I am not trying to get another of those... (Not Chess Related)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • I am not trying to get another of those... (Not Chess Related)

    long, "Yes, there is!" and "No, there is not!" discussions going. I merely present this article or Op-Ed as someone called the previous URL for your information.

    http://www.financialpost.com/opinion...tml?id=2083871

  • #2
    Sources of Concern

    Too bad the discussion just stopped short when it got interesting.

    This above-mentioned article starts with :

    This week, the doomsters were embarrassed to learn, once again, that the planet was not in grave peril. Antarctica, their greatest candidate for catastrophe, was not melting at an ever-faster rate, according to a report in Geophysical Research Letters, but at the slowest rate in 30 years. To add to their frustration, they couldn't even lash out at the lead author, Marco Tedesco of the Earth and Atmospheric Sciences Department of City College of New York -- the doomsters had praised his previous reports showing high rates of Antarctic melt.
    Here is the abstract of the Tedesco and Monagan 2009 article :

    A 30-year minimum Antarctic snowmelt record occurred during austral summer 2008–2009 according to spaceborne microwave observations for 1980–2009. Strong positive phases of both the El-Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) and the Southern Hemisphere Annular Mode (SAM) were recorded during the months leading up to and including the 2008–2009 melt season. The 30-year record confirms that significant negative correlations exist at regional and continental scales between austral summer melting and both the ENSO and SAM indices for October–January. In particular, the strongest negative melting anomalies (such as those in 2008 and 2009) are related to amplified large-scale atmospheric forcing when both the SAM and ENSO are in positive phases. Our results suggest that enhanced snowmelt is likely to occur if recent positive summer SAM trends subside in conjunction with the projected recovery of stratospheric ozone levels, with subsequent impacts on ice sheet mass balance and sea level trends.
    Source: http://climatechangepsychology.blogs...aghan-grl.html

    I wonder why the agnostics would like to boast about that. In fact, I really wonder what is there to understand about that data. Too bad the author does not take time to educate the reader.

    The second paragraph is even more interesting. The miraculous return of the artic ice seems again a victory for the agnostics. Instead of telling us why it is so, the author tells us this very relevant story about a scoundrel who tried to sell carbon credit.

    The last part about a documentary of the article is intriguing. Unfortunately, the description only emphasizes the reddening of the faces. More could be found by going there and following the breadcrumbs :

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Not_Evil_Just_Wrong

    Don't forget to overcheck every source, since this page seems quite heavily edited by agnostics, if not by the authors of the documentary themselves. By the way, there is money to make for agnostics willing to spread the word into the wikisphere and the bloggosphere. Writing is an industry, like everything else.

    Energy Probe says it does not receive money from corporation or union. But it receives 80% of its fundings from foundations. Where these foundations get their money is not spelled out.
    Last edited by Benoit St-Pierre; Sunday, 11th October, 2009, 05:29 PM.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: I am not trying to get another of those... (Not Chess Related)

      Originally posted by J. Ken MacDonald View Post
      long, "Yes, there is!" and "No, there is not!" discussions going. I merely present this article or Op-Ed as someone called the previous URL for your information.

      http://www.financialpost.com/opinion...tml?id=2083871
      Ken,

      Thanks for posting this article. It illustrates once again, the "more hype than fact" agruments made against the climate change "alarmists".:( To quote from the article:

      This week, the doomsters were embarrassed to learn, once again, that the planet was not in grave peril. Antarctica, their greatest candidate for catastrophe, was not melting at an ever-faster rate, according to a report in Geophysical Research Letters, but at the slowest rate in 30 years.....

      Two years ago with the Arctic ice in rapid retreat, the doomsters, convinced of the coming of an ice-free Arctic, could scarcely contain themselves. Now, with the Arctic ice in rapid return, their anticipation of disaster seems more a cruel hoax of Nature.

      The 1st paragraph states that the Antartica ice is still melting, but just at a slower rate.......but then the 2nd paragraph claims it's "in rapid return". ??

      Is the 2nd paragraph referring to ice in the Arctic or Antarctic? Paul??

      Anyway, throw a ton of salt at this article, I'm not convinced yet. Go Green!
      Last edited by Bob Gillanders; Saturday, 10th October, 2009, 10:46 AM.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: I am not trying to get another of those... (Not Chess Related)

        Originally posted by Bob Gillanders View Post
        Ken,

        Thanks for posting this article. It illustrates once again, the "more hype than fact" agruments made against the climate change "alarmists".:( To quote from the article:

        This week, the doomsters were embarrassed to learn, once again, that the planet was not in grave peril. Antarctica, their greatest candidate for catastrophe, was not melting at an ever-faster rate, according to a report in Geophysical Research Letters, but at the slowest rate in 30 years.....

