Tweet
I, of the not so silent minority, duly express my gratitude to Fred and Sid, for giving me fodder for my next dinner party!!
-
-
NWO/GR & The Depopulation Strategy
Sid Belzberg - Post # 1763 - 23/9/19
Greenpeace co-founder, Dr. Patrick Moore [Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-rn3zdpMB8k&t=7s] , explains how unelected globalists (including Klaus Schwab and the United Nations) are using the #ClimateScam as an excuse to cut off fossil fuels and nitrogen fertiliser, in order to deliberately depopulate the planet. "These powerful elites, like Schwab and on down, they want control of the world. They want control of everybody. Now what do they want? They want fewer people."
Response
[A post of mine in the NWO thread, that Sid has ignored, and kept up with his very dubious analysis]
"The best current projections estimate a peak global population sometime soon — within the lifetimes of children alive today."
https://messaging-custom-newsletters...d396a4debfd6ce
Question
If the shrinking of the world's population is going to happen naturally, and very soon.........
Why should the "Higher Authority (My name for the covert/overt influencer coalition seeking a one-world government)" waste time and energy now "de-populating? It is not going to hurry things along much.....why not focus on other issues - this one is going to take care of itself naturally.
Bob A (Anti-NWO)Comment
-
And when Bob tries to balance Sid's 37 and Fred's 73, he has to legally steal 36 from Fred and keep it for himself, but forever wondering why his Marxism still leaves him behind both Sid and Fred...Last edited by Dilip Panjwani; Sunday, 24th September, 2023, 06:58 AM.Comment
-
Hi Bob,Originally posted by Bob Armstrong View Post
I recently wrote this article, and some of the more prominent members of a forum of doctors and scientists I am part of submitted this for publication in a high-impact quarterly Medical Journal.
Please read carefully as it was an eye-opener for even me and can explain the many excess deaths and lower birthrates we now see worldwide.
PART 1
A History of Eugenics in the United States and How it influenced Bill Gates Jr and the subsequent WHO-Sponsored Genocides
By Sid Belzberg
The Origins of Eugenics:
Sir Francis Galton, a pioneering figure in eugenics, was inspired by the work of his half-cousin, Charles Darwin, especially Darwin's theory of evolution. Galton's central belief was that both desirable and undesirable traits were inherited, and he proposed that society should encourage the breeding of those with favorable traits and discourage the breeding of those with unfavorable traits. He coined the term "eugenics" to describe this proposed science of "good birth.”
This foundational understanding of eugenics is crucial as it sets the stage for how the movement developed and the subsequent policies it influenced during the 20th century.
Sir Francis Galton lived from 1822 to 1911
Early 20th Century Eugenics in the U.S.
Notable Advocates:
Many influential figures believed eugenics could improve society. As it was then, the Industrial Elites advocated for Eugenics and depopulation.
Andrew Carnegie: His foundation funded the Station for Experimental Evolution and the Eugenics Record Office (ERO), in Cold Spring Harbor in 1913, with active operations until 1939.
Henry Ford: He expressed anti-Semitic views, asserting Jews were behind the "mongrelization" of the white race.
Thomas Edison: Supported eugenics as a tool for improving the human race.
John D. Rockefeller: Staunch supporter of eugenics up until and after World War II. In the 1930s, Rockefeller funded Nazi scientists’ eugenics research used to rationalize the extermination of the Jewish Population in World War II.
Rockefeller initially funded Dr. Rene Sand to organize the WHO after Word War II, who hired Dr. Brock Chisholm as the WHO’s first Director Genera. Dr. Chisholm was a passionate eugenicist, and depopulation advocate.
Thomas Watson Sr.:The first CEO of IBM and passionate eugenics supporter, used punch card technology for the Eugenics Research Office that recorded data on the US population.
During WW II, Watson Sr. made the data collection technology available to assist the Nazis in organizing extermination of the Jews. The IBM punch card technology was used to organize all records of Jews’ personal details.
Eugenics Record Office (ERO)
Founded in Cold Spring Harbor, New York in 1910 and endowed by Andrew Carnegie in 1913, the ERO subsequently became a hub for eugenics research, amassing large amounts of data on US individuals and families. Charles Davenport and Harry Laughlin were two leading figures at the ERO.
Founding Figures: The ERO was founded by Charles B. Davenport, a biologist and early advocate of the American eugenics movement. Davenport secured funding from
Mrs. E.H. Harriman, the widow of railroad magnate Edward Harriman, and later from the Carnegie Institution, to establish the ERO in 1913.
Activities: Data Collection: The ERO collected vast amounts of data on American families, creating pedigrees that traced the inheritance of physical, mental, and moral traits. This information was used to argue for the inheritance of intelligence, criminality, and other traits and to support eugenics-based policies.
Research & Publications: The office produced numerous studies, publications, and lectures promoting eugenics theory and practice, popularizing concepts such as the "degenerate" family lineages, exemplified by the infamous (and pseudonymously named) "Jukes" and "Kallikak" families.
Promotion of Sterilization: Harry H. Laughlin, the superintendent of the ERO, was a significant advocate for eugenic sterilizations. He crafted a model sterilization law adopted by many U.S. States. By the 1930s, thousands of forced sterilizations were carried out in the U.S., largely targeting people in prisons, asylums, and other such institutions.
Field Workers: The ERO employed field workers - data collectors - to collect data from various populations around the country. These workers were often college students trained by the ERO to gather family histories, measure individuals using anthropometric methods, and assess the "fitness" of different families.
Controversies, Criticism and Closure: By the late 1920s and early 1930s, the ERO's research methodologies and conclusions increasingly came under criticism from other scientists for their lack of rigor and overtly racist and classist biases.
Closure: The ERO's funding received from the Carnegie Institution was withdrawn in 1939, leading to ERO's closure. This decision was due in part to a report by a committee led by the geneticist L.C. Dunn, which highlighted the ERO's unscientific methodologies and unsound conclusions.
Legacy: While the ERO was closed in 1939, its influence persisted. The sterilization laws it championed continued to be enforced in several states well into the latter half of the 20th century and in one State to this day. The ERO's legacy serves as a cautionary tale about the misuse of science and the consequences of unchallenged pseudoscientific beliefs. It remains a topic of study and reflection in the history of science, bioethics, and the broader history of the United States.
IBM’s involvement with Eugenics Record Office and, subsequently, Nazi Germany and the Holocaust
IBM's involvement with eugenics in the U.S. context predates its collaborations with Nazi Germany, and there is evidence that ties the company to other prominent eugenics supporters in the United States, including institutions funded by Carnegie, Rockefeller, and other influential figures.
Eugenics Record Office (ERO) at Cold Spring Harbor: Established in 1910 with funding from the Carnegie Institution and later receiving support from the Rockefeller Foundation, the ERO was a central institution in the American eugenics movement. Charles Davenport and Harry H. Laughlin were key figures at the ERO. IBM, through its punch-card technology, helped the ERO systematize and process vast amounts of data on family lineages, traits, and other information used in eugenics research. This technological aid facilitated the ERO's push for eugenic policies, such as forced sterilizations.
1930s – Census and Sterilization Laws: IBM's punch card technology played a role in the U.S. census of the 1930s, which, in turn, was used by States to enforce sterilization laws. By making it easier to categorize and track individuals deemed "unfit," the technology indirectly supported eugenic policies. ERO’s Harry H. Laughlin, provided testimonies and crafted model sterilization laws adopted by many states.
Connection to Prominent Figures: While IBM's collaborations with ERO were largely on an institutional level, these institutions were supported by philanthropic giants such as the Carnegie Institution and the Rockefeller Foundation. The financial ties between these entities are well-documented, even if direct personal collaborations between IBM's top executives
and figures such as Carnegie or Rockefeller. might not be as explicit.
During the early 20th century, eugenics was a mainstream scientific pursuit, and many institutions, scholars, and businesses were involved in it to varying degrees.
IBM's involvement with eugenics, particularly during the early 20th century, is a documented part of IBM’s history, most notably in its collaboration with the Third Reich during the 1930s and 1940s.
Thomas J. Watson, the CEO of IBM during the 1930s, oversaw the company's business dealings with Nazi Germany. IBM, through its German subsidiary, Dehomag, provided punch-card systems that were used in censuses and helped facilitate the Nazis' identification, segregation, and extermination of groups they considered undesirable, including Jews, Roma, and others.
While it is clear that IBM's technology was employed in the service of the Nazis' eugenics and genocidal programs, Watson’s personal support of eugenic beliefs is a more complex matter. Watson did have a relationship with the Nazi regime—he was awarded the Order of the German Eagle by Hitler in 1937, though he returned the medal in 1940 as World War II escalated. IBM's business dealings with Nazi Germany were largely driven by economic interests.
The connection between IBM and the Nazi regime's eugenic practices is explored in depth in Edwin Black's book "IBM and the Holocaust."
Last edited by Sid Belzberg; Monday, 25th September, 2023, 07:32 PM.Comment
-
Part 2
Eugenics Record Office and Vaccine Passports
Eugenics, despite being discredited as a science, has left an indelible mark on global health policies and practices. Its remnants can be seen in the ethical challenges we face today in public health. Understanding this history is crucial for ensuring informed, ethical, and inclusive global health decisions.
In the US, in a 1976 investigation, the Government Accountability Office found that over 25 percent of Native Americans were forcibly sterilized in the early 1970s. In China, many Chinese geneticists sought to improve population quality. Beginning in the 1990s, some Chinese government officials sought to eliminate those with opposing moral values which tend to
be influenced by the Buddhist and Taoist religions.
The ERO, armed with the early IBM punch card technology, was a precursor to the infamous digital vaccine passport during COVID-19. Today’s ultra-sophisticated data collection technology makes it possible for governments to access detailed information on any group of people or specific individuals.
Rockefeller Financed Margaret Sanger and the Negro Project: The Genesis of “Planned Parenthood
In 1921, Margaret Sanger established the American Birth Control League (ABCL).
In 1939, Sanger reorganized ABCL and renamed it the Birth Control Federation of America (BCFA). That same year, Sanger initiated The "Negro Project”. In 1942, the BCFA changed its name to Planned Parenthood Federation of America, which is still in operation today as Planned Parenthood.
The “Negro Project”, ostensibly aimed at introducing "birth control" to the African American community, was in reality a project intended to reduce the Black population. Sanger collaborated with Black leaders, including W.E.B. Du Bois, deceptively convincing them that birth control could improve the socio-economic conditions of the Black community.
The "Negro Project" was paternalistic and exploitative, aiming to control Black reproduction under the guise of "helping" the Black community.The project targeted Black communities as particularly "unfit" and sought to reduce their numbers.
The following quote from a letter Margaret Sanger wrote in 1939 to Dr. Clarence Gamble, discussing the "Negro Project” illustrates Sanger’s true intentions:
"We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members."
William Gates Sr. and Planned Parenthood
William Gates Sr., the father of Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates, served on the board of Planned Parenthood Federation of America during the late 1960s and early 1970s. The Gates family has been open about their support for "reproductive health" and "family planning causes." Bill Gates Jr. has mentioned in interviews that his father's involvement with Planned Parenthood influenced his and the Gates Foundation's commitment to "reproductive health initiatives globally.”
At $60.1billion paid out since the year 2000, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is one of the largest in the world. As a private organization, the Foundation is accountable solely to its now two trustees, Bill and Melinda Gates.
“You may have foundations with assets larger than almost 70% of the world's nations making decisions about public policy and public priorities without any public discussion or political process" - Pablo Eisenberg, the Georgetown Public Policy Institute.
Because the Gates Foundation allocates enormous amounts of money to fund health research, it treats research like a business. Tim Schwab, who has been investigating the Gates Foundation for years, said that the Gates Foundation "feels more like an investment bank than it does a charity. If you look across global health, they're funding everybody," he said, "Nobody is more than one degree removed from the Gates Foundation. If you're a journalist writing about global health, you might get a fellowship or a grant to report the Gates Foundation funds that. So it's really hard to overstate how much influence that gives the foundation. Through June 2020, the foundation had given more than $250 million to journalism and outlets such as the BBC, NBC, The Atlantic, and the Center for Investigative Reporting.
According to The Seattle Times, the Gates Foundation is funding the research around journalism, training for journalists, crafting media fact sheets, and even shaping op-eds found in places like The New York Times.
Rockefeller Financed Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment
Conducted between 1932 and 1972, the study was a joint venture between the Rockefeller-financed Tuskegee Institute (University) and the US Public Health Service (USPHS), to observe the natural progression of syphilis in untreated African American population. Participants were told they were treated for “bad blood” and would get free medical exams, meals and burial insurance for their participation. Early on, Dr. Eugene Dibble, as a Black American Doctor, was recruited to gain the confidence of his fellow African Americans - victims in this heinous crime. Participants were not asked to sign informed consent and, after 1940, when penicillin became available as a treatment for syphilis, the participants were denied the treatment. The only treatment the participants sick with syphilis received, was heavy metals therapy. During the study, forty wives of the participants also contracted syphilis and 19 children were born with it.
Creation of The World Health Organization
After World War II, the Rockefellers continued to relentlessly push their eugenics depopulation agenda by institutionalizing it globally through the establishment of the World Health Organization
During the 1945 United Nations Conference on International Organization, Szeming Sze, a delegate from China, conferred with Norwegian and Brazilian delegates on creating an international health organization under the auspices of the new United Nations.
Sze went to the 1945 U.N. conference in San Francisco as an aide to Chinese Foreign Minister T.V. Soong.
During a “medical lunch” that Sze had with Dr. Karl Evang of Norway and Dr. Geraldo De Paula Souza of Brazil, Evang proposed setting up a new health organization in conjunction with the United Nations.
The men asked Sze to put forth the idea in his role as a member of the Chinese delegation, one of the four nations--Britain, the United States, the Soviet Union and China--sponsoring the conference.
Sze got the approval of Soong, the head of the Chinese delegation, and wrote the declaration to set up an international conference to create the World Health Organization, which the San Francisco meeting adopted.
The constitution of the World Health Organization was signed by all 51 countries of the United Nations, and by 10 other countries, on July 22, 1946. Its constitution formally came into force
on April 7, 1948, when it was ratified by the 26th member state. The first meeting of the World Health Assembly concluded on July 24, 1948, having secured a budget of US$5 million, some of which came from the Rockefeller Foundation. The Foundation played a pivotal role in shaping global health policies and institutions. Before the establishment of WHO, the Rockefeller Foundation was actively involved in international health through its its International Health Division. When WHO was being established, the Rockefeller Foundation provided both, technical expertise and financial support.
Prior to the creation of the WHO, Dr. René Sand, a Belgian medical doctor, social worker, and co-founder of the WHO, was chairman of the committee of experts whose aim was to create the WHO. Several of Dr. Sand’s initiatives were funded by the Rockefeller Foundation.
Dr. Sand recruited Dr. Brock Chisholm, a Canadian psychiatrist and an outspoken eugenicist, to be the WHO's first Director-General. Before his tenure at the WHO, Dr. Chisholm voiced concerns about overpopulation and was an ardent proponent of eugenics. During his leadership, "family planning" became part of the WHO's central discussion, paving the way for controversial population control measures.
Tetanus Vaccine in Kenya
WHO's Research on Birth Control using hCG as hidden sterilization component
of a Tetanus Vaccine
Background: During the 1970s and 1980s, the World Health Organization sponsored research into creating a birth control vaccine. The idea behind the vaccine was to stimulate the body's immune system to produce antibodies against human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), a hormone essential for maintaining pregnancy. By causing the immune system to treat hCG as a foreign invader, it would prevent the hormone from sustaining a pregnancy, thereby acting as a contraceptive.
Development: The vaccine was developed by adding a small amount of hCG to the tetanus toxoid (an exotoxin secreted by bacteria). This process would then cause the recipient's immune system to recognize both the tetanus and the hCG as foreign invaders, producing antibodies against both.
Clinical Trials: The WHO conducted clinical trials in the 1980s and early 1990s to test the efficacy and safety of this contraceptive vaccine. The vaccine was never widely distributed or made commercially available due to concerns about its efficacy and potential side effects
Last edited by Sid Belzberg; Monday, 25th September, 2023, 05:16 PM.Comment
-
Part 3
Tetanus Vaccine Disaster
Beginning of Catastrophe: In the 1990s, allegations arose claiming that tetanus vaccines provided by the WHO in developing countries, notably the Philippines, Mexico, and several African nations, were contaminated with hCG. The claim suggested that the WHO was secretly trying to sterilize women without the women’s knowledge or consent.
Investigations: Multiple investigations were carried out, both by independent organizations and the WHO, and instances were found where hCG was detected in the vaccines.
WHO's Response: The WHO has consistently denied any wrongdoing or intent to sterilize women covertly. The WHO’s implausible explanation that hCG-tetanus toxoid vaccine was distinct from regular tetanus vaccines and was not used outside the context of closely monitored clinical trials, begged the question of how hCG originated in some of the vaccines in the first place.
This controversy led to a deep distrust towards vaccination campaigns in several countries, long before the roll out of the C-19 injections.
The 1990s campaign to vaccinate women against tetanus became a public relations disaster for the WHO when the Catholic Church in Kenya proved that some of the vaccines, specifically those aimed at women of reproductive age, contained hCG. The results were subsequently confirmed by other outside tests.
WHO/Gates India's Polio Vaccination Program 2000-2017
491,000 more cases of non-Polio acute placid paralysis.
Neetu Vashisht and Jacob Puliyel, the authors of a research paper on the polio vaccination program in India, noted that between 2000 to 2017, there were 491,000 additional cases of non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (NPAFP) in India, which they posited as potentially being linked to the oral polio vaccine.
The paper essentially raised concerns about the escalating cases of NPAFP in India, while hypothesizing a potential connection with repeated doses of the oral polio vaccine. The
Authors observed a directly proportional relationship between the number of oral polio vaccine doses received and the incidence of NPAFP in a region.
2022: Court order to release the Pfizer trial-results of C-19 injections, documents, which the FDA requested the Court to keep hidden for 75 years, to hide the real purpose of the C-19 injections: Depopulation through Genocide
The Pfizer DocumentsAfter the court order to release the C-19 injections trial results, Pfizer released 55,000 documents per month, with each document containing as many as 10,000 pages.
The documents show Pfizer’s internal experiments leading up to the injection, and what
happened to people when they were injected with the mRNA injection.
Three and a half thousand medical and scientific experts from around the world analyzed the documents. Here are their findings so far:
Pfizer knew in November 2020, i.e. one month after rollout of the injection, that the vaccines didn’t work to stop COVID. Also at that time, Pfizer identified vaccine failure and failure of efficacy. Additionally, they identified that the third most common side effect of the Pfizer vaccine is… COVID infection!
2. Within a month or two after the release of the vaccine, Pfizer was getting so many reports
of adverse effects in injected people, that they were forced to hire 2,400 staffers to process
the flood of the adverse effects reports coming in.
3. in May of 2021, Pfizer knew that their vaccines were causing heart damage in minors at the
rate of 35 cases per week. All the Pfizer documents have a note at the bottom stating: “FDA
confidential”, so Pfizer shared these documents, and the information on the adverse effects,
with the FDA. However, the government of the United States did not disclose to the parents
until August of 2021, that there was an elevated risk of heart damage from the injection, in
their healthy children.
4. The CDC said that the material in the injection stays in the injection site - it does not.
The components of the injection are: lipid nanoparticles, mRNA, and Spike Protein.
While Pfizer were assuring the population that the injection stays at the injection site, it was
well known to Pfizer that, in fact, the components of the injection, all of the components, are
distributed throughout the body within 48 hours after the injection. The components do not
stay at the site of the injection.
Lipid nanoparticles is industrial fat which is covered in polyethylene glycol – a petroleum by-
product. They are liquid at super cold temperatures but clot at room temperature and at
body temperature. Lipid nanoparticles are designed to cross every membrane of the human
organism – this has been known for ten years. So the vaccine components go to the brain,
they bio-distribute to the liver, the adrenals, the spleen, and in women, the vaccine
components accumulate in the ovaries. They also, to a lesser extent, accumulate in men’s
testicles. What is scary is that there is no known mechanism for the body to clear away
these lipid nanoparticles or cause them externally to be removed from the women’s ovaries.
5. The Pfizer documents show that in three months after the first injections, there were over
1,200 deaths out of 42,000 adverse events. The side effects consist of catastrophic
categories: Strokes, hemorrhages, blood clots – lung clots, leg clots, neurological disorders,
dementia-type disorders, Guillain-Barre syndrome, Bell’s Palsy; but the number 1 side
effect is joint pain. Another common side effect is myalgia – muscle pain. According to the
Pfizer documents, joint and muscle pain occurs in young, otherwise healthy, fit young
people after receiving the injection.
These are not the side effects that the CDC or your doctor tells you about. According to the
CDC, you may experience some chills, a headache, maybe a little swelling at the injection
site, but the Pfizer documents tell a more disturbing story. According to Pfizer, there were 61
deaths, for example, from stroke and half of the stroke adverse events took place within 48
hours of the injection. Five deaths occurred from liver damage and half of the adverse
effects of the liver damage occurred within 48 hours of the injection.
6. Pfizer report #56 refers to children. In early 2021, months before the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) was issued for children to receive the COVID vaccine, i.e. before the vaccine was legal for children, Pfizer injected 62 children with the COVID vaccine. Some of the children were as young as two months old. Of the 62 children, records exist only for 34 children.
The records for the remaining 28 children have disappeared; it is not known whether the children are still alive. Of the 34 records remaining, one seven-year old girl sustained a stroke and a two months old baby had a liver damage. At that same time, and before the EUA was passed, 1000 children were experimented on with the COVID vaccine, in various medical centres in the US.
7. The key section of the Pfizer documents is the experiment on human reproduction -
specifically, on how to disrupt and impair human reproduction. In this experiment involving the COVID vaccine, Pfizer instructed participating women not to get pregnant – a curious instruction considering that COVID is a respiratory disease. Despite these instructions, 270 of the participating women got pregnant. Out of the 270 pregnant women, Pfizer “lost” the records of 234 women. Of the 36 pregnant women whose records are available, over 80 % lost their babies due to miscarriage.
8. Is shedding real? Yes, shedding is real. The Pfizer documents define exposure to the vaccine as: skin contact, inhalation, and sexual intercourse. The lipid nanoparticles traverse the woman’s placenta, invade the placental fluid and every cell of the placenta environment and the fetus.
Dr. David Thorpe, a maternal-fetal medicine specialist, found in his vaccinated patients that the
placenta has formed a network of calcifications caused by the vaccine lipid nanoparticles. The compromised or impaired placentas in these women resulted in pre-mature deliveries of the babies. Dr. Thorpe also observed chromosomal abnormalities in these newborns of vaccinated mothers.
9. The Pfizer documents also reveal that lipid nanoparticles enter breast milk. Four of the moms in the study produced breast milk that turned blue-green. Subsequent to the Pfizer study, the NIH conducted another study which also showed that babies nursed by vaccinated moms were having failure to thrive and to putt on weight, the babies were agitated, restless and sleepless.
Comment
-
Part 4
10. In the documents, Dr. Chandler found that of the adverse events, 72% were sustained by women and this a constant 3:1 ratio women to men. This is not to say that men are not harmed, they are, but women are harmed in disproportionately greater numbers . Of the 72%, Pfizer found that 16% were reproductive disorders. The number for men was 0.49%.
In 2022, nine months after the rollout of the vaccine in Western Europe and North America, there is a 13 to 20 % drop in live births. The sub-data show double the number of still births in Scotland, 89 still births in one Canadian Province, where the usual number is 2 or 3 still births for the same time period.
11. Amy Kelly found that lipid nanoparticles degrade baby boys in utero. Lipid nanoparticles travers the testicular membrane of the boys’ Sertoli cells (necessary for sperm production in males) and Leydig cells (primary source of testosterone or androgens in males). It is not yet known if these baby boys of vaccinated moms will be able to grow up to be reproductively functioning adult men.
12. Considering the fact that COVID is a respiratory infection, the question remains why did Pfizer conduct COVID vaccine experiments on rats focusing specifically on the reproductive organs of the rats. The answer is clear: Pfizer was searching for a vaccine designed specifically to disrupt human reproduction. The vaccine is a manufactured bio weapon.
13. Pfizer partnered with BioNTech to create the COVID vaccine. According to the SEC filings. in 2021 there was a 100% IP transfer from BioNTech to China. China then opened manufacturing facilities for these vaccines in Europe, the US (and in China, only for export).
The COVID-19 vaccines do not prevent transmission or cure the disease. So why was the global population forced to be injected? - The answer is clear - it is to cripple our society to start asymmetric warfare, degrade, demoralize, and depopulate the population.
References:
"In the Name of Eugenics: Genetics and the Uses of Human Heredity" by Daniel J. Kevles
"The Nazi Connection: Eugenics, American Racism, and German National Socialism"
by Stefan Kühl
"Defective Genes: The Quest for Purity" by Paul A. Lombardo. In: "A Century of Eugenics
in America: From the Indiana Experiment to the Human Genome Era."
https://www.nickiswift.com/801110/bi...rsial-moments/
https://thetuskegeeexperiment.wordpr...-of-the-study/
Black, Edwin. "War Against the Weak: Eugenics and America's Campaign to Create a Master Race."
Washington, Harriet A. "Medical Apartheid."
Farley, John. "Brock Chisholm, the World Health Organization, and the Cold War."
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12346214/ Tetanus Vaccine & hCG
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22591873/ Polio Vaccination Program
https://icandecide.org/pfizer-documents/ Court Orderd Pfizer Documents
https://www.researchgate.net/publica...veloping_World
Last edited by Sid Belzberg; Monday, 25th September, 2023, 11:18 PM.Comment
-
I'm not on line so much lately......but I'll give it a shot when I can........will have to be in pieces at a time.
I expect you are going to answer, not only what has been done, but why they are bothering when the population of Earth is going to nose dive soon naturally (Low birthrate makes holding the world population impossible [Unless we have ET Emigrants]).
Bob A (The ET's are already, in fact, part of the World Population numbers, mis-identified as "humans". Seems they are not countering the natural de-population problem, if it is such).Comment
-
Originally posted by Bob Armstrong View PostJust read my reply before posting. You have time to speculate about what I post but no time to read....not a good look!Originally posted by Bob Armstrong
You made this statement
You make this ignorant misinformed statement I reply and you have time to speculate about what I replied instead of just reading it. Of course,Originally posted by Bob Armstrong
what can I expect from someone who claims to know that the WEF NAZIS view themselves as "benevolent".Comment
-
Hi Sid:
It is amazing how each individual's "Multi-Verse Paradigm (M-VP)" informs the way they perceive.
Two people can look at the same objective static object, and have two wildly differing descriptions.
It is a great validation for the philosophy of "Phenomenology (Edmund Husserl) - that we overlay our projection of characteristics on some object out there. Then we have to self-analyze, and peel back all the layers we've subjectively put on the "object", in order to try to get close to what it REALLY is.
Bob A (Philosopher)Comment
-
ChessTalk
Negative Climate Change (NCC) Thread
(Started: 21/12/9)
Weekly Overview
A. Weekly Stats:
Week # 38 (23/9/18 – 24, 2023 [7 days])
Views
.....................................................2023 Average.... 2022 Average
Last Week's......Prior Week's........Views/Day..........Views/Day
Views/Day........Views/Day.............(38 wks.)___________
........35...................23.........................37....................44
Responses (Posts)
......................................................2023 Average.........2022 Average
....Last Week's.....Prior Week's......Responses/Day......Responses/Day
Responses/Day....Resp./Day............ (38 wks.)__________________
.............2......................1.......................3...........................5.
Analysis of Last Week's Stats
Last week's stats are running close to the 2023 average so far, and ahead of the prior week's participation.
There remains here, a steady interest in the critical issue of negative climate change of almost 40 CT'ers daily (Unless some come more than once per day).
All sides of the issue are free to post material they claim to be in support (Though this thread was started by an Anthropogenicist). CT'ers are getting a good sampling of all that is out there. You decide!
B.The Anthropogenicist Position
The Pressing Climate Change Issue
Building a sense of URGENCY on this issue in society. We must realize that we cannot kick it down the road any longer!
The core issue:
The public is aware of the climate change issue.......
BUT.....
climate activists must find strategies to “AWAKEN” the public to the “urgency”.
It is expected, though somewhat disheartening, to see other negative issues of the day climb immediately to the top of the public's agenda, with climate change being sometimes substantially downgraded in importance. We will all pay for this.........
The Time Line
Nature's Tipping point is estimated to be, on current trajectory, only 8 years away (Around Jan. 1, 2031). Capping the temperature rise at only 1.5 degrees Celsius (the original international target) before then is now impossible (UN Climate Change Panel's most recent report in March, 2023). Their position is that the problem at this time is mostly due to human activity, not just “natural” warming, and that radical change in our method of living is the only way to avoid this rising, very problematic, temperature. UNCCP noted that current government deadlines were totally insufficient to solve the problem. CO 2 must be capped by 2025 since it is the main contributor to the problem! Methane is another greenhouse gas of concern, with some maintaining it contributes more to the problem than CO2. The extent of involvement in the greenhouse effect of water vapour is somewhat controversial.
Also, it has now become necessary to add in the process of CO 2 “removal”, along with “eliminating” the spewing of greenhouse gases into our atmosphere by human activity.
Our window of opportunity is fast closing.
C. The Naturalist Position -Negative “Natural” Climate Change
This thread has had a number of CT'ers arguing for Natural Climate Change, and arguing that the human economic activity contribution to negative climate change is negligible. We are just in one of Nature's long warming cycles.
We would encourage everyone to consider the materials being presented, and then see whether they in any way change your perspective, if you are an adherent of negative Anthropogenic climate change. Whether you change anything, or not, your assessment of the evidence would be most welcome in this thread.
D. Negative Climate Change: The “Conversation” Project
All sides have been trying to come up with accurate Statements on climate change, giving Support Reasons, that will gain general acceptance....we are using "The Conversation Format Protocol (TCFP)".
Under TCFP we have adopted in this thread, a proposed statement is given the benefit of the doubt that it is "generally accepted" when originally proposed. If not challenged during one week, then the Statement joins the other generally accepted Statements, without any discussion, nor Secretary ruling.
Should a proposed Statement be challenged, with reasons, then all are free to post "Supplementary Support" or "Supplementary Challenge".
As well, the onus is on the Challenger to muster CT'er support for his/her Challenge, to confirm that s/he is not the only challenger.
The discussion will generally have one week to run from the date of the posting of the Proposed Statement.
The goal is not “unanimity”, though that would be nice. Neither is the goal “consensus”. We only seek a substantial majority for a Statement to be “generally accepted”.
E. CT'ers' (Of all stripes) Immediate Tasks
a. Statement/Revised Statement/Challenge
Propose your idea for the majority to consider. You can also just post a Supplementary Support for a Statement, or, a Supplementary Challenge.
Take a hand at drafting "critical scientific statements in layperson's terms"!
b. Negative Climate Change Thread “Responses”
There are lots of climate change articles out there, both on negative anthropogenic climate change, and negative natural climate change.
This thread encourages CT'ers on all sides to re-post here, as responses, the climate change posts of interest they see elsewhere. Overall, ChessTalker's have been quite active here in posting “responses”. It seems that chess players across Canada are wanting information on climate change, a challenge unlike any our species has ever faced before.
Note:
1. The goal of this thread is not to woodshed an opposing view into submission. Every position is entitled to post as it sees fit, regardless of the kind of, and amount of, postings by other positions. What is wanted is serious consideration of all posts........then you decide.
2. I personally, as the thread originator, am trying to post a new response at least every 2nd day, but admit my busy schedule means I am sometimes falling short on this. So it is great that a number of other CT'ers are posting responses here somewhat regularly.
c. CT'ers' Action: Promotion of the Conversation on Negative Climate Change
i) The Large Picture Solution
Can we come up with at least one viable suggestion of some impressive, radical thing that might wake up the public, that we could then put out there to other concerned climate activists?
