If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Policy / Politique
The fee for tournament organizers advertising on ChessTalk is $20/event or $100/yearly unlimited for the year.
Les frais d'inscription des organisateurs de tournoi sur ChessTalk sont de 20 $/événement ou de 100 $/année illimitée.
You can etransfer to Henry Lam at chesstalkforum at gmail dot com
Transfér à Henry Lam à chesstalkforum@gmail.com
Dark Knight / Le Chevalier Noir
General Guidelines
---- Nous avons besoin d'un traduction français!
Some Basics
1. Under Board "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQs) there are 3 sections dealing with General Forum Usage, User Profile Features, and Reading and Posting Messages. These deal with everything from Avatars to Your Notifications. Most general technical questions are covered there. Here is a link to the FAQs. https://forum.chesstalk.com/help
2. Consider using the SEARCH button if you are looking for information. You may find your question has already been answered in a previous thread.
3. If you've looked for an answer to a question, and not found one, then you should consider asking your question in a new thread. For example, there have already been questions and discussion regarding: how to do chess diagrams (FENs); crosstables that line up properly; and the numerous little “glitches” that every new site will have.
4. Read pinned or sticky threads, like this one, if they look important. This applies especially to newcomers.
5. Read the thread you're posting in before you post. There are a variety of ways to look at a thread. These are covered under “Display Modes”.
6. Thread titles: please provide some details in your thread title. This is useful for a number of reasons. It helps ChessTalk members to quickly skim the threads. It prevents duplication of threads. And so on.
7. Unnecessary thread proliferation (e.g., deliberately creating a new thread that duplicates existing discussion) is discouraged. Look to see if a thread on your topic may have already been started and, if so, consider adding your contribution to the pre-existing thread. However, starting new threads to explore side-issues that are not relevant to the original subject is strongly encouraged. A single thread on the Canadian Open, with hundreds of posts on multiple sub-topics, is no better than a dozen threads on the Open covering only a few topics. Use your good judgment when starting a new thread.
8. If and/or when sub-forums are created, please make sure to create threads in the proper place.
Debate
9. Give an opinion and back it up with a reason. Throwaway comments such as "Game X pwnz because my friend and I think so!" could be considered pointless at best, and inflammatory at worst.
10. Try to give your own opinions, not simply those copied and pasted from reviews or opinions of your friends.
Unacceptable behavior and warnings
11. In registering here at ChessTalk please note that the same or similar rules apply here as applied at the previous Boardhost message board. In particular, the following content is not permitted to appear in any messages:
* Racism
* Hatred
* Harassment
* Adult content
* Obscene material
* Nudity or pornography
* Material that infringes intellectual property or other proprietary rights of any party
* Material the posting of which is tortious or violates a contractual or fiduciary obligation you or we owe to another party
* Piracy, hacking, viruses, worms, or warez
* Spam
* Any illegal content
* unapproved Commercial banner advertisements or revenue-generating links
* Any link to or any images from a site containing any material outlined in these restrictions
* Any material deemed offensive or inappropriate by the Board staff
12. Users are welcome to challenge other points of view and opinions, but should do so respectfully. Personal attacks on others will not be tolerated. Posts and threads with unacceptable content can be closed or deleted altogether. Furthermore, a range of sanctions are possible - from a simple warning to a temporary or even a permanent banning from ChessTalk.
Helping to Moderate
13. 'Report' links (an exclamation mark inside a triangle) can be found in many places throughout the board. These links allow users to alert the board staff to anything which is offensive, objectionable or illegal. Please consider using this feature if the need arises.
Advice for free
14. You should exercise the same caution with Private Messages as you would with any public posting.
i think it should be no yearly membership fee and just a pay per use considering there is no magazine...up the tournament fee to $5 or $10 or whatever. if the only service we are paying for is ratings, a pay per use is reasonable.
Pay per use implies that the fees are related to the costs of providing the service. Currently at $3 per person, per tournament, these fees are lucrative for the CFC and don't require any increase. Raise participation and the volume of fees will go up. It seems to me that this is already happening.
If we could just raise Canadian participation to U.S. levels we would not even have a problem.
Lets not build new empires when we were just recently forced to dismantle the old one.
Re: Would you change the CFC Ordinary Members' fee?
The CFC provides no value whatsoever for the $42 dollars annual fee. If you didn't need membership in the CFC to play in rated chess tournaments, you can be 100% sure that membership numbers would drop to zero. This large membership fee (with tournament entry fees on top) is a barrier to participation in chess events for new players.
