If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Policy / Politique
The fee for tournament organizers advertising on ChessTalk is $20/event or $100/yearly unlimited for the year.
Les frais d'inscription des organisateurs de tournoi sur ChessTalk sont de 20 $/événement ou de 100 $/année illimitée.
You can etransfer to Henry Lam at chesstalkforum at gmail dot com
Transfér à Henry Lam à chesstalkforum@gmail.com
Dark Knight / Le Chevalier Noir
General Guidelines
---- Nous avons besoin d'un traduction français!
Some Basics
1. Under Board "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQs) there are 3 sections dealing with General Forum Usage, User Profile Features, and Reading and Posting Messages. These deal with everything from Avatars to Your Notifications. Most general technical questions are covered there. Here is a link to the FAQs. https://forum.chesstalk.com/help
2. Consider using the SEARCH button if you are looking for information. You may find your question has already been answered in a previous thread.
3. If you've looked for an answer to a question, and not found one, then you should consider asking your question in a new thread. For example, there have already been questions and discussion regarding: how to do chess diagrams (FENs); crosstables that line up properly; and the numerous little “glitches” that every new site will have.
4. Read pinned or sticky threads, like this one, if they look important. This applies especially to newcomers.
5. Read the thread you're posting in before you post. There are a variety of ways to look at a thread. These are covered under “Display Modes”.
6. Thread titles: please provide some details in your thread title. This is useful for a number of reasons. It helps ChessTalk members to quickly skim the threads. It prevents duplication of threads. And so on.
7. Unnecessary thread proliferation (e.g., deliberately creating a new thread that duplicates existing discussion) is discouraged. Look to see if a thread on your topic may have already been started and, if so, consider adding your contribution to the pre-existing thread. However, starting new threads to explore side-issues that are not relevant to the original subject is strongly encouraged. A single thread on the Canadian Open, with hundreds of posts on multiple sub-topics, is no better than a dozen threads on the Open covering only a few topics. Use your good judgment when starting a new thread.
8. If and/or when sub-forums are created, please make sure to create threads in the proper place.
Debate
9. Give an opinion and back it up with a reason. Throwaway comments such as "Game X pwnz because my friend and I think so!" could be considered pointless at best, and inflammatory at worst.
10. Try to give your own opinions, not simply those copied and pasted from reviews or opinions of your friends.
Unacceptable behavior and warnings
11. In registering here at ChessTalk please note that the same or similar rules apply here as applied at the previous Boardhost message board. In particular, the following content is not permitted to appear in any messages:
* Racism
* Hatred
* Harassment
* Adult content
* Obscene material
* Nudity or pornography
* Material that infringes intellectual property or other proprietary rights of any party
* Material the posting of which is tortious or violates a contractual or fiduciary obligation you or we owe to another party
* Piracy, hacking, viruses, worms, or warez
* Spam
* Any illegal content
* unapproved Commercial banner advertisements or revenue-generating links
* Any link to or any images from a site containing any material outlined in these restrictions
* Any material deemed offensive or inappropriate by the Board staff
12. Users are welcome to challenge other points of view and opinions, but should do so respectfully. Personal attacks on others will not be tolerated. Posts and threads with unacceptable content can be closed or deleted altogether. Furthermore, a range of sanctions are possible - from a simple warning to a temporary or even a permanent banning from ChessTalk.
Helping to Moderate
13. 'Report' links (an exclamation mark inside a triangle) can be found in many places throughout the board. These links allow users to alert the board staff to anything which is offensive, objectionable or illegal. Please consider using this feature if the need arises.
Advice for free
14. You should exercise the same caution with Private Messages as you would with any public posting.
This is a pretty funny thread...
I am not an IM but I also thinking that anyone outside of the elite (IM & GM) has no business trying to make money out of chess. Although if they do, great for them, kuddos! Chess is a hobby & game, awesome at that too.
Maybe I am just elitist
Having said that... NM title here I come!
(looking forward to posting the CFC certificate on my fridge)
Or at least something to look forward to
Alex, is the rumour true that you are organizing a 7 game match between Bindi Cheng and Gary Ruben this fall ? Maybe raise some money for charity ? Heard something about it on the Colbert Report.
Last edited by Duncan Smith; Saturday, 20th August, 2011, 07:50 PM.
As I've said, I don't mean to offend anyone in pursuit of a nationally recognized title, I just think if you're going to aim for that, why not slightly higher and be internationally recognized
I've heard from a few strong players who don't understand class players. You're talented, able to focus and worked hard. Based on your growth and understanding of chess, it may seem easy for you that anyone can reach 2200. But most players who play alot and study hard will peak at 2000 or 1800 or lower. There may be chess concepts that they just can't get, or have trouble making decisions, handling time, mental slips, blind spots, emotionally overwhelmed, or ?. That that will be their lifetime peak may be difficult for masters to comprehend.
The NM and class tiles gives players recognition for achieving a goal. Some may be happy to sit with Category 2, 1 or NM title, some may use it as a stepping stone to their goal of becoming an International Master. The title is a celebration of all the tournaments they have played in and may encourage them to play in more. Being a tournament player already makes them stronger than most players who know little more than the moves and the title may impress their family and casual-playing friends.
I don't think FM is as accepted as you may think, for one ICC doesn't even offer free membership to them :(
As I've said, I don't mean to offend anyone in pursuit of a nationally recognized title, I just think if you're going to aim for that, why not slightly higher and be internationally recognized
IM & GM doesn't usually get you into my tournaments free either. Doesn't mean they are not worthwhile titles :-)
But as to aiming higher - I could say the same thing about people who stop at finishing high school, community college programs, BA, BSc, MA, MSc. Why stop there? Because, either due to inclination or ability, that's as far as it got and it's an important marker to them.
As I understand , his (Bindi Cheng) and partially mine concern is that the National Master title is devalued with a 2200 rating. If it would be the new title, I preferred 2400. It should approach the FIDE IM or at least a strong FM (~2350). However, it has already a history with 2200.
As I understand , his (Bindi Cheng) and partially mine concern is that the National Master title is devalued with a 2200 rating. If it would be the new title, I preferred 2400. It should approach the FIDE IM or at least a strong FM (~2350). However, it has already a history with 2200.
I've always understood it to be 2200. Certainly that is what the USCF does. And why would you have a title that duplicates more or less what you would be given by FIDE? (well maybe the CFC would save on FIDE costs for titles).
I like the idea of accomplishments or norms being made. FIDE already has the FM and CM titles. There shouldn't be any problem with IM's, GM's and FM's being awarded a national master title. Others should have to make qualifications which are a step below, and not far below, the qualifications for an international title.
There isn't anything wrong with making the qualifications hard. Hard is what makes the titles worth something. Still, the chance of obtaining the title has to be realistic.
Comment