If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Policy / Politique
The fee for tournament organizers advertising on ChessTalk is $20/event or $100/yearly unlimited for the year.
Les frais d'inscription des organisateurs de tournoi sur ChessTalk sont de 20 $/événement ou de 100 $/année illimitée.
You can etransfer to Henry Lam at chesstalkforum at gmail dot com
Transfér à Henry Lam à chesstalkforum@gmail.com
Dark Knight / Le Chevalier Noir
General Guidelines
---- Nous avons besoin d'un traduction français!
Some Basics
1. Under Board "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQs) there are 3 sections dealing with General Forum Usage, User Profile Features, and Reading and Posting Messages. These deal with everything from Avatars to Your Notifications. Most general technical questions are covered there. Here is a link to the FAQs. https://forum.chesstalk.com/help
2. Consider using the SEARCH button if you are looking for information. You may find your question has already been answered in a previous thread.
3. If you've looked for an answer to a question, and not found one, then you should consider asking your question in a new thread. For example, there have already been questions and discussion regarding: how to do chess diagrams (FENs); crosstables that line up properly; and the numerous little “glitches” that every new site will have.
4. Read pinned or sticky threads, like this one, if they look important. This applies especially to newcomers.
5. Read the thread you're posting in before you post. There are a variety of ways to look at a thread. These are covered under “Display Modes”.
6. Thread titles: please provide some details in your thread title. This is useful for a number of reasons. It helps ChessTalk members to quickly skim the threads. It prevents duplication of threads. And so on.
7. Unnecessary thread proliferation (e.g., deliberately creating a new thread that duplicates existing discussion) is discouraged. Look to see if a thread on your topic may have already been started and, if so, consider adding your contribution to the pre-existing thread. However, starting new threads to explore side-issues that are not relevant to the original subject is strongly encouraged. A single thread on the Canadian Open, with hundreds of posts on multiple sub-topics, is no better than a dozen threads on the Open covering only a few topics. Use your good judgment when starting a new thread.
8. If and/or when sub-forums are created, please make sure to create threads in the proper place.
Debate
9. Give an opinion and back it up with a reason. Throwaway comments such as "Game X pwnz because my friend and I think so!" could be considered pointless at best, and inflammatory at worst.
10. Try to give your own opinions, not simply those copied and pasted from reviews or opinions of your friends.
Unacceptable behavior and warnings
11. In registering here at ChessTalk please note that the same or similar rules apply here as applied at the previous Boardhost message board. In particular, the following content is not permitted to appear in any messages:
* Racism
* Hatred
* Harassment
* Adult content
* Obscene material
* Nudity or pornography
* Material that infringes intellectual property or other proprietary rights of any party
* Material the posting of which is tortious or violates a contractual or fiduciary obligation you or we owe to another party
* Piracy, hacking, viruses, worms, or warez
* Spam
* Any illegal content
* unapproved Commercial banner advertisements or revenue-generating links
* Any link to or any images from a site containing any material outlined in these restrictions
* Any material deemed offensive or inappropriate by the Board staff
12. Users are welcome to challenge other points of view and opinions, but should do so respectfully. Personal attacks on others will not be tolerated. Posts and threads with unacceptable content can be closed or deleted altogether. Furthermore, a range of sanctions are possible - from a simple warning to a temporary or even a permanent banning from ChessTalk.
Helping to Moderate
13. 'Report' links (an exclamation mark inside a triangle) can be found in many places throughout the board. These links allow users to alert the board staff to anything which is offensive, objectionable or illegal. Please consider using this feature if the need arises.
Advice for free
14. You should exercise the same caution with Private Messages as you would with any public posting.
2009 Toronto Labour Day
Open Chess Tournament
September 5th, 6th & 7th (Sat, Sun & Mon)
Macedonian Community Hall
76 Overlea Blvd Toronto
Style: 6 round Swiss in 5 sections:
OPEN (w/ U2300 -- FIDE-rated), U2200, U2000, U1800, U1600 (w/ U1400 & UNR)
Rounds: 11:00AM & 5:30PM on Saturday, 10:00AM and 4:30PM on Sunday & Monday
Time Control: 40/2, SD/1
Byes: Maximum of 2 in rounds 1-5
Entry Fees: $75 if payment is received in advance
$80 if registered in advance but paying onsite
$90 cash only onsite
AMATEUR: $30 Adult, $25 Junior (under 20) (for U1800 and U1600 only)
(Amateur entries not eligible for cash prizes & do not contribute to prize fund)
Discount 1: $20 less for Juniors (under 20), Seniors (60 and older), Women, and FMs.
$30 less for Juniors (under 12), and IMs. Free entry for GMs.
No discount for Amateur players; only one discount per player.
Discount 2: $5 discount per tournament to play in both Labour Day and Thanksgiving Open.
This discount applies to all players.
Registration: 9:00-10:30AM on Saturday, September 5th
Registrants after 10:30AM are not guaranteed to be paired by 11:00AM
In advance by mail to: Bryan Lamb 95 Ferncliffe Crescent, Markham ON L3S4N6
Make cheque payable to Bryan Lamb. No postdated cheque please.
Email registration to bryan.lamb@rogers.com. Email registrants who haven’t paid must arrive onsite before 10:30AM to pay or will be charged the onsite fee.
