If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Policy / Politique
The fee for tournament organizers advertising on ChessTalk is $20/event or $100/yearly unlimited for the year.
Les frais d'inscription des organisateurs de tournoi sur ChessTalk sont de 20 $/événement ou de 100 $/année illimitée.
You can etransfer to Henry Lam at chesstalkforum at gmail dot com
Transfér à Henry Lam à chesstalkforum@gmail.com
Dark Knight / Le Chevalier Noir
General Guidelines
---- Nous avons besoin d'un traduction français!
Some Basics
1. Under Board "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQs) there are 3 sections dealing with General Forum Usage, User Profile Features, and Reading and Posting Messages. These deal with everything from Avatars to Your Notifications. Most general technical questions are covered there. Here is a link to the FAQs. https://forum.chesstalk.com/help
2. Consider using the SEARCH button if you are looking for information. You may find your question has already been answered in a previous thread.
3. If you've looked for an answer to a question, and not found one, then you should consider asking your question in a new thread. For example, there have already been questions and discussion regarding: how to do chess diagrams (FENs); crosstables that line up properly; and the numerous little “glitches” that every new site will have.
4. Read pinned or sticky threads, like this one, if they look important. This applies especially to newcomers.
5. Read the thread you're posting in before you post. There are a variety of ways to look at a thread. These are covered under “Display Modes”.
6. Thread titles: please provide some details in your thread title. This is useful for a number of reasons. It helps ChessTalk members to quickly skim the threads. It prevents duplication of threads. And so on.
7. Unnecessary thread proliferation (e.g., deliberately creating a new thread that duplicates existing discussion) is discouraged. Look to see if a thread on your topic may have already been started and, if so, consider adding your contribution to the pre-existing thread. However, starting new threads to explore side-issues that are not relevant to the original subject is strongly encouraged. A single thread on the Canadian Open, with hundreds of posts on multiple sub-topics, is no better than a dozen threads on the Open covering only a few topics. Use your good judgment when starting a new thread.
8. If and/or when sub-forums are created, please make sure to create threads in the proper place.
Debate
9. Give an opinion and back it up with a reason. Throwaway comments such as "Game X pwnz because my friend and I think so!" could be considered pointless at best, and inflammatory at worst.
10. Try to give your own opinions, not simply those copied and pasted from reviews or opinions of your friends.
Unacceptable behavior and warnings
11. In registering here at ChessTalk please note that the same or similar rules apply here as applied at the previous Boardhost message board. In particular, the following content is not permitted to appear in any messages:
* Racism
* Hatred
* Harassment
* Adult content
* Obscene material
* Nudity or pornography
* Material that infringes intellectual property or other proprietary rights of any party
* Material the posting of which is tortious or violates a contractual or fiduciary obligation you or we owe to another party
* Piracy, hacking, viruses, worms, or warez
* Spam
* Any illegal content
* unapproved Commercial banner advertisements or revenue-generating links
* Any link to or any images from a site containing any material outlined in these restrictions
* Any material deemed offensive or inappropriate by the Board staff
12. Users are welcome to challenge other points of view and opinions, but should do so respectfully. Personal attacks on others will not be tolerated. Posts and threads with unacceptable content can be closed or deleted altogether. Furthermore, a range of sanctions are possible - from a simple warning to a temporary or even a permanent banning from ChessTalk.
Helping to Moderate
13. 'Report' links (an exclamation mark inside a triangle) can be found in many places throughout the board. These links allow users to alert the board staff to anything which is offensive, objectionable or illegal. Please consider using this feature if the need arises.
Advice for free
14. You should exercise the same caution with Private Messages as you would with any public posting.
15. Have fun!
(Thanks to Nigel Hanrahan for writing these up!)
Trump: Set to declare 2024 presidential bid tonight; will indictments follow soon?
You think global warming, lab created virus ... is a problem?
Think again!
Strip away the rights of the Individual. Each and every Citizen! Fabricate laws to enforce the rape.
Rape it all away.
Simply do it ... by force!
Make it ... fake it ... to look legal. We love legal ... right???
Kafka wrote a book on this ... didn't he?
.
There is nothing absurd or fantastical about the situation Trump finds himself in. So the reference to Kafka is irrelevant. Trump is in a legal quagmire not due to external absurdities, but to his own behavior.
As I posted previously, let the trial(s) take place, THEN post about absurdities. Trying to taint the whole legal system, and especially characterizing a jury that hasn't been chosen yet, as being "democratic", only makes you seem fanatical. The U.S. legal system is not like a banana republic, unless you have some EVIDENCE to the contrary.
Neil, Trump has attacked in public the wife of the District Attorney that is prosecuting his case. Do you still support Trump?
She (Jamila Ponton) came out on Twitter and proudly claimed that her Soros-bought-and-paid-for husband "has Trump nailed on felonies". Seriously, just like that.
Why would she be allowed to rile you up with that comment? What does she know, anyways?
This isn't a game. But you're getting played anyway.
So, should we expect fair play here, Brad? Impartial democrat Judge? Impartial democrat Jury? Impartial democrat DA? Should we?
But what are you all fed instead? DA Bragg has his wife post on Twitter ... "has Trump nailed on felonies".
Crazy stuff!!
So what do you Brad, expect from Trump?
Laugh it off?
Huh?
This isn't funny!
Just think about all the Republican DAs around the country just chomping at the bit to drag Hillary ... drag the Bidens ... et. al ... into their district courts on trumped up charges ... over and over and over again ... in ALL the strong hold Republican districts!! Including Florida, ha!
Neil, I think you underestimate the charges that we will find out about on Tuesday, assuming Trump shows up. If he declared the monies paid to Cohen as legal expenses, then this may well lead to tax evasion charges. This is how they got Al Capone. Now, I do think that these charges are the least of Trump's problems. If he is indicted for inciting insurrection, for the attempts to manipulate results in Georgia and/or for the theft and concealment of classified documents, then Trump has bigger problems. And his own recorded/filmed words clearly convict him on all of these possible charges. This man is finished, he is simply trying to take as much of America down with him as he goes. He is a pathetic coward. If he is sentenced to jail, I suspect he will kill himself instead of serving humiliating time.
Firstly, there is nothing wrong with making law. It happens around the world every year.
Secondly, if you are right that it is as you call it "political lynching", then let it happen as a trial and pick apart the actual trial. Don't ask to not even HAVE the trial, because THAT would be making precedent in which if SOMEONE arbitrarily decides it is a political lynching, it can't even go to trial.
Do you want a world in which there are no trials that someone, somewhere, arbritrarily deems "political lynching"?
WHO GET TO DECIDE POLITICAL LYNCHING?
YOU????
LOOL
hA!
This local DA is using a wayyy past expired 'issue' with some 'hooker' lawyer's expense. Wayyy past the statute of limitations by about two years! 2 years!
He needed to pull that trick off in order to upscale a charge to a Federal charge of using campaign monies as lawyer's payment.
OK?
Using something 2 year past expiry that has ZERO legitimacy in order to prosecute a Federal change. This DA is local DA not a Federal DA ... he has ZERO legitimacy to enforce Federal change.
DA Bragg is a democrat, the Judge is a democrat, the Jury which is pooled from a district which votes 85% democratic ... is, well, you get the point ... democrat Jury!
ZERO legitimacy.
If this political lynching is allowed to happen just because a DA thinks it can get away with it!!
Just imagine Pargat, if Justice was blind.
Huh?
So ya, we are witnessing a POLITICAL LYNCHING!
I only hope that across America this political lynching by the democrats doesn't turn into a tit for tat ... Hillary will be next to suffer. You thought America has divided before this local DA's political lynching?
Think again, ha!
.
Last edited by Neil Frarey; Sunday, 2nd April, 2023, 06:09 PM.
Brad, You may be using this language as hyperbole, but talking of assassinating someone is not acceptable even as hyperbole. Decent societies around the world have even abolished the death penalty.
Agreed. Many American states still have the death penalty and treason is such an offence. This is essentially an American problem, we must hope that it does not spill over into Canada.
Last edited by Brad Thomson; Sunday, 2nd April, 2023, 09:05 AM.
Yes, I am comparing it to what must felt like witnessing a horrifying lynching!
Just in a different setting, Brad.
Democratic DA, democratic Judge, democratic Jury ... you really think that this is going to be a fair trail? Seriously, do you?
And in comparison ... from horrible times past ...
White DA, white Judge, white Jury. Yes ... we are witnessing a political lynching ... sigh.
What's worse than that, if possible? Why not just fabricate a law?
Simply make one up ... why not? It's Trump after all. Just make up a law. The DA is a democrat, the judge is a democrat, the jury will be most all democrats ... seriously, just simply make up a law ... this the real danger.
And that is exactly what this DA has done, ha!
.
Firstly, there is nothing wrong with making law. It happens around the world every year.
Secondly, if you are right that it is as you call it "political lynching", then let it happen as a trial and pick apart the actual trial. Don't ask to not even HAVE the trial, because THAT would be making precedent in which if SOMEONE arbitrarily decides it is a political lynching, it can't even go to trial.
Do you want a world in which there are no trials that someone, somewhere, arbritrarily deems "political lynching"?
Brad, You may be using this language as hyperbole, but talking of assassinating someone is not acceptable even as hyperbole. Decent societies around the world have even abolished the death penalty.
I do not think you should use the word "lynching", it sounds racist (though having known you I do not believe that you are), as are the words "Nazi" and "Gestapo" when Trump and his sycophants use them (they ARE racists).
Yes, I am comparing it to what must felt like witnessing a horrifying lynching!
Just in a different setting, Brad.
Democratic DA, democratic Judge, democratic Jury ... you really think that this is going to be a fair trail? Seriously, do you?
And in comparison ... from horrible times past ...
White DA, white Judge, white Jury. Yes ... we are witnessing a political lynching ... sigh.
What's worse than that, if possible? Why not just fabricate a law?
Simply make one up ... why not? It's Trump after all. Just make up a law. The DA is a democrat, the judge is a democrat, the jury will be most all democrats ... seriously, just simply make up a law ... this the real danger.
And that is exactly what this DA has done, ha!
.
Last edited by Neil Frarey; Friday, 31st March, 2023, 08:33 PM.
Based upon what the media has stated repeatedly in recent months I have suggested that if Trump is convicted of a felony, he will be disqualified from running for President again. It seems that this was mis- if not dis-information and I apologize for not checking my facts. GO TRUMP GO (to jail and then to the oval office remotely from your cell). Can a Convicted Felon Run for President? - Recording Law
Not to worry Neil, in America one is innocent until proven guilty. If Trump is not guilty with respect to the hooker, the insurrection, the attempts to manipulate the results in Georgia and the absconding with classified documents, then he will get off. He may even get off if he IS guilty, but he will never be convicted by juries of his peers UNLESS he is guilty.
I do not think you should use the word "lynching", it sounds racist (though having known you I do not believe that you are), as are the words "Nazi" and "Gestapo" when Trump and his sycophants use them (they ARE racists).
Entertaining to watch the drool drip from your collective draconian mouths whilst recklessly constructing this theater of a political modern day lynching.
I believe this set of Trump indictments in New York could be just the first set of many more to come, in various jurisdictions.
I won a small wager, good for one adult beverage of my choice, by predicting the first Trump indictment would arrive in March, 2023.
The real test for The Donald may arrive if prosecutors from different legal entities would work together to produce a RICO-related case against him. RICO, acronym for Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations, was brought in circa 1970, to deal with organized crime in a more effective manner. Canada has a similar statute: 'Criminal Organization'. One aspect of RICO favoring prosecutors: No statute of limitations. Interestingly, Trump's lawyer Rudy Giuliani employed RICO with success when he was working as a Manhattan prosecutor, before he served as Mayor of New York City. Giuliani's father was apparently a small-time organized crime figure.
Leave a comment: