If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Policy / Politique
The fee for tournament organizers advertising on ChessTalk is $20/event or $100/yearly unlimited for the year.
Les frais d'inscription des organisateurs de tournoi sur ChessTalk sont de 20 $/événement ou de 100 $/année illimitée.
You can etransfer to Henry Lam at chesstalkforum at gmail dot com
Transfér à Henry Lam à chesstalkforum@gmail.com
Dark Knight / Le Chevalier Noir
General Guidelines
---- Nous avons besoin d'un traduction français!
Some Basics
1. Under Board "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQs) there are 3 sections dealing with General Forum Usage, User Profile Features, and Reading and Posting Messages. These deal with everything from Avatars to Your Notifications. Most general technical questions are covered there. Here is a link to the FAQs. https://forum.chesstalk.com/help
2. Consider using the SEARCH button if you are looking for information. You may find your question has already been answered in a previous thread.
3. If you've looked for an answer to a question, and not found one, then you should consider asking your question in a new thread. For example, there have already been questions and discussion regarding: how to do chess diagrams (FENs); crosstables that line up properly; and the numerous little “glitches” that every new site will have.
4. Read pinned or sticky threads, like this one, if they look important. This applies especially to newcomers.
5. Read the thread you're posting in before you post. There are a variety of ways to look at a thread. These are covered under “Display Modes”.
6. Thread titles: please provide some details in your thread title. This is useful for a number of reasons. It helps ChessTalk members to quickly skim the threads. It prevents duplication of threads. And so on.
7. Unnecessary thread proliferation (e.g., deliberately creating a new thread that duplicates existing discussion) is discouraged. Look to see if a thread on your topic may have already been started and, if so, consider adding your contribution to the pre-existing thread. However, starting new threads to explore side-issues that are not relevant to the original subject is strongly encouraged. A single thread on the Canadian Open, with hundreds of posts on multiple sub-topics, is no better than a dozen threads on the Open covering only a few topics. Use your good judgment when starting a new thread.
8. If and/or when sub-forums are created, please make sure to create threads in the proper place.
Debate
9. Give an opinion and back it up with a reason. Throwaway comments such as "Game X pwnz because my friend and I think so!" could be considered pointless at best, and inflammatory at worst.
10. Try to give your own opinions, not simply those copied and pasted from reviews or opinions of your friends.
Unacceptable behavior and warnings
11. In registering here at ChessTalk please note that the same or similar rules apply here as applied at the previous Boardhost message board. In particular, the following content is not permitted to appear in any messages:
* Racism
* Hatred
* Harassment
* Adult content
* Obscene material
* Nudity or pornography
* Material that infringes intellectual property or other proprietary rights of any party
* Material the posting of which is tortious or violates a contractual or fiduciary obligation you or we owe to another party
* Piracy, hacking, viruses, worms, or warez
* Spam
* Any illegal content
* unapproved Commercial banner advertisements or revenue-generating links
* Any link to or any images from a site containing any material outlined in these restrictions
* Any material deemed offensive or inappropriate by the Board staff
12. Users are welcome to challenge other points of view and opinions, but should do so respectfully. Personal attacks on others will not be tolerated. Posts and threads with unacceptable content can be closed or deleted altogether. Furthermore, a range of sanctions are possible - from a simple warning to a temporary or even a permanent banning from ChessTalk.
Helping to Moderate
13. 'Report' links (an exclamation mark inside a triangle) can be found in many places throughout the board. These links allow users to alert the board staff to anything which is offensive, objectionable or illegal. Please consider using this feature if the need arises.
Advice for free
14. You should exercise the same caution with Private Messages as you would with any public posting.
There are certainly a lot of players who have norms and ratings just under 2500 who have not quite fulfilled requirements for the grandmaster title. I was reminded by this when I read some more about Willy Hendriks, popular chess author. (he is one)
I am going to start a list even though it could get quite numerous (maybe into the thousands ?)
Willy Hendrix
also names from the past in Canadian chess (only because they are so familiar with me)
Lawrence Day
Bryon Nickoloff
Jan Teplitsky
Deen Hergott
Frank Anderson
Zvonko Vranesic
Bruce Amos
Leonid Gerzhoy
Nikolay Noritsyn
Edward Porper
Igor Zugic
Raja Panjwani
Tomas Krnan
Artiom Samsonkin
Shiyam Thavandiran
Zhe Quan
Stephen Glinert
Feel free to contribute (especially current players)
Last edited by Hans Jung; Thursday, 18th March, 2021, 04:46 PM.
