If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Policy / Politique
The fee for tournament organizers advertising on ChessTalk is $20/event or $100/yearly unlimited for the year.
Les frais d'inscription des organisateurs de tournoi sur ChessTalk sont de 20 $/événement ou de 100 $/année illimitée.
You can etransfer to Henry Lam at chesstalkforum at gmail dot com
Transfér à Henry Lam à chesstalkforum@gmail.com
Dark Knight / Le Chevalier Noir
General Guidelines
---- Nous avons besoin d'un traduction français!
Some Basics
1. Under Board "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQs) there are 3 sections dealing with General Forum Usage, User Profile Features, and Reading and Posting Messages. These deal with everything from Avatars to Your Notifications. Most general technical questions are covered there. Here is a link to the FAQs. https://forum.chesstalk.com/help
2. Consider using the SEARCH button if you are looking for information. You may find your question has already been answered in a previous thread.
3. If you've looked for an answer to a question, and not found one, then you should consider asking your question in a new thread. For example, there have already been questions and discussion regarding: how to do chess diagrams (FENs); crosstables that line up properly; and the numerous little “glitches” that every new site will have.
4. Read pinned or sticky threads, like this one, if they look important. This applies especially to newcomers.
5. Read the thread you're posting in before you post. There are a variety of ways to look at a thread. These are covered under “Display Modes”.
6. Thread titles: please provide some details in your thread title. This is useful for a number of reasons. It helps ChessTalk members to quickly skim the threads. It prevents duplication of threads. And so on.
7. Unnecessary thread proliferation (e.g., deliberately creating a new thread that duplicates existing discussion) is discouraged. Look to see if a thread on your topic may have already been started and, if so, consider adding your contribution to the pre-existing thread. However, starting new threads to explore side-issues that are not relevant to the original subject is strongly encouraged. A single thread on the Canadian Open, with hundreds of posts on multiple sub-topics, is no better than a dozen threads on the Open covering only a few topics. Use your good judgment when starting a new thread.
8. If and/or when sub-forums are created, please make sure to create threads in the proper place.
Debate
9. Give an opinion and back it up with a reason. Throwaway comments such as "Game X pwnz because my friend and I think so!" could be considered pointless at best, and inflammatory at worst.
10. Try to give your own opinions, not simply those copied and pasted from reviews or opinions of your friends.
Unacceptable behavior and warnings
11. In registering here at ChessTalk please note that the same or similar rules apply here as applied at the previous Boardhost message board. In particular, the following content is not permitted to appear in any messages:
* Racism
* Hatred
* Harassment
* Adult content
* Obscene material
* Nudity or pornography
* Material that infringes intellectual property or other proprietary rights of any party
* Material the posting of which is tortious or violates a contractual or fiduciary obligation you or we owe to another party
* Piracy, hacking, viruses, worms, or warez
* Spam
* Any illegal content
* unapproved Commercial banner advertisements or revenue-generating links
* Any link to or any images from a site containing any material outlined in these restrictions
* Any material deemed offensive or inappropriate by the Board staff
12. Users are welcome to challenge other points of view and opinions, but should do so respectfully. Personal attacks on others will not be tolerated. Posts and threads with unacceptable content can be closed or deleted altogether. Furthermore, a range of sanctions are possible - from a simple warning to a temporary or even a permanent banning from ChessTalk.
Helping to Moderate
13. 'Report' links (an exclamation mark inside a triangle) can be found in many places throughout the board. These links allow users to alert the board staff to anything which is offensive, objectionable or illegal. Please consider using this feature if the need arises.
Advice for free
14. You should exercise the same caution with Private Messages as you would with any public posting.
What about the TD in a FIDE/CfC event. Typically, the open section in most EOCA events is double rated. This puts the onus on the tD to do the manual compilation.
It is an issue now on the confidential CFC Governors' Discussion Board, about a governor's assertion that in the last number of years, the number of Canadian organizers has dropped by about 1/3. The CFC must wrestle with how to reverse this trend. Is this one of those small situations, where a decision to put FIDE ratings immediately viewable on the CFC member rating page, would be a small step by CFC to show support for organizers?
What about the TD in a FIDE/CfC event. Typically, the open section in most EOCA events is double rated. This puts the onus on the tD to do the manual compilation.
I would like CFC to provide relevant information to the member on his/her rating page, and one of those pieces of information that should immediately be visible on the page should be the player's FIDE rating, plus a link to that player's FIDE rating page.
Bob, I think just the link to the players FIDE rating page is the best solution. The FIDE rating in the CFC database that requires constant updating should be left blank. Players can then easily click the FIDE link and get so much more information on their FIDE rating than we could ever provide. The simple solutions are often the best!
It is far from being ludicrous. If two players have the same name, the arbiter has no way to know how to match the player with his CFC rating. For example, suppose that we have the following players
John Doe CFC 1900,
John Doe FIDE 1904
John Doe CFC 1908,
John Doe FIDE 1910 .
What is the FIDE rating of the John Doe who has a CFC rating of 1900? The CFC Office knows that.
except that the program would not even look at the name. (looking instead at the FIDE ID in the CFC database). Sure, for new FIDE players with a new FIDE ID, those would have to be flagged for manual entry into the CFC database (once only)
It is far from being ludicrous. If two players have the same name, the arbiter has no way to know how to match the player with his CFC rating. For example, suppose that we have the following players
John Doe CFC 1900,
John Doe FIDE 1904
John Doe CFC 1908,
John Doe FIDE 1910 .
What is the FIDE rating of the John Doe who has a CFC rating of 1900? The CFC Office knows that.
Originally posted by Kerry Liles;75009It is ludicrous to somehow copy the FIDE ratings manually into the CFC database - a dynamic link to the player's FIDE card is
pretty much all that would be useful. In any case, there are links to download ALL of the FIDE ratings as a txt file:
[url
http://ratings.fide.com/download.phtml[/url] shows all the possible downloads and
(of course, each URL would be customized to use the player's FIDE ID number - the one above is for Eric Hansen)
It is ludicrous to somehow copy the FIDE ratings manually into the CFC database - a dynamic link to the player's FIDE card is
pretty much all that would be useful.
Hi Kerry:
I view the personal player rating page as a service CFC provides to its members.
As such, I would like CFC to provide relevant information to the member on his/her rating page, and one of those pieces of information that should immediately be visible on the page should be the player's FIDE rating, plus a link to that player's FIDE rating page.
Secondly, the updating of the FIDE rating every first of the month (when FIDE revises its lists), should automatically trigger the updating of the FIDE rating on the player's CFC rating page. I would like this feature, if the cost to CFC of automating it is not too high. I see this as an expenditure of CFC funds on a benefit to members.
I'd be pleased to hear any more comments on what I'd like to achieve.
Bob A, GTCL/Ont. CFC Governor
Last edited by Bob Armstrong; Monday, 18th November, 2013, 01:25 AM.
(of course, each URL would be customized to use the player's FIDE ID number - the one above is for Eric Hansen)
It is ludicrous to somehow copy the FIDE ratings manually into the CFC database - a dynamic link to the player's FIDE card is
pretty much all that would be useful. In any case, there are links to download ALL of the FIDE ratings as a txt file:
The FIDE ratings in the CFC's database are messed up.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]1403[/ATTACH]
A small example below:
[ATTACH=CONFIG]1404[/ATTACH]
Hi Rene:
Here is a report on this issue, in my upcoming newsletter to GTCL CFC Members:
FIDE Ratings on CFC Member’s Rating Page
There has been a problem with amending the FIDE ratings on a player’s CFC rating page, when FIDE publishes the new monthly rating list. Apparently this is to a high degree a manual operation in the job description of the CFC Executive Director, Michael von Keitz. But there has been a lag (sometimes of about three months, according to one CFC member post on the CMA chess discussion board, Chesstalk). Before that post, I had already drawn two instances of wrong FIDE rating on a player’s CFC rating page, to the attention of the E.D.. I had asked for clarification of the process required, and why this job description task was getting bogged down. I received no reply before I brought this issue to the CFC Governors’ Discussion Board. I requested that this function be automated, so that it did not require any E.D. labour. I was given two different answers on this:
1. this is a very difficult programming issue and will be very costly (by a GTCL CFC Constituent, who wants to remain anonymous, with whom I have been discussing this – he maintains the link to FIDE ratings is sufficient, and the member should just click on the link if they want to know the CFC member’s FIDE rating; he sees no need for it to be on the CFC member’s personal rating page, if this would cost CFC $$);
2. it is a simple programming issue that even basic programmers can do cheaply (a past CFC President, who does do programming).
I have asked the executive to provide me with confirmation that this is a relatively simple thing to accomplish, and that I be advised what the cost would be.
Bob Armstrong, GTCL/Ont. CFC Governor
P.S. If you would like to receive my free monthly newsletter, Monthly CFC Report (from the GTCL perspective), just e-mail me: bobarm@sympatico.ca
Last edited by Bob Armstrong; Sunday, 17th November, 2013, 11:20 PM.
Leave a comment: