Originally posted by David Ottosen
View Post
Anthropogenic Negative Climate Change (ANCC)
Collapse
X
-
Agreed completely, this is the point I have been making in many posts. The problem is not the system, it is the number of people on the planet, combined with their lack of moral sense. We could all live with huge individual carbon footprints in a completely capitalistic society if there were far fewer of us. This is why a cull is in effect now. We will not give up what we have achieved technologically, and why should we? All that is needed is fewer people so that our total pollution/carbon footprint is below the threshold of the capacity of Nature to recover and self-sustain.
-
What are they waiting for? Climate change is already here. I assume you have heard the phrase " an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure".Originally posted by David Ottosen View Post
Capitalism is way more likely to save the world from existential threats than destroy it. Capitalism is all about "if you want something, go and make it happen". When climate change hits some point, the smartest people in the world will turn their attention to it and solve it because they have no choice.
Comment
-
Maybe, maybe not. I don't think any of us are capable of predicting the level of technological solutions that might be available when it's at the point of the human race being on the line. The one thing I often think about to get hope about it is during the Olympics in 2008 when measures were taken in Beijing to improve air quality, and literally within a week there was noticeable improvement without massive technological investment. Without going full flower child, the earth has immense capacity to heal if we give it a chance.Originally posted by Brad Thomson View Post
When it does it will be far too late, it already is.
Comment
-
David, I was just wondering if you have had a chance to read this book?Originally posted by David Ottosen View Post
Maybe, maybe not. I don't think any of us are capable of predicting the level of technological solutions that might be available when it's at the point of the human race being on the line. The one thing I often think about to get hope about it is during the Olympics in 2008 when measures were taken in Beijing to improve air quality, and literally within a week there was noticeable improvement without massive technological investment. Without going full flower child, the earth has immense capacity to heal if we give it a chance.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YAp4..._channel=MSNBC
Comment
-
Hi David:
Your trust in human creativity when under threat is impressive. Especially when the creativity is going to occur within the existing capitalist system.
It seems your answer is that capitalism, whenever future profit is threatened, rises to the occasion at the last minute, or, at least, far enough ahead of the calamity to give it time to implement the solution, yes?
We all seem to agree on one thing though..........a time of disaster is ahead of us based on current trajectory.
My own view: even vaunted capitalism is going to "awaken" too late - the time frame will be too short for its creativity.
Capitalism needs to "awaken" NOW! I am afraid that if we are relying on current global governance/capitalism for the solution...........we are waiting for Godot.
~ Bob A (T-S/P)
Comment
-
Walking over to Tim's this morning for coffee, I was wondering on the death toll so far from climate change. Is there a website tracking deaths like we do COVID19?
There seems to be some attempts at this, amongst many here is one.
https://www.greenmatters.com/p/clima...nge-death-toll
But if somebody comes across one which is more explicit and detailed with specific numbers and a total, please post.
It may help to raise awareness.
Comment
-
The current billionaires are not the only smarties in the world today.... there are millions of similar or even smarter minds around, and if the crippling governmental restrictions which prevent these minds from being able to effectively compete and produce thousands of competing Amazons, Microsofts, Googles and the like, are removed, we will also find a novel scenario of extreme demand for workforce, in which the frontline workers will be able to simply ask for (and get) much better working conditions and incomes.... without union-bullying...Originally posted by Bob Gillanders View Post
David, I was just wondering if you have had a chance to read this book?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YAp4..._channel=MSNBCLast edited by Dilip Panjwani; Saturday, 22nd January, 2022, 03:15 PM.
Comment
-
Dilip, would you say this is an example of Libertarian thinking?Originally posted by Dilip Panjwani View Post
The current billionaires are not the only smarties in the world today.... there are millions of similar or even smarter minds around, and if the crippling governmental restrictions which prevent these minds from being able to effectively compete and produce thousands of competing Amazons, Microsofts, Googles and the like, are removed, we will also find a novel scenario of extreme demand for workforce, in which the frontline workers will be able to simply ask for (and get) much better working conditions and incomes.... without union-bullying...
Comment
-
In practice? The only place it has been practiced that I know of, is within small highly functional communities/villages...Originally posted by Bob Armstrong View PostDilip - my view -
Libertarianism has too optimistic a view of man, and too pessimistic a view of man's systems.
In practice, it leads to societal chaos.
Just my 2 cents
~ Bob A (T-S/P)
Bob, any of man's systems without the stifling tyranny of Marxism is worth looking at...Last edited by Dilip Panjwani; Saturday, 22nd January, 2022, 10:51 PM.
Comment
-
and at the local level maybe it works, but only because it is cocooned in a larger non-Libertarian community.Originally posted by Dilip Panjwani View Post
The only place it has been practiced that I know of, is within small highly functional communities/villages...
Large corporations are out of control now, removing all government regulations is a terrifying idea.
So interesting?, not so much. Terrifying, yes!
Amazon exploits it workers.
Microsoft buys out it competitors.
Google threatens our privacy.
I don't see how allowing them to do whatever they want, leads to greater competition.
Besides, this thread is about climate change. The challenge is to reduce our carbon footprint, or more generally to live within our means, to adapt to the reality of a finite world. Letting the wealthy consume whatever they want, leads to environmental collapse.Last edited by Bob Gillanders; Sunday, 23rd January, 2022, 09:13 AM.
Comment


Comment