There are certainly a lot of players who have norms and ratings just under 2500 who have not quite fulfilled requirements for the grandmaster title. I was reminded by this when I read some more about Willy Hendriks, popular chess author. (he is one)
I am going to start a list even though it could get quite numerous (maybe into the thousands ?)
Willy Hendrix
also names from the past in Canadian chess (only because they are so familiar with me)
Lawrence Day
Bryon Nickoloff
Jan Teplitsky
Deen Hergott
Frank Anderson
Zvonko Vranesic
Feel free to contribute (especially current players)
Canada is noted for having some strong IMs who probably would be GMs if they lived in Europe, if they had the financial and coaching support to concentrate on playing, not teaching. I think of people with GM potential like Bindi Cheng, Jean Hébert, Goran Milicevic, Artiom Samsonkin, and Shiyam Thavandiran.
Canada is noted for having some strong IMs who probably would be GMs if they lived in Europe, if they had the financial and coaching support to concentrate on playing, not teaching. I think of people with GM potential like Bindi Cheng, Jean Hébert, Goran Milicevic, Artiom Samsonkin, and Shiyam Thavandiran.
There are two others I can think of. Roman Pelts made an IM norm at one of the Olympiads in Greece. Ray Stone made a couple I think; one at a World Open in Philadelphia where he defeated Larry Christiansen. Not sure of the other.
There are two others I can think of. Roman Pelts made an IM norm at one of the Olympiads in Greece. Ray Stone made a couple I think; one at a World Open in Philadelphia where he defeated Larry Christiansen. Not sure of the other.
In 1984 Olympiad Pelts, 2435, on 4th board, +5=6-0, almost all games as White?, had a great 2540 performance. Against GMs +1=2-0, against IMs +2=0-0. Finished 4th for board 4 prize. I don't know what the norm rules were then.
There are two others I can think of. Roman Pelts made an IM norm at one of the Olympiads in Greece. Ray Stone made a couple I think; one at a World Open in Philadelphia where he defeated Larry Christiansen. Not sure of the other.
Raymond Stone defeated GM Larry Christiansen in the 1987 World Open, but Christensen tied for third, 7-3, winning $1,433. First was Gulko and Miles, 8-2 winning $16,138. Stone scored 6-4, tied With GMs Anand, Djurich, and oldsters Byrne, Reshevsky and Bisguier,.
How could I forget Raja Panjwani who has 3 GM norms but needs to get his raying to 2500? - and Tomas Krnan who has at least one GM norm and is also close to 2500.
How could I forget Raja Panjwani who has 3 GM norms but needs to get his raying to 2500? - and Tomas Krnan who has at least one GM norm and is also close to 2500.
I believe Victor Plotkin has 2 norms and was well on his way to his third norm at the 2020 Senior Team World Championship, when the tournament was cut short because of COVID. I seem to recall Victor performing over 2500, but only played 7 games.
For the record, I got 1 IM norm back at the 1986 World Open.
I think the world has too many GM's. From less than 100 in the late 60's to 1500 today. We need a new title or titling system - e.g. the top 100 by rating at any given time are given a separate title. They could drop out of the top 100 - losing the new title - but possibly getting it back with an increase in rating.
The US has 101 GM's - I've heard of maybe 20 or 25 of them. If you're inviting a US GM to a tournament - do you look at the name or the rating? Would you care if no one has heard of your invited GM?
I was only planning to list GM candidates but maybe I should list IM candidates as well.
GM candidates from the most realistic point of view:
1. IM N.Noritsyn - rating above 2500, 1 GM norm. Plays GM level for very long period of time. Doesn't have too many opportunities for GM norms, since he plays only in Canada. Looks like Olympiads are the most real chance for him.
2. IM R.Panjwani - 3 GM norms, but never crossed 2500 level. Needs about 50 rating points for the title. Alternate very good and mediocre tournaments. Absolutely capable with his talent, but needs to play better in bad tournaments.
3. IM L.Gerzhoy. Actually he is probably the closest one as he needs only 1 GM norm. That means, he is just 1 good tournament from the title. However, his current rating of 2348 makes me sad. He lost more than 150 points from his maximum, he is just 33 y.o.
4. IM A.Samsonkin and IM T.Krnan both have 1 norm.
5. Obviously, every young 2350+ player and every talented and ambitious junior have a chance... But it will take time.
Thanks Victor. There is another one I missed. Artiom Samsomkin will always be known to me as the giant killer. He crushed Nakamura in 2009 in Toronto in front of my popping eyes!
Comment