If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Policy / Politique
The fee for tournament organizers advertising on ChessTalk is $20/event or $100/yearly unlimited for the year.
Les frais d'inscription des organisateurs de tournoi sur ChessTalk sont de 20 $/événement ou de 100 $/année illimitée.
You can etransfer to Henry Lam at chesstalkforum at gmail dot com
Transfér à Henry Lam à chesstalkforum@gmail.com
Dark Knight / Le Chevalier Noir
General Guidelines
---- Nous avons besoin d'un traduction français!
Some Basics
1. Under Board "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQs) there are 3 sections dealing with General Forum Usage, User Profile Features, and Reading and Posting Messages. These deal with everything from Avatars to Your Notifications. Most general technical questions are covered there. Here is a link to the FAQs. https://forum.chesstalk.com/help
2. Consider using the SEARCH button if you are looking for information. You may find your question has already been answered in a previous thread.
3. If you've looked for an answer to a question, and not found one, then you should consider asking your question in a new thread. For example, there have already been questions and discussion regarding: how to do chess diagrams (FENs); crosstables that line up properly; and the numerous little “glitches” that every new site will have.
4. Read pinned or sticky threads, like this one, if they look important. This applies especially to newcomers.
5. Read the thread you're posting in before you post. There are a variety of ways to look at a thread. These are covered under “Display Modes”.
6. Thread titles: please provide some details in your thread title. This is useful for a number of reasons. It helps ChessTalk members to quickly skim the threads. It prevents duplication of threads. And so on.
7. Unnecessary thread proliferation (e.g., deliberately creating a new thread that duplicates existing discussion) is discouraged. Look to see if a thread on your topic may have already been started and, if so, consider adding your contribution to the pre-existing thread. However, starting new threads to explore side-issues that are not relevant to the original subject is strongly encouraged. A single thread on the Canadian Open, with hundreds of posts on multiple sub-topics, is no better than a dozen threads on the Open covering only a few topics. Use your good judgment when starting a new thread.
8. If and/or when sub-forums are created, please make sure to create threads in the proper place.
Debate
9. Give an opinion and back it up with a reason. Throwaway comments such as "Game X pwnz because my friend and I think so!" could be considered pointless at best, and inflammatory at worst.
10. Try to give your own opinions, not simply those copied and pasted from reviews or opinions of your friends.
Unacceptable behavior and warnings
11. In registering here at ChessTalk please note that the same or similar rules apply here as applied at the previous Boardhost message board. In particular, the following content is not permitted to appear in any messages:
* Racism
* Hatred
* Harassment
* Adult content
* Obscene material
* Nudity or pornography
* Material that infringes intellectual property or other proprietary rights of any party
* Material the posting of which is tortious or violates a contractual or fiduciary obligation you or we owe to another party
* Piracy, hacking, viruses, worms, or warez
* Spam
* Any illegal content
* unapproved Commercial banner advertisements or revenue-generating links
* Any link to or any images from a site containing any material outlined in these restrictions
* Any material deemed offensive or inappropriate by the Board staff
12. Users are welcome to challenge other points of view and opinions, but should do so respectfully. Personal attacks on others will not be tolerated. Posts and threads with unacceptable content can be closed or deleted altogether. Furthermore, a range of sanctions are possible - from a simple warning to a temporary or even a permanent banning from ChessTalk.
Helping to Moderate
13. 'Report' links (an exclamation mark inside a triangle) can be found in many places throughout the board. These links allow users to alert the board staff to anything which is offensive, objectionable or illegal. Please consider using this feature if the need arises.
Advice for free
14. You should exercise the same caution with Private Messages as you would with any public posting.
Well, Dickey's personal catcher who came in the trade was shipped to the Minors in March. They had been together for a few seasons. First two games Dickey gets lit up like an Xmas tree.
Buck, the veteran catcher the Jays got and traded away has been real hot so far this season. The one they let get away so far.
The season still has a long way to go but Buerhle and Dickey have to do a bit better (Buerhle got smoked today) and the Jays still need a 2nd baseman. Bonificio made his 4th error of the season today.
Anyhow, it's still early.
The Jays won today 8-6 against the Tigers, so I'm not sure what you mean, JW.
I didn't know a genuine major league pitcher had to lean on a personal catcher. Sounds different.
Anything that can go wrong will go wrong. Murphy's law, by Edward A. Murphy Jr., USAF, Aerospace Engineer
I didn't know a genuine major league pitcher had to lean on a personal catcher. Sounds different.
Knuckleballs are hard to catch. The pitcher doesn't usually know where they are going. If a catcher is good at catching them and the pitcher is confident in the catcher that's often who they use.
Here's a list from the web. Note Tim Wakefield who was a knuckleball pitcher.
Knuckleballs are hard to catch. The pitcher doesn't usually know where they are going. If a catcher is good at catching them and the pitcher is confident in the catcher that's often who they use.
