If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Policy / Politique
The fee for tournament organizers advertising on ChessTalk is $20/event or $100/yearly unlimited for the year.
Les frais d'inscription des organisateurs de tournoi sur ChessTalk sont de 20 $/événement ou de 100 $/année illimitée.
You can etransfer to Henry Lam at chesstalkforum at gmail dot com
Transfér à Henry Lam à chesstalkforum@gmail.com
Dark Knight / Le Chevalier Noir
General Guidelines
---- Nous avons besoin d'un traduction français!
Some Basics
1. Under Board "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQs) there are 3 sections dealing with General Forum Usage, User Profile Features, and Reading and Posting Messages. These deal with everything from Avatars to Your Notifications. Most general technical questions are covered there. Here is a link to the FAQs. https://forum.chesstalk.com/help
2. Consider using the SEARCH button if you are looking for information. You may find your question has already been answered in a previous thread.
3. If you've looked for an answer to a question, and not found one, then you should consider asking your question in a new thread. For example, there have already been questions and discussion regarding: how to do chess diagrams (FENs); crosstables that line up properly; and the numerous little “glitches” that every new site will have.
4. Read pinned or sticky threads, like this one, if they look important. This applies especially to newcomers.
5. Read the thread you're posting in before you post. There are a variety of ways to look at a thread. These are covered under “Display Modes”.
6. Thread titles: please provide some details in your thread title. This is useful for a number of reasons. It helps ChessTalk members to quickly skim the threads. It prevents duplication of threads. And so on.
7. Unnecessary thread proliferation (e.g., deliberately creating a new thread that duplicates existing discussion) is discouraged. Look to see if a thread on your topic may have already been started and, if so, consider adding your contribution to the pre-existing thread. However, starting new threads to explore side-issues that are not relevant to the original subject is strongly encouraged. A single thread on the Canadian Open, with hundreds of posts on multiple sub-topics, is no better than a dozen threads on the Open covering only a few topics. Use your good judgment when starting a new thread.
8. If and/or when sub-forums are created, please make sure to create threads in the proper place.
Debate
9. Give an opinion and back it up with a reason. Throwaway comments such as "Game X pwnz because my friend and I think so!" could be considered pointless at best, and inflammatory at worst.
10. Try to give your own opinions, not simply those copied and pasted from reviews or opinions of your friends.
Unacceptable behavior and warnings
11. In registering here at ChessTalk please note that the same or similar rules apply here as applied at the previous Boardhost message board. In particular, the following content is not permitted to appear in any messages:
* Racism
* Hatred
* Harassment
* Adult content
* Obscene material
* Nudity or pornography
* Material that infringes intellectual property or other proprietary rights of any party
* Material the posting of which is tortious or violates a contractual or fiduciary obligation you or we owe to another party
* Piracy, hacking, viruses, worms, or warez
* Spam
* Any illegal content
* unapproved Commercial banner advertisements or revenue-generating links
* Any link to or any images from a site containing any material outlined in these restrictions
* Any material deemed offensive or inappropriate by the Board staff
12. Users are welcome to challenge other points of view and opinions, but should do so respectfully. Personal attacks on others will not be tolerated. Posts and threads with unacceptable content can be closed or deleted altogether. Furthermore, a range of sanctions are possible - from a simple warning to a temporary or even a permanent banning from ChessTalk.
Helping to Moderate
13. 'Report' links (an exclamation mark inside a triangle) can be found in many places throughout the board. These links allow users to alert the board staff to anything which is offensive, objectionable or illegal. Please consider using this feature if the need arises.
Advice for free
14. You should exercise the same caution with Private Messages as you would with any public posting.
I understood the Penguin was 1.Nf3 and 2.Rg1. Definitely one for the junkyard, and not part of any suggested repertoire.
That was Schiller's invention. A google search leads to it straight away (or the Penguin Variation 1.Nf3 d5 2.c4 d4 3.Rg1), but as far as Suttles' idea of a Penguin setup goes, I was going by my memory of a story in print I recalled from somewhere. Maybe it was related by Lawrence Day or Jon Berry?!
Last edited by Kevin Pacey; Tuesday, 11th December, 2012, 12:27 PM.
Anything that can go wrong will go wrong. Murphy's law, by Edward A. Murphy Jr., USAF, Aerospace Engineer
So far I've used all of my suggested White offbeat repertoire choices at least once in tournament games, though not always victoriously. Same goes for the Latvian, Fajarowicz Variation, Black Knights Tango and Old Indian, as far as my Black tournament games go.
Anything that can go wrong will go wrong. Murphy's law, by Edward A. Murphy Jr., USAF, Aerospace Engineer
I understood the Penguin was 1.Nf3 and 2.Rg1. Definitely one for the junkyard, and not part of any suggested repertoire.
The oddball variation 6.Rg1 against the Najdorf was actually popular at the top level for a while. Unoffically, I may have played the first database-recorded game with it in 1990.
Anything that can go wrong will go wrong. Murphy's law, by Edward A. Murphy Jr., USAF, Aerospace Engineer
Actually you should realize that there are serious books on the Englund, like on most of these "off-beat" openings that ECO pretends to "refute" in a footnote.
After 4.Qd5 f6 5.exf6 Nxf6 6.Qb3 d5 7.Nc3, the standard move is now 7...Bd7! (intending to castle), because it is very risky for White to take b7 or d5.
I do not know if the Englund is viable at master level, but it is definitely at expert level. I have played dozens games with Black in the last few years, with a very good score. The line I consider the most difficult to meet is 1,d4 e5 2.dxe5 Nc6 3,Nf3 Qe7 4,Nc3!. Black regains his pawn, but there is no easy way to equalize.
Actually you should realize that there are serious books on the Englund, like on most of these "off-beat" openings that ECO pretends to "refute" in a footnote.
As various posts or threads I've made might hint at, I'm not altogether unfamilar with the concept of offbeat openings being possibly underestimated by the conventional wisdom followed implicitly by many books, including ECO, which I use for the sake of example.
I do not know if the Englund is viable at master level, but it is definitely at expert level. I have played dozens games with Black in the last few years, with a very good score. The line I consider the most difficult to meet is 1,d4 e5 2.dxe5 Nc6 3,Nf3 Qe7 4,Nc3!. Black regains his pawn, but there is no easy way to equalize.
Sadly, there are not too many Black wins I've found in my few databases after the continuation 4.Nc3. Lots of losses, including one of yours from 2006. :( As I wrote earlier, I think the Englund may not be as bad as its reputation, but that doesn't mean Black can expect to avoid some sort of disadvantage against best play, whatever it is.
Anything that can go wrong will go wrong. Murphy's law, by Edward A. Murphy Jr., USAF, Aerospace Engineer
As various posts or threads I've made might hint at, I'm not altogether unfamilar with the concept of offbeat openings being possibly underestimated by the conventional wisdom followed implicitly by many books, including ECO, which I use for the sake of example.
Sadly, there are not too many Black wins I've found in my few databases after the continuation 4.Nc3. Lots of losses, including one of yours from 2006. :( As I wrote earlier, I think the Englund may not be as bad as its reputation, but that doesn't mean Black can expect to avoid some sort of disadvantage against best play, whatever it is.
A couple of years ago I lost a rated training game in the Englund as white when I retreated my queen to d1 after winning the pawn. It was a highly contested game but the extra tempo I lost with the queen retreat never allowed me to get back into the game. Last year someone played it against me again and I retreated the queen to b3 as recommended in the books that I consulted after the earlier loss. It was still a tense game but the outcome was never in great doubt. The kibitzers were merciless in razzing my opponent about his opening position. One wit said that white's dominating position was one that you would expect him to have after giving up a gambit pawn not after getting one from black.
A couple of years ago I lost a rated training game in the Englund as white when I retreated my queen to d1 after winning the pawn. It was a highly contested game but the extra tempo I lost with the queen retreat never allowed me to get back into the game. Last year someone played it against me again and I retreated the queen to b3 as recommended in the books that I consulted after the earlier loss. It was still a tense game but the outcome was never in great doubt. The kibitzers were merciless in razzing my opponent about his opening position. One wit said that white's dominating position was one that you would expect him to have after giving up a gambit pawn not after getting one from black.
Mercy seldom follows a loss resulting after one uses an opening with a poor reputation.
After Qb3, your opponent might have tried my recommended idea of ...b6 in reply (see an earlier post of mine), if he instead played the normal ...d5. The move ...b6 may not be objectively best, but it might have forced you to think for yourself at an earlier stage.
Anything that can go wrong will go wrong. Murphy's law, by Edward A. Murphy Jr., USAF, Aerospace Engineer
Comment