If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Policy / Politique
The fee for tournament organizers advertising on ChessTalk is $20/event or $100/yearly unlimited for the year.
Les frais d'inscription des organisateurs de tournoi sur ChessTalk sont de 20 $/événement ou de 100 $/année illimitée.
You can etransfer to Henry Lam at chesstalkforum at gmail dot com
Transfér à Henry Lam à chesstalkforum@gmail.com
Dark Knight / Le Chevalier Noir
General Guidelines
---- Nous avons besoin d'un traduction français!
Some Basics
1. Under Board "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQs) there are 3 sections dealing with General Forum Usage, User Profile Features, and Reading and Posting Messages. These deal with everything from Avatars to Your Notifications. Most general technical questions are covered there. Here is a link to the FAQs. https://forum.chesstalk.com/help
2. Consider using the SEARCH button if you are looking for information. You may find your question has already been answered in a previous thread.
3. If you've looked for an answer to a question, and not found one, then you should consider asking your question in a new thread. For example, there have already been questions and discussion regarding: how to do chess diagrams (FENs); crosstables that line up properly; and the numerous little “glitches” that every new site will have.
4. Read pinned or sticky threads, like this one, if they look important. This applies especially to newcomers.
5. Read the thread you're posting in before you post. There are a variety of ways to look at a thread. These are covered under “Display Modes”.
6. Thread titles: please provide some details in your thread title. This is useful for a number of reasons. It helps ChessTalk members to quickly skim the threads. It prevents duplication of threads. And so on.
7. Unnecessary thread proliferation (e.g., deliberately creating a new thread that duplicates existing discussion) is discouraged. Look to see if a thread on your topic may have already been started and, if so, consider adding your contribution to the pre-existing thread. However, starting new threads to explore side-issues that are not relevant to the original subject is strongly encouraged. A single thread on the Canadian Open, with hundreds of posts on multiple sub-topics, is no better than a dozen threads on the Open covering only a few topics. Use your good judgment when starting a new thread.
8. If and/or when sub-forums are created, please make sure to create threads in the proper place.
Debate
9. Give an opinion and back it up with a reason. Throwaway comments such as "Game X pwnz because my friend and I think so!" could be considered pointless at best, and inflammatory at worst.
10. Try to give your own opinions, not simply those copied and pasted from reviews or opinions of your friends.
Unacceptable behavior and warnings
11. In registering here at ChessTalk please note that the same or similar rules apply here as applied at the previous Boardhost message board. In particular, the following content is not permitted to appear in any messages:
* Racism
* Hatred
* Harassment
* Adult content
* Obscene material
* Nudity or pornography
* Material that infringes intellectual property or other proprietary rights of any party
* Material the posting of which is tortious or violates a contractual or fiduciary obligation you or we owe to another party
* Piracy, hacking, viruses, worms, or warez
* Spam
* Any illegal content
* unapproved Commercial banner advertisements or revenue-generating links
* Any link to or any images from a site containing any material outlined in these restrictions
* Any material deemed offensive or inappropriate by the Board staff
12. Users are welcome to challenge other points of view and opinions, but should do so respectfully. Personal attacks on others will not be tolerated. Posts and threads with unacceptable content can be closed or deleted altogether. Furthermore, a range of sanctions are possible - from a simple warning to a temporary or even a permanent banning from ChessTalk.
Helping to Moderate
13. 'Report' links (an exclamation mark inside a triangle) can be found in many places throughout the board. These links allow users to alert the board staff to anything which is offensive, objectionable or illegal. Please consider using this feature if the need arises.
Advice for free
14. You should exercise the same caution with Private Messages as you would with any public posting.
15. Have fun!
(Thanks to Nigel Hanrahan for writing these up!)
Is the same everywhere: strong girls quitting chess in MS-HS
Re: Is the same everywhere: strong girls quitting chess in MS-HS
I was going to post this in the Rachel Tao thread, Andrei, but I'll post it here instead. I used the CFC ratings search to ascertain Canada's strongest U16 females and I was dumbfounded to see that the entire list comprised all of 4 names ):
I was going to post this in the Rachel Tao thread, Andrei, but I'll post it here instead. I used the CFC ratings search to ascertain Canada's strongest U16 females and I was dumbfounded to see that the entire list comprised all of 4 names ):
That is probably because the list only returns active members and not everyone has birthdate information attached to their CFC membership. There were 13 girls in the under 14 last year at the CYCC in Ottawa. Most of them are probably under 16 now. We have had three girls in that age group in Windsor disappear from our radar screens including two who have qualified to WYCC at one point.
Re: Is the same everywhere: strong girls quitting chess in MS-HS
I discussed this matter with USCF President Ruth Haring during the Olympiad in Tromso. Their statistics show that the exodous start in the 12-14 age category. Among their strategies is a Women's Open tournament which drew 300 players last year. I expect/hope we will be working closer with the USCF in the coming years to combat this trend.
Re: Is the same everywhere: strong girls quitting chess in MS-HS
Vadim wrote:
queries made on the CFC site fail to return names of any CFC members domiciled in Quebec.
I looked up several U20 girls from Quebec who played recently, and they all have CFC expiry dates of 2014-09-01 - that's probably why they don't appear e.g. Indy Ma and Allison Tsypin.
But now it appears that any random Quebec player I select from the Canadian Open crosstable has a CFC expiry date of 2014-09-01 as well! (being a Life Member, I show up as "no expiry" :-) )
Shouldn't the FQE and CFC expiry dates match for Quebec players?
Re: Is the same everywhere: strong girls quitting chess in MS-HS
Chess is the only sport/game I am aware of (other than equestrian sports) where females past puberty are expected to compete against males. Perhaps most women, especially in their late teens and twenties, are not comfortable playing against (and maybe defeating) men, and all-women competitions are not common? Just a thought.
Re: Is the same everywhere: strong girls quitting chess in MS-HS
Ken wrote:
Chess is the only sport/game I am aware of (other than equestrian sports) where females past puberty are expected to compete against males.
Any card game (bridge, poker, etc.) women compete equally with men even at the highest levels. Sailing (until 1988) and shooting (until 1992 - a woman won a gold in 1992) had men and women competing equally at the Olympics.
Chess is the only sport/game I am aware of (other than equestrian sports) where females past puberty are expected to compete against males. Perhaps most women, especially in their late teens and twenties, are not comfortable playing against (and maybe defeating) men, and all-women competitions are not common? Just a thought.
Poker has adult women competing against adult men.
If women feel uncomfortable competing against men in general, this would REALLY show up in poker because it is such a psychological game. In chess, when you are on the move, your opponent is not usually staring right into your soul so to speak, but is looking at the board just as you are. I think in chess it is considered rude to stare at your opponent, no?
But in poker, when you are deciding between fold, call, or raise, you could have anywhere from 1 up to 8 or 9 opponents ALL not just staring into your soul, but even goading you with comments, trying to unnerve you. It is considered part of the game.
Poker does have far less adult (and even pre-adult) women than men competing, but the situation is not as bad as in chess. What this could indicate is that you can get more women to overcome their hesitation to compete against men IF you raised the potential rewards.
Organized chess has a money problem first and foremost, and all its other problems stem from that.
Only the rushing is heard...
Onward flies the bird.
I discussed this matter with USCF President Ruth Haring during the Olympiad in Tromso. Their statistics show that the exodous start in the 12-14 age category. Among their strategies is a Women's Open tournament which drew 300 players last year. I expect/hope we will be working closer with the USCF in the coming years to combat this trend.
There is an interesting article about this very topic:
Comment