If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Policy / Politique
The fee for tournament organizers advertising on ChessTalk is $20/event or $100/yearly unlimited for the year.
Les frais d'inscription des organisateurs de tournoi sur ChessTalk sont de 20 $/événement ou de 100 $/année illimitée.
You can etransfer to Henry Lam at chesstalkforum at gmail dot com
Transfér à Henry Lam à chesstalkforum@gmail.com
Dark Knight / Le Chevalier Noir
General Guidelines
---- Nous avons besoin d'un traduction français!
Some Basics
1. Under Board "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQs) there are 3 sections dealing with General Forum Usage, User Profile Features, and Reading and Posting Messages. These deal with everything from Avatars to Your Notifications. Most general technical questions are covered there. Here is a link to the FAQs. https://forum.chesstalk.com/help
2. Consider using the SEARCH button if you are looking for information. You may find your question has already been answered in a previous thread.
3. If you've looked for an answer to a question, and not found one, then you should consider asking your question in a new thread. For example, there have already been questions and discussion regarding: how to do chess diagrams (FENs); crosstables that line up properly; and the numerous little “glitches” that every new site will have.
4. Read pinned or sticky threads, like this one, if they look important. This applies especially to newcomers.
5. Read the thread you're posting in before you post. There are a variety of ways to look at a thread. These are covered under “Display Modes”.
6. Thread titles: please provide some details in your thread title. This is useful for a number of reasons. It helps ChessTalk members to quickly skim the threads. It prevents duplication of threads. And so on.
7. Unnecessary thread proliferation (e.g., deliberately creating a new thread that duplicates existing discussion) is discouraged. Look to see if a thread on your topic may have already been started and, if so, consider adding your contribution to the pre-existing thread. However, starting new threads to explore side-issues that are not relevant to the original subject is strongly encouraged. A single thread on the Canadian Open, with hundreds of posts on multiple sub-topics, is no better than a dozen threads on the Open covering only a few topics. Use your good judgment when starting a new thread.
8. If and/or when sub-forums are created, please make sure to create threads in the proper place.
Debate
9. Give an opinion and back it up with a reason. Throwaway comments such as "Game X pwnz because my friend and I think so!" could be considered pointless at best, and inflammatory at worst.
10. Try to give your own opinions, not simply those copied and pasted from reviews or opinions of your friends.
Unacceptable behavior and warnings
11. In registering here at ChessTalk please note that the same or similar rules apply here as applied at the previous Boardhost message board. In particular, the following content is not permitted to appear in any messages:
* Racism
* Hatred
* Harassment
* Adult content
* Obscene material
* Nudity or pornography
* Material that infringes intellectual property or other proprietary rights of any party
* Material the posting of which is tortious or violates a contractual or fiduciary obligation you or we owe to another party
* Piracy, hacking, viruses, worms, or warez
* Spam
* Any illegal content
* unapproved Commercial banner advertisements or revenue-generating links
* Any link to or any images from a site containing any material outlined in these restrictions
* Any material deemed offensive or inappropriate by the Board staff
12. Users are welcome to challenge other points of view and opinions, but should do so respectfully. Personal attacks on others will not be tolerated. Posts and threads with unacceptable content can be closed or deleted altogether. Furthermore, a range of sanctions are possible - from a simple warning to a temporary or even a permanent banning from ChessTalk.
Helping to Moderate
13. 'Report' links (an exclamation mark inside a triangle) can be found in many places throughout the board. These links allow users to alert the board staff to anything which is offensive, objectionable or illegal. Please consider using this feature if the need arises.
Advice for free
14. You should exercise the same caution with Private Messages as you would with any public posting.
I cannot think of a piece of land on Earth which has not been claimed by at least one country. This includes places that have no people.
Antarctica is covered by an international treaty. No country is allowed to claim even a part of Antarctica for themself. Of course treaties can be violated.
IThe border people have won the battle of ideas in practice, for good or bad. Land has been claimed and it must be defended from criminal invaders. You claim it and defend it or you will inevitably lose it to someone else who wants it. ...
This is the philosophy that leads to exactly what I said, increasing population leads to increasing borders. Claim it and defend it ... leads to conflict and wars, both civil and international.
I
We don't need to limit population growth through force.
...
I agree with this, even though in my last post I said we should now at this point in time limit population growth. Actually, the window has closed. Instead, population growth is henceforth going to be limited by TOTAL .... GLOBAL .... ECONOMIC .... COLLAPSE.
Anyone with children must now prepare for their children's survival. It That is, if you love your children, in which case prepare to sacrifice yourselves as parents for your children.
It may happen in slow motion ... but it is underway now.
Gold at record highs.
Global trade disintegrating.
China surpassing USA as top world economy, economic war in progress.
USA to annex countries by force, including Canada no matter how many times you say "elbows up".
LOL elbows up .... AK-47s firing .....
end of civilization as we have known it.
Last edited by Pargat Perrer; Monday, 7th April, 2025, 03:43 AM.
I believe parts of Antarctica have been claimed by various countries, though eyeballing the map on the site below it appears that there are unclaimed parts. Perhaps there are also some tiny islands in the middle of nowhere that are unclaimed. I suspect that if there were easy to extract resources / sudden strategic value these places would not be unclaimed for long.
I cannot think of a piece of land on Earth which has not been claimed by at least one country. This includes places that have no people. The border people have won the battle of ideas in practice, for good or bad. Land has been claimed and it must be defended from criminal invaders. You claim it and defend it or you will inevitably lose it to someone else who wants it.
Population in all places except Africa are already stable/declining. We don't need to limit population growth through force.
When two or more countries make it to Mars and they have colonies there, there will probably be borders, especially with limited resources.
I think the entire continent of Antarctica is not claimed by any country
I cannot think of a piece of land on Earth which has not been claimed by at least one country. This includes places that have no people. The border people have won the battle of ideas in practice, for good or bad. Land has been claimed and it must be defended from criminal invaders. You claim it and defend it or you will inevitably lose it to someone else who wants it.
Population in all places except Africa are already stable/declining. We don't need to limit population growth through force.
When two or more countries make it to Mars and they have colonies there, there will probably be borders, especially with limited resources.
The original inhabitants of North America did not secure their borders. So yes, they let criminal invaders into their lands and had no way to evict them. I thought learning from history was one of the reasons to study it. So that we don't make the mistakes that the people before us made.
Securing borders is one of the primary tasks of national governments. Otherwise, Russia invades Ukraine. Or, as speculated on this site by others, US invades Canada. If borders are unimportant, why care about such things?
True, the original inhabitants of North America probably didn't even think of the concept of "borders" because thee was so much land, so few people.
What seems to happen is that as population grows, the number of borders grow with it. The world today probably has more countries than ever before, and still many areas want to separate even further.
I think we can say population growth leads to increasing fragmentation (borders) leads to increasing conflict (wars).
I don't think the lesson from history is that the original natives of North America should have secured borders (that they didn't have). Rather i think it is that we should now at this point in time LIMIT population growth in order to limit fragmentation in order to limit conflict. We have to deal with the limits of planet Earth.
Musk wants us to go to Mars. RIght now there are no borders on Mars. How long will it be before there are borders on Mars?
The original inhabitants of North America did not secure their borders. So yes, they let criminal invaders into their lands and had no way to evict them. I thought learning from history was one of the reasons to study it. So that we don't make the mistakes that the people before us made.
Securing borders is one of the primary tasks of national governments. Otherwise, Russia invades Ukraine. Or, as speculated on this site by others, US invades Canada. If borders are unimportant, why care about such things?
Some of the most worrying trends are in non-Western, but still First-World countries, for example South Korea, Singapore, and Japan. These are high-IQ societies and it would be tragic for the planet to have their numbers decreasing.
Agreed about increasing wealth decreasing the fertility rate. I am sure I have read the same. But I suspect culture also plays a factor and so do incentives.
The 2030 projection I assume includes the criminal invaders that the Trump administration is trying mightily to boot out. That should adjust that number down somewhat.
"Criminal invaders" .... totally ignoring the "criminal natives" .... and by the way, who were the original "criminal invaders" of North America?
Consider that the native population is breeding at significantly less than the 2.1 children per woman needed for replacement. In the US it is roughly 1.7; Canada 1.5. Without legal immigration, the population of most Western nations would be dropping. The propaganda that somehow Western folks are responsible for some sort of population explosion is ridiculous.
Well, I don't know who is blaming it on "Western folks" ... but it seems you are saying that if only we just had "western folks" in the world, everything would be fine.
I don't think population trends depend on race or nationality, but rather on economics. If "Western folks" are not growing their numbers as much as others, it is because they are much wealthier than others. I believe it is a proven fact that increasing overall wealth leads to decreasing population growth. I am sure I saw stats to prove that, but I can't remember where I saw it.
I wonder what were the fertility rates in North America in the 1600s, the 1700s, the 1800s ....among "Western folks" .... again, increasing wealth leads to decreasing population growth. Africa is very poor. They are where North America was in the past centuries aforementioned.
The 2030 projection I assume includes the criminal invaders that the Trump administration is trying mightily to boot out. That should adjust that number down somewhat. Consider that the native population is breeding at significantly less than the 2.1 children per woman needed for replacement. In the US it is roughly 1.7; Canada 1.5. Without legal immigration, the population of most Western nations would be dropping. The propaganda that somehow Western folks are responsible for some sort of population explosion is ridiculous.
Note the countries with fertility rates of 4+ are almost all African nations.
Note that world population would be roughly stable over the next 75 years if you exclude Africa, where population is expected to almost triple.
I looked at it and North America is not "roughly stable" in future projections. Between 2030 and 2050 projected 28 million increase. That was the population of Canada just a few decades ago.
As far as Africa is concerned, maybe the shutdown of USAID is aimed at stopping that growth. But then I heard that China is stepping in where the USA is withdrawing, making Africa exploitable by China in a big way.
I wish that article had grouped Europe in one lump some like they did for North America.
I noticed that Georgia (not the U.S. state but the sovereign country bordering Russia) has a dramatic projected population DECLINE. I wonder what's going on there???
PeePee, I have always maintained that all politicians would be willing to do the 'wrong' thing, if it fetches them lots of votes... the sad aspect of giving politicians unnecessary power.
Oh really? Even Libertarian politicians are willing to do "the wrong thing"?
Leave a comment: