If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Policy / Politique
The fee for tournament organizers advertising on ChessTalk is $20/event or $100/yearly unlimited for the year.
Les frais d'inscription des organisateurs de tournoi sur ChessTalk sont de 20 $/événement ou de 100 $/année illimitée.
You can etransfer to Henry Lam at chesstalkforum at gmail dot com
Transfér à Henry Lam à chesstalkforum@gmail.com
Dark Knight / Le Chevalier Noir
General Guidelines
---- Nous avons besoin d'un traduction français!
Some Basics
1. Under Board "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQs) there are 3 sections dealing with General Forum Usage, User Profile Features, and Reading and Posting Messages. These deal with everything from Avatars to Your Notifications. Most general technical questions are covered there. Here is a link to the FAQs. https://forum.chesstalk.com/help
2. Consider using the SEARCH button if you are looking for information. You may find your question has already been answered in a previous thread.
3. If you've looked for an answer to a question, and not found one, then you should consider asking your question in a new thread. For example, there have already been questions and discussion regarding: how to do chess diagrams (FENs); crosstables that line up properly; and the numerous little “glitches” that every new site will have.
4. Read pinned or sticky threads, like this one, if they look important. This applies especially to newcomers.
5. Read the thread you're posting in before you post. There are a variety of ways to look at a thread. These are covered under “Display Modes”.
6. Thread titles: please provide some details in your thread title. This is useful for a number of reasons. It helps ChessTalk members to quickly skim the threads. It prevents duplication of threads. And so on.
7. Unnecessary thread proliferation (e.g., deliberately creating a new thread that duplicates existing discussion) is discouraged. Look to see if a thread on your topic may have already been started and, if so, consider adding your contribution to the pre-existing thread. However, starting new threads to explore side-issues that are not relevant to the original subject is strongly encouraged. A single thread on the Canadian Open, with hundreds of posts on multiple sub-topics, is no better than a dozen threads on the Open covering only a few topics. Use your good judgment when starting a new thread.
8. If and/or when sub-forums are created, please make sure to create threads in the proper place.
Debate
9. Give an opinion and back it up with a reason. Throwaway comments such as "Game X pwnz because my friend and I think so!" could be considered pointless at best, and inflammatory at worst.
10. Try to give your own opinions, not simply those copied and pasted from reviews or opinions of your friends.
Unacceptable behavior and warnings
11. In registering here at ChessTalk please note that the same or similar rules apply here as applied at the previous Boardhost message board. In particular, the following content is not permitted to appear in any messages:
* Racism
* Hatred
* Harassment
* Adult content
* Obscene material
* Nudity or pornography
* Material that infringes intellectual property or other proprietary rights of any party
* Material the posting of which is tortious or violates a contractual or fiduciary obligation you or we owe to another party
* Piracy, hacking, viruses, worms, or warez
* Spam
* Any illegal content
* unapproved Commercial banner advertisements or revenue-generating links
* Any link to or any images from a site containing any material outlined in these restrictions
* Any material deemed offensive or inappropriate by the Board staff
12. Users are welcome to challenge other points of view and opinions, but should do so respectfully. Personal attacks on others will not be tolerated. Posts and threads with unacceptable content can be closed or deleted altogether. Furthermore, a range of sanctions are possible - from a simple warning to a temporary or even a permanent banning from ChessTalk.
Helping to Moderate
13. 'Report' links (an exclamation mark inside a triangle) can be found in many places throughout the board. These links allow users to alert the board staff to anything which is offensive, objectionable or illegal. Please consider using this feature if the need arises.
Advice for free
14. You should exercise the same caution with Private Messages as you would with any public posting.
I am glad we all agree that GDP (as currently calculated) is a very flawed measurement of economic growth. The problem is that it is the most widely used statistic quoted by politicians and media types. Not only flawed, but measuring the wrong metric. We need to develop a new metric for a sustainable economy and convince the politicians and media to give it priority over GDP.
Hi Bob G.,
GDP simply measures what we all produce. And what we produce is what we can consume. It is everyone's personal choice regarding what he/she wishes to consume, and obviously businesses will produce only what they can sell to the consumers. So the problem does not lie with the measurement of GDP, which reflects our capacity to produce, and is in that sense a good thing, but it lies with how we decide to consume... do not criticize the producers... criticize the consumers if you want to blame someone. And this guy in the video you just posted foolishly believes that everyone will be happier if production falls while we continue to consume... instead of understanding that it would just lead us down the miserable path taken by Allende's Chile or by Chavez & Maduro's Venezuela...
Distorting the meaning of GDP in order to criticize it is a waste of everyone's time.
GDP is simply a measure of the fiscal productiveness demonstrated. What that production was used for is not what it measures, nor does any economist claim that it is a measure of betterment of society.
I am glad we all agree that GDP (as currently calculated) is a very flawed measurement of economic growth. The problem is that it is the most widely used statistic quoted by politicians and media types. Not only flawed, but measuring the wrong metric. We need to develop a new metric for a sustainable economy and convince the politicians and media to give it priority over GDP.
Distorting the meaning of GDP in order to criticize it is a waste of everyone's time.
GDP is simply a measure of the fiscal productiveness demonstrated. What that production was used for is not what it measures, nor does any economist claim that it is a measure of betterment of society.
I've been saying for years that GDP is flawed as a measure of growth. Hurricane Katrina contributed millions of $ to US GDP .... to rebuild what was already there.
Keep your eyes on the effects of global warming on the critical insurance industry....
As you well know, I've been harping on the theme of Earth Sustainability for some time........it is an issue that cuts across all human activity on the planet. The planet must come first.
I've been particularly applying it to political power amassed by our largest nations on the planet, and particularly military might. Our large Nation States (vs Earth as a Collection of Villages/Small City-States) put the sustainability of the human race at risk.
Might it be possible to have a civil, and informative, "discussion" on CT (As opposed to the same old, same old flame wars)?
But I know for years, vegetarians have answered the issue of overpopulation/food security, with the simple solution of: eliminate carnivore-oriented farming; morph into grain/rice/lentil/etc. oriented farming. All modelling shows that the amount of food produced on current farmland will easily feed the growing Earth population (Both Human & Extra-terrestrial ) for some time.
Since you raised the concept of "Collapse of Civilization" (Much broader than this narrow "Negative Climate Change" thread), and in CT we hate people "hi-jacking" threads (!), I have started a new thread with your topic, and re-posted our two posts there, to start the ball rolling.
23/10/29, 05:34 PM (Post from the Negative Climate Change Thread)
Hey Bob A,
- my youtube viewing strayed into the topic of collapse of civilization. This is an even wider canvas where climate change is one of several crisis that could bring down our civilization.
In fact, climate change can really be considered a symptom of a greater cause, that of ecological overshoot. By that, we mean there are too many people consuming the planetary resources faster than the planet can regenerate. We currently have 8 billion people and climbing, but the planet can only support 3 billion (estimates vary) based on current capacity.
I was wondering what you thought. I found a great channel on the topic, here is a sample.
Leave a comment: