If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Policy / Politique
The fee for tournament organizers advertising on ChessTalk is $20/event or $100/yearly unlimited for the year.
Les frais d'inscription des organisateurs de tournoi sur ChessTalk sont de 20 $/événement ou de 100 $/année illimitée.
You can etransfer to Henry Lam at chesstalkforum at gmail dot com
Transfér à Henry Lam à chesstalkforum@gmail.com
Dark Knight / Le Chevalier Noir
General Guidelines
---- Nous avons besoin d'un traduction français!
Some Basics
1. Under Board "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQs) there are 3 sections dealing with General Forum Usage, User Profile Features, and Reading and Posting Messages. These deal with everything from Avatars to Your Notifications. Most general technical questions are covered there. Here is a link to the FAQs. https://forum.chesstalk.com/help
2. Consider using the SEARCH button if you are looking for information. You may find your question has already been answered in a previous thread.
3. If you've looked for an answer to a question, and not found one, then you should consider asking your question in a new thread. For example, there have already been questions and discussion regarding: how to do chess diagrams (FENs); crosstables that line up properly; and the numerous little “glitches” that every new site will have.
4. Read pinned or sticky threads, like this one, if they look important. This applies especially to newcomers.
5. Read the thread you're posting in before you post. There are a variety of ways to look at a thread. These are covered under “Display Modes”.
6. Thread titles: please provide some details in your thread title. This is useful for a number of reasons. It helps ChessTalk members to quickly skim the threads. It prevents duplication of threads. And so on.
7. Unnecessary thread proliferation (e.g., deliberately creating a new thread that duplicates existing discussion) is discouraged. Look to see if a thread on your topic may have already been started and, if so, consider adding your contribution to the pre-existing thread. However, starting new threads to explore side-issues that are not relevant to the original subject is strongly encouraged. A single thread on the Canadian Open, with hundreds of posts on multiple sub-topics, is no better than a dozen threads on the Open covering only a few topics. Use your good judgment when starting a new thread.
8. If and/or when sub-forums are created, please make sure to create threads in the proper place.
Debate
9. Give an opinion and back it up with a reason. Throwaway comments such as "Game X pwnz because my friend and I think so!" could be considered pointless at best, and inflammatory at worst.
10. Try to give your own opinions, not simply those copied and pasted from reviews or opinions of your friends.
Unacceptable behavior and warnings
11. In registering here at ChessTalk please note that the same or similar rules apply here as applied at the previous Boardhost message board. In particular, the following content is not permitted to appear in any messages:
* Racism
* Hatred
* Harassment
* Adult content
* Obscene material
* Nudity or pornography
* Material that infringes intellectual property or other proprietary rights of any party
* Material the posting of which is tortious or violates a contractual or fiduciary obligation you or we owe to another party
* Piracy, hacking, viruses, worms, or warez
* Spam
* Any illegal content
* unapproved Commercial banner advertisements or revenue-generating links
* Any link to or any images from a site containing any material outlined in these restrictions
* Any material deemed offensive or inappropriate by the Board staff
12. Users are welcome to challenge other points of view and opinions, but should do so respectfully. Personal attacks on others will not be tolerated. Posts and threads with unacceptable content can be closed or deleted altogether. Furthermore, a range of sanctions are possible - from a simple warning to a temporary or even a permanent banning from ChessTalk.
Helping to Moderate
13. 'Report' links (an exclamation mark inside a triangle) can be found in many places throughout the board. These links allow users to alert the board staff to anything which is offensive, objectionable or illegal. Please consider using this feature if the need arises.
Advice for free
14. You should exercise the same caution with Private Messages as you would with any public posting.
Yes, with your innate immune system intact, I agree. With the clotshots by the time people are on the third booster 75% of the innate immune system is destroyed. they have poor odds of surviving. Children's hospitals in America are filling up with kids subjected to even trivial colds in terrible shape because their innate immune system is destroyed.
Pfizer’s enlistment of Marvel’s Avengers comes after the U.S. Congress opted to not pass additional COVID-19 funding, signaling that the U.S. government will no longer be the primary purchaser of its COVID-19 vaccines.
"The UK Government has just published blatant propaganda that is now being promoted by mainstream media organisations such as Sky News and The Guardian.
The propaganda claims that the UK summer heatwave caused 2,800 excess deaths among the over 65’s.
But what the propaganda fails to mention is that the UK has suffered an average of 1,180 excess deaths for 22 consecutive weeks since the middle of April, with the worst week for excess deaths (2,208) actually occurring during the middle of May, two months prior to the UK recording a temperature of 40 degrees Celcius for a single day.
This is clear-cut evidence that the Government and mainstream media are cherrypicking data and trying to con you into believing that we are in a climate change crisis that is already killing thousands."
There is a mainstream consensus that cases are about to rise, hospitalizations are about to rise, and, due to waning of vaccination protection, COVID deaths are about to rise.
I am aware that there are those who posit that "COVID-19 Death Statistics" are "propaganda", and that these deaths are unrelated to COVID-19, or are in fact, or will be, due to the initial vaccination itself.
Up to CT'ers to weigh the evidence, and the sources, and decide.
There is a mainstream consensus that cases are about to rise, hospitalizations are about to rise, and, due to waning of vaccination protection, COVID deaths are about to rise.
I am aware that there are those who posit that "COVID-19 Death Statistics" are "propaganda", and that these deaths are unrelated to COVID-19, or are in fact, or will be, due to the initial vaccination itself.
Up to CT'ers to weigh the evidence, and the sources, and decide.
You gotta be kidding, of course there is going to be a rise in COVID death that have gone up steadily since the jabs were rolled out. They are neither safe
nor effective, get over it! i already posted my evidence. https://forum.chesstalk.com/forum/ch...685#post221685
In fact, the more doses, the more the immune system is destroyed. across all age groups. Wow, it looked like those third doses really helped the elderly huh?....die quicker, that is! In fact the best off are the unvaxxed. The one dose only looks in good shape, but they are a transient group because usually, one dose after a short time followed up with the second dose.
My sources are the govt data itself not govt funded propagandized media. The govt after June stopped including jab status in their epidemiology reports
because the data is absolutely horrific.
Don't misrepresent what I posted in response to post 3127.. The way the statistics are presented is propaganda, the article I posted put the statistics in proper context and directly linked to govt data. Clearly, you have not read the article.
Last edited by Sid Belzberg; Thursday, 20th October, 2022, 01:54 AM.
Are there negative consequences (Despite the benefits) from getting the jab?
"A coalition of over 20 public interest groups is calling on the federal government to publicly affirm the “material risks and scientific uncertainties” related to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, presenting a letter signed by 19 doctors, scientists, and academics across the country.
Coming together as the “Citizens’ Group,” the coalition wrote the letter to Jean-Yves Duclos and Dr. Theresa Tam dated Oct. 13, asking for “transparent answers” to all questions and concerns revolving around COVID-19 vaccines."
# 1. This is by 20 public interest groups - a number, but not a "lot" nor a "majority".........but it is true that "insights" often arise out of minority views.
# 2. Letter signed by 19 doctors, scientists and academics........very, very few.......
For example - just licensed physicians in Canada: 92,173 (2020)
# 3. We know that there are some negative reactions by a small minority of recipients to receipt of the vaccine. It is a legitimate question to document the extent of adverse reactions/long-term negative consequences.
# 4. As an example of concern: "Bivalent booster shots from Moderna Inc. and Pfizer Inc. failed to raise levels of protective proteins called neutralizing antibodies against the dominant omicron strains any more than four doses of the original Covid vaccine, according to an early independent study on a small group of people."
The Bi-valents are marketed mainly as being "more protective" against the Omicron strains??
Are there negative consequences (Despite the benefits) from getting the jab?
"A coalition of over 20 public interest groups is calling on the federal government to publicly affirm the “material risks and scientific uncertainties” related to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, presenting a letter signed by 19 doctors, scientists, and academics across the country.
Coming together as the “Citizens’ Group,” the coalition wrote the letter to Jean-Yves Duclos and Dr. Theresa Tam dated Oct. 13, asking for “transparent answers” to all questions and concerns revolving around COVID-19 vaccines."
# 1. This is by 20 public interest groups - a number, but not a "lot" nor a "majority".........but it is true that "insights" often arise out of minority views.
# 2. Letter signed by 19 doctors, scientists and academics........very, very few.......
For example - just licensed physicians in Canada: 92,173 (2020)
# 3. We know that there are some negative reactions by a small minority of recipients to receipt of the vaccine. It is a legitimate question to document the extent of adverse reactions/long-term negative consequences.
# 4. As an example of concern: "Bivalent booster shots from Moderna Inc. and Pfizer Inc. failed to raise levels of protective proteins called neutralizing antibodies against the dominant omicron strains any more than four doses of the original Covid vaccine, according to an early independent study on a small group of people."
The Bi-valents are marketed mainly as being "more protective" against the Omicron strains??
The reason this is a minority is that organizations like the College of Physicians and Surgeons in Ontario and many State Medical Boards will terminate Dr's licenses if they speak out against the mainstream narrative or even prescribe FDA-approved treatments off-label that are not part of the mainstream. These organizations are funded by the pharma industry and are "regulatory captured" and pharma corrupted.
By the way, this is the last day you can watch this documentary for free by long-time democrat Robert F Kennedy Jr, "The Real Anthony Fauci," which explains all of this.
Tweet
Comment