, very soon he comes to think little of robbing; and from robbing he comes next to drinking and Sabbath-breaking, and from that to incivility and procrastination." - Thomas De Quincey
The youth financial report was presented during Governors online meeting. You may ask the secretary for the minutes or a copy. Maybe it is even online at the cfc board.
I didn't see any mention of a youth financial report in Patrick's report at the 2012 online, outgoing governors' meeting. I'll email Lyle Craver to request that he send me a copy. Thanks.
"We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office." - Aesop
"Only the dead have seen the end of war." - Plato
"If once a man indulges himself in murder, very soon he comes to think little of robbing; and from robbing he comes next to drinking and Sabbath-breaking, and from that to incivility and procrastination." - Thomas De Quincey
This is simply a pass through. The "revenue" contains the contribution from the 2011 CYCC and all of the accomodation/food contribution of the families going to the WYCC. Perhaps as many as 50 people.
Fred, in the CFC's fiscal 2012 financial statements, office expenses, which represented about 7% of total expenses, were broken down in detail (see below - sorry, don't know how to copy a table into Chesstalk). Why shouldn't the 'other programs' expense, which represented about 49% of total expenses, receive the same level of disclosure?
Also, I'm curious as to why the CFC would have over $2,000 in credit card charges? Are these fees charged by your bank for issuing the CFC a commercial credit card (in which case you should commence shopping for a new bank right away), or are these interest charges for carrying an outstanding balance from month to month? If the latter, isn't that rather an expensive way for the CFC to borrow?
What could be more fun for a retired banker than digging into some organization's financial statements!!! :D
8. OFFICE EXPENSES 2012
(a) Storage $ 3,538
(b) Credit Card charges 2,104
(c) Amortization 3,981
(d) Professional fees 1,200
(e) Travel 1,382
(f) Advertising 599
(g) Bank charges 605
(h) Other 1,441
TOTAL $ 14,850
"We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office." - Aesop
"Only the dead have seen the end of war." - Plato
"If once a man indulges himself in murder, very soon he comes to think little of robbing; and from robbing he comes next to drinking and Sabbath-breaking, and from that to incivility and procrastination." - Thomas De Quincey
Fred, in the CFC's fiscal 2012 financial statements, office expenses, which represented about 7% of total expenses, were broken down in detail (see below - sorry, don't know how to copy a table into Chesstalk). Why shouldn't the 'other programs' expense, which represented about 49% of total expenses, receive the same level of disclosure?
Peter, as Fred has already said, most of the "other programs" expense is merely a flow thru of funds received from the families attending the WYCC to the WYCC organizers. So they aren't expenses in that sense.
The governors were given a detailed report for the 2011 CYCC/WYCC revenues and expenditures at the April Governors meeting. I do agree with you and Alan that some of this detail should be included in the financial statements. I will speak with Fred and Gerry about making that happen.
Also, I'm curious as to why the CFC would have over $2,000 in credit card charges? Are these fees charged by your bank for issuing the CFC a commercial credit card (in which case you should commence shopping for a new bank right away), or are these interest charges for carrying an outstanding balance from month to month? If the latter, isn't that rather an expensive way for the CFC to borrow?
Neither!
This is the fee charged us whenever our customers/members pay the CFC with their credit cards.
The banks pound of flesh!
This is the fee charged us whenever our customers/members pay the CFC with their credit cards.
The banks pound of flesh!
I believe this is the so-called 'merchant fee' (perhaps that is a term I just think I recall...) but it is rumoured to be around 3% for Visa and MC - higher for AMEX (the reason many merchants either don't take Amex or discourage it in favour of the other two biggies).
Doesn't Paypal also take a pound of flesh for paypal purchases too? Perhaps the quoted amount also includes some of that too?
Peter, as Fred has already said, most of the "other programs" expense is merely a flow thru of funds received from the families attending the WYCC to the WYCC organizers. So they aren't expenses in that sense.
The governors were given a detailed report for the 2011 CYCC/WYCC revenues and expenditures at the April Governors meeting. I do agree with you and Alan that some of this detail should be included in the financial statements. I will speak with Fred and Gerry about making that happen.
Well, if they aren't the CFC's expenses, then who's expenses are they and why has the CFC chosen to record them in the CFC financial statements? Do I infer correctly from your comments that the CFC did indeed spend nearly $112,000 for travel and accommodation to send 12 kids and some parents to the 2011 WYCC? Wow!! It appears that the Olympiads are a major bargain in comparison. Maybe the CFC should just send the kids to the Olympiads every two years and save itself a ton of money (that's 'tonne' for all you kids under age 40). :)
"We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office." - Aesop
"Only the dead have seen the end of war." - Plato
"If once a man indulges himself in murder, very soon he comes to think little of robbing; and from robbing he comes next to drinking and Sabbath-breaking, and from that to incivility and procrastination." - Thomas De Quincey
Well, if they aren't the CFC's expenses, then who's expenses are they and why has the CFC chosen to record them in the CFC financial statements? Do I infer correctly from your comments that the CFC did indeed spend nearly $112,000 for travel and accommodation to send 12 kids and some parents to the 2011 WYCC? Wow!! It appears that the Olympiads are a major bargain in comparison. Maybe the CFC should just send the kids to the Olympiads every two years and save itself a ton of money (that's 'tonne' for all you kids under age 40). :)
My guess (tm) would be that the CFC paid for travel and expenses with money given to the CFC by the players and parents and coaches and klingons that were going... (minus of course, the expenses etc for the player(s) that the CFC said they would pay for directly). That would be a curious way to lump all that together - curious and not useful.
My guess (tm) would be that the CFC paid for travel and expenses with money given to the CFC by the players and parents and coaches and klingons that were going... (minus of course, the expenses etc for the player(s) that the CFC said they would pay for directly). That would be a curious way to lump all that together - curious and not useful.
"Curious and not useful": a good way to characterize the CFC's lack of disclosure on this large $$ item. You seem to be implying that the CFC has a little WYCC travel agency running here. If that is the case, doesn't it represent a potential risk to the CFC's mainline business? What is the CFC doing to mitigate this risk (e.g. are they carrying appropriate insurance for potential travel-related liabilities caused by delays, cancellations or, heaven forbid, injury or death?)? How do we members determine what's happening with the national federation if they're burying large expenses under the heading of 'flow through'?
"We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office." - Aesop
"Only the dead have seen the end of war." - Plato
"If once a man indulges himself in murder, very soon he comes to think little of robbing; and from robbing he comes next to drinking and Sabbath-breaking, and from that to incivility and procrastination." - Thomas De Quincey
Well, if they aren't the CFC's expenses, then who's expenses are they and why has the CFC chosen to record them in the CFC financial statements? Do I infer correctly from your comments that the CFC did indeed spend nearly $112,000 for travel and accommodation to send 12 kids and some parents to the 2011 WYCC? Wow!! It appears that the Olympiads are a major bargain in comparison. Maybe the CFC should just send the kids to the Olympiads every two years and save itself a ton of money (that's 'tonne' for all you kids under age 40). :)
Thanks to Bob Gillanders who took the time out to compile this (presumably with the help of Gerry).
I notice the deficit shown here is slightly smaller than that shown on the CFC Financial Statement (page 6). I think this discrepancy is due to accommodations for two of the coaches not being accounted for in the disbursements as shown in this table.
Not very pretty formatting on my part - but here it is:
Euros Cdn $
Payments to WYCC organizers
Sept 20, 2011 41,376.00 57,053.37
Oct 31, 2011 5,569.00 7,905.20
46,945.00 64,958.57 64,958.57
Champions - Prize fund from CYCC 12,000.00
Distribution of CYCC surplus
30% to CYCC winners 5,460.00
70% to WYCC participan 12,740.00
18,200.00 18,200.00
Entry fees to FIDE Euros
Champions (70 Euros each) x 12 840.00
Additional players (140 Euros each) x 28 3,920.00
Total paid at 1.4 Cdn 4,760.00 6,664.00
Head of Delegation - Andrew Giblon 1,000.00
Assistant HOD - Gary Gladstone 500.00
Coaches - Noritsyn, Peredun, Egorov $350 each 1,050.00
Coaches - Airline tickets 3,832.00
Team T shirts 604.55
I believe this is the so-called 'merchant fee' (perhaps that is a term I just think I recall...) but it is rumoured to be around 3% for Visa and MC - higher for AMEX (the reason many merchants either don't take Amex or discourage it in favour of the other two biggies).
Doesn't Paypal also take a pound of flesh for paypal purchases too? Perhaps the quoted amount also includes some of that too?
Anytime we accept memberships, rating fees, equipment purchases, etc by credit card there is a cost to us involved.
When I was involved in a small retail business, 2-3% was normal.
Comment