If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Policy / Politique
The fee for tournament organizers advertising on ChessTalk is $20/event or $100/yearly unlimited for the year.
Les frais d'inscription des organisateurs de tournoi sur ChessTalk sont de 20 $/événement ou de 100 $/année illimitée.
You can etransfer to Henry Lam at chesstalkforum at gmail dot com
Transfér à Henry Lam à chesstalkforum@gmail.com
Dark Knight / Le Chevalier Noir
General Guidelines
---- Nous avons besoin d'un traduction français!
Some Basics
1. Under Board "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQs) there are 3 sections dealing with General Forum Usage, User Profile Features, and Reading and Posting Messages. These deal with everything from Avatars to Your Notifications. Most general technical questions are covered there. Here is a link to the FAQs. https://forum.chesstalk.com/help
2. Consider using the SEARCH button if you are looking for information. You may find your question has already been answered in a previous thread.
3. If you've looked for an answer to a question, and not found one, then you should consider asking your question in a new thread. For example, there have already been questions and discussion regarding: how to do chess diagrams (FENs); crosstables that line up properly; and the numerous little “glitches” that every new site will have.
4. Read pinned or sticky threads, like this one, if they look important. This applies especially to newcomers.
5. Read the thread you're posting in before you post. There are a variety of ways to look at a thread. These are covered under “Display Modes”.
6. Thread titles: please provide some details in your thread title. This is useful for a number of reasons. It helps ChessTalk members to quickly skim the threads. It prevents duplication of threads. And so on.
7. Unnecessary thread proliferation (e.g., deliberately creating a new thread that duplicates existing discussion) is discouraged. Look to see if a thread on your topic may have already been started and, if so, consider adding your contribution to the pre-existing thread. However, starting new threads to explore side-issues that are not relevant to the original subject is strongly encouraged. A single thread on the Canadian Open, with hundreds of posts on multiple sub-topics, is no better than a dozen threads on the Open covering only a few topics. Use your good judgment when starting a new thread.
8. If and/or when sub-forums are created, please make sure to create threads in the proper place.
Debate
9. Give an opinion and back it up with a reason. Throwaway comments such as "Game X pwnz because my friend and I think so!" could be considered pointless at best, and inflammatory at worst.
10. Try to give your own opinions, not simply those copied and pasted from reviews or opinions of your friends.
Unacceptable behavior and warnings
11. In registering here at ChessTalk please note that the same or similar rules apply here as applied at the previous Boardhost message board. In particular, the following content is not permitted to appear in any messages:
* Racism
* Hatred
* Harassment
* Adult content
* Obscene material
* Nudity or pornography
* Material that infringes intellectual property or other proprietary rights of any party
* Material the posting of which is tortious or violates a contractual or fiduciary obligation you or we owe to another party
* Piracy, hacking, viruses, worms, or warez
* Spam
* Any illegal content
* unapproved Commercial banner advertisements or revenue-generating links
* Any link to or any images from a site containing any material outlined in these restrictions
* Any material deemed offensive or inappropriate by the Board staff
12. Users are welcome to challenge other points of view and opinions, but should do so respectfully. Personal attacks on others will not be tolerated. Posts and threads with unacceptable content can be closed or deleted altogether. Furthermore, a range of sanctions are possible - from a simple warning to a temporary or even a permanent banning from ChessTalk.
Helping to Moderate
13. 'Report' links (an exclamation mark inside a triangle) can be found in many places throughout the board. These links allow users to alert the board staff to anything which is offensive, objectionable or illegal. Please consider using this feature if the need arises.
Advice for free
14. You should exercise the same caution with Private Messages as you would with any public posting.
1. not entirely sure what you are referring to, but there will be no borrowing from the Chess Foundation;
2. The president is elected by the Governors at the moment. There is a report that is proposing to change the governance structure quite radically, but it is at the moment unclear if it will come to a vote this meeting. Still in progress.
It seems Trudeau is trying to move back into the house where he grew up. Probably take away some NDP votes in Quebec.
I think you might have bet the wrong election. The NDP probably has a better chance of winning in Ontario if they pull the plug fast enough. At least get the official opposition. In a minority after an election I could see the Libs propping up the NDP.