Re: Would you change the CFC Ordinary Members' fee?
As stated in my post the CFC fees should decrease. Without a magazine with a membership what's the point?. Please correct me if I'm wrong but did the CFC remove the $10 single tournament fee. This would force every member if playing in 1 tournament a year to buy a years membership? Northern Ontario has rated our own tournaments for the last 2 years due to the deficit and hundreds of dollars lost for rating fees from the CFC. Northern Ontario a whole will reconsider supporting the CFC if the organization come up with something for the membership fees as well as rating the tournaments which are payed for by the TD.
The CFC provides no value whatsoever for the $42 dollars annual fee. If you didn't need membership in the CFC to play in rated chess tournaments, you can be 100% sure that membership numbers would drop to zero. This large membership fee (with tournament entry fees on top) is a barrier to participation in chess events for new players.
How many new CFC members does anyone think will show up at the upcoming Canadian Open? (I suppose we really should not count people who used to be CFC members and have come back for what likely is one tournament).
The price tag for the entry fee + CFC membership would be rather hefty... I guess whatever the current tournament membership would be attractive so save a few dollars if this was a single shot deal.
At the club the other night I heard someone ask (rhetorically) why they should pay $20 a game to get hammered by someone a zillion rating points higher only to move on to pay the same to play someone around 1500? I haven't seen a clear announcement of the pairing system they intend to use (perhaps I missed that) but if it is one big section (even with accelerated pairings) it likely will result in see-saw opposition for most middle folk 1700-2000 or thereabouts.
This is a poll to see if respondents would like to change the current price of an Ordinary (adult) annual CFC membership fee.
There is some justification, perhaps, for raising the fee, given that the CFC now produces a monthly email newsletter. In the past, when the CFC had a print magazine, issues were produced every two months, at the most.
I believe the current price of a CFC membership is $36, plus the applicable provincial association fee. In Ontario, for example, the total cost to be an Ordinary CFC member is $43.
If I say who wants to pay more for the coffee the answer of the poll will be obvious.
The question is: Do you have a plan? Raising the fees is not a plan. If you have a plan then raise the fees so that you can make it happen and forget the polls. There is no business if you don't take risks.
In Karate the budget for an individual yound or adult here in Montreal is between 100 to 150$ per month, 8-9 months per years including the competitions fees. Create projects, take risks and within 5 years people in Chess could spend the same money (they will not tell you that because they don't know that they will accept to pay this price). I pay this price for 5 of my kids every months. In my city in South Shore of Montreal there is at least 3 Karate Clubs with more than 200 members.
Forget those who can't pay, their personal finances are not your responsabilities. If you have good events and prizes they will find a job or sell chocolate bar to be there.
Re: Would you change the CFC Ordinary Members' fee?
Carl:
Maybe the CFC already has their own plan. In any case, some extra cash can't hurt the CFCs cause, if enough members are supportive enough to tolerate a fee increase.
For what it's worth, I gave my own 11 point plan in another thread. However any proposed plan(s) might not lend themselves well to a poll. Respondents to the present poll may assume that the CFC would develop a plan to use the extra income, if they don't already have one that would be advanced further with the extra income. Dividing opinion over which, if any, proposed plan to adopt would make people even less likely to accept a fee increase.
Anything that can go wrong will go wrong. Murphy's law, by Edward A. Murphy Jr., USAF, Aerospace Engineer
In Karate the budget for an individual yound or adult here in Montreal is between 100 to 150$ per month, 8-9 months per years including the competitions fees.
What are the competitions fees in karate? (if you can break them in levels similar to chess: Canadian Open and Closed 150-200; opens 40-100; club tournaments 0-30, etc)
Re: Would you change the CFC Ordinary Members' fee?
Why would members support a fee increase for an organization that gives them nothing?
It doesn't cost $42 per member to operate an online rating database. And this ridiculous fee is a distinct barrier to new players taking up chess. I have personally spoken to people who would like to try out tournament chess but could not afford a $42 CFC membership + $40 entry fee. At least when there was a magazine they got some value for their money, but now they get nothing, not even an email newsletter (I've heard that such a newsletter exists, but I've been a CFC member for the last two years and I've never received one).
And whose bright idea was this email newsletter anyway? Why not just post the content for free on the front page of the CFC website to perhaps capture some public interest? I would actually be willing to pay membership fees if they were going to support a good quality website.
Re: Would you change the CFC Ordinary Members' fee?
Hi Patrick:
The CFC did not uniformly collect all members' e-mails in the past. So when they started the newsletter last September, they had to ask all members who weren't getting it to e-mail the CFC office so they could be put into the e-mail group. You obviously have to do this.
It is a very good newsletter according to everyone. And everyone seems to enjoy getting it e-mailed to them directly, rather than going to a website. In fact CFC did have a webzine for a short while, after the demise of the print magazine, but it was not of very good quality, hard to keep up, and not competitive with all the other very good chess websites out there. That's the reason CFC went to an e-newsletter instead.
Why would members support a fee increase for an organization that gives them nothing?
It doesn't cost $42 per member to operate an online rating database. And this ridiculous fee is a distinct barrier to new players taking up chess. I have personally spoken to people who would like to try out tournament chess but could not afford a $42 CFC membership + $40 entry fee. At least when there was a magazine they got some value for their money, but now they get nothing, not even an email newsletter (I've heard that such a newsletter exists, but I've been a CFC member for the last two years and I've never received one).
And whose bright idea was this email newsletter anyway? Why not just post the content for free on the front page of the CFC website to perhaps capture some public interest? I would actually be willing to pay membership fees if they were going to support a good quality website.
Hi Patrick
1) Afaik the total fee is $43 for Ontario CFC members, not $42.
2) A newsletter exists; you missed early appeals for CFC members to send in their email addresses so that they could receive it (I would think that the CFC ought to post this prominently on their website, if they don't already).
3) Posting the newsletter on the CFC website for all to see 'for free' not only gives away a service that's a privilege of being a CFC member to all, but this goes against the logic of your own earlier somewhat erroneous point (i.e. your claim that members don't even have a magazine/newsletter, as a benefit of membership).
4) An arguable 'virtue' of the webzine, while it existed, was that some info could be given away 'for free' in its 'public' section, but some members were annoyed that such a freebie was given away on such a large scale (the print magazine was ideal for giving freebies away, on a small scale, now and then to people for the sake of local CFC promotion). A webzine was a good idea in theory, but in practice it could not be sustained since apparently not enough submitted material could be put on it on a continual basis.
5) You've got a point about people who only want to try out tournament chess without committing themselves to an expensive CFC membership, given that they might stop after at least one event (at least they would have a newsletter, if the CFC got their email address). However the CFC has had this problem for decades, when they had a print magazine bi-monthly. Now at least they have a monthly newsletter.
6) The newsletter was the idea of the current CFC President Eric Van Dusen. You can talk to him anytime since he lives in our city and goes to the RA, including some weekend events, and the Annual EOCA meeting held at the RA sometime in the spring (it will be announced in the club at some point, and may be posted on chess message boards and the EOCA website as well).
Anything that can go wrong will go wrong. Murphy's law, by Edward A. Murphy Jr., USAF, Aerospace Engineer
Maybe the CFC already has their own plan. In any case, some extra cash can't hurt the CFCs cause, if enough members are supportive enough to tolerate a fee increase.
For what it's worth, I gave my own 11 point plan in another thread. However any proposed plan(s) might not lend themselves well to a poll. Respondents to the present poll may assume that the CFC would develop a plan to use the extra income, if they don't already have one that would be advanced further with the extra income. Dividing opinion over which, if any, proposed plan to adopt would make people even less likely to accept a fee increase.
CFC will not work anyway. Last summer when I saw that people like Mr xxxxx were representing the CFC I knew this system would never work. CFC need a business driving team, not radical socialists.
The FQE in Quebec management is working very good this year. Let me explain what led to such a huge success: Once upon a time.... Jean Hebert highly recommended that people create a team to take control of the FQE. He concluded that in the past people with completly opposite positions and with personnal conflicts were elected to lead the FQE. So FQE was stuck.
I then started a political campain and put messages on French Chesstalk to find some people sharing the same ideas as mines to form a group to take control of FQE. In reaction, 5 peoples probably met in a Tim Horton over a coffee cup and then announced that they would be in the run for all the position at the FQE elections. In my opinion most of them are people that were so afraid that I would succeed to take control of the FQE that they created an opposite team - this is a very good democratic reaction.
They had a plan, a lot of experience and they share the same goals and opinions.
NORMAL PROCESS FOR CFC SUCCESS
1 - So before any poll, before any plan, you need a dictator or a united team with full power (a businessman as president) to take control of the CFC.
2 - Create a plan and announce it.
3 - Take control of the CFC with friends agreeing with your plan and kick the politicians and the socialists out of there.
3 - Realize the plan raise the fees as much as you want to make the plan a success.
Carl
Last edited by Carl Bilodeau; Wednesday, 24th February, 2010, 10:27 AM.
NORMAL PROCESS FOR CFC SUCCESS
1 - So before any poll, before any plan, you need a dictator or a united team with full power (a businessman as president) to take control of the CFC.
2 - Create a plan and announce it.
3 - Take control of the CFC with friends agreeing with your plan and kick the politicians and the socialists out of there.
[4] - Realize the plan raise the fees as much as you want to make the plan a success.
Carl:
If we are to take your proposal seriously, here's some points:
1 - The CFC is more inert than even the FQE was when it was 'stuck', I suspect, because the CFC has so many apathetic, 'sleeping' Governors. They're not yet divided, they're simply sleeping. The CFC Executive is the real power, and it is apparently not so divided or dysfunctional these days. The current CFC president may act like a dictator from time to time, perhaps, but he is not a businessman. The kind of guy that might fit your mould is semi-retired Ottawa organizer Neil James Frarey (ahem), but bear in mind his record is checkered and he needs to discipline himself not to be highly divisive.
2 - Coming up with a plan is no problem, but will it be sound :D?
3 - The Executive and the Presidency in particular are of course key to 'taking over' the CFC. The Governors are not so powerful, and if they know the plan before an election of an Executive then that makes things easier, if they vote for it in effect by electing the powerful clique/slate as an Executive, as you envisage. The 'politicians' amongst the Governors unfortunately are elected by provincial associations, so not much can be done about any disharmony they cause. Btw, Canada is already a socialist country, at least in the eyes of Americans, so you're too late :(.
4 - Realizing the plan often gets a monkey wrench thrown into it sometime when it comes to the CFC. So many more things can go wrong, compared to one province's association, like in Quebec. CFC Governors might balk if fees are increased too much for their liking, unless they are warned of this when the plan is unveiled.
Anything that can go wrong will go wrong. Murphy's law, by Edward A. Murphy Jr., USAF, Aerospace Engineer
If we are to take your proposal seriously, here's some points:
1 - The CFC is more inert than even the FQE was when it was 'stuck', I suspect, because the CFC has so many apathetic, 'sleeping' Governors. They're not yet divided, they're simply sleeping. The CFC Executive is the real power, and it is apparently not so divided or dysfunctional these days. The current CFC president may act like a dictator from time to time, perhaps, but he is not a businessman. The kind of guy that might fit your mould is semi-retired Ottawa organizer Neil James Frarey (ahem), but bear in mind his record is checkered and he needs to discipline himself not to be highly divisive.
2 - Coming up with a plan is no problem, but will it be sound :D?
3 - The Executive and the Presidency in particular are of course key to 'taking over' the CFC. The Governors are not so powerful, and if they know the plan before an election of an Executive then that makes things easier, if they vote for it in effect by electing the powerful clique/slate as an Executive, as you envisage. The 'politicians' amongst the Governors unfortunately are elected by provincial associations, so not much can be done about any disharmony they cause. Btw, Canada is already a socialist country, at least in the eyes of Americans, so you're too late :(.
4 - Realizing the plan often gets a monkey wrench thrown into it sometime when it comes to the CFC. So many more things can go wrong, compared to one province's association, like in Quebec. CFC Governors might balk if fees are increased too much for their liking, unless they are warned of this when the plan is unveiled.
Kevin,
Thank you for the details. I could be wrong but I feel discussions will last forever and I predict complete failure since the governor system and the provincial representation will not change. The only way then to improve the situation a bit would be to trust the private sector - have "Continental Chess" in the USA or Chess'n Math take the market here - invite them and propose them some solutions, some playing halls and some well located store ready for rent in your cities. That way you will have a business team or business person really working for success.
I would suggest serious Canadian players to move in Quebec just like Bator did - at least for the next two years it will be much better.
Carl
Last edited by Carl Bilodeau; Wednesday, 24th February, 2010, 01:01 PM.
I think you asked on the Ottawa board for the document written by Pugi (?) about the possible ways for the organization like the CFC. the document was copied and posted. Do you have a copy to post it here? I think it had some good points.
Tweet
Comment