If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Policy / Politique
The fee for tournament organizers advertising on ChessTalk is $20/event or $100/yearly unlimited for the year.
Les frais d'inscription des organisateurs de tournoi sur ChessTalk sont de 20 $/événement ou de 100 $/année illimitée.
You can etransfer to Henry Lam at chesstalkforum at gmail dot com
Transfér à Henry Lam à chesstalkforum@gmail.com
Dark Knight / Le Chevalier Noir
General Guidelines
---- Nous avons besoin d'un traduction français!
Some Basics
1. Under Board "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQs) there are 3 sections dealing with General Forum Usage, User Profile Features, and Reading and Posting Messages. These deal with everything from Avatars to Your Notifications. Most general technical questions are covered there. Here is a link to the FAQs. https://forum.chesstalk.com/help
2. Consider using the SEARCH button if you are looking for information. You may find your question has already been answered in a previous thread.
3. If you've looked for an answer to a question, and not found one, then you should consider asking your question in a new thread. For example, there have already been questions and discussion regarding: how to do chess diagrams (FENs); crosstables that line up properly; and the numerous little “glitches” that every new site will have.
4. Read pinned or sticky threads, like this one, if they look important. This applies especially to newcomers.
5. Read the thread you're posting in before you post. There are a variety of ways to look at a thread. These are covered under “Display Modes”.
6. Thread titles: please provide some details in your thread title. This is useful for a number of reasons. It helps ChessTalk members to quickly skim the threads. It prevents duplication of threads. And so on.
7. Unnecessary thread proliferation (e.g., deliberately creating a new thread that duplicates existing discussion) is discouraged. Look to see if a thread on your topic may have already been started and, if so, consider adding your contribution to the pre-existing thread. However, starting new threads to explore side-issues that are not relevant to the original subject is strongly encouraged. A single thread on the Canadian Open, with hundreds of posts on multiple sub-topics, is no better than a dozen threads on the Open covering only a few topics. Use your good judgment when starting a new thread.
8. If and/or when sub-forums are created, please make sure to create threads in the proper place.
Debate
9. Give an opinion and back it up with a reason. Throwaway comments such as "Game X pwnz because my friend and I think so!" could be considered pointless at best, and inflammatory at worst.
10. Try to give your own opinions, not simply those copied and pasted from reviews or opinions of your friends.
Unacceptable behavior and warnings
11. In registering here at ChessTalk please note that the same or similar rules apply here as applied at the previous Boardhost message board. In particular, the following content is not permitted to appear in any messages:
* Racism
* Hatred
* Harassment
* Adult content
* Obscene material
* Nudity or pornography
* Material that infringes intellectual property or other proprietary rights of any party
* Material the posting of which is tortious or violates a contractual or fiduciary obligation you or we owe to another party
* Piracy, hacking, viruses, worms, or warez
* Spam
* Any illegal content
* unapproved Commercial banner advertisements or revenue-generating links
* Any link to or any images from a site containing any material outlined in these restrictions
* Any material deemed offensive or inappropriate by the Board staff
12. Users are welcome to challenge other points of view and opinions, but should do so respectfully. Personal attacks on others will not be tolerated. Posts and threads with unacceptable content can be closed or deleted altogether. Furthermore, a range of sanctions are possible - from a simple warning to a temporary or even a permanent banning from ChessTalk.
Helping to Moderate
13. 'Report' links (an exclamation mark inside a triangle) can be found in many places throughout the board. These links allow users to alert the board staff to anything which is offensive, objectionable or illegal. Please consider using this feature if the need arises.
Advice for free
14. You should exercise the same caution with Private Messages as you would with any public posting.
15. Have fun!
(Thanks to Nigel Hanrahan for writing these up!)
CFC Member Inactivity/Lack of Interest in CFC Program
CFC Member Inactivity/Lack of Interest in CFC Program
I have reproduced my post from another thread, because I think it starts a somewhat new discussion:
Hi Peter:
I perceive a practical reason why CFC membership is generally so inactive, and not interested in the program of the CFC ( outside of providing ratings ):
CFC Bylaw # 1
LIMITATION OF RIGHTS
14. No individual Member shall have any right to be heard on any matter pertaining to the affairs of the Federation, or his individual membership. Should any individual member be aggrieved by any matter arising in the conduct of the affairs of the Federation, his remedy shall be to bring the matter before his provincial organization, and if there be no Provincial Organization in the Province in which he resides, he may bring the matter to the attention of a Governor representing such Province. Any complaints or suggestions of any individual Member shall be sufficiently dealt with by the Federation Secretary, if he shall reply to such individual Member quoting this By-law.
What do CFC members think of this section of the bylaw # 1?
What effect does this have on CFC member participation in the organization, if any?
Bob Armstrong, Coordinator,
Cooperative Chess Coalition ( CCC )
Last edited by Bob Armstrong; Monday, 14th February, 2011, 12:41 PM.
Cooperative Chess Coalition! Is this a new movement you started, or has the grassroots movement changed it's name? Either way, where do I sign up! :D
As to the constitutional section you quote, which appears to give the office and the CFC executive every right to ignore the complaints of individual CFC members by referring them to their provincial associations, I can assure you that this is not what happens in practice. All complaints and questions are referred to the appropriate person and answered. :)
If any provincial affiliates would prefer to handle their members complaints themselves, just let me know. ;)
So Bob and Ken, go ahead and repeal that section with my blessings. :D
... for being counterproductive and repulsive. The guy who first wrote this (only a lawyer could have been capable of such abomination) should be stoned and hanged. I want his name. :)
I have reproduced my post from another thread, because I think it starts a somewhat new discussion:
Hi Peter:
I perceive a practical reason why CFC membership is generally so inactive, and not interested in the program of the CFC ( outside of providing ratings ):
CFC Bylaw # 1
LIMITATION OF RIGHTS
14. No individual Member shall have any right to be heard on any matter pertaining to the affairs of the Federation, or his individual membership. Should any individual member be aggrieved by any matter arising in the conduct of the affairs of the Federation, his remedy shall be to bring the matter before his provincial organization, and if there be no Provincial Organization in the Province in which he resides, he may bring the matter to the attention of a Governor representing such Province. Any complaints or suggestions of any individual Member shall be sufficiently dealt with by the Federation Secretary, if he shall reply to such individual Member quoting this By-law.
What do CFC members think of this section of the bylaw # 1?
What effect does this have on CFC member participation in the organization, if any?
Bob Armstrong, Coordinator,
Cooperative Chess Coalition ( CCC )
I would have to agree that motion is archaic and counter-productive (etc.)
Any ideas how many times it has been invoked? Ever? I have a vague recollection that it was used to stymie some requests in the recent past, but alas, I cannot recall any details.
14. No individual Member shall have any right to be heard on any matter pertaining to the affairs of the Federation, or his individual membership. Should any individual member be aggrieved by any matter arising in the conduct of the affairs of the Federation, his remedy shall be to bring the matter before his provincial organization, and if there be no Provincial Organization in the Province in which he resides, he may bring the matter to the attention of a Governor representing such Province. Any complaints or suggestions of any individual Member shall be sufficiently dealt with by the Federation Secretary, if he shall reply to such individual Member quoting this By-law.
What do CFC members think of this section of the bylaw # 1?
I don't think this bylaw has much effect at all, however I understand why it is there. It prevents the AGM from being taken over by crazies. Not that there are a lot of crazies in the chess world ;)
I don't think it is such a big deal for a member to have to bring their concerns to a governor(s) before being heard. Imagine if the public had the "right" to be heard in the house of commons.
Does anyone feel they have been negatively impacted by this rule?
If not, I suggest it does not need fixing.
I don't think it is such a big deal for a member to have to bring their concerns to a governor(s) before being heard. Imagine if the public had the "right" to be heard in the house of commons.
A big fat loss of time to me is a big deal. if I recall correctly, it is not long ago that some active Governors complained about being ignored by the former CFC president... Am I wrong Bob A. ?
And I would not compare the CFC with the House of Commons. But with the Senate I could agree.
We have raised s. 14 of Bylaw # 1, because it is so anti-member. However it is true that we likely cannot turn the CFC into a direct democracy, with a member having a vote on all motions.
But there has to be more direct involvement of the membership; they have to be given some kind of direct power to use to influence CFC direction.
I am not sure what type of political structure we are conjuring up here, that gives the members some real power, so they develop a real interest in the program of the CFC, and yet still manages to be practically functionable.
