Anthropogenic Negative Climate Change (ANCC)

[Bob Armstrong]

Negative Climate Change

1 Consequence - Weather Extremes

Drought

"Drought Touches a Quarter of Humanity, U.N. Says, Disrupting Lives Globally

The crisis, worsened partly by climate change, has been accompanied by soaring food prices and could have consequences for hunger, elections and migration worldwide."

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/11/c...d396a4debfd6ce

Bob A (Anthropogenicist)

[Bob Armstrong]

Negative Climate Change - A Ballot Box Issue?



"This year is the biggest election year on record. Voters in more than 60 countries—including four of the five most populated—will go to the polls in 2024.

And in all of them, climate change is unavoidably on the ballot. Last year was the hottest year on record; this year is expected to be even hotter. The actions that countries take in the coming years will determine the trajectory of future emissions. Yet, despite this reality, climate change remains largely on the electoral campaign backburner. [Emphasis added]."

Bob A (Anthropogenicist)

[Bob Armstrong]

Negative Climate Change

Atmospheric Warming

"No year on record was hotter than 2023, and global temperatures are set to exceed key threshold [1.5 % heat increase from base year]"

http://secure.campaigner.com/csb/Pub...5qavc-d7iqhoh6

Bob A (Anthropogenicist)

[Bob Armstrong]

What, if anything, is happening to Earth's Atmospheric Temperature?

"It’s confirmed: 2023 was the planet’s warmest year on record and perhaps in the last 100,000 years. By far."



https://messaging-custom-newsletters...d396a4debfd6ce

Please note on this chart, the very distinct difference between the Pre-Industrial Period, and the Post-Industrial Period. Man is responsible, with his activities, of being the major factor in the rising Earth temperature.

Bob A (Anthropogenicist)

[Pargat Perrer]

It is one thing for the "Naturalists to say that this is part of a longer process in time, of eons, that man is not the main driver, and that it has been worse before. One might agree that, at least, this raises some rational argument.

But many "naturalists" do admit that at the moment, there are more people on the planet than last time, and that, indeed, the environment is slowly (Slower than the "anthropogenicists say) getting more hostile to the human species. So the second time around is going to cause a lot of people dislocation, as it did in earlier phases (Do I get the Naturalists right here?).

But it is entirely something else (Irrational argument) for "climate change deniers" to claim, in the face of world evidence of collateral damage to persons, that "nothing is going on"!

They may claim that what is going on has happened before (That is, it is not "unusual" in that sense). But to deny it is "unusual" for the people of the current time, right now, when we have never faced such hostile environmental changes for multi-centuries, is merely "wishful thinking". I expect that these people will be scrambling to adapt like everyone else who is a realist as the clock ticks closer to midnight..

What will be their explanation for their struggling to adapt, at that time?

Bob A

Many months ago, I mentioned in this thread that the economics of climate change and its effects will override any other aspect of climate change. In other words, it is useless for Sid to argue that we are going to be ok because the temperature was much warmer X thousand years ago when in TODAY'S world, economic trends due to climate change will accelerate and eventually cause recession and then depression to occur.

The example I gave was the stresses occurring around the world in the insurance sector.

Now read this....

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/real...ce/ar-AA1myfo2

The stresses are now building up to enormous levels. It is affecting the entire housing market in North America, not just in Texas and Florida.

In the '60s, '70's, '80s, '90s the U.S. had annual breakouts of tornados, hurricanes, hailstorms, forest fires, floods etc and the insurance industry in those times was NOT in peril. Now the situation is much different. The industry is in peril and the entire real estate industry is on the verge of collapse because of it. And that collapse will cause a major domino effect across all other economic sectors.

Trillions of dollars in household wealth is likely to be wiped out. It could happen overnight. And it is all due to the effects of climate change. Of course, the pandemic didn't help matters, but even without the pandemic, things would be just about as bad in real estate as they are.

The government will have to come to the rescue, with state-funded insurance, causing another huge increase in government debt.

The smart people will see that this is unsustainable. Fiat currency is counting down to getting demolished. Ownership of precious metals is just about the only way to survive what is coming.... and / or ownership of very well-stocked survival bunkers to ride out the economic storm.

[Dilip Panjwani]

https://www.cbc.ca/listen/live-radio...epreneurs-gone

[Pargat Perrer]

Yet another personal attack! What has happened to you, Bob A, I am worried...

"WHAAAA! WHAAAAA! PERSONAL ATTACK! PERSONAL ATTACK!"

Someone please give Dollop a pacifier!

[Bob Armstrong]

Reducing Fossil Fuel Vehicles

"China's BYD set to overtake Tesla as world’s most popular EV maker."

https://www.japantimes.co.jp/busines...hav_jzigixiztw

Bob A

[Bob Armstrong]

Negative Climate Change

Accelerating?

"Is climate change speeding up? Here’s what the science says.

This year’s record temperatures have some scientists concerned that the pace of warming may be accelerating. But not everyone agrees."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/clima...wpisrc=nl_most

Bob A (Anthropogenicist)

[Dilip Panjwani]

Dilip also does not recognize what constitutes a "personal attack"...........I try to almost never lower myself to that level, common on CT.

Those who have known me for two decades on Fb are well aware of that........I have been asked myriads of times: Why do you respond to these trolls?

In law, it is the tort of libel, to publish negative untrue statements about another's character.

Bob A

Yet another personal attack! What has happened to you, Bob A, I am worried...

[Dilip Panjwani]

My statement in my last post was not a personal attack.

It was a true objective fact statement, confirmed by the response.

Bob A

Of course it was a personal attack, accusing me of not knowing climate vs. weather.
In my post, I was not referring to climate change, but to climate-anxiety, which unfortunately is nowadays fashionable to have, whether related to true climate-change or not..

[Bob Armstrong]

Dilip also does not recognize what constitutes a "personal attack"...........I try to almost never lower myself to that level, common on CT.

Those who have known me for two decades on Fb are well aware of that........I have been asked myriads of times: Why do you respond to these trolls?

In law, it is the tort of libel, to publish negative untrue statements about another's character.

Bob A

[Bob Armstrong]

My statement in my last post was not a personal attack.

It was a true objective fact statement, confirmed by the response.

Bob A

[Dilip Panjwani]

Dilip doesn't know the difference between "weather" and "Climate".

Bob A

I do, Bob. Your climate anxiety peaks when some place records the highest ever temperature; so let it be alleviated when some other place records the lowest ever temperature...
and do not imitate your co-marxist by using personal attacks, okay?

[Bob Armstrong]

Dilip doesn't know the difference between "weather" and "Climate".

Bob A