If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Policy / Politique
The fee for tournament organizers advertising on ChessTalk is $20/event or $100/yearly unlimited for the year.
Les frais d'inscription des organisateurs de tournoi sur ChessTalk sont de 20 $/événement ou de 100 $/année illimitée.
You can etransfer to Henry Lam at chesstalkforum at gmail dot com
Transfér à Henry Lam à chesstalkforum@gmail.com
Dark Knight / Le Chevalier Noir
General Guidelines
---- Nous avons besoin d'un traduction français!
Some Basics
1. Under Board "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQs) there are 3 sections dealing with General Forum Usage, User Profile Features, and Reading and Posting Messages. These deal with everything from Avatars to Your Notifications. Most general technical questions are covered there. Here is a link to the FAQs. https://forum.chesstalk.com/help
2. Consider using the SEARCH button if you are looking for information. You may find your question has already been answered in a previous thread.
3. If you've looked for an answer to a question, and not found one, then you should consider asking your question in a new thread. For example, there have already been questions and discussion regarding: how to do chess diagrams (FENs); crosstables that line up properly; and the numerous little “glitches” that every new site will have.
4. Read pinned or sticky threads, like this one, if they look important. This applies especially to newcomers.
5. Read the thread you're posting in before you post. There are a variety of ways to look at a thread. These are covered under “Display Modes”.
6. Thread titles: please provide some details in your thread title. This is useful for a number of reasons. It helps ChessTalk members to quickly skim the threads. It prevents duplication of threads. And so on.
7. Unnecessary thread proliferation (e.g., deliberately creating a new thread that duplicates existing discussion) is discouraged. Look to see if a thread on your topic may have already been started and, if so, consider adding your contribution to the pre-existing thread. However, starting new threads to explore side-issues that are not relevant to the original subject is strongly encouraged. A single thread on the Canadian Open, with hundreds of posts on multiple sub-topics, is no better than a dozen threads on the Open covering only a few topics. Use your good judgment when starting a new thread.
8. If and/or when sub-forums are created, please make sure to create threads in the proper place.
Debate
9. Give an opinion and back it up with a reason. Throwaway comments such as "Game X pwnz because my friend and I think so!" could be considered pointless at best, and inflammatory at worst.
10. Try to give your own opinions, not simply those copied and pasted from reviews or opinions of your friends.
Unacceptable behavior and warnings
11. In registering here at ChessTalk please note that the same or similar rules apply here as applied at the previous Boardhost message board. In particular, the following content is not permitted to appear in any messages:
* Racism
* Hatred
* Harassment
* Adult content
* Obscene material
* Nudity or pornography
* Material that infringes intellectual property or other proprietary rights of any party
* Material the posting of which is tortious or violates a contractual or fiduciary obligation you or we owe to another party
* Piracy, hacking, viruses, worms, or warez
* Spam
* Any illegal content
* unapproved Commercial banner advertisements or revenue-generating links
* Any link to or any images from a site containing any material outlined in these restrictions
* Any material deemed offensive or inappropriate by the Board staff
12. Users are welcome to challenge other points of view and opinions, but should do so respectfully. Personal attacks on others will not be tolerated. Posts and threads with unacceptable content can be closed or deleted altogether. Furthermore, a range of sanctions are possible - from a simple warning to a temporary or even a permanent banning from ChessTalk.
Helping to Moderate
13. 'Report' links (an exclamation mark inside a triangle) can be found in many places throughout the board. These links allow users to alert the board staff to anything which is offensive, objectionable or illegal. Please consider using this feature if the need arises.
Advice for free
14. You should exercise the same caution with Private Messages as you would with any public posting.
Well, "too much" is by definition bad, but how much is "too much"? My personal position would be that any amount of "starcraft" is already "too much", but I admit to bias.
If you are a biased bloke who blindly speaks out hatred, then BEGONE. YOU ARE ALSO NO LONGER WELCOME IN THIS THREAD.
Have you ever tried it? Starcraft may be just a 'video game' but it has dominated the strategy genre for around 10 years. It's the chess of video games, simple in concept, but amazingly deep. World championships are held and there are people who make their living playing this one game. Just try it you might find that you actually like it :)
How many people watched the last Chess world championship live? Do you think they could pack a building like the last Starcraft World championship?
I used to love Starcraft 1, but I got tired very fast of the second one. Maybe it's because I don't have enough RAM to make it run smoothly....
Starcraft 2 is lame in comparison... Only good thing is that it has Boxer, July and Nada. They only switched because they're old and don't get to play much Brood War anymore.
If you believe that there is anyone without biases, including yourself, then I think you are disconnected with reality. Your apparent belief that you can somehow "banish" me from the thread lends supporting evidence to this theory.
If you believe that there is anyone without biases, including yourself, then I think you are disconnected with reality. Your apparent belief that you can somehow "banish" me from the thread lends supporting evidence to this theory.
Sir, having a bias towards something is a far cry from blindly hating it and making purposeless, distasteful posts towards it. I cannot stop you from posting in here, but it is most certainly not welcome. Please educate yourself on the matter at hand before posting any further.
Sir, having a bias towards something is a far cry from blindly hating it
I don't have any blind hates, that's merely your ugly misinterpretation of what I said.
and making purposeless, distasteful posts towards it. I cannot stop you from posting in here, but it is most certainly not welcome.
Lighten up guy! It was an offhand remark, nothing more. Everyone in the world doesn't have to like what you like. I take your excessive and over the top language as evidence that my bias is correct.
Please educate yourself on the matter at hand before posting any further.
Please feel entirely free to go out and have yourself stuffed.
I don't have any blind hates, that's merely your ugly misinterpretation of what I said.
Lighten up guy! It was an offhand remark, nothing more. Everyone in the world doesn't have to like what you like. I take your excessive and over the top language as evidence that my bias is correct.
Please feel entirely free to go out and have yourself stuffed.
Sir, in response to a inquiry as to whether or not you've played Starcraft before, you responded with the following: "Nope." You know nothing of the matter at hand, yet you are posting derogatory remarks. I do not butt into conversations about Fable with hateful comments, for I've never played it and know nothing about it. I'd appreciate it if you could show the same courtesy and respect for the topic at hand.
Sir, in response to a inquiry as to whether or not you've played Starcraft before, you responded with the following: "Nope."
Because I hate computer games other than chess and the odd manic run at freecell. So there was no need to know more. However, if you think people have to have actual knowlege before having an opinion then you are exceedingly naive.
If you cannot tolerate people having other opinions for no good reason than you then for your own good you had best go into a monastary. Otherwise you'll soon be in another institution.
If you think what I said was "hateful" then report it to the police. Otherwise maybe you should, for your own good, learn to tone down your rhetoric. It is over the top, pointless, and silly. Can't be good for your health.
Maybe you should see if you can buy yourself a sense of humour.
Because I hate computer games other than chess and the odd manic run at freecell. So there was no need to know more. However, if you think people have to have actual knowlege before having an opinion then you are exceedingly naive.
If you cannot tolerate people having other opinions for no good reason than you then for your own good you had best go into a monastary. Otherwise you'll soon be in another institution.
If you think what I said was "hateful" then report it to the police. Otherwise maybe you should, for your own good, learn to tone down your rhetoric. It is over the top, pointless, and silly. Can't be good for your health.
Maybe you should see if you can buy yourself a sense of humour.
Sir, computer games cover an incredibly broad spectrum. While I am capable of handling the opinions of others, your bigotry is not appreciated, nor are your strange insults (I've yet to be in any kind of mental institution). Perhaps you should attempt to purchase the ability to interact with others in a civilised manner. Goodbye.
Sir, computer games cover an incredibly broad spectrum. While I am capable of handling the opinions of others, your bigotry is not appreciated, nor are your strange insults (I've yet to be in any kind of mental institution). Perhaps you should attempt to purchase the ability to interact with others in a civilised manner. Goodbye.
Because I hate computer games other than chess and the odd manic run at freecell. So there was no need to know more. However, if you think people have to have actual knowlege before having an opinion then you are exceedingly naive.
I'm hoping this is sarcasm. Or maybe you're talking about what reality is, and not what we should all be attempting to be. Generally, if I have no knowledge of something, I don't like to immediately denigrate and insult it.
Comment