If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Policy / Politique
The fee for tournament organizers advertising on ChessTalk is $20/event or $100/yearly unlimited for the year.
Les frais d'inscription des organisateurs de tournoi sur ChessTalk sont de 20 $/événement ou de 100 $/année illimitée.
You can etransfer to Henry Lam at chesstalkforum at gmail dot com
Transfér à Henry Lam à chesstalkforum@gmail.com
Dark Knight / Le Chevalier Noir
General Guidelines
---- Nous avons besoin d'un traduction français!
Some Basics
1. Under Board "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQs) there are 3 sections dealing with General Forum Usage, User Profile Features, and Reading and Posting Messages. These deal with everything from Avatars to Your Notifications. Most general technical questions are covered there. Here is a link to the FAQs. https://forum.chesstalk.com/help
2. Consider using the SEARCH button if you are looking for information. You may find your question has already been answered in a previous thread.
3. If you've looked for an answer to a question, and not found one, then you should consider asking your question in a new thread. For example, there have already been questions and discussion regarding: how to do chess diagrams (FENs); crosstables that line up properly; and the numerous little “glitches” that every new site will have.
4. Read pinned or sticky threads, like this one, if they look important. This applies especially to newcomers.
5. Read the thread you're posting in before you post. There are a variety of ways to look at a thread. These are covered under “Display Modes”.
6. Thread titles: please provide some details in your thread title. This is useful for a number of reasons. It helps ChessTalk members to quickly skim the threads. It prevents duplication of threads. And so on.
7. Unnecessary thread proliferation (e.g., deliberately creating a new thread that duplicates existing discussion) is discouraged. Look to see if a thread on your topic may have already been started and, if so, consider adding your contribution to the pre-existing thread. However, starting new threads to explore side-issues that are not relevant to the original subject is strongly encouraged. A single thread on the Canadian Open, with hundreds of posts on multiple sub-topics, is no better than a dozen threads on the Open covering only a few topics. Use your good judgment when starting a new thread.
8. If and/or when sub-forums are created, please make sure to create threads in the proper place.
Debate
9. Give an opinion and back it up with a reason. Throwaway comments such as "Game X pwnz because my friend and I think so!" could be considered pointless at best, and inflammatory at worst.
10. Try to give your own opinions, not simply those copied and pasted from reviews or opinions of your friends.
Unacceptable behavior and warnings
11. In registering here at ChessTalk please note that the same or similar rules apply here as applied at the previous Boardhost message board. In particular, the following content is not permitted to appear in any messages:
* Racism
* Hatred
* Harassment
* Adult content
* Obscene material
* Nudity or pornography
* Material that infringes intellectual property or other proprietary rights of any party
* Material the posting of which is tortious or violates a contractual or fiduciary obligation you or we owe to another party
* Piracy, hacking, viruses, worms, or warez
* Spam
* Any illegal content
* unapproved Commercial banner advertisements or revenue-generating links
* Any link to or any images from a site containing any material outlined in these restrictions
* Any material deemed offensive or inappropriate by the Board staff
12. Users are welcome to challenge other points of view and opinions, but should do so respectfully. Personal attacks on others will not be tolerated. Posts and threads with unacceptable content can be closed or deleted altogether. Furthermore, a range of sanctions are possible - from a simple warning to a temporary or even a permanent banning from ChessTalk.
Helping to Moderate
13. 'Report' links (an exclamation mark inside a triangle) can be found in many places throughout the board. These links allow users to alert the board staff to anything which is offensive, objectionable or illegal. Please consider using this feature if the need arises.
Advice for free
14. You should exercise the same caution with Private Messages as you would with any public posting.
(5) Vote Results: As soon after the close of voting on motions as possible, the Posting Secretary will post the results of all motions, giving the names of governors and their vote, and confirm whether the motion passed or failed (e.g. whether constitutional amendments achieved the 2/3 majority needed ), on the Governors’ Discussion Board and the members’ CFC Chess Forum.
It started Saturday, Oct. 1, and runs to Saturday, Oct. 8. 58% of the Governors are in attendance ( 32/55 ).
...
Wow....58%. I guess this really is democracy in action. KB{l}
"We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office." - Aesop
"Only the dead have seen the end of war." - Plato
"If once a man indulges himself in murder, very soon he comes to think little of robbing; and from robbing he comes next to drinking and Sabbath-breaking, and from that to incivility and procrastination." - Thomas De Quincey
Wow....58%. I guess this really is democracy in action. KB{l}
I think what's more important is the fact that we have 32 people who believe in the CFC and are willing to take several hours out of their busy week to attend the on-line happenings and have an effect on the course of events.
It doesn't really matter about those that are not attending, they are the perennial deadwood. Some provinces just don't have enough caring people, some of our "mandatory" governors have served their time.
... some of our "mandatory" governors have served their time.
I figure most will show up to vote against that.
By the way, around 3.5% of the members being honourary members seems a bit high to me. You should be charging. It's not like the organization is a charity.
I also would like to see less " deadwood " among the governors - it makes me wonder why someone becomes a governor who does not intend to carry out a key function - going to the quarterly/AGM meetings ( can go by internet or by proxy if can't attend personally ).
But it must also be seen in context - under the old Governors' Letters voting system, we used to get about 25- 35% participation! So we have encouraged more governors to participate with our modern stream-lined cyber-space meetings over the course of a full week.
So it is a significant group of volunteer governors doing the actual running of the CFC.
I think what's more important is the fact that we have 32 people who believe in the CFC and are willing to take several hours out of their busy week to attend the on-line happenings and have an effect on the course of events. ...
You're right, Fred. I'm turning into a grumpy old fart. :) I like your glass-is-half-full approach.
"We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office." - Aesop
"Only the dead have seen the end of war." - Plato
"If once a man indulges himself in murder, very soon he comes to think little of robbing; and from robbing he comes next to drinking and Sabbath-breaking, and from that to incivility and procrastination." - Thomas De Quincey
And we had some fireworks. A code of conduct for a Governors was suggested by a former executive member and a current executive member suggested I should do the federation a favour and resign as Governor. I wonder if all of the discussions held at the CFC AGM would pass the litmus test of a code of conduct.
And we had some fireworks. A code of conduct for a Governors was suggested by a former executive member and a current executive member suggested I should do the federation a favour and resign as Governor. I wonder if all of the discussions held at the CFC AGM would pass the litmus test of a code of conduct.
That is depressing to hear Ken. I hope you consider the source before worrying about the suggestion.
I cannot say I always agree with everything you write, but I absolutely respect your opinion and advice and I believe you *care*.
That is depressing to hear Ken. I hope you consider the source before worrying about the suggestion.
I cannot say I always agree with everything you write, but I absolutely respect your opinion and advice and I believe you *care*.
best regards.
It is understandable that defendant will try to defend his/her positions. We all do respect an opinion of the defendant, but in this case it is irrelevant, and nothing more. With everything that happened in CFC world in last so far in last year all direction point not in its favor. :D
And we had some fireworks. A code of conduct for a Governors was suggested by a former executive member and a current executive member suggested I should do the federation a favour and resign as Governor. I wonder if all of the discussions held at the CFC AGM would pass the litmus test of a code of conduct.
In today's world in order for organization to be successful it must reward its customers and think outside of the box.
Kudos to you Ken for trying to do a right thing! I guess other CFC executives and governors do not see it the same way.
I wonder where CFC would be, if it was in real competitive world??? I bet,
its memberships will be decreasing. :)
In today's world in order for organization to be successful it must reward its customers and think outside of the box.
Kudos to you Ken for trying to do a right thing! I guess other CFC executives and governors do not see it the same way.
I wonder where CFC would be, if it was in real competitive world??? I bet,
its memberships will be decreasing. :)
If it was anything other than a 2-man crusade against Ken, at least the rest were smart enough to keep their mouths shut (or their fingers still, in this case). Ironically, the demand for resignation basically proved Ken's point, as well.
Ken's resignation only proven, which direction CFC is going. It is not going in the right direction. CFC is losing bright people. Also this summer CFC chased away few talented organizers away. Unfortunately CFC can't point fingers or force anyone this time either. It has no one to blame but itself for this one. :)
at least the rest were smart enough to keep their mouths
Unfortunately this is only your opinion. To see, that people who kept their mouths shut and remain in CFC office are smart enough, remains to be seen. So far I only seen bright individuals chased away from CFC organization. It is very sad to see this, but it is the reality.
Comment