Re: Looking for one good reason to renew my CFC annual membership
Eugen, WDF? Why do you constantly respond to posts concerning me? What is it with you Romanians!! (no offence to Andrei) Stop stalking me and leave me alone already. First of all - the CFC did NOTHING for me to become the "player" I am today. I did the studying, I did the playing, and the paying and the only two worthwhile things that I got was a trip to Armenia, which I won in a very weak year and a $500 bonus from this year. Next, stop obsessing over the fact that you wanted me to play in a crummy canadian chess challenge when I won tied for first in the Keres and actually enjoyed the competition offered there. When was the last time that a first round match that I had was against a 2100 and not an 1800 in a normal Swiss event? Third, if you suck a lot at chess, it doesn't mean you get to harp on others for being better than you. So what if you have correspondence IM title; Gary has Correspondence Senior IM and you don't see him saying crap about others who are better than him. In fact, he complains about just about everything that I don't even know which complaints he's most pleased with.
So Eugen, keep this in mind, I let go of this issue a LONG time ago... let's say several months ago when I realized that it was useless to explain my reasons to retired chess players such as yourself, for ex. calling yourself an IM when in fact your fide is only about 2200 and your real otb playing strength is probably only 1900. Also, I asked you publicly on the old chess forum about the concerns of the March email that you sent me in a 5 paragraph essay concerning the art of sportsmanship with the canadian chess challenge and what your thoughts on it were. I never got a reply.
Now to actually go back to your main point of how I say the cfc doesn't do things for me... I NEVER said that until this post right here where I said the two things CFC actually did for me. So please get the facts straight and why the hell do you respond when obviously, I wasn't addressing someone who's played ONE tournament, if you can call it that in the past how many years but rather someone who's actually played tournament games where rating and prizes and other issues are at stake.
I was gonna criticize something concerning Gary... but Valer takes the cake and I'm pretty sure anything that I say to Gary will be automatically replied within half an hour with more points to criticize and such, the cycle never ends.
This ends my ridiculously long heckling post.
P.S. Eugen, have you thought of starring in the third Grudge movie, so you could act as the caucasian father to the kid and mom who gets pissed off in a weird flashback? Oh yeah, and Gary? Correspondence does not attract potential players and until you realize that no one (yes no one) at any education institution worthy of any decent chess players play correspondence, the sooner you will realize, no matter how worse off the CFC may be, correspondence will never appear on the globe like Fide has. It's like comparing the CFL to find the pin in the haystack corporation
Bindi
Eugen, WDF? Why do you constantly respond to posts concerning me? What is it with you Romanians!! (no offence to Andrei) Stop stalking me and leave me alone already. First of all - the CFC did NOTHING for me to become the "player" I am today. I did the studying, I did the playing, and the paying and the only two worthwhile things that I got was a trip to Armenia, which I won in a very weak year and a $500 bonus from this year. Next, stop obsessing over the fact that you wanted me to play in a crummy canadian chess challenge when I won tied for first in the Keres and actually enjoyed the competition offered there. When was the last time that a first round match that I had was against a 2100 and not an 1800 in a normal Swiss event? Third, if you suck a lot at chess, it doesn't mean you get to harp on others for being better than you. So what if you have correspondence IM title; Gary has Correspondence Senior IM and you don't see him saying crap about others who are better than him. In fact, he complains about just about everything that I don't even know which complaints he's most pleased with.
So Eugen, keep this in mind, I let go of this issue a LONG time ago... let's say several months ago when I realized that it was useless to explain my reasons to retired chess players such as yourself, for ex. calling yourself an IM when in fact your fide is only about 2200 and your real otb playing strength is probably only 1900. Also, I asked you publicly on the old chess forum about the concerns of the March email that you sent me in a 5 paragraph essay concerning the art of sportsmanship with the canadian chess challenge and what your thoughts on it were. I never got a reply.
Now to actually go back to your main point of how I say the cfc doesn't do things for me... I NEVER said that until this post right here where I said the two things CFC actually did for me. So please get the facts straight and why the hell do you respond when obviously, I wasn't addressing someone who's played ONE tournament, if you can call it that in the past how many years but rather someone who's actually played tournament games where rating and prizes and other issues are at stake.
I was gonna criticize something concerning Gary... but Valer takes the cake and I'm pretty sure anything that I say to Gary will be automatically replied within half an hour with more points to criticize and such, the cycle never ends.
This ends my ridiculously long heckling post.
P.S. Eugen, have you thought of starring in the third Grudge movie, so you could act as the caucasian father to the kid and mom who gets pissed off in a weird flashback? Oh yeah, and Gary? Correspondence does not attract potential players and until you realize that no one (yes no one) at any education institution worthy of any decent chess players play correspondence, the sooner you will realize, no matter how worse off the CFC may be, correspondence will never appear on the globe like Fide has. It's like comparing the CFL to find the pin in the haystack corporation
Bindi
Comment