If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Policy / Politique
The fee for tournament organizers advertising on ChessTalk is $20/event or $100/yearly unlimited for the year.
Les frais d'inscription des organisateurs de tournoi sur ChessTalk sont de 20 $/événement ou de 100 $/année illimitée.
You can etransfer to Henry Lam at chesstalkforum at gmail dot com
Transfér à Henry Lam à chesstalkforum@gmail.com
Dark Knight / Le Chevalier Noir
General Guidelines
---- Nous avons besoin d'un traduction français!
Some Basics
1. Under Board "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQs) there are 3 sections dealing with General Forum Usage, User Profile Features, and Reading and Posting Messages. These deal with everything from Avatars to Your Notifications. Most general technical questions are covered there. Here is a link to the FAQs. https://forum.chesstalk.com/help
2. Consider using the SEARCH button if you are looking for information. You may find your question has already been answered in a previous thread.
3. If you've looked for an answer to a question, and not found one, then you should consider asking your question in a new thread. For example, there have already been questions and discussion regarding: how to do chess diagrams (FENs); crosstables that line up properly; and the numerous little “glitches” that every new site will have.
4. Read pinned or sticky threads, like this one, if they look important. This applies especially to newcomers.
5. Read the thread you're posting in before you post. There are a variety of ways to look at a thread. These are covered under “Display Modes”.
6. Thread titles: please provide some details in your thread title. This is useful for a number of reasons. It helps ChessTalk members to quickly skim the threads. It prevents duplication of threads. And so on.
7. Unnecessary thread proliferation (e.g., deliberately creating a new thread that duplicates existing discussion) is discouraged. Look to see if a thread on your topic may have already been started and, if so, consider adding your contribution to the pre-existing thread. However, starting new threads to explore side-issues that are not relevant to the original subject is strongly encouraged. A single thread on the Canadian Open, with hundreds of posts on multiple sub-topics, is no better than a dozen threads on the Open covering only a few topics. Use your good judgment when starting a new thread.
8. If and/or when sub-forums are created, please make sure to create threads in the proper place.
Debate
9. Give an opinion and back it up with a reason. Throwaway comments such as "Game X pwnz because my friend and I think so!" could be considered pointless at best, and inflammatory at worst.
10. Try to give your own opinions, not simply those copied and pasted from reviews or opinions of your friends.
Unacceptable behavior and warnings
11. In registering here at ChessTalk please note that the same or similar rules apply here as applied at the previous Boardhost message board. In particular, the following content is not permitted to appear in any messages:
* Racism
* Hatred
* Harassment
* Adult content
* Obscene material
* Nudity or pornography
* Material that infringes intellectual property or other proprietary rights of any party
* Material the posting of which is tortious or violates a contractual or fiduciary obligation you or we owe to another party
* Piracy, hacking, viruses, worms, or warez
* Spam
* Any illegal content
* unapproved Commercial banner advertisements or revenue-generating links
* Any link to or any images from a site containing any material outlined in these restrictions
* Any material deemed offensive or inappropriate by the Board staff
12. Users are welcome to challenge other points of view and opinions, but should do so respectfully. Personal attacks on others will not be tolerated. Posts and threads with unacceptable content can be closed or deleted altogether. Furthermore, a range of sanctions are possible - from a simple warning to a temporary or even a permanent banning from ChessTalk.
Helping to Moderate
13. 'Report' links (an exclamation mark inside a triangle) can be found in many places throughout the board. These links allow users to alert the board staff to anything which is offensive, objectionable or illegal. Please consider using this feature if the need arises.
Advice for free
14. You should exercise the same caution with Private Messages as you would with any public posting.
What kind of pairing system are they using? Both Bolivia and Costa Rica have 2 match points, and each Canadian team has 0 match points. How do we end up paired up??
Not ideal pairings on women's boards 13-15. Teams from the bottom half which won in the first round play each other. Some of them are still going to have perfect scores for the third round, leading to uneven pairings. A variation would be to pair (some of) the top half teams which drew in the first round (you'll find them on boards 38-41) against those second half teams. But you have to go with the rules you announced. Another variation, going back to the first round: make the top half a bit larger than the bottom half, so that after the drawn matches in the top half, the number of top half losers = the number of bottom half winners. This second approach is a gamble, because you don't know how many top half matches will be drawn, nor do you know that there won't be any draws in the bottom half.
Instead of starting at 15.00 CET (that's 6 am Pacific Time), the start of the round was
delayed an hour. According to chessdom.com , this was due to changes in the composition of the Philippines (wasn't it peculiar yesterday that their lowest-rated player Villamayor was on top board? But from what I see at chessdom, the only issue is one equivalent to "who plays today?" Why would that occasion a round postponement?) and Nigeria.
You can find the delay confirmed at the pairings page:
Does anybody remember an Olympiad round being delayed for this reason?
Super ironic of course that the organization insisted that board composition and order had to be determined months in advance and was not allowed to change. Previously,the inviolate nature of team compositions was a joke, an open fiction, with huge changes being made the night before the first round, but I don't remember a round being delayed because of this question.
Instead of starting at 15.00 CET (that's 6 am Pacific Time), the start of the round was
delayed an hour. According to chessdom.com , this was due to changes in the composition of the Philippines (wasn't it peculiar yesterday that their lowest-rated player Villamayor was on top board?
That's a decent strategy in match play. Slot your weakest player on board 1 and only use him against teams where you expect to lose. When you play him you move your stronger players down one board to face weaker opponents than they would normally play and hope the weak player on board 1 can maybe draw.
Since Russia giving 4th board to Morozevich (second-highest rated player in all of the Olympiad) occasioned an official protest from the Swiss delegation, it seemed reasonable that the delay was due to a protest about the Philippines board order. The rating difference for the Philippines is bigger than the rating difference for Russia. So it was interesting that this plausible scenario is, apparently, not the case.
Stacking (the name for the strategy you described) often works, but it also sometimes backfires. It almost always annoys the other teams. Right up your alley!
It could be that they just want to protect their young genius Wesley So from the psychic brunt of too much Board 1 play. Wesley is rapidly approaching the world ranking that Eugenio Torre had in his salad years. His rating of 2610 may be higher than Torre ever achieved; the highest I could find for Torre was 2580 in 1983. Of course, those were different days.
The postponement of the round was announced (over an hour) before its scheduled start time. So the official reason, given above, does not seem out of order, does it?
But I can only heartily agree with your conclusion in the second paragraph.
Open Olympics, Canada - Bolivia, board 4, Thomas's opponent Raisa Luna is an 18-year-old female.
Tyler,
According to my TWIC base, in recent games Black has a better score, 39%, with 7...Nf6, than the recommended 7...Nh6 (33%), and after 9.Nxd4 (winning the pawn) has scored 50% in 13 games. That isn't Truth, but it may be practical.
Incidentally, if you can't figure out how the current position arrived, left click on the board. That'll bring up a (static) game history. Clicking on the player names brings up their FIDE rating graph and often a photo!
According to my TWIC base, in recent games Black has a better score, 39%, with 7...Nf6, than the recommended 7...Nh6 (33%), and after 9.Nxd4 (winning the pawn) has scored 50% in 13 games. That isn't Truth, but it may be practical.
We're waiting for White's 10th move. Dragan Solak, a 2595 GM, played the remarkable 10.Ne6 and went on to win against Nikac (2390) at Budva, 2004. In the only other game I could find, White tried the blah Nb3 and lost.
Comment