COVID-19 ... how we cope :)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Neil Frarey
    replied
    Yup, just getting started ... sigh.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sid Belzberg
    replied
    The Notice of Liability delivered to individuals at the W.H.O. this week

    Addressing both corporate and personal liability in wrongdoing


    DR TESS LAWRIE, MBBCH, PHD​
    MAY 07, 2024

    214

    55

    39
    Share

    Below you will find the text of the Notice of Liability delivered to Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Dr Maria van Kerkhove, Dr Janet Diaz and Jeremy Farrar this week. It was drafted with the help of specialist international lawyers and health scientists. Feel free to copy, paste and adapt for the purpose of notifying others of their liability in relation to the Covid-19 fraud.


    Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus: a man

    dba: Director General World Health Organisation (WHO)

    Office of the Director General

    Avenue Appia 20

    1202 Geneva - Switzerland       

    6th day in the month of May in the year 2024

    Dear Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus (hereafter ‘you’),
    Re: Notice upon Harm and to Cease and Desist


    On behalf of living men, women and all their sons and daughters living right now and those yet to be born on Earth, we hereby place you: a man: Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, doing business as the Director General of the World Health Organisation (hereafter W.H.O), on notice that:
    1. Your actions carried out in the capacity of Director General of the W.H.O during the Covid-19 chapter, principally consisting of falsely informing world governments of a so-called pandemic, thereby causing governments to declare non-existent medical emergencies, have been and are still an integral part of a chain of events that is resulting in mass loss of life, immense physical harm and untold psychological distress and trauma to the people on this planet;
    2. Said actions appear to have led to Governments deploying insufficiently tested SARS-CoV-2 genetically modified organisms (GMOs) falsely termed ‘vaccines’ being also gene therapies, mandating unscientific masking protocols, implementing inhumane and anti-scientific ‘social distancing’ measures, purchasing and deploying ineffective and fraudulent PCR tests subsequently used to create false ‘casedemics’ in order to justify unlawful ‘lockdowns’, business closures and house arrest;
    3. We demand that, with immediate effect, you cease and desist from taking further actions that would involve false and fraudulent communication to governments thereby causing or resulting in further instances of the kind of catastrophic outcomes outlined above.
    Notice upon Personal Liability

    We also put you on notice that failure to cease or desist from continued or repeated involvement or implication in the above harms shall render you liable both in your personal and corporate capacity. As a man, you shall be investigated for criminal conspiracy. As a corporate officer, you shall be investigated for gross negligence, serious misconduct in public office, corporate fraud and potentially even aiding and abetting corporate manslaughter.

    Further to the above Notices, and in order to clarify our position, may we take this opportunity respectfully to remind you of your own position and legal responsibilities.
    WHO Constitutional Obligation


    As early as 2021, international experts were cautioning against the novel Covid strategies recommended by the WHO Covid team, especially but not limited to the experimental modRNA medical technologies developed at ‘warp speed’ to function purportedly as vaccines.

    The WHO Constitution states in Article 67 that members of the WHO may enjoy ‘such privileges and immunities as may be necessary for the fulfilment of its objective and for the exercise of its functions.” Such privileges and immunity, whilst patently unfair, inequitable and dangerous, only apply when fulfilling the Article 1 objective.

    By your unilateral recommendation of harmful Covid strategies, The People, represented by the World Council for Health, do not believe that you acted in accordance with your constitutional obligations in Article 1. If your actions are found to be in contravention of Article 1, you will not be covered by Article 67 of the WHO Constitution that provides for the stated protection and immunity. In other words, you may be personally liable for the millions of deaths and immense suffering caused on account of your role in the unlawful authorisation of these harmful recommendations. Moreover, given the blatant conflicts of interest evident in the WHO’s activities, closely connected to commercial interests, immunity is not guaranteed when acting at the behest of those interests.
    Consequences of your WHO Covid Policies, Recommendations, Advice and Omissions

    1. Immeasurable suffering and death


    In the past four years, billions of people who trusted and complied with WHO-based country government advice have experienced ongoing physical and mental suffering, illness, disability, loss of income, poverty, child abuse, other violence, and even death as a result.
    2. Human rights violations


    Country governments worldwide implemented severe emergency measures directly based on WHO recommendations that consequently resulted in widespread violations of fundamental human rights. Boys, girls and babies were masked and injected. Living men and women expressing, or wishing to express their right to free speech, travel, bodily autonomy, and to choose, were threatened, intimidated, coerced, neglected, abused and in some cases assaulted, imprisoned or killed. The WHO did nothing to address the harm it caused.
    3. Failure to recommend inexpensive, safe and effective treatments and remedies for Covid-19

    Covid-19 can be effectively treated with safe and established multi-purpose generic medicines, including ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, in combination with zinc, vitamin D, vitamin C, and other immune-boosting, health-promoting and anti-coagulant treatments. Failure to disclose and raise awareness of these, and failure to recommend ivermectin widely in combination with zinc for early use, meant that millions of people suffered and many died as a result of not being offered effective early and late treatments.

    By recommending ivermectin only in the context of clinical trials and omitting sound and practical advice on how to attain the highest level of health during the Covid-19 scare, ivermectin and other effective treatments were withheld in many countries in favour of expensive GMO drugs, emergency-authorized patented pharmaceutical drugs without safety records. Thus, in your personal capacity, the world’s people may hold you responsible for the consequences of serious omissions related to safe, effective treatments for Covid-19, in preference for undisclosed .



    Leave a comment:


  • Neil Frarey
    replied
    CDC redacts every single word of 148 page study on Myocarditis after Covid Vaccination ...

    https://twitter.com/RobertKennedyJr/...76567678017604

    ... who ordered the destruction of this myocarditis data.

    ...

    So how many Covid19 booster shots have been injected into you all by now?

    5? 6? ... 9?

    I seriously don't know.
    Thankfully, I still don't have this experimental mRNA technology injected into my body.


    .

    Leave a comment:


  • Neil Frarey
    replied
    To maim and kill people ... deliberately.
    https://twitter.com/i/status/1757008739733770419

    Former VP of Pfizer.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sid Belzberg
    replied
    Killing FIELDS of CAMBODIA, do you think that was bad? Do you think Kampuchea during Khmer Rouge rule was bad? Well, in Ontario, Canada, under Doug Ford's conservative government (uniparty with the liberals),

    it was the KILLING FIELDS in nursing homes, long-term facilities, old-aged homes, and for-profit nursing homes that were worst! Nurses, doctors, and staff KILLED our parents and grandparents with the "COVID protocol"!



    DR. PAUL ALEXANDER
    FEB 4, 2024

    This was about greed, power, malice, malfeasance, ineptness, just cruelty! Depopulation. This was about a fraud fake non-pandemic, a deadly mRNA Malone, Bourla, Bancel, Weissman et al. mRNA vaccine, this is about deadly medical management of our most precious elderly etc. in health facilities under the black hole of the COVID protocol.

    Hang them!


    How did they kill our families? A false-positive COVID diagnosis often, they were 95% false-positive, then isolated behind that glass wall, no doctor the nurse would touch them, left our parents dying in misery in their feces and piss, maggots eating away at them, we pulled back the blankets and saw mounds of feces, they were quickly dehydrated, malnourished that hastened death, DNR orders against family wishes, denial of needed antibiotics often for bacterial pneumonia secondary to any viral infection or ILI, they then sedated granny using deadly cocktails of propofol, midazolam, fentanyl, lorazepam, diamorphine, etc.), then pumped her with excessive deadly liver and kidney toxic drugs like Remdesivir, and then put her in the ground by placing her on a ventilator that blew massive holes in her lungs and caused ventilator-associated pneumonia.

    These fuckers killed our parents, these medical doctors, and you want fucking amnesty?

    Never! Drag Doug Ford into court.

    The KILLING FIELDS that occured in Canada’s hospitlas and nursing homes would have made Kampuchea during Khmer Rouge rule blush I tell you, the concentration of murder. It was murder in the FIRST!

    I say hang these people high, take them to courts and juries first to legally examine and fairly but if shown they did wrong and caused deaths, if judges say they caused deaths, reckless, deliberate, anyhow, then we hang them!




    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toron...tudy-1.5659224

    Last edited by Sid Belzberg; Sunday, 4th February, 2024, 08:12 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sid Belzberg
    replied
    Originally posted by Bob Armstrong View Post
    "The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends that people with Covid-19 isolate for at least five days, but recent policy changes in California and Oregon break from that guidance."

    https://www.cnn.com/2024/01/23/healt...=1706873827936


    Bob A
    Isolate for five days for a virus that has now mutated to the point that it is no worse than a cold???? You still view CNN as a valid source of information? Sigh.The fact that even pharma-corrupted shithole states like California and Oregon would go against the CDC speaks volumes about the credibility of this once-trusted organization.
    Last edited by Sid Belzberg; Friday, 2nd February, 2024, 12:44 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bob Armstrong
    replied
    "The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends that people with Covid-19 isolate for at least five days, but recent policy changes in California and Oregon break from that guidance."

    https://www.cnn.com/2024/01/23/healt...=1706873827936

    Bob A

    Leave a comment:


  • Sid Belzberg
    replied
    Originally posted by Bob Armstrong View Post
    MAID is a blessing for those whose quality of life has become intolerable......the stats give rise to no problem ...the problem was that those with intolerable life conditions, in the past, simply had to suffer their personal torture.

    I also support the extension of MAID to include mental illness. Some peoples' mental state includes no longer any desire to live.They are cut off from life at their very core...they feel like the walking dead. The only option for them, if not MAID, is suicide. The problem with embracing suicide as the answer to an intolerable life is that the collateral damage to partners, family, friends is most extensive.

    I agree that the issue of detection of absolute desperation in the case of mental illness is difficult, and the studies must get to the point of saying the system will work well. Also, the government must believe it is in the best interest of society. And a majority of Canadians now support MAID (With the stats unclear as to extension to include mental illness):

    "....three-in-five Canadians (61%) say they support the current MAID law in Canada, which allows a patient to request the treatment under certain circumstances but without facing foreseeable death."

    Mental Health and MAID: Canadians question looming changes to Canada’s assisted-death law
    https://angusreid.org/assisted-dying...mental-health/

    There is urgency in this task, since some people are suffering intolerable lives........most unfair.

    Bob A
    Originally posted by Bob Armstrong View Post
    .three-in-five Canadians (61%) say they support the current MAID law in Canada, which allows a patient to request the treatment under certain circumstances but without facing foreseeable death."
    Here is a perfect example of your continued support of "tyranny of the majority," allowing a person not capable of making a logical decision to commit suicide is a violation of section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights.
    No wonder you look for paths to "ditch" constitutions as per your Democratic Marxism thread.

    Leave a comment:


  • Neil Frarey
    replied
    Originally posted by Bob Armstrong View Post

    "....three-in-five Canadians (61%) say they support the current MAID law in Canada, which allows a patient to request the treatment under certain circumstances but without facing foreseeable death."


    There is urgency in this task, since some people are suffering intolerable lives........most unfair.

    Bob A
    Is that the same three-in-five Canadians (61%) that do not own a Holy Bible and are not familiar with the healing power of daily prayer?




    Leave a comment:


  • Bob Armstrong
    replied
    MAID is a blessing for those whose quality of life has become intolerable......the stats give rise to no problem ...the problem was that those with intolerable life conditions, in the past, simply had to suffer their personal torture.

    I also support the extension of MAID to include mental illness. Some peoples' mental state includes no longer any desire to live.They are cut off from life at their very core...they feel like the walking dead. The only option for them, if not MAID, is suicide. The problem with embracing suicide as the answer to an intolerable life is that the collateral damage to partners, family, friends is most extensive.

    I agree that the issue of detection of absolute desperation in the case of mental illness is difficult, and the studies must get to the point of saying the system will work well. Also, the government must believe it is in the best interest of society. And a majority of Canadians now support MAID (With the stats unclear as to extension to include mental illness):

    "....three-in-five Canadians (61%) say they support the current MAID law in Canada, which allows a patient to request the treatment under certain circumstances but without facing foreseeable death."

    Mental Health and MAID: Canadians question looming changes to Canada’s assisted-death law
    https://angusreid.org/assisted-dying...mental-health/

    There is urgency in this task, since some people are suffering intolerable lives........most unfair.

    Bob A
    Last edited by Bob Armstrong; Tuesday, 30th January, 2024, 06:29 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sid Belzberg
    replied
    Parliamentary MAID committee releases damning report against Liberal expansion of assisted suicide


    A special parliamentary committee released a report Monday urging Ottawa to park the breaks on expanding assisted suicide legislation to include mental illness. A 2021 annual report said 31,664 Canadians accessed the procedure between 2016 and 2021.
    A special parliamentary committee released a report Monday urging Ottawa to park the breaks on expanding assisted suicide legislation.

    "Committee concludes that the medical system in Canada is not prepared for medical assistance in dying where mental disorder is the sole underlying medical condition (hereinafter “MAID MD-SUMC”), the report reads. It recommends not moving forward with the expansion to include mental illness until the departments of health and justice adequately consult provincial and territorial governments.

    After MAID became legal in 2016, a Quebec court expanded access after judges ruled the "reasonably foreseeable" death clause unconstitutional.

    In 2021, Ottawa permitted anyone with "a serious and incurable illness, disease or disability" who is in "an advanced state of irreversible decline" to access MAID — not including the mentally ill. However, the Senate permitted those with "irremediable" mental illness to access the procedure in a controversial amendment that passed later that year.

    On Monday, Conservative and NDP MPs on the committee called for a pause to the planned expansion of eligibility for such cases, initially scheduled for March 17. The committee, made up of 15 MPs and senators, had to determine whether the healthcare system is prepared for the expansion.
    Angelina Ireland of Delta Hospice Society describes the Medical assistance in dying program (MAID), as a "predatory regime against the Canadian people."https://t.co/TlhyHul70J pic.twitter.com/1IlDvrWQ89

    — Rebel News (@RebelNewsOnline) January 27, 2024



    "One year prior to the date on which it is anticipated that the law will permit MAID MD-SUMC the House of Commons and the Senate re-establish the Special Joint Committee on Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) in order to verify the degree of preparedness attained for a safe and adequate application of MAID MD-SUMC," the report reads.

    If the Trudeau Liberals adopt the recommendations of the all-party committee, it would mark the second delay of the expansion after a previous year-long delay. Health Minister Mark Holland will decide after the committee submits its report by January 31.

    Conservative MP Michael Cooper argued that "Canada isn't ready," pointing to concerns raised by psychiatrists about the difficulty for medical professionals in determining the irreversibility of mental illness or the rationality behind a request for assisted death. "These Liberals have put ideology ahead of evidence-based decision making," he claimed.

    NDP MP Alistair MacGregor, a vice-chair of the committee, criticized the feds for changing the law without proper consultation.

    According to the 2021 MAID annual report, the number of Canadians accessing the procedure has steadily increased between 2016 and 2021, totalling 31,664 patients, typically above 70 years of age.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sid Belzberg
    replied
    First peer-reviewed paper to call for a worldwide moratorium on C19 vaccines due to the "unacceptably high risk-to-benefit ratio."


    Abstract


    Our understanding of COVID-19 vaccinations and their impact on health and mortality has evolved substantially since the first vaccine rollouts. Published reports from the original randomized phase 3 trials concluded that the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines could greatly reduce COVID-19 symptoms. In the interim, problems with the methods, execution, and reporting of these pivotal trials have emerged. Re-analysis of the Pfizer trial data identified statistically significant increases in serious adverse events (SAEs) in the vaccine group. Numerous SAEs were identified following the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), including death, cancer, cardiac events, and various autoimmune, hematological, reproductive, and neurological disorders. Furthermore, these products never underwent adequate safety and toxicological testing in accordance with previously established scientific standards. Among the other major topics addressed in this narrative review are the published analyses of serious harms to humans, quality control issues and process-related impurities, mechanisms underlying adverse events (AEs), the immunologic basis for vaccine inefficacy, and concerning mortality trends based on the registrational trial data. The risk-benefit imbalance substantiated by the evidence to date contraindicates further booster injections and suggests that, at a minimum, the mRNA injections should be removed from the childhood immunization program until proper safety and toxicological studies are conducted.

    Federal agency approval of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines on a blanket-coverage population-wide basis had no support from an honest assessment of all relevant registrational data and commensurate consideration of risks versus benefits. Given the extensive, well-documented SAEs and unacceptably high harm-to-reward ratio, we urge governments to endorse a global moratorium on the modified mRNA products until all relevant questions pertaining to causality, residual DNA, and aberrant protein production are answered.

    https://www.cureus.com/articles/203052-covid-19-mrna-vaccines-lessons-learned-from-the-registrational-trials-and-global-vaccination-campaign#!/

    Leave a comment:


  • Sid Belzberg
    replied
    Originally posted by Bob Armstrong View Post
    Americas - USA

    COVID-19 - Drugs - Available/Unavailable

    Click image for larger version  Name:	COVID-19.png Views:	0 Size:	580.0 KB ID:	231512

    "The antiviral drug Paxlovid is widely available, but it’s only approved for people at high risk of severe disease, such as older adults and people with underlying conditions.
    .............
    Antivirals currently available overseas seem to be effective at shortening the length and treating the symptoms of mild-to-moderate cases of COVID-19."

    https://time.com/6588624/covid-19-an...lctg=206908353

    Bob A
    Paxlovid In their own trials, it was worthless in the vaccinated. Minimally effective with risk of rebound in unvaxxed. Only been shown to prevent severe symptoms, not death, in unvaxxed. Side effects aren’t it’s major problem as it isn’t on board long enough to induce or downregulate P450 enzymes. The major drawback of all of these anti-viral drugs is that the disease isn’t viral. It’s a viral infection, but it’s a disease of the inflammation regulation pathways and immune system regulation mechanisms. All the effective treatments are aimed at those two issues, not at the pathogen. Paxlovid is 1390.00 for around 30 pills, and it does not work in later non viral stages of the disease.

    Ivermectin is effective at all stages of the disease and costs around 70.00 USD for a package of 50 12mg pills. Banned in Canada, available in the US, including over-the-counter for humans in Tenessee and over-the-counter for animals in all fifty states. Animal pills are the same as the human ones. I had the particularly virulent delta variant in November 2021 and treated myself with Ivermectin HCQ Quercetin D3 C Zinc; Tumeric got through no problem and ended up with superior longer, lasting natural immunity.
    Last edited by Sid Belzberg; Monday, 29th January, 2024, 05:15 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bob Armstrong
    replied
    Americas - USA

    COVID-19 - Drugs - Available/Unavailable

    Click image for larger version

Name:	COVID-19.png
Views:	53
Size:	580.0 KB
ID:	231512

    "The antiviral drug Paxlovid is widely available, but it’s only approved for people at high risk of severe disease, such as older adults and people with underlying conditions.
    .............
    Antivirals currently available overseas seem to be effective at shortening the length and treating the symptoms of mild-to-moderate cases of COVID-19."

    https://time.com/6588624/covid-19-an...lctg=206908353

    Bob A

    Leave a comment:


  • Sid Belzberg
    replied

    EXCLUSIVE: Email Reveals Why CDC Didn’t Issue Alert on COVID Vaccines and Myocarditis

    CDC officials were worried about causing panic.A health care worker fills a syringe with Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine in a file image. (Robyn Beck/AFP via Getty Images)
    By Zachary Stieber
    1/25/2024
    Updated:
    1/25/2024
    Print
    X 1

    0:00


    The nation’s top public health agency did not send an alert on COVID-19 vaccines and heart inflammation because officials were concerned they would cause panic, according to an email obtained by The Epoch Times.

    The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in 2021 drafted an alert for heart inflammation, or myocarditis, and the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines. Officials prepared to release it to the public, taking steps including having the agency’s director review the language, internal documents show.

    The alert would have been sent through the CDC’s Health Alert System (HAN) network, which goes to state and local officials, as well as doctors, across the country.

    Story continues below advertisement



    The alert was never sent.

    In the May 25, 2021, email, exclusively obtained by The Epoch Times, a CDC official revealed why some officials were against sending the alert.

    “The pros and cons of an official HAN are what the main discussion are right now,” Dr. Sara Oliver, the official, wrote in the missive. “I think it’s likely to be a HAN since that is CDC’s primary method of communications to clinicians and public health departments, but people don’t want to appear alarmist either.”

    RELATED STORIES
    CDC Drafted Alert for Myocarditis and COVID-19 Vaccines but Never Sent It
    1/17/2024

    CDC Labeled Accurate Articles as Misinformation, Documents Show
    1/23/2024

    Dr. Oliver was corresponding with an employee of either Pfizer or Moderna. The employee’s name and email were redacted in the copy obtained by The Epoch Times.

    Dr. Oliver did not respond to a request for comment. Asked about the email, the CDC did not address Dr. Oliver’s statement.

    The “CDC’s apparent decision to not immediately issue a formal alert to clinicians warning them about the increased risk of myocarditis and pericarditis in vaccinated individuals is not only inexcusable, it’s malpractice,” Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), the top Republican on the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, told The Epoch Times in an email.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X