If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Policy / Politique
The fee for tournament organizers advertising on ChessTalk is $20/event or $100/yearly unlimited for the year.
Les frais d'inscription des organisateurs de tournoi sur ChessTalk sont de 20 $/événement ou de 100 $/année illimitée.
You can etransfer to Henry Lam at chesstalkforum at gmail dot com
Transfér à Henry Lam à chesstalkforum@gmail.com
Dark Knight / Le Chevalier Noir
General Guidelines
---- Nous avons besoin d'un traduction français!
Some Basics
1. Under Board "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQs) there are 3 sections dealing with General Forum Usage, User Profile Features, and Reading and Posting Messages. These deal with everything from Avatars to Your Notifications. Most general technical questions are covered there. Here is a link to the FAQs. https://forum.chesstalk.com/help
2. Consider using the SEARCH button if you are looking for information. You may find your question has already been answered in a previous thread.
3. If you've looked for an answer to a question, and not found one, then you should consider asking your question in a new thread. For example, there have already been questions and discussion regarding: how to do chess diagrams (FENs); crosstables that line up properly; and the numerous little “glitches” that every new site will have.
4. Read pinned or sticky threads, like this one, if they look important. This applies especially to newcomers.
5. Read the thread you're posting in before you post. There are a variety of ways to look at a thread. These are covered under “Display Modes”.
6. Thread titles: please provide some details in your thread title. This is useful for a number of reasons. It helps ChessTalk members to quickly skim the threads. It prevents duplication of threads. And so on.
7. Unnecessary thread proliferation (e.g., deliberately creating a new thread that duplicates existing discussion) is discouraged. Look to see if a thread on your topic may have already been started and, if so, consider adding your contribution to the pre-existing thread. However, starting new threads to explore side-issues that are not relevant to the original subject is strongly encouraged. A single thread on the Canadian Open, with hundreds of posts on multiple sub-topics, is no better than a dozen threads on the Open covering only a few topics. Use your good judgment when starting a new thread.
8. If and/or when sub-forums are created, please make sure to create threads in the proper place.
Debate
9. Give an opinion and back it up with a reason. Throwaway comments such as "Game X pwnz because my friend and I think so!" could be considered pointless at best, and inflammatory at worst.
10. Try to give your own opinions, not simply those copied and pasted from reviews or opinions of your friends.
Unacceptable behavior and warnings
11. In registering here at ChessTalk please note that the same or similar rules apply here as applied at the previous Boardhost message board. In particular, the following content is not permitted to appear in any messages:
* Racism
* Hatred
* Harassment
* Adult content
* Obscene material
* Nudity or pornography
* Material that infringes intellectual property or other proprietary rights of any party
* Material the posting of which is tortious or violates a contractual or fiduciary obligation you or we owe to another party
* Piracy, hacking, viruses, worms, or warez
* Spam
* Any illegal content
* unapproved Commercial banner advertisements or revenue-generating links
* Any link to or any images from a site containing any material outlined in these restrictions
* Any material deemed offensive or inappropriate by the Board staff
12. Users are welcome to challenge other points of view and opinions, but should do so respectfully. Personal attacks on others will not be tolerated. Posts and threads with unacceptable content can be closed or deleted altogether. Furthermore, a range of sanctions are possible - from a simple warning to a temporary or even a permanent banning from ChessTalk.
Helping to Moderate
13. 'Report' links (an exclamation mark inside a triangle) can be found in many places throughout the board. These links allow users to alert the board staff to anything which is offensive, objectionable or illegal. Please consider using this feature if the need arises.
Advice for free
14. You should exercise the same caution with Private Messages as you would with any public posting.
15. Have fun!
(Thanks to Nigel Hanrahan for writing these up!)
The Women’s Chess System – Finally Time to Abolish It?
As long as FIDE maintained a separate, parallel women's system, CFC would consent to any woman going to play in any female FIDE event that they would qualify for.
The whole point of the exercise is not to restrict the individual liberty of Canadian women/girl chess players, but to discourage participation in a separate women's system by taking away the formal infrastructure in Canada of that system.
But CFC would not authorize any formal " representative " to a female tournament.
So, for example, Canada would not take up the option of sending a woman to the Women's World Championship as Canadian Women's Champion, and without that, no Canadian women would be able to gain entry on their own personal initiative, into the Women's World Championship.
The CYCC would be a different matter re the female categories, because FIDE allows any girl junior to play who has consent of a national federation. They will pay all their own expenses, and will not be entitled to the " official " representative free board and lodging.
Bob A
Bob, I agree with Roger. Your stance on this issue is appalling.
It's disturbing when people propose to make important decisions but don't appear to have many facts at their disposal. For example, what exactly is this "infrastructure" you talk about and how much is it costing the CFC annually? (I'm guessing the CFC doesn't have a lot of skin in this game) Has anyone bothered to talk to female chess players and/or their parents to see what they'd like?
You say you don't want to restrict the liberty of female chess players and yet you want to enact something that ensures that no Canadian female will ever be allowed to play for FIDE's women's world championship.
Let's see some facts!
"We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office." - Aesop
"Only the dead have seen the end of war." - Plato
"If once a man indulges himself in murder, very soon he comes to think little of robbing; and from robbing he comes next to drinking and Sabbath-breaking, and from that to incivility and procrastination." - Thomas De Quincey
Re: Support for Motion to Abolish ? What It Includes.
Something else to consider: before putting the kibosh on the CFC's (would 'minimal' be a good adjective here?) efforts in the area of women's chess, wouldn't it be a good idea to talk in detail with people who actually should know something about women's/girl's chess and its future prospects? For instance, I expect Larry Bevand could provide a lot of useful information for the CFC to consider. And what about someone like John Coleman, from Windsor, who has had a lot of experience and success organizing school events? Or how about someone like Hans Jung who has had decades of experience teaching chess to children? I'm sure there must dozens if not scores more out there who could provide the CFC with much valuable advice on how the CFC might best use its limited resources in order to be more effective in promoting children's (yes, that includes girls too) chess. Instead, Bob, your approach is to smash what little "infrastructure" now exists. Why? What's really driving this project of yours?
"We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office." - Aesop
"Only the dead have seen the end of war." - Plato
"If once a man indulges himself in murder, very soon he comes to think little of robbing; and from robbing he comes next to drinking and Sabbath-breaking, and from that to incivility and procrastination." - Thomas De Quincey
Precisely my feelings, Bindi. And by way of concrete example, I would strongly recommend to Harmony Zhu's parents (whom I see most Mondays at the ACC) that she not only forego the CYCC U8 Girls next year, but also the CYCC U8 Open. She's too strong for that as well. She should clearly play up in age if she wants to best hone her chess skills. If she continues to tack on rating points, she might even consider playing up 2 age categories and playing in the CYCC U12 Open.
If she continues to tack on rating points and becomes a force to be reckoned with, I would suggest you tell her parents to play the CYCC U8 boys. Even thuogh she might outclass her competition, just the fact that a girl is able to play in the boys section will allow other girls to see that it's possible to do so. Plus, the fame will help her as well.
As long as FIDE maintained a separate, parallel women's system, CFC would consent to any woman going to play in any female FIDE event that they would qualify for.
The whole point of the exercise is not to restrict the individual liberty of Canadian women/girl chess players, but to discourage participation in a separate women's system by taking away the formal infrastructure in Canada of that system.
But CFC would not authorize any formal " representative " to a female tournament.
So, for example, Canada would not take up the option of sending a woman to the Women's World Championship as Canadian Women's Champion, and without that, no Canadian women would be able to gain entry on their own personal initiative, into the Women's World Championship.
The CYCC would be a different matter re the female categories, because FIDE allows any girl junior to play who has consent of a national federation. They will pay all their own expenses, and will not be entitled to the " official " representative free board and lodging.
Bob A
Bob, please remove me from the list of supporters of the CCC. I am all for chess reform and improved chess democracy but I really don't want to be associated with any organization that would seek to limit the opportunities of half the kids that I am coaching in such a draconian manner purely out of a sense of inflated political correctness.
Bob, please remove me from the list of supporters of the CCC. I am all for chess reform and improved chess democracy but I really don't want to be associated with any organization that would seek to limit the opportunities of half the kids that I am coaching in such a draconian manner purely out of a sense of inflated political correctness.
It was not clear to me that this thread has any direct relationship to the CCC. Some of the severe negative reaction seems a little over the top - especially since Bob A. indicated recently that this is a dead issue and, if you re-read the initial post, the thread was simply a discussion starter...
It was not clear to me that this thread has any direct relationship to the CCC. Some of the severe negative reaction seems a little over the top - especially since Bob A. indicated recently that this is a dead issue and, if you re-read the initial post, the thread was simply a discussion starter...
Anyway, I'm just saying...
When you start listing which CFC governor's support your proposal and speculating on which others may you have moved past a simple discussion starter.
I too would ask that my name be removed from the list of CCC supporters; except that I believe it already has been as I indicated I would not have time to participate while on exchange in France.
It was not clear to me that this thread has any direct relationship to the CCC. Some of the severe negative reaction seems a little over the top - especially since Bob A. indicated recently that this is a dead issue and, if you re-read the initial post, the thread was simply a discussion starter...
Anyway, I'm just saying...
You are correct that it is not a CCC issue since it was raised as part of his other chess project TCN. On the other hand TCN and CCC are both very much a Bob Armstrong project. I don't want to be associated in any way with the views expressed in that original post and subsequent clarifying posts that would seek to curtail the opportunities for my students. In the last three years we have had five girls (Minya Bai, Lily Zhou, Jeannie Zhang, Rachel Tao, Melissa Lee) attend WYCC who are either students or a former student of the Friday class and friend in the case of Melissa Lee. Lily has gone twice and Rachel and Melissa qualified but didn't attend one of the two times they could have. Half of my Friday advanced class consists of girls who are capable of qualifying for WYCC and probably will at one time or another.
It was clear to me that if there had been support for this idea then we would have been dealing with a motion at the next CFC meeting. One point of pride in our efforts in Windsor is that we seem to be able to attract girls to chess in the same numbers as we do boys. I would like to see the rest of the CFC manage the same thing. Believe me, this kind of motion is not the way to go about it.
Last edited by Vlad Drkulec; Friday, 9th November, 2012, 06:05 PM.
It was not clear to me that this thread has any direct relationship to the CCC. Some of the severe negative reaction seems a little over the top - especially since Bob A. indicated recently that this is a dead issue and, if you re-read the initial post, the thread was simply a discussion starter...
Anyway, I'm just saying...
To quote Bob Armstrong, who obviously has far too much time on his hands........"Sometimes, you just have to take a stand!"
If she continues to tack on rating points and becomes a force to be reckoned with, I would suggest you tell her parents to play the CYCC U8 boys. Even thuogh she might outclass her competition, just the fact that a girl is able to play in the boys section will allow other girls to see that it's possible to do so. Plus, the fame will help her as well.
Reality is these kind of moves are problematic given how the CYCC system is designed and how people react to such events. Given that no real contendor has done this since 2002, its hard to say doing so opens up the doors to more players doing so. More likely it will be a one-off with very little benefit to the player and quickly forgotten as other junior girls carry on as before.
Last edited by Duncan Smith; Friday, 9th November, 2012, 07:16 PM.
You are correct that it is not a CCC issue since it was raised as part of his other chess project TCN. On the other hand TCN and CCC are both very much a Bob Armstrong project. I don't want to be associated in any way with the views expressed in that original post and subsequent clarifying posts that would seek to curtail the opportunities for my students. In the last three years we have had five girls (Minya Bai, Lily Zhou, Jeannie Zhang, Rachel Tao, Melissa Lee) attend WYCC who are either students or a former student of the Friday class and friend in the case of Melissa Lee. Lily has gone twice and Rachel and Melissa qualified but didn't attend one of the two times they could have. Half of my Friday advanced class consists of girls who are capable of qualifying for WYCC and probably will at one time or another.
It was clear to me that if there had been support for this idea then we would have been dealing with a motion at the next CFC meeting. One point of pride in our efforts in Windsor is that we seem to be able to attract girls to chess in the same numbers as we do boys. I would like to see the rest of the CFC manage the same thing. Believe me, this kind of motion is not the way to go about it.
Vlad, you are to be commended for building a decent program; you might be interested to know this is not without precedent. Seneca Hill P.S. and another group in Vancouver both had highly successful junior programs with huge female participation. These groups fed a significant number of players into the CFC world as well, and produced many CYCC medalists. In fact, the failure of the CFC in the past to understand this led to significant drops in chess interest in later years once the momentum died. The CFC world did very little to welcome these players and understand their reality. This reality often encourages junior girls to gravitate towards CYCC/WYCC events because they are socially more pleasant then other chess events.
The reasons that 12-18 year old boys excel to higher levels then girls are simple. The male dominated clubs are more enjoyable for them, they are mentored by top male adult players more readily, and occasionally futurities are provided for them. Top girls are also hit by messages telling them why they won't succeed, both subtle and not so subtle. I started seeing this when my girls were as young as 7.
Vlad, you are to be commended for building a decent program;
I have lots of help, John Coleman, NM Zoltan Kiraly, NM Istvan Kiraly, and Herb Alice were there tonight for the 13 kids not playing in the WYCC or King's Island. Alan Baljeu and Terry Coulombe are often on hand as well. It is pretty much a community effort especially when we are helping them prepare for OYCC/CYCC/WYCC.
you might be interested to know this is not without precedent. Seneca Hill P.S. and another group in Vancouver both had highly successful junior programs with huge female participation. These groups fed a significant number of players into the CFC world as well, and produced many CYCC medalists. In fact, the failure of the CFC in the past to understand this led to significant drops in chess interest in later years once the momentum died. The CFC world did very little to welcome these players and understand their reality. This reality often encourages junior girls to gravitate towards CYCC/WYCC events because they are socially more pleasant then other chess events.
We also have some Detroit and Michigan events which seem to be far more sociable than the typical Canadian tournament with the possible exception of Hal Bond's events or some of the Kitchener events. The Michigan Scholastic which a bunch of the kids and I will be attending next weekend will have very much the air of an OYCC at one fifth the price. Last week's Michigan Festival also was very kid and girl friendly as well... Irena Krush was there as an example of what a young woman might achieve in USCF chess. There were several notable female players from Latin America and elsewhere as well. Graham Burgess of Gambit Publications provided analysis of their games for free for anyone that was interested.
The reasons that 12-18 year old boys excel to higher levels then girls are simple. The male dominated clubs are more enjoyable for them, they are mentored by top male adult players more readily, and occasionally futurities are provided for them. Top girls are also hit by messages telling them why they won't succeed, both subtle and not so subtle. I started seeing this when my girls were as young as 7.
I see this more in the beginners/intermediate class than the advanced class though the immaturity of some of the boys does drive away the older girls even in the advanced class who get fed up with the rambunctiousness. The girls in Windsor do have mentors. Hopefully many of them (and the boys as well) will stick with chess for years to come and we can get back to building up a chess culture which can be self sustaining. Tonight at the end of the class a bunch of college age kids or maybe high school age football type guys sat down at our analysis boards after we were done analyzing our games with the kids and played some games. They were paying close attention to the games oblivious to the world around them. They weren't very good but they weren't that bad either. No self consciousness about playing chess. The future for chess looks promising in Windsor at least.
Reality is these kind of moves are problematic given how the CYCC system is designed and how people react to such events. Given that no real contendor has done this since 2002, its hard to say doing so opens up the doors to more players doing so. More likely it will be a one-off with very little benefit to the player and quickly forgotten as other junior girls carry on as before.
I couldn't disagree with you more, Duncan. The 2002 example you site, namely, Hazel Smith, who played in the CYCC U12 Boys (as it was then called), was rated 1729 at the time and her 4.5/8 performance was pretty much spot on, a 1726 TPR. She was clearly a bit out of her league against the winner that year, Raja Panjwani, rated 2034, and who won the event easily with a 7.5/8. Hazel of course reverted to the Girls section the following year which she won far too easily.
Harmony Zhu would be completely wasting her time playing the 2013 CYCC U8 Girls. The girl who won the 2012 CYCC U8 Girls, Kylie Tan (and who turns 9 in February and thus in the U10 age group in 2013) ,with a 7.5/8 is rated 960, almost 600 points below Harmony. Harmony, imho, is even too strong for the U8 Open. And this is where Bindi and I part company. I think Harmony's chess career would be best furthered by not only playing in an Open section but also playing beyond her age. You don't maximize your chess potential by playing with weaker opponents. Perhaps it only takes one shining example to attract a good number of new girls to the game. By way of example, look what Anand has done for the popularity of chess in India.
Re: Re : Re: Re : Re: The Women’s Chess System – Finally Time to Abolish It?
The fact that you can post this kind of garbage analysis and so easily dismiss the skills of a past junior player only serves to confirm my
points on this matter ( "very little benefit to the player and quickly forgotten" ).
Last edited by Duncan Smith; Sunday, 11th November, 2012, 12:24 AM.
The fact that you can post this kind of garbage analysis and so easily dismiss the skills of a past junior player only serves to confirm my
points on this matter ( "very little benefit to the player and quickly forgotten" ).
I'm in no way dismissing the skills of a player who is a veritable legend in Canadian chess, Duncan. Hazel is on the very short list for the best female Canadian chess player ever. The fact remains, however, that she peaked at 2201. I'm suggesting to you that she could have been a whole let better had she stayed in the boys/open sections and not reverted to the girls only sections. Frankly, playing in girls only sections was a total waste of her time in terms of improving her chess skills. You don't improve by continually crushing your opponents. You improve by losing to better opponents and learning from those losses. If we are to ever see our first ever 2400+ girl/woman in this country it will be precisely because she eschewed the girls only tournaments.
Re : The Women’s Chess System – Finally Time to Abolish It?
Perhaps Laszlo Polgar may have said it best. From the Wikipedia entry on his daughter Judit:
Traditionally, chess has been a male-dominated activity, and women are often seen as weaker players; thus advancing the idea of a Women's World Champion.[5] However, from the beginning, László was against the idea that his daughters had to participate in female-only events. "Women are able to achieve results similar, in fields of intellectual activities, to that of men," he wrote. "Chess is a form of intellectual activity, so this applies to chess. Accordingly, we reject any kind of discrimination in this respect."[6] This put the Polgárs in conflict with the Hungarian Chess Federation of the day, whose policy was for women to play in women-only tournaments. Polgár's older sister, Susan, first fought the bureaucracy by playing in men's tournaments and refusing to play in women's tournaments. Susan Polgár, when she was a 15-year-old International Master, said in 1985 that it was due to this conflict that she had not been awarded the Grandmaster title despite having made the norm eleven times.[7]
Tweet
Comment