Here's a list from the web. Note Tim Wakefield who was a knuckleball pitcher.
Actually, apparently the unique thing with Dickey is he does have a lot more control over the knuckleball compared to a traditional knuckleballer like Wakefield. He does it partly by throwing about 10 mph faster than Wakefield did.
That doesn't make it really any easier to catch of course... but what was the point of trading for a guy whose only purpose is to catch for Dickey and then not let him catch for Dickey?
That doesn't make it really any easier to catch of course... but what was the point of trading for a guy whose only purpose is to catch for Dickey and then not let him catch for Dickey?
I don't know why they sent Thole to the minors in March. I think there were 3 passed balls in Dickey's first game and only 1 in his second game where the Jays used their backup catcher. Problem with the second game is Dickey didn't think his ball was breaking. One of those games, I guess.
Charlie Sheen was pitching around 85 MPH in the Movie Major League. I guess to a good fastball hitter at that speed the ball would look like a grapefruit coming to the plate. :) A good closer might throw in the 90's.
Now that the regular season is well underway, and going the wrong way for the Jays so far (who aren't even bit by the injury bug yet) :(, has the optimism dried up already for many of the above posters?
Boston and the NYY almost invariably seem to have the best talent money can buy, with their bigger payroll capacity than Toronto, in spite of however promising the Jays look on paper - another reason for pessimism in addition to their trend of recent years to have the injury bug.
I hate long summers without wanting to watch baseball. :(
If you are seriously basing your interest on the first ten games of the season then maybe find another sport to watch. What were the Yankees after 9 games last season ( something similar I believe ), and Boston started 0-6 recently and were in playoff contention by August. Blue Jays were pretty good in April last few years. Lot of good that did them.
I don't know why you think that NYY and Boston have great teams this year, the Yankees have a lineup that looks doomed to failure over a long season, so unless they buy some MORE players they are going nowhere. Boston lost a starter already, they are a hard team to grade ( lot of uncertainty ). Nobody who knows baseball would ever categorize either team "as is" as being a powerhouse. So they have to compete like everyone else and maybe add a couple of stars at the trade deadline. Detroit is real good. Toronto could get real good but so far no, but its not going to take a huge win total to take their division this year.
Jays actually HAVE been struck with injuries. Losing Lawrie ( all games ) and Bautista ( 3 games ) was a big chunk of their lineup. However, they are a team built for the long haul, the deepest pitching staff in baseball. Bonofocio is not really their 2B, Izterus is. Lind will lose his job if he doesn't hit soon. These kind of issues tend to sort themselves out by May.
So they may be 3 games out end of today. You should panic now. :):):)
Last edited by Duncan Smith; Thursday, 11th April, 2013, 04:15 PM.
Starting Arencebia first game was more a misguided sense of loyalty given his history of great opening days. They tried it, didn't work. The guy has been great since. Without his offence ( I believe 7 extra base hits ) they'd arguably be 1-8.
Catching is not their issue, never has been. Not sure why the chess group here is obsessed with this aspect. Infield defence more of a problem really, but Lawrie will solve that.
I don't know much about baseball when it comes to details (I care more about results). However I do know some of the big trends that I've mentioned. Toronto's injuries are nothing so far compared to the genuine injury bug they've experienced in recent years. They are off to a bad start, but they are not like Boston & NYY in their capability to come back from such, the recent years' trends seem to indicate. I trust Boston & NYY scouting & talent assessment more than, say, the Jays' (or any fans' opinion).
I've observed that when a team falls 9 or more games out of contention for a playoff spot, they seldom come back, whatever point in the season that happens to be. So far the Jays are close to exceeding their normal pace of dropping 3 or less points out of contention each month as the season goes on, at least for many years now.
Last edited by Kevin Pacey; Friday, 12th April, 2013, 04:11 PM.
Reason: Spelling
Anything that can go wrong will go wrong. Murphy's law, by Edward A. Murphy Jr., USAF, Aerospace Engineer
I know don't know much about baseball when it comes to details (I care more about results). However I do know some of the big trends that I've mentioned. Toronto's injuries are nothing so far compared to the genuine injury bug they've experienced in recent years. They are off to a bad start, but they are not like Boston & NYY in their capability to come back from such, the recent years' trends seem to indicate. I trust Boston & NYY scouting & talent assessment more than, say, the Jays' (or any fans' opinion).
I've observed that when a team falls 9 or more games out of contention for a playoff spot, they seldom come back, whatever point in the season that happens to be. So far the Jays are close to exceeding their normal pace of dropping 3 or less points out of contention each month as the season goes on, at least for many years now.
Kevin, you sound like a casual fan with your observations. What Gary has said is completely true, it's only been 9 games and Lawrie has missed all of those games with his great infield defense. Their pitching staff has so far been ineffective but again, the season's just started. If it's August and they're still 3 games under 500 then there's a problem. What makes you think Boston and New York's scouting and talent assessment is better than the Jays? Have you seen the top 20 prospect lists of recent years? Jays were top 5 last year (#1 on certain lists like John Sickel's list) before the massive trade in which they traded away almost all their prospects for major leaguers. Boston and Yankees on the other hand were never in the top 5 and are usually in the teens.
While Boston and New York have shown a capability to come back in the past, have you seen their roster for this year? Yankees lost Jeter, R-rod, Texeira, Granderson and Pineda so far in 2013. Jeter of course will be back soon but the rest will take a couple months before showing up. Good luck having a major league team that earns less than those on the DL. Boston got lucky and traded away Crawford, Beckett and A-gon to Dodgers and were able to shed a ton of payroll. What did they do with that payroll? Sign a bunch of medium level free agents who are 30+ years old of course. They're playing year by year and there's no guarantee any of them will be able to perform their career averages. They're a year older after all. In terms of talent, Jays are a much better team than both Boston and Yankees this year. The team most comparable to the Jays is actually Tampa and they're not off to such a hot start either.
Remember, it's only April, if 9 games are your definition of a season, you should watch American football instead.
I know don't know much about baseball when it comes to details (I care more about results). However I do know some of the big trends that I've mentioned. Toronto's injuries are nothing so far compared to the genuine injury bug they've experienced in recent years. They are off to a bad start, but they are not like Boston & NYY in their capability to come back from such, the recent years' trends seem to indicate. I trust Boston & NYY scouting & talent assessment more than, say, the Jays' (or any fans' opinion).
I've observed that when a team falls 9 or more games out of contention for a playoff spot, they seldom come back, whatever point in the season that happens to be. So far the Jays are close to exceeding their normal pace of dropping 3 or less points out of contention each month as the season goes on, at least for many years now.
Most of your observations here are actually totally off base. This is obviously because you focus on short term results and fail to do your research. Such superficial analysis is never good.
I see the newspaper chat lines are packed with "pretend" baseball fans throwing in the towel on the Jays already. What does Vegas think ? Well, with reduced interest in them the line has gone from roughly 8-1 to 15-1. 15-1 is still fairly low odds to win it all. So there is obviously some smart money not totally convinced their chances have gone. Futures are usually a bad bet in baseball but if someone offered 25-1 I'd take it.
Please, please don't get on here months ( weeks ? ) from now saying you now believe in them. You've totally written them off, trashed their scouting department ( I thought their 2012 farm system was praised by many analysts ), and severely overrated the Yankees team this year.
Bandwagon's officially closed to you get some Yankees gear we don't need you.
Last edited by Duncan Smith; Friday, 12th April, 2013, 04:33 PM.
By nine games out of contention I meant out of a playoff spot (e.g. 9 games back in the standings of the team currently holding down the wildcard spot). I thought that'd be clear from my post.
I trust Boston & NYY scouting more than the Jays on the perhaps blind/wild logic that besides being better able to afford top salary talent, the Red Sox & NYY also can afford the best scouts & other staff. Don't actually know what these teams proportionally pay their non-player staff (compared to the Blue Jays, say) as opposed to just their players.
Tampa Bay, I agree, is also a tough team to overtake. It's well known the Jays are also unfortunate to be in a tough division.
Anything that can go wrong will go wrong. Murphy's law, by Edward A. Murphy Jr., USAF, Aerospace Engineer
By nine games out of contention I meant out of a playoff spot (e.g. 9 games back in the standings of the team currently holding down the wildcard spot). I thought that'd be clear from my post.
I trust Boston & NYY scouting more than the Jays on the perhaps blind/wild logic that besides being better able to afford top salary talent, the Red Sox & NYY also can afford the best scouts & other staff. Don't actually know what these teams proportionally pay their non-player staff (compared to the Blue Jays, say) as opposed to just their players.
Tampa Bay, I agree, is also a tough team to overtake. It's well known the Jays are also unfortunate to be in a tough division.
Yankees are actually known for bad decisions on veteran talent, but get away with it some years by spending boat loads of money. However, when your team gets old and drops back you can quickly become an unattractive spot for strong players to relocate too.
Yankees picked up Wells and Overbay to ensure they were at least somewhat competitive on the field. Sounds like the Jays teams from 4-5 years ago, but Wells was horrendously bad last year and Overbay barely makes the majors now.
An observation that might have some interest: I briefly worked in an ashphalt and soil testing lab in Bramalea back in the late 1980s. At one point we tested some of the concrete being used for the Jays playing field at the time, I recall.
Like I wrote much earlier in the thread, I wonder if there is something a little wrong with the Skydome turf that might contribute to the Jays unusual number of injuries in recent seasons (see an earlier post of mine in this thread for links to reports of Jays injuries in recent years).
Last edited by Kevin Pacey; Friday, 12th April, 2013, 08:52 PM.
Reason: Spelling
Anything that can go wrong will go wrong. Murphy's law, by Edward A. Murphy Jr., USAF, Aerospace Engineer
Comment