The Cooperative Chess Coalition ( CCC ), which has raised s. 14 as an issue, is open to creative ideas on this.
The Cooperative Chess Coalition is a new chess movement that sees greater participation of CFC members at all levels of chess in Canada - clubs, Regional Affiliates in Ontario, Provincial Affiliates and the CFC and FIDE.
It is new, but has its roots in the Grassroots Campaign and the CFC Constitutional Coalition. Some of the members of those groups are being canvassed to join this new initiative.
If you would like to get a copy of the CCC program, just e-mail me ( bobarm@sympatico.ca ).
Bob G - I'll be sending you the program - you were part of the prior reform movements, and we'd welcome you to this one too.
Bob A, Coordinator,
Cooperative Chess Coalition ( CCC )
A big fat loss of time to me is a big deal. if I recall correctly, it is not long ago that some active Governors complained about being ignored by the former CFC president... Am I wrong Bob A. ?
And I would not compare the CFC with the House of Commons. But with the Senate I could agree.
The idea is that it prevents loss of time by preventing members not familiar with the mechanics of the organisation from filibustering (filibusting?) meetings.
I maintain the house of commons analogy.
It should be clear that is does not say that members concerns will not be heard, just that they don't have the "right" to be heard-- Try going to the house of commons (or the senate) and claiming you have a right to be heard and see what happens.
I still await an instance of someone being negatively impacted by this rule.
Also, I don't think even governors have the "right" to be heard. There is procedure to get something on any meeting agenda, and if you don't attend to it, you don't get heard... there is no problem here.
Last edited by Stuart Brammall; Monday, 14th February, 2011, 10:09 PM.
Negative Impact of No Member " Right to Be Heard "
Hi Stuart:
Before I became a govenor, I was a Member/ activist/ reformer ( hope I haven't lost it all since I became a governor ). I can tell you that I was turned down by a number of govenors on different occasions where I needed a governor to move/second one of the motions I wanted brought on behalf of the Grassroots' Campaign. At the same time, I want to say that other governors stepped up to the plate to help. It was frustrating enough I decided it had to be easier being a governor - which it was.
But it may be that CFC needs some mechanism for members to be able to directlly bring their motions before a Quarterly or AGM Meeting.
Re: Negative Impact of No Member " Right to Be Heard "
Something else to consider:
Suppose this bylaw was removed-- would that imply that members would have the "right" to be heard? Probably not. If the organisation chooses to ignore someone, whether ignoring them is justified or not, whatever bylaws there are don't matter one way or another.
Bob,
I know some governors still actively ignore your stuff, and you should consider that perhaps if you deviated from commenting on matters strictly relating to the technicalities of procedure, and added in a little psuedo-chess content occasionally, that this would likely not be the case.
I think this rule remains potentially useful, however I will admit that I don't think anything would change were it removed.
Even if it were to be replaced by a bylaw that said "All members have the absolute right to be heard anytime of the day or night, during a meeting or not during meeting, naked or clothed", I don't think it would really matter in any substantial way.
That does not change my opinion that it is a good rule to have in principle, in case one day out meeting are meeting are interupted by a bunch of nude membership fee protesters.
Re: CFC Member Inactivity/Lack of Interest in CFC Program
Bob... whether the bylaw is right or wrong... have you seriously ever had someone say they would be more active without it? Or heard from someone who quit because of that bylaw?
The idea is that it prevents loss of time by preventing members not familiar with the mechanics of the organisation from filibustering (filibusting?) meetings...
...Also, I don't think even governors have the "right" to be heard...
The way I understand this, it is not about allowing ordinary members to attend CFC executive meetings or anything like that. No one I believe would want that. It is about allowing members to be "heard" in one way or another in principle. And if as you claim even governors have no right to be heard, what would be the point for a member to present his problem to a governor (which seems to be the intention behind this bylaw) or even be a governor ? There may be simpler and more efficient ways to move forward than always present motions through governors. Sometimes a simple exchange of views does the trick.
An ordinary citizen can contact the Prime Minister or any other member of government directly by letter or email for example. The bylaw that we are discussing seems to imply that at the CFC it is not possible for members to talk to the CFC leaders, which makes no sense to me at all.
Comment