Not sure how Trudeau will play in Quebec - the Liberal scandal seems etched in Quebec memory. I think the NDP will hold on, though their growth will have to come from outside Quebec. Ontario might yet swing away from Harper somewhat - as you say, the NDP may do better than expected in the next Ont. Provincial election. Some Liberal BC'ers seem concerned about an NDP provincial win coming out there - more room for the Federal NDP?
The next election will likely be held with the new boundaries. Ontario will pick up 15 extra seats and Quebec 3. Maybe I shouldn't write this but I think Quebec is becoming insignificant as a political force with the relatively stagnant population numbers.
Worriesome. Vote split on the left will deny NDP becoming new Canadian gov't.
An exclusive poll done by Nanos Research for Power & Politics reveals how Liberal leadership frontrunner Justin Trudeau stacks up against Tom Mulcair and Stephen Harper....The results show Trudeau's uptick in the polls is coming at the expense of the NDP leader.
On the question of who is the most inspiring leader, the poll suggests Trudeau is connecting with Canadians, with 30 per cent of Canadians choosing him as the most inspiring leader. Harper was second with 17.8 per cent and Mulcair third with 11.6 per cent....But while Trudeau is seen as the most inspiring, the poll also shows Canadians believe he is lacking experience. Only 8.6 per cent of Canadians feel Trudeau has the best experience to lead the country, compared with 41 per cent for Harper and 17.6 per cent for Mulcair.
Nanos points out that the Conservatives have already been trying to take advantage of this by "hammering Trudeau for his lack of experience."
The new polls reveal that particular message resonates, he added. And when you weigh which of these factors is more important for a political leader, experience is the winner, Nanos said.
"Winning is not neccesarily a popularity contest. Stephen Harper has won not based on his personal popularity or hugability, he's won because people have gone into the ballot booth and have made what they believe is the least risky choice," Nanos said.
So the future is less clear than I had hoped, and the vote split means my odds of winning this $ 20 bet are going down. I'm going to hate to lose this one, you know.
I never thought the NDP had a chance to form the federal government. I don't know how people will respond to Trudeau as a leader. I never voted for his father (and he was there for close to 2 decades) and I won't vote for him. Lots will, though.
I thought the NDP chances are here in Ontario. However, Horvath seems more comfortable gaining small concessions from the Liberal government and I have to wonder if she's more comfortable in a supporting role than she would be as Premier. Her time might be passing.
Sometimes I'm unsure of a government which gets elected and it wasn't my choice. Like Harpers government. Next election I ask myself if they have done enough to get re-elected because by that time it's a known quantity. In this case I think they have done enough and I don't see much reason for a change.
I love this video about a hypothetical election in the animal kingdom. It explains in an entertaining way how our current system is flawed, narrows our choices, and discriminates against 3rd parties. Better, more democratic systems are in place in other parts of the world. Why not in Canada? My vote will go to any party that seriously pushes for reform.
I Better, more democratic systems are in place in other parts of the world. Why not in Canada? My vote will go to any party that seriously pushes for reform.
I think the CCC should get on this right away. Armstrong for PM.
I thought you voted for the green party, or have I got it wrong?
Our system is democratic. That is doesn't elect the leaders you want doesn't change that.
Do you realize the U.S. and North Korea are close to nuclear war which won't do much for the environment? This is probably the closest since the Cuban Missile Crisis.
As you know, Ontario had a chance to bring in one of the proportional representation options, to replace the outdated first-past-the-post system we have, and didn't vote for it!
Even the CCC, with all its skill, and great Coordinator, would likely have a somewhat uphill battle bringing in federally such a system!
My concern is my precious $ 20 in this one - got to keep priorities straight!
Do you realize the U.S. and North Korea are close to nuclear war which won't do much for the environment? This is probably the closest since the Cuban Missile Crisis.
No way the North Koreans will follow through all the way on that bluff. We've basically seen this movie before.
Iran may be another story, given the religious zealotry their leaders have, but they're not armed with nukes, yet.
Anything that can go wrong will go wrong. Murphy's law, by Edward A. Murphy Jr., USAF, Aerospace Engineer
I did not claim otherwise. What I am saying is that there is room for improvement.
Democracy is not just a simple case of whether or not you get a vote. It's a little more complicated than that.
I did not claim otherwise. What I am saying is that there is room for improvement.
Democracy is not just a simple case of whether or not you get a vote. It's a little more complicated than that.
I wish there was a test in place to qualify a person to vote.
I also would like voting to be compulsory - although I realize people could still render their vote spoiled or otherwise useless.
Comment