COVID-19 ... how we cope :)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Neil Frarey
    replied
    Originally posted by Tom O'Donnell View Post
    What could possibly go wrong?
    I'd survive ... sigh.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tom O'Donnell
    replied
    Outrage as Boston University CREATES Covid strain that has an 80% kill rate | Daily Mail Online

    What could possibly go wrong?

    Leave a comment:


  • Bob Armstrong
    replied
    COVID-19 - Vaccine & Transmission


    Americas - Canada

    MP Leslyn Lewis Calls for Inquiry After Pfizer Exec Says COVID Vaccine Not Tested on Preventing Transmission

    https://www.theepochtimes.com/leslyn...&utm_content=2

    ~ Bob A (T-S/P)

    Leave a comment:


  • Sid Belzberg
    replied
    Originally posted by Tom O'Donnell View Post
    Big tech censored the Surgeon General of Florida who advised men from the ages of 18-39 to not get the jab, citing evidence that it causes heart problems in that group.
    https://twitter.com/kylenabecker/sta...49529765056513

    Leave a comment:


  • Tom O'Donnell
    replied
    Big tech censored the Surgeon General of Florida who advised men from the ages of 18-39 to not get the jab, citing evidence that it causes heart problems in that group.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sid Belzberg
    replied
    Originally posted by Bob Armstrong View Post
    I understood Pfizer to have stated that vaccination would DECREASE, NOT "stop", the chance of transmission.

    Nevertheless, they did have to have SOME evidence of this to even make this limited declaration......

    I always understood the MAIN, and most important, claim to be:

    - when you actually got COVID-19 by transmission, the vaccine lessened the negative consequences of the virus......for example, less chance of death, less chance of hospitalization, and less severe symptoms.

    Am I not right on this?

    ~ Bob A (T-S/P)
    Originally posted by Bob Armstrong View Post
    I understood Pfizer to have stated that vaccination would DECREASE, NOT "stop", the chance of transmission

    Nevertheless, they did have to have SOME evidence of this to even make this limited declaration.
    You ": understood " wrong, but that is because you were lied to. Go to the 2:00-minute mark on the video Neil posted. The Pfizer executive clearly states that they never tested for transmission, therefore, as Neil, stated, they had no scientific evidence to make a statement that it would decrease, stop or otherwise prevent transmission. This removed the entire legal basis for the Covid passport, as MEP Rob Roos said.on the video “This is scandalous. Millions of people worldwide felt forced to get vaccinated because of the myth that ‘you do it for others’.”
    “Get vaccinated for others” was always a lie, tweeted MEP Rob Roos yesterday.
    And you expect us to trust in the benevolence and goodness of Govts, what a joke!

    Originally posted by Bob Armstrong View Post
    I always understood the MAIN, and most important, claim to be:

    - when you actually got COVID-19 by transmission, the vaccine lessened the negative consequences of the virus......for example, less chance of death, less chance of hospitalization, and less severe symptoms.
    You and I already covered this ground above, that was also a proven lie
    https://forum.chesstalk.com/forum/ch...685#post221685

    I would urge you to listen to this video I already posted below by a highly respected long-time pharma drug trial professional.


    https://www.bitchute.com/embed/oWz8tNM9dK0n/



    Last edited by Sid Belzberg; Wednesday, 12th October, 2022, 07:40 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bob Armstrong
    replied
    I understood Pfizer to have stated that vaccination would DECREASE, NOT "stop", the chance of transmission.

    Nevertheless, they did have to have SOME evidence of this to even make this limited declaration......

    I always understood the MAIN, and most important, claim to be:

    - when you actually got COVID-19 by transmission, the vaccine lessened the negative consequences of the virus......for example, less chance of death, less chance of hospitalization, and less severe symptoms.

    Am I not right on this?

    ~ Bob A (T-S/P)

    Leave a comment:


  • Neil Frarey
    replied
    Pfizer finally admits that they never had any scientific evidence that being vaccinated would stop transmission of the Covid-19 virus.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TMFrOIebS0k

    Think about that for a moment.

    Those who were unvaccinated couldn't keep a job. Couldn't get on a plane. Couldn't even go into a restaurant.
    Why was the public so grossly mislead with this disinformation campaign concerning virus transmissiblilty?

    Pandemic of the vaccinated.

    Humans are easy.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sid Belzberg
    replied
    https://www.bitchute.com/embed/oWz8tNM9dK0n/

    Leave a comment:


  • Sid Belzberg
    replied
    Originally posted by Neil Frarey View Post

    From that link this bar chart compiled by VAERS is sooo worth posting ...

    Click image for larger version

Name:	CovidDeaths_VAERS.gif
Views:	73
Size:	233.3 KB
ID:	221878

    Leave a comment:


  • Neil Frarey
    replied
    Originally posted by Sid Belzberg View Post
    If you have any doubts, this author has compiled a great list of papers.

    https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/the-evidence
    From that link this bar chart compiled by VAERS is sooo worth posting ...

    Click image for larger version

Name:	CovidDeaths_VAERS.gif
Views:	73
Size:	233.3 KB
ID:	221878

    Leave a comment:


  • Sid Belzberg
    replied
    If you have any doubts, this author has compiled a great list of papers.

    https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/the-evidence

    Leave a comment:


  • Sid Belzberg
    replied
    Coming soon to Canada!
    https://www.truthforhealth.org/2022/...-fresno-calif/

    Leave a comment:


  • Sid Belzberg
    replied
    Originally posted by Bob Armstrong View Post
    Thanks Sid - very detailed analysis.......I will take some time with it.

    Obviously I am not happy with my take on your proposition (I am not sure you are actually going this far):

    All mainstream medical researchers/scientists, AND all the industry magazines that publish their reports, are compromised by the tainted money of Big Pharma.

    ~ Bob A (T-S/P)
    Not all, but many, hence you have to analyze the data yourself.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bob Armstrong
    replied
    Thanks Sid - very detailed analysis.......I will take some time with it.

    Obviously I am not happy with my take on your proposition (I am not sure you are actually going this far):

    All mainstream medical researchers/scientists, AND all the industry magazines that publish their reports, are compromised by the tainted money of Big Pharma.

    ~ Bob A (T-S/P)

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X