Anthropogenic Negative Climate Change (ANCC)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Bob Armstrong
    replied
    Carbon Dioxide (CO2) and Greenhouse Gases

    "Carbon dioxide (CO2) is the PRIMARY [Emphasis added] greenhouse gas emitted through human activities. In 2021, CO2 accounted for 79% of all U.S. greenhouse gas emissions from human activities."

    https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/ove...eenhouse-gases

    Greenhouse Gases have coalesced into a canopy, part-way up the Earth's atmosphere, which is prohibiting reflected heat from the Earth's surface from escaping into space, as it used to do before man caused the formation of this canopy.

    Bob A (Anthropogenicist)

    Leave a comment:


  • Pargat Perrer
    replied
    Originally posted by Sid Belzberg View Post
    .....
    Click image for larger version Name:	Screenshot 2024-02-11 at 11.43.24 PM.png Views:	0 Size:	649.9 KB ID:	231773
    .....
    This is the Spanish 500, not to be confused with (and much slower than) the Indianapolis 500.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sid Belzberg
    replied
    The World Economic Forum touts 'carbon removal plants'—each of which removes five million tonnes of CO2 from the atmosphere each year—as "crucial to meeting global climate goals", despite the fact that CO2 currently makes up just 0.04% of the atmosphere, and if it drops to half of that, all plant life—and thus all animal and human life—will perish.


    Leave a comment:


  • Sid Belzberg
    replied
    Massive farmers protest in Rome with tractors as far as the eye can see. Farmers against the climate communism agenda

    Click image for larger version  Name:	Screenshot 2024-02-11 at 11.37.50 PM.png Views:	0 Size:	382.1 KB ID:	231772


    https://twitter.com/PeterSweden7/sta...14703345475847


    The massive farmer's protest in Spain is continuing. Thousands of tractors out protesting against Socialism and the Agenda 2030.

    Click image for larger version  Name:	Screenshot 2024-02-11 at 11.43.24 PM.png Views:	0 Size:	649.9 KB ID:	231773

    https://twitter.com/PeterSweden7/status/1756725531779940399


    Update
    Countries that have now joined the farmers protest: Netherlands, Scotland, France ,Germany, Poland, Lithuania, Romania, Belgium ,Greece, Spain, Italy, Portugal, Ireland, Bulgaria ,Britain ,Wales Moldova

    Say no to Genocidal Climate Communism! Say no to net zero!

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot 2024-02-11 at 11.53.00 PM.png
Views:	17
Size:	1.39 MB
ID:	231774

    https://twitter.com/PeterSweden7/sta...47261311152472
    Last edited by Sid Belzberg; Monday, 12th February, 2024, 01:12 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bob Gillanders
    replied
    Climate scientist Michael Mann wins his defamation lawsuit.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eX_a...el=PBSNewsHour

    Leave a comment:


  • Bob Armstrong
    replied
    CT Non-chess Forums

    Learning Centres

    Negative Climate Change

    Click image for larger version

Name:	ClimateChange2.jpg
Views:	18
Size:	17.7 KB
ID:	231758

    This is a somewhat unique thread, says its originator.

    It is my understanding that both Anthropogenicists and Naturalists agree:

    Statement # 1 - Negative Climate Change is currently occurring.

    However they disagree on almost everything else:

    1. Rate of negative climate change;
    2. Causes of negative climate change;
    3. the scientific "how" of negative climate change;
    4. the projected consequences and timeline of this negative climate change.
    5. whether there is any "crisis"

    In this thread so far, it has appeared that both sides claim to have science on their side (With disputes about how many scientists are on each side, the type of scientists, and the qualifications of each other's scientists).

    Both sides have impressive credentials for their scientists and their "expert" reports. Both sides have a multiplicity of impressive looking graphs with many multiple lines across them.

    So we cannot say there is a dearth of material to go through.

    But, admittedly, it can be hard to compare charts which seem to be dealing with something from slightly different perspectives. It can be difficult to evaluate the worth of the attacks on various scientists' credentials.

    We even have expert reports on glaciers: one says they are melting; the other says they are NOT melting.

    Whoa....how can both be true? Is it possible they both are.....but they're viewing glaciers from somewhat different perspectives, and the meaning of "melting" is in dispute?

    Anyway, to conclude, this thread has served the very good purpose of presenting CT viewers a wealth of conflicting material, among which to determine the truth as THEY see it.

    And we know many are reading only.....for many reasons, though, they are hesitant to make a public commitment on their view, or they simply have not yet come to conclusions, given the overwhelming amount of material, and the extent of opposition. This is fine.

    That there may be few drivers of the thread (Posters), as long as they are presenting ongoing evidence supporting their view, this thread is worthwhile.

    Bob A (Anthropogenicist)

    Leave a comment:


  • Sid Belzberg
    replied
    IT'S HAPPENING
    The British farmers have now joined the protests against the climate communist agenda.
    An empty supermarket is coming soon to a country near you!

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot 2024-02-09 at 5.12.44 PM.png
Views:	21
Size:	393.5 KB
ID:	231754

    Leave a comment:


  • Sid Belzberg
    replied
    Originally posted by Bob Armstrong View Post
    The Rising Temperature of Earth

    "It’s official: For the past 12 months, the Earth was 1.5 degrees Celsius higher than in preindustrial times, scientists said Thursday, crossing a critical barrier into temperatures never experienced by human civilizations."

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/clima...c7b80f14df10b6

    Bob A (Anthropogenicist)
    Data Shows We're NOT Seeing Record Heat


    by Gregory Wrightstone Hotter Than the Fourth of July!

    By Angela Wheeler

    2 min. read
    View original

    07.9.2023
    Data Shows We’re NOT Seeing Record Heat


    by Gregory Wrightstone

    Hotter Than the Fourth of July!

    It was widely reported recently that July 4th, 2023 was the hottest day in Earth’s recorded history.

    Paulo Ceppi, a climate scientist at London’s Grantham Institute stated: “It hasn’t been this warm since at least 125,000 years ago, which was the previous interglacial.” And, of course, it was reported that it was our fault due to our “sins of emission.”

    This didn’t meet the smell test for the scientists at the CO2 Coalition. We know that previous warm periods were warmer than our modern temperatures. For example, during the Roman Warm Period there was citrus being grown in the north of England and barley was grown by Vikings on Greenland 1,000 years ago. Why aren’t they grown there now? It’s quite simple: Lower modern temperatures.

    So, here at the CO2 Coalition, we did what scientists are trained to do:

    We looked at the available data. Our Science and Research Associate Byron Soepyan reviewed temperature data from the US Historical Climatology Network and found that both the number of weather stations reporting temperature over 100 degrees F and the Maximum Average Temperature for July 4th were slightly declining since the record began in 1895 – not increasing – as Ceppi claimed.





    The Great Texas Heat Wave

    It is summer. It is hot in Texas. It is not unusual or unprecedented. Below is a chart of the percentage of days in Texas that were above 100 degrees Fahrenheit since 1895. Despite a significant and steady rise in CO2 emissions, there has been a decline in the occurrence of very hot days.



    Gregory Wrightstone is a geologist; executive director of the CO2 Coalition, Arlington, VA; and author of Inconvenient Facts: The Science That Al Gore Doesn’t Want You to Know.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bob Armstrong
    replied
    The Rising Temperature of Earth

    "It’s official: For the past 12 months, the Earth was 1.5 degrees Celsius higher than in preindustrial times, scientists said Thursday, crossing a critical barrier into temperatures never experienced by human civilizations."

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/clima...c7b80f14df10b6

    Bob A (Anthropogenicist)

    Leave a comment:


  • Bob Armstrong
    replied
    Iceland & Negative Climate Change

    "Iceland uses remarkably few fossil fuels to power its economy and heat its homes. Instead, 85 percent of the country’s energy comes from domestically produced renewables, primarily geothermal power and hydropower.......

    Geothermal power also produces about 20 percent of the country’s electricity......

    One of its glaciers, Okjokull, has completely melted away. Over the next 200 years, scientists expect the rest — including the massive Vatnajokull glacier, which covers some 3,000 square miles — to disappear as well....

    ...like all coastal cities around the world, Iceland’s capital, Reykjavik, is threatened by rising sea levels."

    https://messaging-custom-newsletters...d396a4debfd6ce

    Bob A (Anthropogenicist)

    Leave a comment:


  • Sid Belzberg
    replied
    Originally posted by Bob Armstrong View Post
    Transition to the Green Economy

    Purpose: To slow and stop Negative Climate Change/To generate Positive Climate Change to Restore Nature's Balance


    Maros Sefcovic, a Commission vice-president, [European Union]: “We do recognise the legitimate concerns of citizens and industry over the cost of transition.”

    According to this, European "Transition" is intended to continue.

    But....

    it will be done in such a way that the "Cost of Transition" is borne relatively equally by the various sectors of the economy.

    Thus the legitimate concerns of the farm sector that they were being asked to bear an unfair amount of the transition cost were recognized.

    It is up to the EU, and all countries, to effect the transition fairly and place the relative costs where they should be borne.

    It is not in doubt that "Transition", now that we have degraded our environment to the extent we have, will cost.

    Bob A (Anthropogenicist)
    Sorry Bob, but if it was not for the fact that these farmers almost put the EU parliament under siege, these subhumans would have been quite content to induce
    a manmade famine. They had no compunction to panic the world into making sure all roads led to toxic mass 'injections"after being partners in committing an act of bioterrorism and suppressing simple repurposed, safe and effective drugs, and now they are at it again with their "transition" to famine. on the basis of a "climate emergency" caused by CO2 Methane and Nitrous oxide emissions with no definitive proof. Solar activity is the driver of climate change, and I have countless posts here that prove it. If I know that, for sure, these monsters know it as well.
    I have posted about the famine in Sri Lanka as an example of what these WEF monsters are doing;
    https://forum.chesstalk.com/forum/ch...164#post228164
    You are on the wrong side of history, and the siege of Europe by heroic farmers and now truckers has not ended! The Genocidal Nazi WEF, communist climate change scammers, will not prevail. There are eight billion of us, and at most 100,000 of them.

    Spanish farmers have now joined the European protests against climate change communism.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot 2024-02-07 at 7.52.01 AM.png
Views:	30
Size:	546.5 KB
ID:	231695

    Last edited by Sid Belzberg; Wednesday, 7th February, 2024, 08:52 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bob Armstrong
    replied
    Transition to the Green Economy

    Purpose: To slow and stop Negative Climate Change/To generate Positive Climate Change to Restore Nature's Balance


    Maros Sefcovic, a Commission vice-president, [European Union]: “We do recognise the legitimate concerns of citizens and industry over the cost of transition.”

    According to this, European "Transition" is intended to continue.

    But....

    it will be done in such a way that the "Cost of Transition" is borne relatively equally by the various sectors of the economy.

    Thus the legitimate concerns of the farm sector that they were being asked to bear an unfair amount of the transition cost were recognized.

    It is up to the EU, and all countries, to effect the transition fairly and place the relative costs where they should be borne.

    It is not in doubt that "Transition", now that we have degraded our environment to the extent we have, will cost.

    Bob A (Anthropogenicist)

    Leave a comment:


  • Sid Belzberg
    replied
    Victory for Europe's protesting farmers as Brussels backs down on net zero


    Ursula von der Leyen offers further concession by dropping her controversial proposal to halve pesticide use within six years

    3 min. read
    View original

    The European Union has caved in to angry protests from farmers, cutting its target to scrap specific agricultural emissions which formed part of the bloc’s net zero drive.

    A demand to reduce nitrogen, methane and other emissions linked to farming by almost a third has been removed from a wider Brussels plan to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 90 per cent by 2040.

    On Tuesday, Ursula von der Leyen, the European Commission president, offered a further concession to demonstrating farmers by dropping her controversial proposal to halve pesticide use within six years.

    A recommendation urging EU citizens to eat less meat was also removed from the plan.

    The concessions came amid mounting demonstrations by farmers in Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Poland and Romania ahead of this year’s EU elections.

    Spanish farmers on Tuesday joined the movement by blockading major highways with convoys of tractors and burning tyres.

    Meanwhile, blockades on supermarket distribution centres have left shelves empty in Brussels, while several people have been injured in traffic accidents caused by farmers’ protests in the Netherlands, as they dumped rubbish and set fires on highways.

    Organisers have threatened to continue disruption in the lead-up to the European Parliament elections in June.

    Fruit and vegetables thrown out during protests in Caserta, Italy Credit: Antonio Balasco/Avalon
    The plight of the disillusioned farmers has become politically symbolic ahead of the vote.

    To quell their angry protests, which have sometimes become violent and caused destruction to cities, Mrs von der Leyen acknowledged net zero rules targeting farmers would need to be watered down.

    Our farmers deserve to be listened to,” she told the European Parliament in Strasbourg on Tuesday.

    “I know that they are worried about the future of agriculture and their future as farmers.

    “But they also know that agriculture needs to move to a more sustainable model of production so that their farms remain profitable in the years to come.”

    The Commission president admitted the proposal to cut pesticide use had become a “symbol of polarisation”.

    Brussels is also rowing back on planned rules on animal welfare and allowing the cultivation of land left fallow to restore nature.

    The reduction of nitrogen oxide emissions was seen as a key pillar of the EU’s climate change strategy, which sparked the initial wave of farming protests in the Netherlands over the summer of 2022.

    The target means farmers will be required to reduce their livestock in order to meet the binding limit on emissions.

    Mrs von der Leyen has also tried to get farmers on side by announcing a series of “strategic dialogues” to allow them to voice their concerns directly to EU bureaucrats.
    Mounting pressure


    Her effort to placate the farmers came after mounting pressure from political allies ahead of the European parliamentary elections.

    Manfred Weber, a German MEP and leader of the centre-Right European Political Party, from which Mrs Von der Leyen is a member, warned farming communities could shift their allegiances to hard-Right parties at the ballot.

    “We always realised that farmers are citizens and don’t want Left-wing ideologies that dictate everything to them,” he told the European Parliament on Tuesday.

    Europe has been rocked by continuing protests by farmers who have blocked key roads Credit: Albert Gea/REUTERS
    In a letter to the Commission, the Parliament’s Green group said the farmers’ protest movement was “no surprise to us”.

    “The root of the problem is clear: the majority of farmers simply cannot make a living from their work,” they wrote. “They are trapped in a system that is killing them.”

    The Greens also called for Brussels to halt trade talks with South America’s Mercosur bloc, with competition from cheap non-EU products a chief concern amongst farmers.

    Maros Sefcovic, a Commission vice-president, said the publication of the bloc’s landmark plan to cut emissions by 90 per cent by 2040 came at a “crucial moment in the debate around the future path of Europe’s green transition”.

    “We do recognise the legitimate concerns of citizens and industry over the cost of transition,” he added.

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-ne...-eu-back-down/

    Leave a comment:


  • Sid Belzberg
    replied
    This is huge Dutch farmers are STILL protesting in the Netherlands. The government planned to SEIZE 3000 farms to meet 2030 climate goals essentially. The World is rising against Climate Communism.

    Click image for larger version  Name:	Screenshot 2024-02-06 at 8.01.14 PM.png Views:	0 Size:	578.8 KB ID:	231690


    Leave a comment:


  • Sid Belzberg
    replied

    "If you control the food, you control the people." Unelected globalists are using the "man-made global warming" narrative as a pretext to collapse the global food supply deliberately so that people will have no choice but to eat insects and lab-grown "meat"—as detailed in a must-watch new documentary titled 'No Farmers, No Food: Will You Eat The Bugs?'

    No Farmers No Food: Will You Eat The Bugs? | Documentary

    Documentaries
    Views 3.3M •
    Sep-25-2023
    Food prices are skyrocketing in grocery stores around the world, and some world leaders say it’s due to climate change. Their solution is Agenda 21, the United Nation’s 100-year long master plan for humanity and the 21st century, which is broken down into shorter 15-year plans. The current plan is Agenda 2030, which aims at “transforming our world for sustainable development” according to the UN.
    Agenda 2030 is now being implemented across the world. In America, it is implemented as the Biden administration’s 30x30 agenda, a plan to take 30 percent of America’s land completely out of production by the year 2030, resulting in small farmers and ranchers being forced off their lands. In other countries like The Netherlands, Dutch farmers are forced to shut down due to the government’s “green policies” that limit nitrogen emissions. In Sri Lanka, farmers are fighting for their survival because of the government’s ban on synthetic fertilizer.
    While we are seeing a global war on farmers, the World Economic Forum and the United Nations are pushing people to eat bugs as a solution to reduce climate change, world hunger, and save the planet. Why are world leaders and even celebrities suddenly pushing edible bugs? Should the government control our food? What would a world be like without farmers?
    “No Farmers No Food: Will You Eat The Bugs?” is an Epoch Original documentary exposing the hidden agenda behind global “Green Policies,” the untold stories of farmers forced out of business, the disruption this will have on our food supply, and why edible bugs are suddenly being pushed to the fore as a “Global Green Solution.”
    EpochTV’s “Facts Matter” host Roman Balmakov traveled around the world to over 25 locations and interviewed over 50 farmers, scientists, and experts in the United States, The Netherlands, and Sri Lanka to get to the truth behind this global agenda and investigate the coming global food crisis that is being ignored by the world’s media.
    History has a tendency to rhyme. In the 1950, Chinese communist leader Mao Zedong sold the “Great Leap Forward” to the public under the banner of progress, but his policies led to the largest man-made famine in history, with over 50 million dying of hunger. The UN’s “green policies” appear to have the hallmarks of a new “Green Leap Forward”, they might sound good on paper, but in practice they undermine our food security, property rights, water rights, and represent an existential threat to our liberties as free citizens. A famous quote reads “Who controls the food supply controls the people”.
    This documentary is important for everyone to watch, not just for knowing what’s on your dinner plate but also to have the knowledge to prevent another man-made famine in the future and protect your freedoms and liberties.

    Click image for larger version  Name:	Screenshot 2024-02-06 at 9.43.26 AM.png Views:	0 Size:	1.12 MB ID:	231682


    https://www.theepochtimes.com/epochtv/nofarmersnofood-5390883?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=wideawake_media&src_src=partner&src_cmp=wideawake_media

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X