You can do something! Promote the discussion on Negative Climate Change!
ii) The Local Picture Solution
When you like one of this thread's Responses or links on an aspect of climate change, spread the news by posting it to your social media accounts and other Websites/Discussion Boards you participate in! Send them to your personal friends interested in climate change!
Bob A. (Anthropogenicist/As Participant)Last edited by Bob Armstrong; Tuesday, 26th September, 2023, 11:02 PM.Comment
-
Bob, for once in your life knock off the bullshit, read the article and please enlighten me where you claim my analysis is "very dubious". Put up or shut up!Originally posted by Bob Armstrong View PostComment
-
Proposed Statement 12 There is no climate emergency.
Evidence
“There is No Climate Emergency,” says Nobel Prize winner Dr. John F. Clauser
BY PATRICIA HARRITY ON SEPTEMBER 24, 2023 • ( 12 COMMENTS )
John F. Clauser, winner of the 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics for his work on quantum mechanics, has decided to sign the World Climate Declaration of Clintel with its central message “There is no climate emergency”.
Clauser is the second Nobel Laureate to sign the declaration, Dr. Ivar Giaever was the first. The number of scientists and experts signing the World Climate Declaration is growing rapidly.
Fear Mongering
Guus Berkhout, President of Clintel says “In the past decades the public has been flooded with fear-mongering stories, telling them that global temperatures will rise to catastrophically high levels.
Climate activists claim that the cause of all this impending doom is the increasing amount of CO2 produced by human activities. The proposed solution is the so-called net-zero emission policy, aimed at lowering human net CO2-emissions to the levels of the pre-industrial era of the late 1700s.
Those activists also claim that people should panic, and that time is running out: “Be aware that it is five minutes to midnight, we must act without delay!” Many thousands of scientists disagree; “Already 1774 are Clintel signatories.” (Source)
A Dangerous Corruption of Science
Now Clauser has publicly distanced himself from climate alarmism and this year he also joined the Board of Directors of the CO2 Coalition. In the announcement by the CO2 Coalition, Clauser was quoted in the following way:
“The popular narrative about climate change reflects a dangerous corruption of science that threatens the world’s economy and the well-being of billions of people. Misguided climate science has metastasized into massive shock-journalistic pseudoscience.
In turn, the pseudoscience has become a scapegoat for a wide variety of other unrelated ills. It has been promoted and extended by similarly misguided business marketing agents, politicians, journalists, government agencies, and environmentalists. In my opinion, there is no real climate crisis.
There is, however, a very real problem with providing a decent standard of living to the world’s large population and an associated energy crisis. The latter is being unnecessarily exacerbated by what, in my opinion, is incorrect climate science.”
IPCC is spreading dangerous misinformation
In July Clauser gave a talk at the event Quantum Korea 2023. He warned the audience about the growing amount of pseudoscience and misinformation.
“Now I am not alone in observing the dangerous proliferation of pseudoscience. Recently, The Nobel Foundation has formed a new panel to address the issue called the International Panel on Information Environment. They plan to model it after the UN’s International Panel on Climate Change, the IPCC.
I think personally that they are making a big mistake in that effort because in my opinion the IPCC is one of the worst sources of dangerous misinformation. What I’m about to recommend is in furtherance of that, of the aims of that panel. […]
I have a second elephant in the room that I have recently discovered regarding climate change. I believe that climate change is not a crisis. […]
Beware. If you’re doing good science, it may lead you into politically incorrect areas. If you’re a good scientist, you will follow them. I have several I won’t have time to discuss, but I can confidently say there is no real climate crisis and that climate change does not cause extreme weather events.”
As Clintel demonstrated in its recent book The Frozen Climate Views of the IPCC, the IPCC indeed made serious errors in its latest report. Shortly after his talk in Korea the International Monetary Fund (IMF) cancelled a scheduled talk by Clauser about climate models. In an interview with the Epoch Times, Clauser said with respect to climate science: “We are totally awash in pseudoscience”.
Guus Berkhout, emeritus professor of geophysics at the TU Delft and president of Clintel, very much welcomes Professor Clauser to the Clintel Community.
“It’s very encouraging when high-profile scientists such as Dr Clauser are willing to speak out about the glaring corruption of science by the climate establishment. We aim to make Clintel a full-fledged counterpart of the IPCC. The more excellent scientists in the Clintel network, the stronger our position in the debate with the IPCC as well as the leaders of supranational policy organisations.”
The Clintel World Climate Declaration was published in 2019, the year Clintel was founded. The strength of the declaration is its accessibility and its powerful message: there is no climate crisis. This holds true regardless of whether you believe in a large or small contribution of CO2 to the warming in the past 150 years. Scientists and experts who want to sign the declaration can submit their request here.
Source Clintel World Climate Declaration
A great way to learn more about the life and work of Dr. Clauser is to watch this Nobel Prize interview with him:
Comment
-
Negative Climate Change (NCC)
Generally-Accepted Statements
(Accepted by a group of Canadian Tournament Chess players [Across the Spectrum re partisan politics and opinion on the issue] on the Canadian national chess discussion board, ChessTalk (Non-Chess Topics Forum):
https://forum.chesstalk.com/forum/ch...ss-discussion- board/217060-anthropogenic-negative-climate-change-ancc)
Statement # 11 (Proposed - Sid Belzberg - Post # 1783 - 23/9/27)
There is no climate emergency.
[Secretarial Note:
1. This Statement is not presented in "good faith". The proposer well knows that, in this CT'er group, numbers of members totally oppose this Statement. There cannot be a "generally accepted" Statement of this type on this issue in this CT'er group (The fact is irrelevant to this group if his Statement IS generally accepted world-wide, which it also is NOT).
I have the power to disallow the Statement, as I asked this Group to endorse my Ruling, which they did, that we would not accept as any proposed Statement, one dealing with the source of Canadian Wildfires i.e. Arson.
However, it may be time for our The Conversation Format Protocol to deal with this properly, or to fail to deal with it. If this Statement is "generally accepted" by this group, then the group must review this whole format, since it has not worked to get truly and only "generally-accepted" Statements.
So I will treat the Statement, this one time, as in good faith, which it is not, and process it in the same way as all the prior Statements in this thread.
2. There are at present only 10 Statements in our list - see the last "Update" post. Sid has wrongly numbered his proposed Statement as # 12 - I have re-numbered it as # 11.]
Supporting Reasons
“There is No Climate Emergency,” says Nobel Prize winner Dr. John F. Clauser
BY PATRICIA HARRITY ON SEPTEMBER 24, 2023 • ( 12 COMMENTS )
John F. Clauser, winner of the 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics for his work on quantum mechanics, has decided to sign the World Climate Declaration of Clintel with its central message “There is no climate emergency”.
Clauser is the second Nobel Laureate to sign the declaration, Dr. Ivar Giaever was the first. The number of scientists and experts signing the World Climate Declaration is growing rapidly.
Fear Mongering
Guus Berkhout, President of Clintel says “In the past decades the public has been flooded with fear-mongering stories, telling them that global temperatures will rise to catastrophically high levels.
Climate activists claim that the cause of all this impending doom is the increasing amount of CO2 produced by human activities. The proposed solution is the so-called net-zero emission policy, aimed at lowering human net CO2-emissions to the levels of the pre-industrial era of the late 1700s.
Those activists also claim that people should panic, and that time is running out: “Be aware that it is five minutes to midnight, we must act without delay!” Many thousands of scientists disagree; “Already 1774 are Clintel signatories.” (Source)
A Dangerous Corruption of Science
Now Clauser has publicly distanced himself from climate alarmism and this year he also joined the Board of Directors of the CO2 Coalition. In the announcement by the CO2 Coalition, Clauser was quoted in the following way:
“The popular narrative about climate change reflects a dangerous corruption of science that threatens the world’s economy and the well-being of billions of people. Misguided climate science has metastasized into massive shock-journalistic pseudoscience.
In turn, the pseudoscience has become a scapegoat for a wide variety of other unrelated ills. It has been promoted and extended by similarly misguided business marketing agents, politicians, journalists, government agencies, and environmentalists. In my opinion, there is no real climate crisis.
There is, however, a very real problem with providing a decent standard of living to the world’s large population and an associated energy crisis. The latter is being unnecessarily exacerbated by what, in my opinion, is incorrect climate science.”
IPCC is spreading dangerous misinformation
In July Clauser gave a talk at the event Quantum Korea 2023. He warned the audience about the growing amount of pseudoscience and misinformation.
“Now I am not alone in observing the dangerous proliferation of pseudoscience. Recently, The Nobel Foundation has formed a new panel to address the issue called the International Panel on Information Environment. They plan to model it after the UN’s International Panel on Climate Change, the IPCC.
I think personally that they are making a big mistake in that effort because in my opinion the IPCC is one of the worst sources of dangerous misinformation. What I’m about to recommend is in furtherance of that, of the aims of that panel. […]
I have a second elephant in the room that I have recently discovered regarding climate change. I believe that climate change is not a crisis. […]
Beware. If you’re doing good science, it may lead you into politically incorrect areas. If you’re a good scientist, you will follow them. I have several I won’t have time to discuss, but I can confidently say there is no real climate crisis and that climate change does not cause extreme weather events.”
As Clintel demonstrated in its recent book The Frozen Climate Views of the IPCC, the IPCC indeed made serious errors in its latest report. Shortly after his talk in Korea the International Monetary Fund (IMF) cancelled a scheduled talk by Clauser about climate models. In an interview with the Epoch Times, Clauser said with respect to climate science: “We are totally awash in pseudoscience”.
Guus Berkhout, emeritus professor of geophysics at the TU Delft and president of Clintel, very much welcomes Professor Clauser to the Clintel Community.
“It’s very encouraging when high-profile scientists such as Dr Clauser are willing to speak out about the glaring corruption of science by the climate establishment. We aim to make Clintel a full-fledged counterpart of the IPCC. The more excellent scientists in the Clintel network, the stronger our position in the debate with the IPCC as well as the leaders of supranational policy organisations.”
The Clintel World Climate Declaration was published in 2019, the year Clintel was founded. The strength of the declaration is its accessibility and its powerful message: there is no climate crisis. This holds true regardless of whether you believe in a large or small contribution of CO2 to the warming in the past 150 years. Scientists and experts who want to sign the declaration can submit their request here.
Source Clintel World Climate Declaration
A great way to learn more about the life and work of Dr. Clauser is to watch this Nobel Prize interview with him:
Processing
There shall be one week for Revision and/or Opposition Challenges; deadline: Wed., Oct. 4 @ 11:59 PM EDT.
Bob A (As Group Secretary)
Last edited by Bob Armstrong; Wednesday, 27th September, 2023, 05:57 PM.Comment
Comment