If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Policy / Politique
The fee for tournament organizers advertising on ChessTalk is $20/event or $100/yearly unlimited for the year.
Les frais d'inscription des organisateurs de tournoi sur ChessTalk sont de 20 $/événement ou de 100 $/année illimitée.
You can etransfer to Henry Lam at chesstalkforum at gmail dot com
Transfér à Henry Lam à chesstalkforum@gmail.com
Dark Knight / Le Chevalier Noir
General Guidelines
---- Nous avons besoin d'un traduction français!
Some Basics
1. Under Board "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQs) there are 3 sections dealing with General Forum Usage, User Profile Features, and Reading and Posting Messages. These deal with everything from Avatars to Your Notifications. Most general technical questions are covered there. Here is a link to the FAQs. https://forum.chesstalk.com/help
2. Consider using the SEARCH button if you are looking for information. You may find your question has already been answered in a previous thread.
3. If you've looked for an answer to a question, and not found one, then you should consider asking your question in a new thread. For example, there have already been questions and discussion regarding: how to do chess diagrams (FENs); crosstables that line up properly; and the numerous little “glitches” that every new site will have.
4. Read pinned or sticky threads, like this one, if they look important. This applies especially to newcomers.
5. Read the thread you're posting in before you post. There are a variety of ways to look at a thread. These are covered under “Display Modes”.
6. Thread titles: please provide some details in your thread title. This is useful for a number of reasons. It helps ChessTalk members to quickly skim the threads. It prevents duplication of threads. And so on.
7. Unnecessary thread proliferation (e.g., deliberately creating a new thread that duplicates existing discussion) is discouraged. Look to see if a thread on your topic may have already been started and, if so, consider adding your contribution to the pre-existing thread. However, starting new threads to explore side-issues that are not relevant to the original subject is strongly encouraged. A single thread on the Canadian Open, with hundreds of posts on multiple sub-topics, is no better than a dozen threads on the Open covering only a few topics. Use your good judgment when starting a new thread.
8. If and/or when sub-forums are created, please make sure to create threads in the proper place.
Debate
9. Give an opinion and back it up with a reason. Throwaway comments such as "Game X pwnz because my friend and I think so!" could be considered pointless at best, and inflammatory at worst.
10. Try to give your own opinions, not simply those copied and pasted from reviews or opinions of your friends.
Unacceptable behavior and warnings
11. In registering here at ChessTalk please note that the same or similar rules apply here as applied at the previous Boardhost message board. In particular, the following content is not permitted to appear in any messages:
* Racism
* Hatred
* Harassment
* Adult content
* Obscene material
* Nudity or pornography
* Material that infringes intellectual property or other proprietary rights of any party
* Material the posting of which is tortious or violates a contractual or fiduciary obligation you or we owe to another party
* Piracy, hacking, viruses, worms, or warez
* Spam
* Any illegal content
* unapproved Commercial banner advertisements or revenue-generating links
* Any link to or any images from a site containing any material outlined in these restrictions
* Any material deemed offensive or inappropriate by the Board staff
12. Users are welcome to challenge other points of view and opinions, but should do so respectfully. Personal attacks on others will not be tolerated. Posts and threads with unacceptable content can be closed or deleted altogether. Furthermore, a range of sanctions are possible - from a simple warning to a temporary or even a permanent banning from ChessTalk.
Helping to Moderate
13. 'Report' links (an exclamation mark inside a triangle) can be found in many places throughout the board. These links allow users to alert the board staff to anything which is offensive, objectionable or illegal. Please consider using this feature if the need arises.
Advice for free
14. You should exercise the same caution with Private Messages as you would with any public posting.
Has anyone else seen The Big Short?
I saw it yesterday, not exactly what I expected, but glad I saw it.
Based on the book by Michael Lewis about the financial collapse of 2008.
It explains the corrupt financial system thru the eyes of a few eccentric characters who saw the collapse coming and bet against the housing market and became billionaires.
Yes, sorry, this is not chess related, so please forgive me.
The US government has done very little to punish those responsible or to regulate to prevent another collapse, the “too big to fail” banks are now even bigger than in 2008.
Only Bernie Sanders seems ready to take them on. I was happy to see a major endorsement from leading economists today.
The US government has done very little to punish those responsible or to regulate to prevent another collapse, the “too big to fail” banks are now even bigger than in 2008.
The people responsible were congress as shown in a brilliant Saturday night live skit a few years ago.
Bernie Sanders wins big in New Hampshire primary!
Hurrah. :)
Kind of unbelievable from a 6 months ago perspective! I think he has a real shot at winning the nomination (which will drive the Democrats establishment nuts, because they see him as unelectable in a race with the GOP for President). The Establishment is certainly behind Hillary, and will be pulling out all the stops to shut the Bern down.
Does anyone else see Bernie winning the nomination?
Kind of unbelievable from a 6 months ago perspective!
Bob A
Bob, not at all, I saw it coming. Check your email. We had a short chat on politics and I sent you this email on June 7, 2015.
Bob A.,
We just might be in the early days of a generational shift to the political left in both Canada and USA.
Some 40 years ago, the sands began shifting right under Ronald Reagan. I recall as a young accounting student, and myself on the political right, buying into the unions are too strong, entrepreneurs are great, free trade hurrah, and cheering for Preston Manning. Seems crazy to me now, but to be fair to my younger self, it was a different world. A shift to the right, okay. But after 40 years, enough is enough.
I think the silent majority feel the same way. They just need a excuse to break ties with the old line parties. Look at recent Alberta election. Jim Prentice continued the arrogance of the Alberta conservatives, calling the election early to catch the opposition unready. Then his condescending comment to Rachel Notley about “math is difficult”. The voters had enough. Throw out the bums.
The Canadian Senate scandal. Great potential for a protest vote against the establishment. We’ll see.
In the USA, the Citizens United decision, the absurd list of lunatic Republican candidates, endless wars, the opposition to health care, and climate change deniers, it is only a matter of time until Americans say enough is enough.
Bernie Sanders wins big in New Hampshire primary!
Hurrah. :)
Bernie Sanders is the first Jew in the history of the United States to win a Presidential Primary. Personally, I'd rather see him run as an independent, as suggested by Seattle City Councillor Kshama Sawant, but his accomplishment is remarkable.
Bob, not at all, I saw it coming. Check your email. We had a short chat on politics and I sent you this email on June 7, 2015.
Bob A.,
We just might be in the early days of a generational shift to the political left in both Canada and USA.
Some 40 years ago, the sands began shifting right under Ronald Reagan. I recall as a young accounting student, and myself on the political right, buying into the unions are too strong, entrepreneurs are great, free trade hurrah, and cheering for Preston Manning. Seems crazy to me now, but to be fair to my younger self, it was a different world. A shift to the right, okay. But after 40 years, enough is enough.
I think the silent majority feel the same way. They just need a excuse to break ties with the old line parties. Look at recent Alberta election. Jim Prentice continued the arrogance of the Alberta conservatives, calling the election early to catch the opposition unready. Then his condescending comment to Rachel Notley about “math is difficult”. The voters had enough. Throw out the bums.
The Canadian Senate scandal. Great potential for a protest vote against the establishment. We’ll see.
In the USA, the Citizens United decision, the absurd list of lunatic Republican candidates, endless wars, the opposition to health care, and climate change deniers, it is only a matter of time until Americans say enough is enough.
Bob G.
Hi Bob G:
As you know, my memory is pretty faulty....but you seemed right on.....it is a tidal wave building.
Re: Bernie Sanders is the first Jew in US history to win a Presidential primary.
My own political position is similar to that of Bernie Sanders, having had my grandfather be among the founders of the Co-Operative Commonwealth Federation (fore-runner of today's NDP) in 1932, and three generations of my family since then staying involved with the CCF/NDP. Actually, the Canadian Chess Federation (CCF) had to change its name and acronym to the Chess Federation of Canada (CFC), to avoid confusion with the CCF, which became the NDP in 1961! :)
My preference would be for a Hilary Clinton -- Bernie Sanders Democratic Party ticket for President and Vice-President. I just don't think Sanders will have enough staying power in Southern states to take the presidential nomination. Hillary is going to win it. If she is smart, she will pick him as running mate.
I think that if Donald Trump were to win the presidency in 2016, we would see nuclear war in the Middle East. Jeb Bush recently questioned Trump's mental stability, with good reason.
Of course young people feel that way. Most of them haven't earned much in their lives and have been given every material thing by their parents.
My dad, and Archie Bunker, used to talk like that in the 1960's. You're giving away your age, Tom. Truth is, when idealistic young people rebel against their own society, then this is often the surest sign that that society is rotten to the core and overdue for change.
The 1% should be afraid.
Dogs will bark, but the caravan of chess moves on.
I just don't think Sanders will have enough staying power in Southern states to take the presidential nomination. Hillary is going to win it. If she is smart, she will pick him as running mate.
Some commentators are actually saying that Clinton is finished. I don't know enough to comment on that.
In any case, remarks like Frank's above is partly why Kshama Sawant in Seattle suggests that Sanders would do more good by running as an independent. I haven't checked her website to see what she is saying now, but the basic idea is that the electoral system, dominated as it is by uncontrolled money (one analyst remarked that this election would cost 5 billion dollars by the end of it!), is fixed in advance, and it would be better to run a campaign that is not diluted and/or destroyed by the Clinton dynasty and establishment Democrats. I mean, just look at how little the current Dem President has accomplished.
Better, say some, for Sanders' Presidential campaign to be the start of a mass movement for change. In the end, it is not elections that will bring about the needed change in the US (or Canada). The Quebec students, for example, did not bring the hated Charest regime to an end by marking ballots.
Dogs will bark, but the caravan of chess moves on.
but the basic idea is that the electoral system, dominated as it is by uncontrolled money (one analyst remarked that this election would cost 5 billion dollars by the end of it!), is fixed in advance, and it would be better to run a campaign that is not diluted and/or destroyed by the Clinton dynasty and establishment Democrats. I mean, just look at how little the current Dem President has accomplished.
Better, say some, for Sanders' Presidential campaign to be the start of a mass movement for change. In the end, it is not elections that will bring about the needed change in the US (or Canada).
Calm down there Nigel. For all the problems of the US electoral system, Bernie is showing us that maybe it is possible to fix it through the ballot box. Give him a chance.
I've always wondered why the people who whine about the 1% don't become CEOs and bankers if the jobs are so easy and pay so well then donate 99% of their income to the less fortunate.
Comment