ClimateGate - A Question for Ed Seedhouse and Paul Beckwith

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: ClimateGate - A Question for Ed Seedhouse and Paul Beckwith

    Originally posted by Carl Bilodeau View Post
    Bob,

    If you read about the climategate it will help you find what is the real scientific information and what is not. Following some readings Canadians should logically conclude:

    1 - There is no global warming at all.
    2 - CO2 is not pollution. The nature, the forest and the animals produce 100 billions tons per year while the human production is 3 billions. This is a lot but has no effect on the climate so far. Studies show that CO2 stays in the air probably only 10 years, not a 100 years.
    3 - Water vapor is far more important in quantity and has a much more influence on the climate than CO2.
    4 - On the climategate we understand that the top level scientists lied and they don't know where the "increase heat" is. They were very disapointed to see the that the climate data was not showing it and made sure to find ways to show a global warming that does not exist.
    5 - A study showing that there was a scientist consensus on global warming has been proved to be completly false but was largely used in news media.
    6 - Our cars have catalysers so that they produce low pollution and only CO2 which is not pollution.
    7 - When you see smog over a city, you have to realize that there is 16 km of atmosphere over the city and that above 150 meters of the city you have fresh air.
    8 - Ice level did recover, there is no problem there at all.

    So the Canadians should change their priorities on pollution. Instead of reducing our productivity and mobility we should:
    1 - Put our work on recycling. The more we develop technologies the more it will be use by other countrys. The real pollutions (not CO2) will be very important in developping countries in the future.
    2 - Produce more petrol to help our economy but with less pollution on the grounds.
    3 - Instead of giving money to the poor countrys to reduce pollution, we should pay them catalysers (made in Candana to reduce the actual help) for their cars and factorys.
    4 - Make sure that we review the scientist studies and that they stop hiding their data for peer-reviewing.
    5 - Help find technologies for clean and massive coal production. Our cars for the next 500 years will be running on coal. I mean they will be electric but the electricity will be produce by coal. USA and China has enough coal for more than 500 years even if the population will increase and that we would rely only on coal. As soon the petrol price will raise it will be the solution.
    6 - The biggest climate problem actually on earth is the increase in nuclear plants all around the world. The risk increase every year and Tchernobyl, not CO2 has cause the worst problems in the last century.

    You refer to Sarah Pallin. She has some very interesting logics and would be a much more better president than Obama. But I understand that USA needed to have a black president to cut the past and this is a very good thing. Globally the Canadians should put Global warming much lower in our top priorities like Sarah says. The biggest menace in the last 100 years have been world wars most of them created by the extremists from the left movements like we had with Nazi, communists, etc.
    1 - So we must keep our economy strong in north america. We Canadians, Quebecers and USA are Americans and we will be the solution to the problems in the world like we have been in the last century.
    2 - We must isolate and reduce the influence of extreme-left movements and anti-capitalism here on our continent like we have in Cuba, Venezuela, Quebec (voting for Harper is a good way you can do that since it bring Canada to the center). In other continents we must isolate the dictatures like we have in Iran and like we had in Irak and Afghanistan. We must participate in Afganistan, Irak and put our money there, not on global warming.
    3 - Have much confidence in North America and in the USA which is our friend. We should be much more skeptical about Europeans that brought extreme-left movements and wars in the last century. They are globally moving from the left to the center in France, Italy, Spain and England, but it will take years to get to the level we have in USA and the global warming phenomena is a sign that the left is still too strong there and that they still can mobilize people on massive false project.

    And finally for Quebec:
    Move to the center politically in order to raise the economy, the education, and the entreprenorship. When this will be achieved voters will be confident in Quebec future and eventually vote yes for the separation from Canada. With a so big territory, this new country in 200 years will be the largest french country in the world (with 100% recycling hopefully). But for now Quebec must stay in Canada so that Canadians tax payers pay for our Quebec socialism govermental system like the West-Europe had to pay to fix what the Govermental Socialims systems did in East-Europe. Thank you Bob for your perequation taxes in the next 20 years. Personally, I would vote for Sarah Pallin for prime minister in Quebec (only two mandates)... less taxes, more productivity, family values, private school, less government, modern heathl care, less corruption (the bigger the government, the bigger is the corruption), competitions would be back Quebec vocabulary, etc!

    Carl
    Carl, what? are you serious? you're punking me, right!

    I disagree with just about everything you've written. :D I guess compared to you, I must be a lefty socialist tree hugging eco terrorist!;)

    President Palin in 2012 ? Hasn't the USA suffered enough.

    Comment


    • Re: ClimateGate - A Question for Ed Seedhouse and Paul Beckwith

      Originally posted by Ed Seedhouse View Post
      First, three years is not enough to conclude anything about the long term trend. Three years is weather, not climate.
      Three years would be climate, although strictly speaking we are talking about ice cover so it is neither climate nor weather. HTH.

      Comment


      • Re: ClimateGate - A Question for Ed Seedhouse and Paul Beckwith

        [QUOTE=Ed Seedhouse;17609]Yeah Carl, you're right. The Climate scientists are all lying to us, and raking in billions and billions of dollars from...er, what? Just exactly how are they earning billions from telling us about climate change again? [QUOTE]

        I posted the link yesterday that showed the money trail that led from the chairman of the IPCC to Tata which stands to rake in $600 million US in carbon credits for the next three years for closing down a steel mill in England and opening one of similar capacity in India. Net carbon effect: zero.

        Al Gore was worth about $1 million dollars when he left the White House. He is worth $100 million today. If cap and trade is brought in he will probably be a billionaire. Coincidence? I think not.

        Millions of dollars in U.S. government research funding for each of your CRU scammers.

        Comment


        • Re: ClimateGate - A Question for Ed Seedhouse and Paul Beckwith

          [QUOTE=Vlad Drkulec;17612][QUOTE=Ed Seedhouse;17609]Yeah Carl, you're right. The Climate scientists are all lying to us, and raking in billions and billions of dollars from...er, what? Just exactly how are they earning billions from telling us about climate change again?

          I posted the link yesterday that showed the money trail that led from the chairman of the IPCC to Tata which stands to rake in $600 million US in carbon credits for the next three years for closing down a steel mill in England and opening one of similar capacity in India. Net carbon effect: zero.

          Al Gore was worth about $1 million dollars when he left the White House. He is worth $100 million today. If cap and trade is brought in he will probably be a billionaire. Coincidence? I think not.
          No actual scientists mentioned so far. And even $600 million is not "billions".

          Millions of dollars in U.S. government research funding for each of your CRU scammers.
          Name one, and the amount he received, with sources. Then name one major oil company CEO who got less, also with references.

          Until you do you are just blowing smoke.
          Last edited by Ed Seedhouse; Thursday, 17th December, 2009, 08:23 PM.

          Comment


          • Re: ClimateGate - A Question for Ed Seedhouse and Paul Beckwith

            Climate scientists have been caught fudging the temperature data in Russia, New Zealand, Hawaii and Antarctica by discarding all data that disagrees with their hypothesis and only including data which supports their intended conclusions (at least after they had adjusted it).

            They have been caught fudging the sea level data in Hong Kong, the Adriatic and on those Pacific Islands that everyone connected with IPCC claims are going under. Curiously they did not engage any sea level experts when coming up with their nightmare scenarios. I guess they couldn't be bought.

            They (IPCC) lied about the effect on hurricanes. They lied in their summaries for the IPCC document which contradicted their own contributing scientists' findings.

            Every time someone gets access to the raw data which the AGW crowd used to prove their anthropogenic global warming (AGW) hypothesis it turns out that they adjusted the numbers so that they created relationships where none existed before the adjustments.

            The AGW crowd lies about the supposed consensus among scientists regarding global warming. They also lie about their peer review process since it turns out that the data was not released to their peers. Further peer review is supposed to be blind. The IPCC did their peer review face to face at workshops without providing the data to people who had coauthored papers with the authors. How is that peer review?

            I am afraid that we have to start all over again and discard all the adjusted data. Fortunately this does not mean that we have to start from scratch. Much of the temperature record is available despite the AGW religionists attempts to obscure it. Lets go back to the raw data and run it through an analysis undertaken by independent scientists not involved in Climategate or the IPCC or any of the discredited organisations. Let the data be made public and the explanation for any adjustments be front and center. Show us the graphs with and without adjustments. Then we can at least determine if it is actually getting warmer or if in fact it is all a hoax as it is starting to appear.

            Claims by Al Gore and his ilk that we have to worry about sea level changes of 15 meters is problematic as that seems geometrically impossible just based on the amount of ice in Antarctica and Greenland and the fact that oceans cover most of the Earth's surface. Ignore for a moment the fact that the Antarctic is not even losing ice cover but gaining it.

            Comment


            • Re : Re: ClimateGate - A Question for Ed Seedhouse and Paul Beckwith

              Originally posted by Carl Bilodeau View Post
              The biggest menace in the last 100 years have been world wars most of them created by the extremists from the left movements like we had with Nazi, communists, etc.
              Actually, Nazism is historically considered as a right-wing movement.....................

              No need to comment the rest.

              Comment


              • Re: ClimateGate - A Question for Ed Seedhouse and Paul Beckwith

                [QUOTE=Ed Seedhouse;17613][QUOTE=Vlad Drkulec;17612]
                Originally posted by Ed Seedhouse View Post
                Yeah Carl, you're right. The Climate scientists are all lying to us, and raking in billions and billions of dollars from...er, what? Just exactly how are they earning billions from telling us about climate change again?

                No actual scientists mentioned so far. And even $600 million is not "billions".
                That is one transaction by one company that is heavily involved in the European cap and trade nonsense. There are many more transactions by that one company.

                If the AGW crowd really believed their spew then they would be doing things that actually reduced the carbon footprint of the planet and not just shovelling money around from place to place and from nation to nation.

                In Copenhagen, they had to bring in limos from other countries so that the delegates could get around in the style to which they were accustomed. More Al Goreish, "Do as I say and not as I do."

                What was wrong with public transit or taxis or even the bicycles that they are always encouraging everyone else to drive. More Al Goreish, "Do as I say and not as I do."

                Name one, and the amount he received, with sources. Then name one major oil company CEO who got less, also with references.

                Until you do you are just blowing smoke.
                DYODW. Unless you want to pay my rates. HTH.

                Comment


                • Re: ClimateGate - A Question for Ed Seedhouse and Paul Beckwith

                  [QUOTE=Carl Bilodeau;17601]
                  I am back yes. I know you believe in reincarnation, but I still have the same body. I am the same "version" I was 3 months ago, hahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahah LOL....
                  QUOTE]

                  Actually you are not the same version (speaking on a quantum level).

                  Comment


                  • Re: ClimateGate - A Question for Ed Seedhouse and Paul Beckwith

                    Originally posted by Vlad Drkulec View Post
                    DYODW. Unless you want to pay my rates. HTH.
                    In other words, you can't provide any evidence, and are just blowing more smoke.

                    Comment


                    • Re: ClimateGate - A Question for Ed Seedhouse and Paul Beckwith

                      Originally posted by Bob Gillanders View Post
                      And what's all this stuff about "don't worry, the human race won't become extinct, it will only kill off a few billion!". I would like to think the lives of a few billion people would be enough to mobilize the planet into action.

                      Why would you think that? People smoke tobacco knowing that there is a decent chance it will kill them. They eat too much and don't exercise enough knowing that they are shortening their lifespan on average. People drive polluting cars and populate the world with too many progeny which only exacerbates the problems for everyone.

                      Each action above can be easily explained, imo. People will almost certainly choose whatever feels good in the now (eat too much, abuse their bodies, go a "Tiger", pollute the planet) even if in the longrun it is detrimental. Especially if, as in the case of pollution, it really doesn't matter what one person or even one country does.

                      If Canada chose tomorrow to go back to some sort of agrarian society and elimate all "non-natural" CO2 production, it wouldn't change anything world-wide, only slightly slow it down. You think that people are going to give up their big cars, bigger houses and way of life for that? You must be nuts. ;-)
                      "Tom is a well known racist, and like most of them he won't admit it, possibly even to himself." - Ed Seedhouse, October 4, 2020.

                      Comment


                      • Re: ClimateGate - A Question for Ed Seedhouse and Paul Beckwith

                        Originally posted by Vlad Drkulec View Post
                        Climate scientists have been caught fudging the temperature data in Russia, New Zealand, Hawaii and Antarctica by discarding all data that disagrees with their hypothesis and only including data which supports their intended conclusions (at least after they had adjusted it).

                        They have been caught fudging the sea level data in Hong Kong, the Adriatic and on those Pacific Islands that everyone connected with IPCC claims are going under. Curiously they did not engage any sea level experts when coming up with their nightmare scenarios. I guess they couldn't be bought.

                        They (IPCC) lied about the effect on hurricanes. They lied in their summaries for the IPCC document which contradicted their own contributing scientists' findings.

                        Every time someone gets access to the raw data which the AGW crowd used to prove their anthropogenic global warming (AGW) hypothesis it turns out that they adjusted the numbers so that they created relationships where none existed before the adjustments.

                        The AGW crowd lies about the supposed consensus among scientists regarding global warming. They also lie about their peer review process since it turns out that the data was not released to their peers. Further peer review is supposed to be blind. The IPCC did their peer review face to face at workshops without providing the data to people who had coauthored papers with the authors. How is that peer review?

                        I am afraid that we have to start all over again and discard all the adjusted data. Fortunately this does not mean that we have to start from scratch. Much of the temperature record is available despite the AGW religionists attempts to obscure it. Lets go back to the raw data and run it through an analysis undertaken by independent scientists not involved in Climategate or the IPCC or any of the discredited organisations. Let the data be made public and the explanation for any adjustments be front and center. Show us the graphs with and without adjustments. Then we can at least determine if it is actually getting warmer or if in fact it is all a hoax as it is starting to appear.

                        Claims by Al Gore and his ilk that we have to worry about sea level changes of 15 meters is problematic as that seems geometrically impossible just based on the amount of ice in Antarctica and Greenland and the fact that oceans cover most of the Earth's surface. Ignore for a moment the fact that the Antarctic is not even losing ice cover but gaining it.
                        I don't think it will be easy to find scientists to do a rational scientific work with the data. When you become interested in climate science, you are like a doctor who wants to save life of people. Could we ask a doctor in a hospital to save 75% of the kids and take a risk for 25% of them? I think it is the same for climate scientists, they simply can't let something go along when they feel it could be a problem even if they have to lie and brake scientific protocols. They are not bad people, they wants to save us from ourself and have no confidence in human nature and capitalism to trace the future. Put them in jail and they should still be proud to have taken the best decisions to save humanity from its fate.

                        Carl

                        Comment


                        • Re: ClimateGate - A Question for Ed Seedhouse and Paul Beckwith

                          Originally posted by Carl Bilodeau View Post
                          I am back yes. I know you believe in reincarnation, but I still have the same body. I am the same "version" I was 3 months ago, hahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahah LOL....
                          I'm glad you're back for the same reason Jay Leno and David Letterman would be glad if George Bush were President again. More laughter at your expense!

                          And for that same reason, we're all salivating at the thought of Sarah Palin as President! Except the laughter will be accompanied by tears as she dumbs everything down to her level.

                          She probably will win if she runs, the majority of Americans (and at least one Canadian) ARE that stupid.
                          Only the rushing is heard...
                          Onward flies the bird.

                          Comment


                          • Re: ClimateGate - A Question for Ed Seedhouse and Paul Beckwith

                            Originally posted by Carl Bilodeau View Post
                            When you become interested in climate science, you are like a doctor who wants to save life of people.
                            A ridiculous generalization. Who are you to declare this? Carl, you just keep outdoing yourself!

                            But keep it up, it's VERY entertaining, and in the heat of the debates between the most opinionated of us, you make everyone else look so much better! We can all breathe a sigh of relief and think, wow, I might have been THAT much of an idiot!
                            Only the rushing is heard...
                            Onward flies the bird.

                            Comment


                            • Re: ClimateGate - A Question for Ed Seedhouse and Paul Beckwith

                              Originally posted by Bob Gillanders View Post
                              Carl, what? are you serious? you're punking me, right!

                              I disagree with just about everything you've written. :D I guess compared to you, I must be a lefty socialist tree hugging eco terrorist!;)

                              President Palin in 2012 ? Hasn't the USA suffered enough.
                              Suffered? Our last three Canadian government have been minority elected. Bush had a majority twice. Can we say USA suffered during the first mandate if they elected him a second time? Be serious.

                              I don't think they suffered. They are reliefed from the IRAN problem since they now have military bases in Irak and all around IRAN. By the same way, democraty in IRAK is giving so much lessons to the Chiite in IRAN that they now have a green revolution. Slowly, like in the past for the Soviet eneny, the capitalism and democracy is making its way in these evil systems. By the time China will be rich and well armed, nearly all these evil countries should be pacifics and democratics so our kids won't have to fight a war against China.

                              I don't call it suffering, I call it: They saved the world once more. Europe, Japan, Soviet countries, etc...

                              Comment


                              • Re: ClimateGate - A Question for Ed Seedhouse and Paul Beckwith

                                Originally posted by Paul Bonham View Post
                                I'm glad you're back for the same reason Jay Leno and David Letterman would be glad if George Bush were President again. More laughter at your expense!

                                And for that same reason, we're all salivating at the thought of Sarah Palin as President! Except the laughter will be accompanied by tears as she dumbs everything down to her level.

                                She probably will win if she runs, the majority of Americans (and at least one Canadian) ARE that stupid.
                                When the Rome empire, Napoleon, Hitler, invaded countrys, it was not to bring democracy. The majority of Americans brought it to Europe, Japan, Eastern Europe, Irak, Afghanistant and they let them free. If they are stupids for you, for me it is the best empire we never had in human history.

                                Carl

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X