Great news! The New York Times finally discovered that they were misled during Covid. Only five years after the various disastrous government policies.
If you get your news from places like the NYT you deserve what you get.
-
-
“We’re Eating F***ing GARBAGE!” Can MAGA Trust RFK Jr On Health? Feat Bryan Johnson
At about the 20-minute mark, Birx says outright that the mRNA vaccines should have been given to the elderly and sickly first. They didn't follow the science.Leave a comment:
-
Here is the language of HB 371:Introduced by Rep Greg Kmetz, Rep L. Schubert, Rep K. Love, Rep T. Sharp, Rep R. Gregg, Rep E. Tilleman, Rep T. Manzella, Rep D. Emrich, Rep S. Gist, Rep R. Marshall, Rep J. Schillinger, Rep L. Deming, Rep S. Maness, HB 371 is entitled:“AN ACT PROHIBITING THE ADMINISTRATION OF GENE-BASED VACCINES INTO HUMANS IN THE STATE OF MONTANA; PROVIDING A DEFINITION; AND PROVIDING A PENALTY.”WHEREAS, the mRNA vaccines have caused enormous numbers of deaths, disabilities, and serious adverse events; and
WHEREAS, no long-term studies have been completed regarding fertility, teratogenicity, mutagenicity, or oncogenicity; and
WHEREAS, recipients are not given informed consent; and
WHEREAS, the mRNA vaccines may integrate into the human genome and be passed onto the next generation; and
WHEREAS, the mRNA vaccines are contaminated with DNA, metallic particles, and other unknown nanoparticles; and
WHEREAS, the mRNA vaccines may shed to others and cause side effects or harm.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MONTANA:
NEW SECTION. Section 1. Administration of gene-based vaccines.
(1) A person may not provide or administer a gene-based vaccine to a human within the state.
(2) each incident.
(3) A person who violates this section is guilty of a misdemeanor and is subject to a $500 fine for the appropriate licensure board within the Montana department of labor and industry shall review the license of a person who is licensed under Title 37 and who violates this section.
(4) For the purposes of this section, "gene-based vaccine" means a vaccine developed using messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) technology, modified messenger ribonucleic acid technology, self amplifying messenger ribonucleic acid technology, or deoxyribonucleic acid technology.
NEW SECTION. Section 2. Codification instruction.
[Section 1] is intended to be codified as an integral part of Title 45, chapter 5, and the provisions of Title 45, chapter 5, apply to [section 1].- ENDLeave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Vlad Drkulec View Post
My testimony submitted to the House Judiciary Committee
Montana HB 371, a bill to ban the administration of all gene-based vaccines to humans in the state of Montana, will be heard before the House Judiciary Committee on February 7, 2025, starting at 8 AM (MTN time). I submitted the following testimony in support of the bill:Feb 6 February 6, 2025
Madame chair and members of the committee,
I am a physician in Houston, Texas who successfully treated over 6000 COVID patients during the pandemic. I have witnessed first-hand both the effectiveness of early treatment for COVID as well as the dangers of the COVID shots. In the two years following the roll-out of the COVID shots, seven percent of my new patients came to see me for severe, debilitating side effects resulting from these shots. Ranging from severe tremors to POTS, these side effects are long-lasting and difficult to treat. In my 20+ years of practicing medicine, I’ve never seen anything like this; any other pharmaceutical product would have been pulled off the market a long time ago.
A little over a year ago, I started a nonprofit called Americans for Health Freedom. Our foundational project is to recruit politicians willing to simply state that the COVID shots should be pulled off the market. To date, nearly three hundred elected officials have signed our pledge. Many of these politicians have asked for a reference guide, which I am sharing with you
COVID Shot Fact Sheet
Mary Talley Bowden MD
All Cause Mortality (ACM):
FDA data: 158,000 more people died than expected in first 9 months of 2023.
Rancourt et al: In 17 countries, no association was found between COVID shot and reduction in ACM. The opposite occurred. In 17 countries, ACM increased following COVID shots. The overall risk of death per injection (vDFR) for the 17 countries was 0.126 ± 0.004%, corresponding to 17.0 ± 0.5 million COVID shot deaths worldwide. This amounts to 1 death per 470 living persons.
Vaccine or gene therapy?
The definition of a vaccine changed after the COVID shots came on the market, changing from “produce immunity” to “stimulate the body’s immune response."
Technically these shots are gene therapy. Per Moderna, “mRNA is considered a gene therapy product by the FDA”. FDA has much higher safety standards for gene therapy so it labeled the shots as a ‘vaccine,’ ensuring liability protection, less onerous regulatory requirements, and greater public acceptance.
Improper Testing:
Dutch MEP Rob Roos asked a Pfizer executive if the vaccine was tested against stopping transmission before it entered the market: "No, we were moving at the speed of science." Drugs require at least 5 years of testing/research before risks are understood, and typically it takes 10 years to prove a drug is safe and effective. Brooke Jackson, former research assistant at Pfizer, has come forward with evidence of research misconduct.
EUA requirements (all 4 must be satisfied):- Must be an emergency situation.
- Based on available data, it must be reasonable to believe the EUA product may be effective to counter an emergency situation (full FDA approvable requires proof that the drug is effective)
- Known potential benefits outweigh known potential risks
- No alternative solution.
Vaccine was not an appropriate intervention and not necessary to begin with.- Covid had a high survival rate (we were told 3.4% case fatality rate, not true)
- Flu mortality rate: 0.1%
- Covid mortality rate: 0.26% (no treatment, all ages)- CDC admitted in 3/22 that it had wrongly included more than 72K deaths as COVID deaths and had to reduce reported pediatric deaths by 416 (24%)
- Safe and effective treatments were available. At least 85% of deaths could have been avoided with early treatment
- Monoclonal antibodies were removed from the market when Biden mandated the shots (September 2021, the third and largest wave of the pandemic.)
- Hydroxychloroquine - In 2005, the NIH recognized it as an antiviral.
- Ivermectin - over 100 studies with over 138,000 patients showed ivermectin leads to faster viral clearance, faster time to hospital discharge, faster time to clinical recovery, and 40% reduction in mortality rates with early treatment
- Extremely misleading claim of 95% effectiveness of the COVID shots. The 95% effective claim only reduced the chance of infection from 0.88% to 0.04%
- Rapidly evolving viruses are bad candidates for a vaccine. All previous attempts to develop a vaccine against coronaviruses have failed.
Elderly:
CMS Data: Medicare: >50K deaths within 14 days of 1st or 2nd shot (summer 2021)
Kostroff et al: “People in the 65+ demographic are 5x more likely to die from inoculation as from COVID-19 under the most favorable assumptions.”
DOD Data: 70% of COVID hospitalizations in 65+ age group were among fully vaccinated.
Rancourt et al: Analyzed all-cause mortality in 17 countries and found large and age-dependent increased risk of death per injection in the elderly, as large as 5% (1 death per 20 injections) measured for 90+ year-olds in Chile and Peru, 1% (1 death per 100 injections) (all ages) in India, 0.55% (1 death per 180 injections) for 80+ year-olds in Israel, and 0.93% (1 death per 110 injections) for 85+ year-olds in Australia. The risk of death per injection increases exponentially with age, for 60+ years ages, doubling approximately every 4 years in age.
CDC: Significant safety signals appear on VAERS for patients 50 and older (PRP >2)
Pregnant:
Golden rule of pregnancy: Experimental drugs and new substances should never be given to pregnant or lactating women. 104/127 miscarriage rate (82%) in women who received shot in first 20 weeks. Modified mRNA crosses the placenta and has been detected in breast milk.
Children:
Authorized by FDA for ages 6 months and older. Currently on the pediatric vaccine schedule. All babies are recommended to receive 3 COVID shots by the age of 9 months.
Pfizer: Initially 34 children under age 12 were given the shot - 24 had serious adverse reactions -13 did not resolve
CDC survey 9/22: 6% children unable to do normal activities after 2nd shot
Florida recommends against COVID shots for under age 17
Europe 9/22: 691% increase in excess deaths of children 0-14
Dr. Eric Rubin (editor-in-chief NEJM): “We’re never going to learn how safe this vaccine is unless we start giving it.”
April 2022: 17,495% increase in monthly average for myocarditis cases under age 18
12/14/20 - 7/29/22: 45,289 adverse events 5 -17 year old, 582 myocarditis, 54 deaths
WHO 1/22: Children under 12 should not be routinely vaccinated against COVID
Rome declaration: >17,000 physicians and scientists are against vaccinating children
93 Israeli doctors signed a joint letter of protest against vaccinating children
Cancer:
Angues et al: COVID19 vaccines may create an environment that predisposes some cancer patients, including survivors, to “cancer progression, recurrence, and/or metastasis” based on two factors- the “multi-hit hypothesis” of cancer, which suggests that cancer is the consequence of several genetic mutations and the “growing evidence and safety reports” in the Vaccine Adverse Effects Report System (VAERS). Early-onset cancer in young women under 30 is rising 0.67% per year.
Myocarditis:
No increase in the incidence of myocarditis and pericarditis in COVID-19 recovered patients compared to uninfected matched controls. (196,992 patients studied)
27,832 reports of myocarditis on VAERS
Pediatric myocarditis can leave an asymptomatic permanent scar on the heart, increasing the risk of arrhythmia and death. Over 200 peer-reviewed studies describe myocarditis after the COVID shots.
There is no easy way to detect myocarditis in a nonverbal child. Must order a cardiac MRI to diagnose.
3-6 months after myocarditis following COVID shot, heart abnormalities remain in >50%
VAERS:
No other vaccine has generated more than 50 studies on adverse reactions. COVID shots have generated over 3400. Under-reporting factor estimated to be 41.
Compare VAERS reports in last 30 years to 1 year of post-COVID reports: 5241 deaths (30 years) vs 9778 (1 yr post COVID)
V-Safe:
Phone app to report side effects. CDC refused to disclose date until 10/22 when it was forced to under court order. Out of 10 million responses: 33.1% significant adverse event, 7.7% received medical care for adverse event
Why is this not public knowledge?- Massive censorship and propaganda
- Retaliatory actions against those who spoke out: Tens of thousands of physicians received a letter threatening revocation of their medical licenses by the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB), American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM), American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM), and American Board of Pediatrics (ABP) for spreading vaccine misinformation.
- Massive corruption and conflicts of interest from the medical industrial complex
- CDC has ownership interest in 56 vaccine patents, buys and distributes $4.6 billion in vaccines annually. Historically, any drug with 5 unexplained deaths gets a black box warning. After 50 unresolved deaths, it’s pulled from the market. A death count of 50 from the COVID shots was reached by Jan 2021.
- CDC has ownership interest in 56 vaccine patents, buys and distributes $4.6 billion in vaccines annually. Historically, any drug with 5 unexplained deaths gets a black box warning. After 50 unresolved deaths, it’s pulled from the market. A death count of 50 from the COVID shots was reached by Jan 2021.
Leave a comment:
-
NEWS: Argentina Announces withdrawal from WHO over COVID Lockdown "Economic Catastrophe" - could be a 1st domino to fall
https://makismd.substack.com/p/news-...m_medium=email
By Owen Evans
2/5/2025The Argentine government has announced its decision to withdraw from the World Health Organization (WHO) in response to the “catastrophic” economic impact of the COVID-19 lockdowns.
In a statement shared on social media platform X on Feb. 5, the office of Argentine President Javier Milei stated that the COVID-19 lockdowns were one of the greatest economic catastrophes in world history, citing the severe and lasting impact on global economies as Argentina’s primary reason for pulling out.“The WHO was established in 1948 to coordinate global health emergency responses, but it failed its most significant test: it promoted indefinite quarantines without scientific backing during the COVID-19 pandemic,” the statement reads in English translation.
“These quarantines caused one of the largest economic catastrophes in world history.”
According to the statement, under the 1998 Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, such lockdown policies could be classified as “a crime against humanity.”Milei’s office stated that in Argentina, the WHO responded to a government that “kept children out of school, left hundreds of thousands of workers without income, caused businesses and [small and medium-sized enterprises] to go bankrupt, and, despite all of this, led to the loss of 130,000 lives.”
“It is urgent that the international community reassess the role of supranational organizations—funded by all—that fail to fulfill the purposes for which they were created, engage in political maneuvering, and attempt to impose their will on member states,” Milei’s office stated.
Anarcho-Capitalist
“President Milei instructed Foreign Minister Gerardo Werthein to withdraw Argentina’s participation in the World Health Organization,” presidential spokesman Manuel Adorni said at a Feb. 5 news conference.
Milei, a self-proclaimed anarcho-capitalist, was inaugurated as Argentina’s president in 2023 after defeating Sergio Massa, economy minister for Alberto Fernández’s socialist administration.
In a September 2024 speech at the United Nations, Milei took aim at the 2030 Agenda’s Sustainable Development Goals, a global initiative for sustainable economic growth and environmental protection.He said that although the program is “well-intentioned in its goals,” it is “nothing more than a supranational government program with a socialist slant.”
“If the 2030 agenda failed, as its own promoters acknowledge, the answer should be to ask ourselves if it was not an ill-conceived program to begin with,” Milei said.
Trump’s Similar Move
On Jan. 20, U.S. President Donald Trump announced that the United States, the WHO’s top donor, would pull out of the organization.He said the global health agency had mishandled the COVID-19 pandemic and other international health crises.
Negotiations with the group about a pandemic agreement and the International Health Regulations would be suspended while the withdrawal is taking place, Trump said.
He said the WHO had failed to act independently from the “inappropriate political influence of WHO member states” and required “unfairly onerous payments” from the United States that were disproportionate to the sums provided by other, larger countries, such as China.
“World Health ripped us off, everybody rips off the United States. It’s not going to happen anymore,” Trump said.
WHO spokesperson Tarik Jasarevic said in response, “We hope that the United States will reconsider, and we really hope that there will be constructive dialogue for the benefit of everyone, for Americans but also for people around the world.”
The United States is currently the largest WHO funder, contributing about $1.28 billion during 2022–2023, the last year reported on the organization’s website. That equates to almost half of the WHO’s joint external evaluation missions for the last fiscal year.
WHO’s Reaction to China’s COVID Cover-Up
This is Trump’s second attempt to withdraw from the WHO. The president began the process in 2020 because of frustration over the WHO’s reaction to China’s cover-up of details surrounding the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 at the start of what became the COVID-19 pandemic.
The House Oversight and Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic released a report in December 2024 on the WHO’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic, calling it “an abject failure.”According to the report, the WHO bent to pressure from the Chinese Communist Party and placed “China’s political interests ahead of its international duties.”
As part of the alleged failure, the WHO reportedly ignored warnings by Taiwan on Dec. 31, 2019, about “atypical pneumonia cases” in Wuhan, which it asked the WHO to investigate.
“The initial mismanagement of the COVID-19 pandemic not only potentially caused the further spread of the virus, but it created a situation where people lost trust in the global public health organization,” the report stated.
A WHO spokesman told The Epoch Times: “Thanks for your query. We are looking into it.”Leave a comment:
-
I picked up a copy of this book on an Amazon Kindle special in the second week of January where for one day you could get it for $1.99 plus HST. It is very illuminating.Originally posted by Sid Belzberg View PostThe Pfizer Papers that arrived today and that I believe are the most significant and irrefutable data yet to become available reveal the truth about the greatest atrocity in the history of humanity - the mRNA platform DoD, military bioweapon global population control (targeted for 7 billion reduction) shots. The source (3,200 medical experts donating their time and expertise) studying hundreds of thousands of Pfizer documents they and the FDA fought in court to suppress for 75 years is irrefutable and cannot be credibly denied. It SHOULD bring down Pfizer, as well as the FDA and many others' careers if not freedom.
In any case, I believe this is the most compelling, bullet-proof source on the greatest atrocity in human history.
I think the suppression of therapies which worked to combat Covid like Ivermectin and hydroxychloriquine is probably the greatest crime of the pandemic. It was intentional. Protecting profits trumped the protection of lives.
Leave a comment:
-
Yes I read the report and konw several of the authors including Dr. Bridle. Even Celeberties like Mel Gibson are now talking about how well ivermectin and Fenbendazole works for late stage cancers, Dr. Warburg won the Noble prize in 1931 for his findings that showed that ferementing cancer cells make a great therpeutic target with a metabolic approach (sugar restricted diet) but only now is this really gaining traction https://x.com/TheChiefNerd/status/1877525664040988721.
Last edited by Sid Belzberg; Tuesday, 28th January, 2025, 02:12 AM.Leave a comment:
-
From today's published News:
A task force created by the Alberta UCP government to review the province's pandemic response has issued its final report.
Among the $2-million report's key recommendations are calls for the provincial government to "immediately halt" the use of all COVID-19 vaccines without "full disclosure" of potential risks and to bar healthy children and teenagers from getting COVID shots.
It criticizes a range of pandemic restrictions, while recommending that doctors be allowed to prescribe alternative medications, including ivermectin.
Leave a comment:
-
"This is the highest quality paper ever produced on myocarditis risk post vaccination. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejhf.2978… The debate is unironically over. With this paper, on top of the numerous others and the mountain of anecdotes and examples with the never-ending stories of athletes collapsing on the field, there should be zero doubt anymore about the vaccine, and its causality. 1 in 35 booster recipients suffered myocarditis. ONE IN THIRTY FIVE. Now go look up the data for the 5 year survival rate of those with myocarditis. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/22129-myocarditis… "The survival rate for myocarditis is 80% one year after having it and 50% five years later." Millions are going to die around the world, and because these cardiovascular events are going to happen intermittently over long periods of time with many variables eliciting their manifestation and possible causal misattribution,
Given these grim statistics, the papers above' stance that myocarditis is mild is an incorrect characterization.
The government and pharma are going to take advantage of this and try to obfuscate this data for as long as possible to prevent the world from revolting against them for knowingly murdering people. With this in mind, you now need to read this document called "death by medicine" by Gary Null, and understand they've been murdering us with their "treatments" for decades. Iatrogenic deaths are GROSSLY under reported, and it's still the 3rd leading cause of death. If you factor in how we barbarically and wrongfully treat heart disease, cancer, and diabetes, you can easily argue that the medical system in general is the leading cause of death. http://webdc.com/pdfs/deathbymedicine.pdf… The westernized allopathic medical system is destroying the world. You should also read Cause Unknown by"
@DowdEdward
https://amazon.com/Cause-Epidemic-Sudden-Childrens-Defense/dp/1510776397…Last edited by Sid Belzberg; Saturday, 9th November, 2024, 11:50 AM.Leave a comment:
-
Stop talking nonsense, you very, very nasty troll.Originally posted by Pargat Perrer View PostLeave a comment:
-
Last edited by Sid Belzberg; Sunday, 20th October, 2024, 05:02 AM.Leave a comment:
-
Oh, delightful .... you make accusations of "fraudulent conclusions" of "stupidly-conducted studies" and of "no additional benefit" of taking ... I suppose you mean ALL the drugs produced by Big Pharma companies?Originally posted by Dilip Panjwani View Post
You provide no evidence of these accusations.
I was correct to characterize you as a nutjob.
so let's see, as a Libertarian leader, you would...
- shut down all sports
- stop all Hollywood movies and TV shows
- shut down all Big Pharma companies
and all because you just don't like what they are doing, even though what they are doing is legal and not even against your own Natural Law since they are in fair competition.
Yup .... police state for sure. Instead of utopia, LIbertarianism would be dystopia.
Leave a comment:
-
Yes you are wrong. What Big Pharma has done in several instances is that it 'bribes' and 'mesmerizes' medical professionals into following their fraudulent conclusions of their stupidly conducted studies, to use drugs in larger numbers of patients and for longer periods of times, harming more patients with more side-effects (without any additional benefit), and also thereby 'stealing' from whoever pays for it. The Medical Professionals who do this are just as much to blame as the 'deliberately bribing' Big Pharma...Originally posted by Pargat Perrer View PostLast edited by Dilip Panjwani; Saturday, 19th October, 2024, 09:45 AM.Leave a comment:
-
The Pfizer Papers that arrived today and that I believe are the most significant and irrefutable data yet to become available reveal the truth about the greatest atrocity in the history of humanity - the mRNA platform DoD, military bioweapon global population control (targeted for 7 billion reduction) shots. The source (3,200 medical experts donating their time and expertise) studying hundreds of thousands of Pfizer documents they and the FDA fought in court to suppress for 75 years is irrefutable and cannot be credibly denied. It SHOULD bring down Pfizer, as well as the FDA and many others' careers if not freedom.
In any case, I believe this is the most compelling, bullet-proof source on the greatest atrocity in human history.
Last edited by Sid Belzberg; Saturday, 19th October, 2024, 10:20 PM.Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: