Anthropogenic Negative Climate Change (ANCC)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Farming & the Green Agenda

    Farmers have a somewhat legitimate beef with governments.

    But it is not about the government declaring that the current way of farming is contributing to negative climate change. The allegation is correct. And modern farming must change its ways to minimize its carbon footprint.

    And this is so, even if it is negatively affecting the bottom line of the small private, and large conglomerate, private businesses of farming. We can only effectively combat increasing negative climate change by steps that are going to cost dollars.

    So......how is their beef correct?

    It has to do with equality of application.

    Farmers legitimately ask: "Why only us?"

    But what farmers should be demanding, is that governments apply the same green agenda to all other sectors of economic activity. If they would demand this, and get the governments to take on the heavyweights of economic activity, we'd soon make good progress combatting negative climate change.

    And if the farmers would make this new demand, they would deserve the support of the public, and the thanks of the public for forcing governments to do what they are reluctant to do........fight with the big guys....instead they pretend to make progress by fighting with the little guys.

    Bob A (Anthropogenicist)

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Bob Armstrong View Post
      Farming & the Green Agenda

      Farmers have a somewhat legitimate beef with governments.

      But it is not about the government declaring that the current way of farming is contributing to negative climate change. The allegation is correct. And modern farming must change its ways to minimize its carbon footprint.

      And this is so, even if it is negatively affecting the bottom line of the small private, and large conglomerate, private businesses of farming. We can only effectively combat increasing negative climate change by steps that are going to cost dollars.

      So......how is their beef correct?

      It has to do with equality of application.

      Farmers legitimately ask: "Why only us?"

      But what farmers should be demanding, is that governments apply the same green agenda to all other sectors of economic activity. If they would demand this, and get the governments to take on the heavyweights of economic activity, we'd soon make good progress combatting negative climate change.

      And if the farmers would make this new demand, they would deserve the support of the public, and the thanks of the public for forcing governments to do what they are reluctant to do........fight with the big guys....instead they pretend to make progress by fighting with the little guys.

      Bob A (Anthropogenicist)
      The current crisis unfolding in countries like Germany and France, where farmer protests have brought crucial agricultural activities to a standstill, is not just alarming—it's a harbinger of a potential global catastrophe. This situation could trigger a domino effect, leading to supply chain disruptions, economic turmoil, and most critically, a severe threat to global food security. The response to this crisis requires urgent attention and action, not adherence to environmental policies that are, at this point, contributing to a potentially disastrous outcome.

      Organizations like CLINTEL and the CO2 Coalition have raised valid concerns about the prevailing narrative on climate change, challenging the assertion that we are facing an immediate climate crisis. The current agricultural policies, based on debatable assumptions about climate change, are now threatening to precipitate a real and undeniable crisis—a famine that could affect billions of people worldwide.

      To continue pushing these policies in the face of such stark evidence of their detrimental impact is not just irresponsible; it borders on recklessness. We are flirting with a disaster of unprecedented scale, all for a climate crisis that is itself a subject of intense scientific debate. This is not the time for unyielding adherence to environmental dogma; it's a time for pragmatic, balanced, and immediate action to avert a global food security disaster.

      Comment


      • Angry Italian Farmers Join Their European Counterparts in Protest Against Climate Tyranny
        Angry Italian farmers have joined their European counterparts in protest against climate tyranny, which has spread across the country for several days.

        Take a listen to the beautiful sound of honking.

        Earlier today, Belgian and Dutch farmers teamed up against crippling globalist policies in the name of curbing climate change.

        Three highways on the border between the two countries are effectively BLOCKED by tractors and other large vehicles.

        According to reports, they plan to stay there at least all weekend.

        In total, farmer protests have been erupting in France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Belgium, Romania, Spain, Portugal, and more.

        The globalists have f*cked with the wrong people.
        Last edited by Sid Belzberg; Friday, 2nd February, 2024, 02:50 PM.

        Comment




        • The Echoes of History: Control Through Scarcity, from Ancient Rome to the Modern Era

          In the annals of history, the manipulation of food supplies has been a tactic employed by rulers and governments to consolidate power and control populations. This method, deeply interwoven into the fabric of societal governance, reveals a recurring theme of exploitation and control that resonates through the ages, from the times of Ancient Rome to the autocratic regimes of the 20th century, and, as some argue, into the contemporary global stage.

          Ancient Rome: Tiberius Julius Alexander’s Control Through THe Food Supply
          The narrative begins with Tiberius Julius Alexander, an influential figure in the Roman Empire, who, according to some historical accounts, conspired with Roman councilmen to manipulate food supplies from Egypt. Egypt, known as the breadbasket of the Roman Empire, was critical to Rome's food security. By controlling the grain flow, Tiberius and his co-conspirators could potentially wield enormous power over the populace, leveraging scarcity as a means to manipulate political power structures and maintain control over the Roman population.

          Stalin’s Soviet Union: The Iron Grip of Collectivization

          Fast forward to the early 20th century, Joseph Stalin's Soviet Union undertook a drastic policy of agricultural collectivization. Framed as a move towards a more equitable society, collectivization forced peasants into collective farms with the promise of modernizing agriculture and boosting productivity. However, the reality was far grimmer. The policy led to widespread famine, notably the Holodomor in Ukraine, where millions perished. Here, control over food was not just about power; it became a weapon of political repression, aiming to quell dissent and eliminate perceived opposition.

          The Modern Parallel: Climate Policy and Agricultural Livelihoods

          In today's context, we can draw parallels between historical instances of food control and current global policies related to climate change and agriculture. Under the guise of combating a climate emergency, globalist and elite factions are enacting policies that detrimentally affect farmers, echoing the manipulations of the past. These policies risk putting farmers out of business, potentially leading to widespread famine, all in pursuit of broader depopulation goals.

          The Climate Naturalist Perspective: Insights from the CETUS Dataset

          Adding a layer to this complex narrative, the CETUS dataset offers a unique perspective, challenging the prevailing climate change discourse. This dataset, rooted in the heart of the Industrial Revolution, presents a consistent average temperature increase of 0.5 degrees Celsius per century, a trend that has remained unchanged despite the massive industrial CO2 emissions from 1850 onwards. This data suggests that factors beyond human-induced CO2 emissions are at play, with solar activity serving as a significant driver of climate variations.

          The persistent role of solar activity, despite the dramatic rise in industrial emissions, underscores the need for a nuanced understanding of climate dynamics. This perspective aligns with the climate naturalist viewpoint, which advocates for a broader consideration of natural and anthropogenic factors influencing climate change.

          A Historical Reflection

          The comparison of past and present raises essential questions about the role of governance, the impact of policy on fundamental human needs, and the lessons history can offer. While the contexts may differ vastly, the underlying theme of leveraging control over essential resources remains a potent reminder of the power dynamics that shape societies. The insights from the CETUS dataset, coupled with historical instances of food control, highlight the importance of a balanced, informed approach to environmental policy—one that takes into account the myriad factors influencing our climate and the critical need to safeguard food security and societal stability.

          Comment


          • "CAN'T MAKE THIS UP! Britain is talking about FORCING farmers to feed cows methane blockers to reduce cow farts. Guess who has recently invested MILLIONS in companies making methane blockers? None other than Bill Gates... To reduce climate emissions and meet the 2030 climate goals they are want to reduce cow farts and burps -

            No, this isn't a joke. They are serious. By 2030, the agriculture industry has to reduce climate emissions by 5 million tons of CO2. In other words, this goes back to the UN Agenda 2030 ”global goals,” which none other than Bill Gates himself is funding, of course. It’s not some crazy future conspiracy theory. I went to the grocery store in Norway, and there is already a new “Climate milk” on the shelves! I decided to do some research on the chemical that they are feeding the cows making this new "Climate milk" -

            And I was SHOCKED. The chemical they are giving the cows is classified as corrosive, irritant, flammable, and a health hazard. This chemical they are feeding cows is suspected of DAMAGING FERTILITY/unborn child. It actually has a warning label for reproductive toxicity.

            Is our milk supply being poisoned in the name of climate change? The worst part is it seems like nobody in the mainstream media is talking about this. People have no clue about what is happening to their milk! So I have to write this article to raise awareness.

            I have done some in-depth research of this chemical they are feeding cows to find out how toxic it actually is...and what I found was SHOCKING! And it's no wonder when you see what ingredients they use to make this compound.

            Guess what else Bill Gates is funding? He has given $319 million to the mainstream media. Now you know why the media isn't talking about this. They are bought and paid for."

            https://twitter.com/PeterSweden7/status/1739655431222374844


            Click image for larger version  Name:	Screenshot 2024-02-03 at 11.00.38 PM.png Views:	0 Size:	986.6 KB ID:	231631
            Last edited by Sid Belzberg; Sunday, 4th February, 2024, 01:16 AM.

            Comment



            • I have something very worrying to tell you. They are planning on poisoning our milk supply in the name of stopping climate change. Of course you will not be hearing anything about this on the mainstream media, so that is why I have to write this article and warn you of what is happening. For some reason, it has been decided that cows are the enemy. The Netherlands plan on seizing thousands of farms and reduce the number of livestock. In New Zealand, the left wing government was just defeated after farmers united to oppose them and their new ”fart tax” to reduce emissions from cows.

              But now countries are beginning to feed TOXIC chemicals to cows in order to get them to have less burps and farts. Yes, you read that correctly! Why is that you may ask? To reduce climate emissions and meet the 2030 climate goals of course! By the year 2030, the agriculture industry has to reduce climate emissions by 5 million tons CO2. In other words, this of course goes back to the UN Agenda 2030 ”global goals” which none other than Bill Gates himself is funding.

              The goal is that all ruminant livestock used for diary and meat shall be fed methane suppressing chemicals in just a few years. What are they calling this new milk? One diary producer is calling it ”Future milk” while another milk is called ”Climate milk”. It’s not some crazy future conspiracy theory. I went to the grocery store in Norway and the new “Climate milk” is ALREADY on the shelves! I decided to do some research on this chemical that they are feeding the cows and I was SHOCKED. The chemical that they are giving the cows is classified as CORROSIVE, FLAMMABLE, IRRITANT and a HEALTH HAZARD!

              But it get’s worse… This chemical they are feeding the cows is suspected of DAMAGING FERTILITY or the unborn child. It has a warning label for reproductive toxicity. It has been found to very harmful to the male reproductive system in rats. In other words, is our milk supply being poisoned in the name of climate change? The worst part is, it seems like nobody in the mainstream media is talking about this. People have no clue about what is happening to their milk!

              So I have to write this article to raise awareness. I have done some in-depth research of this chemical they are feeding cows to find out how toxic it actually is...and what I found was SHOCKING! Oh, and you could never guess who has been giving millions of dollars to the company producing this toxic chemical

              Let’s take a deep dive to find out the truth about this new “Future milk”. Two of Norway’s largest diary producers have simultaneously launched their new ”climate friendly” milks. One from the company Tine is called ”Future Milk” while the other from the company Q Melk is called ”Climate Milk”. T

              his new project is getting support from the Norwegian government which has granted $900 000. ”Methane emissions from livestock is the dominating emission source from agriculture, and it is important that we put in an effort to reduce these emissions while keeping up production of food” said Agriculture and Food Minister Sandra Borch.

              By the year 2030 (of course, we see that year over and over again, I wonder why…?) all ruminant livestock in Norway shall be fed with the new feed containing this toxic chemical. According to Q Melk, their new ”Climate Milk” produces 25-30% less methane than regular milk, and they aim to have all of their 14 000 cows eating this chemical within 3 years.

              When I went to the grocery store, I found this new “Climate Milk” on the shelves already. Here are some photos that I took. The toxic chemical. So what exactly is this chemical that they are feeding cows to get them to fart and burp less? They use a product that is branded as Boaver and is developed by a company called DSM-Firmenich. What is Boaver?

              Comment



              • The chemical used in this product is called 3-Nitrooxypropanol, also known as 3-NOP. Naturally, everyone is trying to reassure us that this chemical is perfectly fine and completely harmless to feed cows. It is approved by the EFSA , the European Food Safety Authority and the Norwegian food authority.

                But some alarm bells started ringing for me, making me wonder if this chemical really is as safe as they are trying to tell us. How is 3-Nitrooxypropanol made? They make it by combining two ingredients. The highly corrosive chemical nitric acid with propanediol (a form of alcohol).

                This chemical, when ingested by the cows, works to suppress the natural methane production in the stomach of the cow. So we are giving cows a chemical made from the highly corrosive chemical nitric acid. Great! According to the UK government, ingestion of nitric acid can be fatal if it is in a high enough dose. I did some more digging and found more details about 3-Nitrooxypropanol from the NIH PubChem website. It is very worrying indeed. It is listed as: Flammable. Corrosive. Irritant. Health Hazard. But it gets worse.

                It is listed as having acute toxicity if swallowed. It causes serious eye damage. But it is also listed as suspected of damaging fertility or the unborn child. In other words, a warning regarding reproductive toxicity. And the plan is to give all cows this chemical. It will be unavoidable that at least traces of this chemical get into the system of the cow and possibly into the milk as well. Could it then hurt the fertility of humans? Of course not the experts will say. The EU Food Authority has approved this chemical.

                Everyone is telling us that this is perfectly SAFE and EFFECTIVE, just like the mRNA shots are perfectly SAFE and EFFECTIVE! The primary metabolite of the 3-nitrooxypropanol chemical is 3-nitrooxypropinoic acid (NOPA). Research has found that NOPA was DETECTED in the milk of 3 out of 4 cows given this chemical. So it does indeed go out into the milk. At a 200mg dose of the chemical, researchers identified DECREASED ovary size in the cows. This is worrying. Could it affect humans, too?
                Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot 2024-02-04 at 12.30.45 AM.png
Views:	17
Size:	750.7 KB
ID:	231635
                Click image for larger version

Name:	hazards identificatin.png
Views:	16
Size:	1.08 MB
ID:	231636



                Despite this find, researchers considered that it should not be considered an adverse effect and concluded that the additive would be safe at the dosage of 200mg/kg. But it gets worse - Again. Studies have found that in rats given higher doses of the chemical, the additive has the potential to cause mesenchymal cell hyperplasia and benign tumors.

                Researchers found that masks may need to be considered when handling the additive because of the risk of acute inhalation toxicity. So when farmers feed cows with this stuff, they should probably wear face masks. But sure, it’s safe to eat! Researchers found that the daily acceptable intake of this stuff for humans is at 0.3mg/kg. bw/d. Genotoxicity.

                Researchers have also looked at whether 3-Nitrooxypropanol is toxic (damaging) to DNA, and here we find even more worrying stuff. In this study, they say that “the genotoxicity potential of 3-NOP cannot be ruled out”.

                A 2 year study in rats reported an increase in rare mesenchymal intestinal tumors “which cannot be considered as a chance finding”. In other words, they say that the chemicals they will feed cows could be toxic to DNA. Not great.

                Fertility problems! Another worrying finding was that 3-Nitrooxypropanol was found to be very toxic to sperm production in rats. When rats received 500mg/kg of this chemical, it caused adverse effects in the testes and caused “severe reduction of spermatogenesis”.

                In other words, it caused a severe reduction in sperm production in the male rats. Also, female rats on the same dose showed evidence of mating, but none of the females became pregnant. Remember the chart earlier that showed that this chemical was suspected of damaging fertility? Looks like it checks out.
                Last edited by Sid Belzberg; Sunday, 4th February, 2024, 01:33 AM.

                Comment



                • So, let’s conclude. They cannot rule out that the chemical could be toxic to DNA. They know that it is very toxic to the male reproductive system. Female rats on a high dose didn’t get pregnant. It is a corrosive substance. Farmers should consider wearing masks when handling it. Rats given higher doses had the potential to develop benign tumors.

                  It decreased the ovary size in cows at high enough doses. Yet they plan on feeding this chemical to ALL cows in Norway within just a few years, all in the name of stopping climate change. This is UDDER madness!

                  Sure, they say it’s SAFE and EFFECTIVE. But they said the same thing about the mRNA shots, and we now know that they are not safe and they are not effective. Are we seeing a repeat of what happened with the mRNA shots but now with milk instead?

                  One last thing… Guess who has helped fund the company behind this toxic chemical? Turns out that none other than Bill Gates has given quite a lot of money to DSM-Firmenich. In fact, a whopping $5,346,859 The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation also gave a whopping $6,344,590 to Firmenich in 2013, the company now part of DSM-Firmenich after an acquisition.

                  What is being done now is that they are introducing new chemicals into the food supply in the name of stopping climate change.

                  This toxic chemical is not needed. It is designed to stop a natural process of methane forming in the cow's stomach.

                  There is plenty of evidence showing that this chemical could be very harmful, especially worrying when it comes to fertility. But they are so intent on reaching the “Global Goals” set out in the UN Agenda 2030 that they are willing to risk public health if it means reducing “climate emissions”.

                  Sure, they say it is safe for humans at the calculated doses. But what happens if humans ingest this over a long period of time? This will happen because people eat and drink dairy products every day. What will the effect be after 10 years of consumption of milk from cows being fed this toxic chemical? Nobody knows.

                  We are subject to another experiment, just like they did with the mRNA shots. Nobody knew about possible long term side effects, and we cannot know that for certain here either. So maybe it would be wise to be more concerned about human health rather than listening to the insane demands of climate fanatics?

                  Comment


                  • The climate agenda is more tyrannical than you might think. It's being used to take away your freedoms and to transfer wealth from you - to the elites. The farmers all over Europe have said NO.

                    Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot 2024-02-04 at 12.47.27 AM.png
Views:	14
Size:	380.3 KB
ID:	231638

                    Comment


                    • Al Gore's predictive track Record:

                      Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot 2024-02-04 at 12.50.54 AM.png
Views:	16
Size:	998.2 KB
ID:	231640

                      Comment


                      • Negative Climate Change

                        One Consequence - Rising Temperatures

                        "Has the planet warmed more than we thought? Ocean sponges might be telling us something."

                        https://apnews.com/article/climate-c...ternoon%20Wire

                        Bob A (Anthropogenicist)

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by WEF useful idiot Bob Armstrong;
                          Negative Climate Change

                          One Consequence - Rising Temperatures

                          "Has the planet warmed more than we thought? Ocean sponges might be telling us something."

                          https://apnews.com/article/climate-c...ternoon%20Wire

                          Bob A (WEF Useful Idiot Anthropogenicist)
                          "A handful of centuries-old sponges from deep in the Caribbean are causing some scientists to think human-caused climate change began sooner and has heated the world more than they thought.

                          They calculate that the world has already gone past the internationally approved target of limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) since pre-industrial times, hitting 1.7 degrees (3.1 degrees Fahrenheit) as of 2020. They analyzed six of the long-lived sponges — simple animals that filter water — for growth records that document changes in water temperature, acidity and carbon dioxide levels in the air, according to a study in Monday’s journal Nature Climate Change.

                          Other scientists were skeptical of the study’s claim that the world has warmed that much more than thought."

                          And no wonder other scientists were skeptical. Rather than theories that are subjected to arguments, the CETUS database, the longest-running thermometer database in the world located in the Central UK, the heart of the industrial revolution going back to 1650, shows none of the findings above .5 degrees per century for over 300 years half the time with carbon the other half without. Data that is not subject to theoretical interpretations!

                          But our WEF useful idiot Marxist Bob Armstrong loves quoting. WEF-controlled climate fear porn propaganda.
                          The entire European continent is at a standstill where supermarket shelves are already becoming empty, and our WEF useful idiot has ZERO to say about that and parrots idiotic WEF climate propaganda as the WEF tries to induce a world wide famine over a so called "climate emergency" that is putting Europes Farmers out of business.

                          All over the world, people are realizing that they can live without politicians, bureaucrats, and unelected globalists, but they absolutely cannot live without farmers. If the farmers perish, we all perish. No Farmers, No Food!

                          Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot 2024-02-06 at 1.53.45 AM.png
Views:	11
Size:	903.7 KB
ID:	231671


                          Last edited by Sid Belzberg; Tuesday, 6th February, 2024, 02:54 AM.

                          Comment


                          • Wednesday, 31st January, 2024, 05:08 AM - Bob's Post # 1891

                            "Farming & the Green Agenda

                            Farmers have a somewhat legitimate beef with governments......."

                            It is not true Sid, that I have not posted about the farming issue. You just have ignored what I've posted because it is a reasonable analysis.

                            Bob A (Anthropogenicist)

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Bob Armstrong View Post
                              Wednesday, 31st January, 2024, 05:08 AM - Bob's Post # 1891

                              "Farming & the Green Agenda

                              Farmers have a somewhat legitimate beef with governments......."

                              It is not true Sid, that I have not posted about the farming issue. You just have ignored what I've posted because it is a reasonable analysis.

                              Bob A (Anthropogenicist)
                              Oh sure Bob, that the unelected Genocidal WEF should apply their climate scam "equally" to everyone. Such brilliant analysis! Starve the world equally!!!! Possibly the dumbest statement ever on CT, and that is saying a lot! Five percent of Candians now rely on the food bank thanks in part to inflation caused by Marxist carbon taxes! Up five times since 2019!!! Bob's genius idea of applying famine equally to everyone in action!!!!
                              Last edited by Sid Belzberg; Tuesday, 6th February, 2024, 09:17 AM.

                              Comment



                              • "If you control the food, you control the people." Unelected globalists are using the "man-made global warming" narrative as a pretext to collapse the global food supply deliberately so that people will have no choice but to eat insects and lab-grown "meat"—as detailed in a must-watch new documentary titled 'No Farmers, No Food: Will You Eat The Bugs?'

                                No Farmers No Food: Will You Eat The Bugs? | Documentary

                                Documentaries
                                Views 3.3M •
                                Sep-25-2023
                                Food prices are skyrocketing in grocery stores around the world, and some world leaders say it’s due to climate change. Their solution is Agenda 21, the United Nation’s 100-year long master plan for humanity and the 21st century, which is broken down into shorter 15-year plans. The current plan is Agenda 2030, which aims at “transforming our world for sustainable development” according to the UN.
                                Agenda 2030 is now being implemented across the world. In America, it is implemented as the Biden administration’s 30x30 agenda, a plan to take 30 percent of America’s land completely out of production by the year 2030, resulting in small farmers and ranchers being forced off their lands. In other countries like The Netherlands, Dutch farmers are forced to shut down due to the government’s “green policies” that limit nitrogen emissions. In Sri Lanka, farmers are fighting for their survival because of the government’s ban on synthetic fertilizer.
                                While we are seeing a global war on farmers, the World Economic Forum and the United Nations are pushing people to eat bugs as a solution to reduce climate change, world hunger, and save the planet. Why are world leaders and even celebrities suddenly pushing edible bugs? Should the government control our food? What would a world be like without farmers?
                                “No Farmers No Food: Will You Eat The Bugs?” is an Epoch Original documentary exposing the hidden agenda behind global “Green Policies,” the untold stories of farmers forced out of business, the disruption this will have on our food supply, and why edible bugs are suddenly being pushed to the fore as a “Global Green Solution.”
                                EpochTV’s “Facts Matter” host Roman Balmakov traveled around the world to over 25 locations and interviewed over 50 farmers, scientists, and experts in the United States, The Netherlands, and Sri Lanka to get to the truth behind this global agenda and investigate the coming global food crisis that is being ignored by the world’s media.
                                History has a tendency to rhyme. In the 1950, Chinese communist leader Mao Zedong sold the “Great Leap Forward” to the public under the banner of progress, but his policies led to the largest man-made famine in history, with over 50 million dying of hunger. The UN’s “green policies” appear to have the hallmarks of a new “Green Leap Forward”, they might sound good on paper, but in practice they undermine our food security, property rights, water rights, and represent an existential threat to our liberties as free citizens. A famous quote reads “Who controls the food supply controls the people”.
                                This documentary is important for everyone to watch, not just for knowing what’s on your dinner plate but also to have the knowledge to prevent another man-made famine in the future and protect your freedoms and liberties.

                                Click image for larger version  Name:	Screenshot 2024-02-06 at 9.43.26 AM.png Views:	0 Size:	1.12 MB ID:	231682


                                https://www.theepochtimes.com/epochtv/nofarmersnofood-5390883?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=wideawake_media&src_src=partner&src_cmp=wideawake_media

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X