Alex ( since I know Bryan doesn't follow ChessTalk ):
The Toronto Labour Day tournament is only 1 1/2 wks. away. Is there going to be a pre-registered list posted on the website or here?
Bob
Hi Bob,
There wasn't a list ready a few days ago when I talked to Bryan, but I'll ask him when we're closer to the tournament. Labour Day Tournament has been the single biggest annual event in Toronto and everyone knows it's a huge success, I don't think there's a concern with numbers or competition of any sort.
I do know that there's a group of 8 of us (so far) from the Hart House Chess Club that will be there for sure though ;)
And I already paid my entry fee!
PRIZES: $7,000
(Based on 150 non-amateur players or 70 %)
1st place in Open Section - Prize of $1,000 Guaranteed!
The Toronto Labour Day was always my favourite Toronto-area tournament. If I could travel to Toronto for the long weekend, I would to play in that tournament.
One question for the organizer(s): Why base the prize fund on 150 non-amateur players, when last year the tournament only had 142 players total? Wouldn't it be better to base it on roughly the number of non-amateur players that registered last year to make the prize money a little more accurate?
Otherwise, you may as well state that the prize fund is $100,000 based on a whole lot more players... ;)
No matter how big and bad you are, when a two-year-old hands you a toy phone, you answer it.
One question for the organizer(s): Why base the prize fund on 150 non-amateur players, when last year the tournament only had 142 players total? Wouldn't it be better to base it on roughly the number of non-amateur players that registered last year to make the prize money a little more accurate?
Otherwise, you may as well state that the prize fund is $100,000 based on a whole lot more players... ;)
Good questions and good points Jordan. You are actually questionning the concept of tournaments with "prize funds based on X participants", that I have already written about in HPE.
The Toronto Labour Day was always my favourite Toronto-area tournament. If I could travel to Toronto for the long weekend, I would to play in that tournament.
One question for the organizer(s): Why base the prize fund on 150 non-amateur players, when last year the tournament only had 142 players total? Wouldn't it be better to base it on roughly the number of non-amateur players that registered last year to make the prize money a little more accurate?
Otherwise, you may as well state that the prize fund is $100,000 based on a whole lot more players... ;)
LOL! I love how you are comparing a 8 player difference in prize money to a $100,000 prize pool.
LOL! I love how you are comparing a 8 player difference in prize money to a $100,000 prize pool.
Sometimes to make a point a thing or two may have to be exagerated, otherwise some people wearing the wrong glasses or no glasses at all have difficulties to see things unless they are big enough.
If you have better figures why don't you come up with them ? Out of 142 players last year, how many exactly were "non-amateurs" ? 100, 110, 120 ? Yes it can be a difference of only 8 (unlikely) but also 30 or 50, resulting in a prize fund reduced by 40 or 50%, depending on the fixed expenses the organizer has to pay for.
This is a real issue because in the past organizers with "based prize funds" have often been too optimistic with their projections. They use inflated prize funds to attract people, and then deflate the prize fund according to the actual participation. But those participants have paid the full entry, not a reduced one to match the reduced prizes.
This is a recipe to lose customers (players) in the long run. You give back less then what the players paid for and expected and you let them absorb the financial deficit even though they are not responsible for the turnout (quite the opposite: they showed up!). If an organizer makes unreasonable projections thus raising expectations, or does not work hard enough (or efficiently enough) to attract people and reach his goals (talking in general I am not saying it is the case here), shouldn't he be responsible to give the prizes he attracted people with ? (At least it is my theory. But on this message board, there is another theory running, saying the organizer can do whatever he wants without being ever responsible... It is the CFC that is responsible...or the players that didn't show up...)
Sometimes to make a point a thing or two may have to be exagerated, otherwise some people wearing the wrong glasses or no glasses at all have difficulties to see things unless they are big enough.
If you have better figures why don't you come up with them ? Out of 142 players last year, how many exactly were "non-amateurs" ? 100, 110, 120 ? Yes it can be a difference of only 8 (unlikely) but also 30 or 50, resulting in a prize fund reduced by 40 or 50%, depending on the fixed expenses the organizer has to pay for.
This is a real issue because in the past organizers with "based prize funds" have often been too optimistic with their projections. They use inflated prize funds to attract people, and then deflate the prize fund according to the actual participation. But those participants have paid the full entry, not a reduced one to match the reduced prizes.
This is a recipe to lose customers (players) in the long run. You give back less then what the players paid for and expected and you let them absorb the financial deficit even though they are not responsible for the turnout (quite the opposite: they showed up!). If an organizer makes unreasonable projections thus raising expectations, or does not work hard enough (or efficiently enough) to attract people and reach his goals (talking in general I am not saying it is the case here), shouldn't he be responsible to give the prizes he attracted people with ? (At least it is my theory. But on this message board, there is another theory running, saying the organizer can do whatever he wants without being ever responsible... It is the CFC that is responsible...or the players that didn't show up...)
LOL AGAIN @ your lengthy reply!! MY ONLY POINT IN MY PREVIOUS POST JUST IN CASE PEOPLE HAVEN'T BEEN FOLLOWING WHAT I SAID WAS AIMED AT THE COMPARISON MADE BY JORDAN, THATS IT THATS ALL BUT THANKS FOR THE OTHERWISE HEFTY REPLY THANKS JEAN FOR ENLIGHTENING ME ON THE MATTER........
Comment