COVID-19 ... how we cope :)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Sid Belzberg
    replied
    Originally posted by Bob Armstrong View Post
    Americas - Canada - Province of British Columbia

    Election: The 2024 British Columbia general election will be held on October 19, 2024, to elect members of the Legislative Assembly to serve in the 43rd parliament of the Canadian province of British Columbia. Wikipedia

    C
    OVID-19 Vaccination Opinion


    "B.C. Conservative Leader John Rustad said the vaccine mandates seemed to be more about shaping public opinion and controlling the population.

    Rustad made the comments in a video interview posted on July 23 by the B.C. Public Service Employees for Freedom which opposes vaccine mandates. The video was publicized on Sept. 23 by the Conservatives’ political rival NDP on social media amid the provincial election campaign.

    In the video, Rustad is seen speaking about a conversation he had with Provincial Health Officer Bonnie Henry on vaccine mandates.

    “I’ve had three shots of the vaccine. I wish I hadn’t, quite frankly,” Rustad said. “That’s one of the things that has changed in my thinking. The so-called vaccine, the COVID mRNA shots.”

    Rustad said the conversation with Henry left him feeling something wasn’t “quite right.”

    “When I talked to Bonnie Henry about it, I started to realize that it wasn’t so much about trying to get herd immunity or trying to stop the spread, but it was more around shaping opinion and control on the population,” Rustad said."

    The Epoch Times: The Morning Brief Newsletter - 24/9/24

    Bob (Vaccination Supporter)
    "The world will not be destroyed by those who do evil, but by those who watch them and do nothing".

    - Albert Einstein

    Leave a comment:


  • Bob Armstrong
    replied
    Americas - Canada - Province of British Columbia

    Election: The 2024 British Columbia general election will be held on October 19, 2024, to elect members of the Legislative Assembly to serve in the 43rd parliament of the Canadian province of British Columbia. Wikipedia

    C
    OVID-19 Vaccination Opinion


    "B.C. Conservative Leader John Rustad said the vaccine mandates seemed to be more about shaping public opinion and controlling the population.

    Rustad made the comments in a video interview posted on July 23 by the B.C. Public Service Employees for Freedom which opposes vaccine mandates. The video was publicized on Sept. 23 by the Conservatives’ political rival NDP on social media amid the provincial election campaign.

    In the video, Rustad is seen speaking about a conversation he had with Provincial Health Officer Bonnie Henry on vaccine mandates.

    “I’ve had three shots of the vaccine. I wish I hadn’t, quite frankly,” Rustad said. “That’s one of the things that has changed in my thinking. The so-called vaccine, the COVID mRNA shots.”

    Rustad said the conversation with Henry left him feeling something wasn’t “quite right.”

    “When I talked to Bonnie Henry about it, I started to realize that it wasn’t so much about trying to get herd immunity or trying to stop the spread, but it was more around shaping opinion and control on the population,” Rustad said."

    The Epoch Times: The Morning Brief Newsletter - 24/9/24

    Bob (Vaccination Supporter)

    Leave a comment:


  • Sid Belzberg
    replied
    Originally posted by Dilip Panjwani View Post

    Sid,
    Being in active medical practice, I have first hand info about what a fool Big-Pharma is making of the medical profession, and through that, the public at large. We should probably get together and devise a strategy to do something about it for the good of our society.
    Robert F Kennedy Jr about big pharma: "Four companies make all 72 of those vaccines, which is Pfizer, Glaxo, Merck, and Sanofi. All of those companies are convicted felons. And not only that, they're serial felons. Their business model is committing felonies. These companies, in the last 10 years collectively have paid $35 billion in penalties, damages, fines, for falsifying science, for defrauding regulators, for lying to doctors, and for killing hundreds of thousands of people. Vioxx, which was Merck's flagship product, killed between 120,000 and 500,000 Americans. This was a pill. And Merck was selling as a headache pill. Right. And Merck knew caused heart attacks and killed people. And they didn't tell anybody. And they knew a certain, you know, we got the spreadsheets that show there being counters. They were accountants. This is, you're going to kill so many people per dose. We can still make more money even if they all sue us. And in the end, they killed, you know, up to half a million Americans and they got away with it. They paid seven billion dollars in fines. Nobody went to jail. And this is... They probably made a hundred million in profits. It requires kind of a cognitive dissonance to believe that these companies that are lying and cheating on every other pharmaceutical product, every other medical device that they create...are somehow found Jesus vaccines and aren't lying to us. And the thing is with vaccines, vaccines is the only place they could never get caught because it's illegal in this country to sue a vaccine company."

    Leave a comment:


  • Dilip Panjwani
    replied
    Originally posted by Sid Belzberg View Post

    Hi Fred,
    Indeed, many examples of c19 propaganda articles sponsored by pharma-corrupted large institutions have been disseminated. Two heavily referenced books that put this in context would be

    https://www.amazon.com/dp/0593541596...controligarchs

    https://www.amazon.com/dp/B09LVYYTJJ...20doctor%20fau
    The paper I previously posted,
    https://www.researchgate.net/publica...extFileContent

    Has significant reproducible evidence backing its findings, which include the following;
    1. Concerns about the clinical trials:
    • The trials were not designed to assess reduction in severe disease, hospitalization, or death due to insufficient statistical power[31,33].
    • There were issues with underreporting of adverse events and early unblinding of participants[49,50,84,85].
    • Reanalysis of trial data showed higher rates of serious adverse events in vaccine groups[50,54].
    1. Safety signals:
    • Increased risks of myocarditis, pericarditis, and other cardiovascular events, especially in younger individuals[57-63].
    • Potential increased risk of all-cause mortality in vaccine groups based on extended trial data[52,54].
    • Reports of neurological, hematological, reproductive and autoimmune adverse events[114,252,253].
    1. Efficacy concerns:
    • Waning effectiveness against infection and transmission, especially with new variants[93-97].
    • Lack of strong evidence for protection against severe disease and death[103].
    1. Mechanistic concerns:
    • Potential for spike protein production to cause systemic inflammation and immune dysfunction[25,26].
    • Issues with lipid nanoparticles and PEG potentially contributing to adverse events[186-191].
    • Concerns about N1-methylpseudouridine modifications potentially causing ribosomal frameshifting[169,170].
    1. Quality control issues:
    • Detection of DNA contamination in some vaccine batches[151,152].
    • Differences between clinical trial batches and mass-produced batches[165,166].
    1. Broader impacts:
    • Potential links to increased all-cause mortality in some population-level analyses[254-256].
    • Concerns about impacts on fertility and reproductive health[114].
    Click image for larger version Name:	Naopmiwolf.png Views:	0 Size:	1.10 MB ID:	236759


    https://rumble.com/v2hpryu-naomi-wolf-whats-in-the-pfizer-documents.html
    Sid,
    Being in active medical practice, I have first hand info about what a fool Big-Pharma is making of the medical profession, and through that, the public at large. We should probably get together and devise a strategy to do something about it for the good of our society.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sid Belzberg
    replied
    Hi Fred,
    Indeed, many examples of c19 propaganda articles sponsored by pharma-corrupted large institutions have been disseminated. Two heavily referenced books that put this in context would be

    https://www.amazon.com/dp/0593541596...controligarchs

    https://www.amazon.com/dp/B09LVYYTJJ...20doctor%20fau
    The paper I previously posted,
    https://www.researchgate.net/publica...extFileContent

    Has significant reproducible evidence backing its findings, which include the following;
    1. Concerns about the clinical trials:
    • The trials were not designed to assess reduction in severe disease, hospitalization, or death due to insufficient statistical power[31,33].
    • There were issues with underreporting of adverse events and early unblinding of participants[49,50,84,85].
    • Reanalysis of trial data showed higher rates of serious adverse events in vaccine groups[50,54].
    1. Safety signals:
    • Increased risks of myocarditis, pericarditis, and other cardiovascular events, especially in younger individuals[57-63].
    • Potential increased risk of all-cause mortality in vaccine groups based on extended trial data[52,54].
    • Reports of neurological, hematological, reproductive and autoimmune adverse events[114,252,253].
    1. Efficacy concerns:
    • Waning effectiveness against infection and transmission, especially with new variants[93-97].
    • Lack of strong evidence for protection against severe disease and death[103].
    1. Mechanistic concerns:
    • Potential for spike protein production to cause systemic inflammation and immune dysfunction[25,26].
    • Issues with lipid nanoparticles and PEG potentially contributing to adverse events[186-191].
    • Concerns about N1-methylpseudouridine modifications potentially causing ribosomal frameshifting[169,170].
    1. Quality control issues:
    • Detection of DNA contamination in some vaccine batches[151,152].
    • Differences between clinical trial batches and mass-produced batches[165,166].
    1. Broader impacts:
    • Potential links to increased all-cause mortality in some population-level analyses[254-256].
    • Concerns about impacts on fertility and reproductive health[114].
    Click image for larger version  Name:	Naopmiwolf.png Views:	0 Size:	1.10 MB ID:	236759


    https://rumble.com/v2hpryu-naomi-wolf-whats-in-the-pfizer-documents.html
    Last edited by Sid Belzberg; Friday, 20th September, 2024, 07:48 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Fred Henderson
    replied
    Originally posted by Sid Belzberg View Post
    Click image for larger version  Name:	Screenshot 2024-07-03 at 6.49.23 AM.png Views:	103 Size:	1.54 MB ID:	234667
    The Myth of Vaccines and Autism Spectrum Disorder - The myth of vaccination and autism spectrum - PMC (nih.gov)

    Autism-vaccine link debunked - Mayo Clinic Health System

    COVID-19 Vaccines: Myth Versus Fact | Johns Hopkins Medicine

    Debunking myths about COVID-19 - Mayo Clinic Health System

    covid vaccine myths 2024 - Google Search


    I'll let someone else go through the rest of the search. Help me out, Pargat. :)
    Last edited by Fred Henderson; Thursday, 19th September, 2024, 10:52 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tom O'Donnell
    replied
    Here's how NY's Covid Czar, Dr. Jay Varma, coped.

    CAUGHT: NYC Covid Czar Admits Forcing Vaccines & Having Drug-Fueled Sex Parties - YouTube


    Leave a comment:


  • Sid Belzberg
    replied
    Originally posted by Pargat Perrer View Post

    I am talking about NOW, 2024, and you respond with something about 2022......

    Remember, the story you and others were spreading, which at the time I considered plausible, was that vaccinated people would slowly accumulate blood clots in their capillaries, and within 2 to 3 years, they would drop like flies in huge numbers, from heart attack or stroke related to the blood clots. Well, here we are and there's no sign of it happening.
    Sadly, these numbers have only gotten worse since the publication of that report.

    "There can be little doubt that the peaks in excess ACM are caused by the COVID-19 vaccinations, with a mean all-ages fatal toxicity by injection of vDFR = (0.126 ± 132 0.004) %, or approximately 1 death per 800 injections, which is reasonably expected to be globally representative. This is a staggering number, compared to what is generally believed about traditional vaccines, which is approximately one serious adverse effect per million (Malhotra, 2023). It is three orders of magnitude (one thousand times) larger."

    https://correlation-canada.org/covid...rn-hemisphere/


    Last year, it was discovered that the manufacturing process contaminated all batches with DNA Plasmid sequences that easily integrate into the genome, causing a new phenomenon of turbo cancers. My late father-in-law, after being injected, immediately had blood clots in the brain and died within a year his body was wracked with vaccine-induced tumors, and the hospital in Montreal put him down like a dog with the lethal drug midazolam that stops one from breathing, and results in a horrible death.

    One in 800 dead is only the beginning. The second paper shows estimates that approximately 100 million people have been seriously injured by the vaccine so far. https://www.researchgate.net/publica...extFileContent

    It seems you have "no problem" with any of this, so I am not sure why you are denying these gruesome facts other than to troll me.

    Originally posted by Pargat Perrer View Post
    I have no problem seeing man as a cancer .... seeing man as not the end product, but as a means to an end ....
    https://forum.chesstalk.com/forum/ch...409#post231409
    Last edited by Sid Belzberg; Tuesday, 13th August, 2024, 07:50 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pargat Perrer
    replied
    Originally posted by Sid Belzberg View Post

    https://correlation-canada.org/wp-co...key-Linard.pdf

    "We also calculate the population-wide risk of death per injection (vDFR) by dose number (1st dose, 2nd dose, boosters) (actually, by time period), and by age (in a subset of European countries). Using the median value of all-ages vDFR for 2021-2022 for the 78 countries with sufficient data gives an estimated projected global all-ages excess mortality associated with the COVID-19 vaccine rollouts up to 30 December 2022: 16.9 million COVID-19-vaccine-associated deaths."

    https://www.researchgate.net/publica...extFileContent
    I am talking about NOW, 2024, and you respond with something about 2022......

    Remember, the story you and others were spreading, which at the time I considered plausible, was that vaccinated people would slowly accumulate blood clots in their capillaries, and within 2 to 3 years, they would drop like flies in huge numbers, from heart attack or stroke related to the blood clots. Well, here we are and there's no sign of it happening.
    Last edited by Pargat Perrer; Tuesday, 13th August, 2024, 06:44 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sid Belzberg
    replied
    Originally posted by Pargat Perrer View Post
    . so where are all the vaccinated people dropping dead from blood clots? It's more than 2 years later, it's supposed to be happening now. I gave that prediction some possible legitimacy, but now it's pretty much refuted. Ok
    https://correlation-canada.org/wp-co...key-Linard.pdf

    "We also calculate the population-wide risk of death per injection (vDFR) by dose number (1st dose, 2nd dose, boosters) (actually, by time period), and by age (in a subset of European countries). Using the median value of all-ages vDFR for 2021-2022 for the 78 countries with sufficient data gives an estimated projected global all-ages excess mortality associated with the COVID-19 vaccine rollouts up to 30 December 2022: 16.9 million COVID-19-vaccine-associated deaths."

    https://www.researchgate.net/publica...extFileContent
    Last edited by Sid Belzberg; Monday, 12th August, 2024, 05:08 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pargat Perrer
    replied
    Originally posted by Sid Belzberg View Post
    The biggest lie ever
    Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot 2024-08-12 at 4.52.10 AM.png
Views:	92
Size:	656.2 KB
ID:	235775

    Not necessarily. You'd have to show that transmissibility of Covid was only as bad as that of the flu. If it's many orders of magnitude higher, you could have the drastic flu drop-off due to lockdowns and mask-wearing, while Covid still spread. One of the things we kept hearing with each new variant was that it was much more transmissible.

    You'd also have to prove that positive COVID test could have resulted from having only the flu.

    Of course you will not have any of it, we all know by now your opinions on this. They want us all dead etc etc ... so where are all the vaccinated people dropping dead from blood clots? It's more than 2 years later, it's supposed to be happening now. I gave that prediction some possible legitimacy, but now it's pretty much refuted.





    Leave a comment:


  • Sid Belzberg
    replied
    The biggest lie ever
    Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot 2024-08-12 at 4.52.10 AM.png
Views:	92
Size:	656.2 KB
ID:	235775

    Leave a comment:


  • Sid Belzberg
    replied
    @PierreKory


    Severe brain fog, psychiatric destabilization, and accelerated dementia are some of the saddest but most common vax injuries I see (especially since no one believes them). Large datasets now show the vaccines roughly double the rates of those conditions.
    We Now Have Proof The COVID Vaccines Damage Cognition

    Examining the causes and treatments of the common neurological injuries caused by vaccination


    A MIDWESTERN DOCTOR
    JUN 20, 2024

    750

    366
    Share
    Story at a Glance:

    •Subtle and overt neurological injuries are one of the most common results of a pharmaceutical injury.

    •The COVID-19 vaccines excel at causing damage to cognition, and many of us have noticed both subtle and over cognitive impairment following vaccination that relatively few people know how to address.

    •For a long time, the hypothesis that the vaccines impaired cognition was “anecdotal” because it was based on individuals observing it in their peer group or patients.


    •Recently large datasets emerged which show this phenomenon is very real and that the severe injuries we’ve seen from the vaccines (e.g., sudden death) are only the tip of the iceberg.

    •In this article we will review the proof vaccine are doing this and explore the mechanisms which allow it to happen so we can better understand how to treat it.

    Note: I originally published this article a year ago. I am republishing it now because a robust dataset emerged which regrettably validates the hypothesis I put forward then.

    https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/w...covid-vaccines

    Leave a comment:


  • Sid Belzberg
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot 2024-07-03 at 6.49.23 AM.png
Views:	227
Size:	1.54 MB
ID:	234667

    Leave a comment:


  • Dilip Panjwani
    replied
    Originally posted by Peter McKillop View Post

    Pargat, the above paragraph is so typical of your acidic, polemical style. It goes like this:
    1. You construct a hypothetical 'house'.
    2. Then, almost always with woefully insufficient justification, you insist that your adversary lives in your hypothetical house.
    3. Then you treat your hypothetical house as fact and attack your adversary for having the temerity to live there.

    Excellent definition of 'Nasty Trolling", Peter!

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X