        Two years ago with the Arctic ice in rapid retreat, the doomsters, convinced of the coming of an ice-free Arctic, could scarcely contain themselves. Now, with the Arctic ice in rapid return, their anticipation of disaster seems more a cruel hoax of Nature.

        The 1st paragraph states that the Antartica ice is still melting, but just at a slower rate.......but then the 2nd paragraph claims it's "in rapid return". ??

        Is the 2nd paragraph referring to ice in the Arctic or Antarctic? Paul??

        Anyway, throw a ton of salt at this article, I'm not convinced yet. Go Green!
        salt melts snow what the heck are trying to do, make things worse :)

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: I am not trying to get another of those... (Not Chess Related)

          Originally posted by J. Ken MacDonald View Post
          long, "Yes, there is!" and "No, there is not!" discussions going. I merely present this article or Op-Ed as someone called the previous URL for your information.

          http://www.financialpost.com/opinion...tml?id=2083871
          Some other articles:

          http://www.shortnews.com/start.cfm?id=76028

          http://www.dailytech.com/Article.aspx?newsid=13834

          http://constitutionallyright.com/?p=866

          Here is one article in december 2008:

          Recent satellite photos reveal a vast ice sheet covering the Arctic Ocean. This is a noteworthy development because of concern among some scientists that the Arctic Ice Cap would disappear entirely this year due to predictions of Global Warming.

          Reported by the University of Illinois's Arctic Climate Research Center, the study concludes that worldwide sea ice covering is equal to that monitored in 1979, when satellite photos first became available of the Arctic.

          Researchers predicted that the thinness of the new Arctic sea ice meant it would melt more quickly. This actually fostered its growth because less snow accumulated on the ice as it grew. In related news, Polar Bear numbers are on the rise.


          This good news has been completly dropped by the fact that many new studies coming out this year were done with the data before last winter (1979 to 2007).

          So when you see an article that says : "A NEW STUDY SHOWS THAT ICE MELT MORE RAPIDLY THAN WE THOUGHT", verify if this new study was done from data of the 1979 to 2007 (which is correct but hide the recent winter results). Some other studies talks about the 1979 to 2008 period but they do not include the august-december 2008 data.

          Why the Arctic ice came back completly in one winter? Some scientists says that the ice was thin and water was then covering it. With the very very cold wind of last winter (the sun is in a quiet phase) this created the formation of ice very rapidly. On a thick ice surface covered with snow, the increase would have been slower.

          Carl
          Last edited by Carl Bilodeau; Saturday, 10th October, 2009, 02:46 PM.

          Comment


          • #6
            Going again to the Source

            These are basically three articles cross-referencing each other. Since their only scientific reference was about a study conducted by the Arctic Climate Research at the University of Illinois, it might have been a good idea to point to their own site. So here it is :

            http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/

            What is interesting is that they maintain on their main page:

            Sea ice extent averaged over the Northern Hemisphere has decreased correspondingly over the past 50 years (shown right). The largest change has been observed in the summer months with decreases exceeding 30%. Decreases observed in winter are more modest.
            That said, it might be interesting to look around the site just for the fun of it. One can find there many interesting data sets, graphics, animations, etc. Almost as ugly as a Canadian GMI's blog, and almost as entertaining.

            By some miracle, the editorial content is near null, even if there are papers; see the links at the right column, under "Recent papers". Here is an interesting hypothesis : in a webpage, the editorial content is inversely proportional to the data it contains. I am sure there are studies on the subject by communication theorists and public relation practicians.
            Last edited by Benoit St-Pierre; Saturday, 10th October, 2009, 05:15 PM.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: I am not trying to get another of those... (Not Chess Related)

              Ken, your source is well know to be biased against the idea of climate change. It is almost guaranteed that any National Post article on climate change will have the view that it is not happening. To get a more balanced viewpoint, you might do better looking at some of the Globe and Mail articles...

              Comment


              • #8
                National Post is a Conservative Newspaper and...

                Globe and Mail is a Liberal Newspaper.

                I subscribe to what I enjoy most. Except, I get the Saturday G&M for Berry's chess column.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: National Post is a Conservative Newspaper and...

                  Originally posted by J. Ken MacDonald View Post
                  Globe and Mail is a Liberal Newspaper.

                  I subscribe to what I enjoy most. Except, I get the Saturday G&M for Berry's chess column.
                  I seem to remember the Globe and Mail being Canada's answer to the Wall Street Journal... did it used to be that, say 13 years ago, and it's been changed since then?

                  I remember the Toronto Star being the liberal paper in Toronto.
                  Only the rushing is heard...
                  Onward flies the bird.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: I am not trying to get another of those... (Not Chess Related)

                    Originally posted by Paul Beckwith View Post
                    Ken, your source is well know to be biased against the idea of climate change. It is almost guaranteed that any National Post article on climate change will have the view that it is not happening. To get a more balanced viewpoint, you might do better looking at some of the Globe and Mail articles...
                    Just because he is biased doesn't mean he is not correct.:)

                    I would consider the following required reading:

                    http://network.nationalpost.com/np/b...e-deniers.aspx

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Globe and Mail...

                      Globe and Mail's Report on Business section was similar to the WSJ, but not even close as to depth of coverage. The Star is liberal and the G&M seems to me to lean left also. The Star seems to me to have anti-USA and Anti-Israel columnists, so I CXL'd my subscription awhile back. I have a hard enough time getting through a single newspaper a day, never mind a couple or three!

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: National Post is a Conservative Newspaper and...

                        Compared to the National Post, anything else in Canada would be seen as liberal...
                        I think that most people would say that the Globe and Mail is more balanced politically than other papers.

                        I try to avoid the political bias by not subscribing to any paper. I read whatever papers are available at the local coffee shops, usually the Globe and Mail, Ottawa Citizen, and sometimes the National Post.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Going again to the Source

                          Originally posted by Benoit St-Pierre View Post
                          ...
                          By some miracle, the editorial content is near null, even if there are papers; see the links at the right column, under "Recent papers". Here is an interesting hypothesis : in a webpage, the editorial content is inversely proportional to the data it contains. I am sure there are studies on the subject by communication theorists and public relation practicians.
                          The Sea Ice Ends Year 2008 at Same Level as 1979. The data is from satellite data. The website is from a very good USA university.

                          See by yourself 2008 result:

                          http://images.dailytech.com/nimage/9...daily.gsia.jpg

                          Carl

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: I am not trying to get another of those... (Not Chess Related)

                            First there was the news that Rio gets the 2016 Olympics. Ok, first South American city ever to be awarded an Olympics, great.

                            Now comes word that Golf will be in that Olympics. Tiger Woods, the world's biggest ego, is ecstatic. He thinks it will be great.

                            Duh.... golf, Rio. Guess what comes next?

                            CUTTING DOWN THE AMAZON RAIN FOREST FOR GOLF COURSES!

                            Oh, well, we have 2012 and the end of civilization to save us from ourselves.
                            Only the rushing is heard...
                            Onward flies the bird.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Worth How Many Words?

                              Originally posted by Carl Bilodeau View Post
                              The Sea Ice Ends Year 2008 at Same Level as 1979. The data is from satellite data. The website is from a very good USA university.

                              See by yourself 2008 result:

                              http://images.dailytech.com/nimage/9...daily.gsia.jpg
                              Charts don't speak by themselves: what is your interpretation of them? Can the chart differentiate new ice with old one? Spell out what you are trying to convey!

                              Taking the words is easier. See :

                              Recent observed surface air temperature changes over the Arctic region are the largest in the world. Winter (DJF) rates of warming exceed 4 degrees C. over portions of the Arctic land areas (shown left).
                              That sentence is easy to interpret: it means that air temperature is heating up quite abnormaly. I don't know how that counts into the overall analysis of global warming, but I would venture to think it's not unimportant. It's easy to forget about ice quality and concentrate only on surface; it's more difficult to tweak air temperature.

                              Here are some other parameters that are studied :
                              • Total cloudiness
                              • Solar radiation
                              • Longwave radiation
                              • Net surface radiation
                              • Cloud net radiative forcing
                              • Surface air temperature
                              • Sea level pressure
                              • Precipitation
                              • Precipitation (Arctic Ocean focus)
                              • Precipitation - Evaporation (P-E)


                              We should not cherry-pick. Here is their page where is taken the chart, splendidly entitled **Cryosphere Today**:

                              http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/

                              Here are some interesting charts:

                              Recent ice area (with an Anomaly line) :

                              http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosph...urrent.365.jpg

                              Ice area 1978-2010 (notice where ends the last line):

                              http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosph...rrent.area.jpg

                              Northern Hemisphere Ice Anomaly (why they call it that):

                              http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosph...rrent.anom.jpg

                              Seasonal sea ice (1900-2007) :

                              http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosph....1900-2007.jpg

                              From what I can gather, I'd say all is far from clear; in the last chart, the summer ice forms a strange pattern, reminding me of our noble national sport ;-) I'd ask our in-house climatologist, then maybe another one: a right-wing friend of mine. Yes, I can have right-wing friends, and he's even more right-wing than one might think.

                              Without questioning how you base your evaluation of that particular university, I'd say that extrapolating from a serious university data does not make one more serious instantly. In any case, the subject seems tough enough that we should take an op-ed taken from a newspaper with a very clear-cut editorial line with a grain of salt:

                              http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CanWest...ation_of_power

                              The editorial lines of Constitutionally Right is even more appaling. Short News and Daily Tech are just news relays. Everyone could write a story and get them published there.
                              Last edited by Benoit St-Pierre; Tuesday, 13th October, 2009, 08:11 PM.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X