If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Policy / Politique
The fee for tournament organizers advertising on ChessTalk is $20/event or $100/yearly unlimited for the year.
Les frais d'inscription des organisateurs de tournoi sur ChessTalk sont de 20 $/événement ou de 100 $/année illimitée.
You can etransfer to Henry Lam at chesstalkforum at gmail dot com
Transfér à Henry Lam à chesstalkforum@gmail.com
Dark Knight / Le Chevalier Noir
General Guidelines
---- Nous avons besoin d'un traduction français!
Some Basics
1. Under Board "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQs) there are 3 sections dealing with General Forum Usage, User Profile Features, and Reading and Posting Messages. These deal with everything from Avatars to Your Notifications. Most general technical questions are covered there. Here is a link to the FAQs. https://forum.chesstalk.com/help
2. Consider using the SEARCH button if you are looking for information. You may find your question has already been answered in a previous thread.
3. If you've looked for an answer to a question, and not found one, then you should consider asking your question in a new thread. For example, there have already been questions and discussion regarding: how to do chess diagrams (FENs); crosstables that line up properly; and the numerous little “glitches” that every new site will have.
4. Read pinned or sticky threads, like this one, if they look important. This applies especially to newcomers.
5. Read the thread you're posting in before you post. There are a variety of ways to look at a thread. These are covered under “Display Modes”.
6. Thread titles: please provide some details in your thread title. This is useful for a number of reasons. It helps ChessTalk members to quickly skim the threads. It prevents duplication of threads. And so on.
7. Unnecessary thread proliferation (e.g., deliberately creating a new thread that duplicates existing discussion) is discouraged. Look to see if a thread on your topic may have already been started and, if so, consider adding your contribution to the pre-existing thread. However, starting new threads to explore side-issues that are not relevant to the original subject is strongly encouraged. A single thread on the Canadian Open, with hundreds of posts on multiple sub-topics, is no better than a dozen threads on the Open covering only a few topics. Use your good judgment when starting a new thread.
8. If and/or when sub-forums are created, please make sure to create threads in the proper place.
Debate
9. Give an opinion and back it up with a reason. Throwaway comments such as "Game X pwnz because my friend and I think so!" could be considered pointless at best, and inflammatory at worst.
10. Try to give your own opinions, not simply those copied and pasted from reviews or opinions of your friends.
Unacceptable behavior and warnings
11. In registering here at ChessTalk please note that the same or similar rules apply here as applied at the previous Boardhost message board. In particular, the following content is not permitted to appear in any messages:
* Racism
* Hatred
* Harassment
* Adult content
* Obscene material
* Nudity or pornography
* Material that infringes intellectual property or other proprietary rights of any party
* Material the posting of which is tortious or violates a contractual or fiduciary obligation you or we owe to another party
* Piracy, hacking, viruses, worms, or warez
* Spam
* Any illegal content
* unapproved Commercial banner advertisements or revenue-generating links
* Any link to or any images from a site containing any material outlined in these restrictions
* Any material deemed offensive or inappropriate by the Board staff
12. Users are welcome to challenge other points of view and opinions, but should do so respectfully. Personal attacks on others will not be tolerated. Posts and threads with unacceptable content can be closed or deleted altogether. Furthermore, a range of sanctions are possible - from a simple warning to a temporary or even a permanent banning from ChessTalk.
Helping to Moderate
13. 'Report' links (an exclamation mark inside a triangle) can be found in many places throughout the board. These links allow users to alert the board staff to anything which is offensive, objectionable or illegal. Please consider using this feature if the need arises.
Advice for free
14. You should exercise the same caution with Private Messages as you would with any public posting.
15. Have fun!
(Thanks to Nigel Hanrahan for writing these up!)
ClimateGate - A Question for Ed Seedhouse and Paul Beckwith
Expensive??? Bob, you just posted something about global warming affecting billions of lives. How expensive is too expensive for saving one life? two lives? four lives? eight lives?.... a couple of billion lives?
I think a law for all NEW buildings is way too inadequate. Retrofit all existing buildings. Desperate times call for desperate measures......
Yes, megaprojects will cost money.......It's a matter of political will. I'm offering a possible solution, but "too expensive" isn't a good enough reason to throw it away in my opinion :).
Paul, I was just offering some alternatives. I am sorry if you thought I was rejecting your megaproject ideas. Quite the contrary, I am starting to like the ideas, but I am still concerned about the costs.
Cost is a legitimate concern (and I am not putting a price on human life), since there are other equally worthy projects that require resources simultaneously, like providing food and shelter to the billions we are trying to save. No sense in saving them from global warming if we can't feed them.
Not to mention teaching them chess;)
Another megaproject idea I heard was to cover large areas of the oceans with a tarp that would reflect sunlight back into space like the dwindling icecaps once did. What do you think?
Last edited by Bob Gillanders; Friday, 11th December, 2009, 04:03 PM.
Paul, I was just offering some alternatives. I am sorry if you thought I was rejecting your megaproject ideas. Quite the contrary, I am starting to like the ideas, but I am still concerned about the costs.
Cost is a legitimate concern (and I am not putting a price on human life), since there are other equally worthy projects that require resources simultaneously, like providing food and shelter to the billions we are trying to save. No sense in saving them from global warming if we can't feed them.
Not to mention teaching them chess;)
Another megaproject idea I heard was to cover large areas of the oceans with a tarp that would reflect sunlight back into space like the dwindling icecaps once did. What do you think?
Bob, I hope you don't think I was upset with you. You and I go back a long way and we'll be friends no matter our opinions on one thing or another. I guess my reply sounded strong, I apologize for that.
You are absolutely right about having to weigh different possible solutions. I think that to begin with, all solutions should be gathered together regardless of cost. Then the collection of them are weighed for cost vs possible effectiveness. Any solution that seems to have a multi-pronged approach and can tackle many aspects of the problem at once should be given high priority, and if cost is the ONLY negative, it should be done regardless (when the problem is as severe as climate change is being portrayed).
So I was hoping for other negatives to my proposal besides cost. I guess that's why I may have seemed strong against the cost argument.
Have they actually done studies as to how effective that tarp idea might be? I hadn't heard of it before.
How is the chess teaching going? I'll bet you're having fun with it, it just seems right up your alley.
Only the rushing is heard...
Onward flies the bird.
Have they actually done studies as to how effective that tarp idea might be? I hadn't heard of it before.
How is the chess teaching going? I'll bet you're having fun with it, it just seems right up your alley.
I don't have any details on the tarp idea, it was mentioned somewhere, and I thought what a wonderfully simple idea. I was hoping Paul B. would comment.
Milton Chess School had it's first graduation day a couple of weeks ago. Mississauga junior program is going strong. We had our AGM this past week, where we presented the kids with some trophies. Also prizes for those kids who kept the best scoresheets! Pictures, courtesy on Vince, are on our website.:)
People on Vlad's side resort to breaking in buildings. Remember that in Watergate the bad guys were the ones breaking in, not the other way around...
Last time I looked it was Greenpeace that broke onto the roof of the Parliament buildings and made the RCMP look rather silly. I think the ecoterrorists should serve hard time.
Another megaproject idea I heard was to cover large areas of the oceans with a tarp that would reflect sunlight back into space like the dwindling icecaps once did. What do you think?
I would hate to look at the unintended consequences that would be likely with that one. Far simpler to introduce the Freakonomics idea of a garden hose pumping hydrogen sulfide into the upper atmosphere.
Last time I looked the ice caps weren't dwindling.
Last time I looked the ice caps weren't dwindling.
True, the north ice cap has made a small recovery in the last 2 years. However, that was after a dramatic drop in 2007. The stock market analogy would be to claim victory with a rise of 100 points in the Dow Jones after a drop of 500 points the day before. The problem hasn't been solved. Check out this youtube video for details.
I would hate to look at the unintended consequences that would be likely with that one. Far simpler to introduce the Freakonomics idea of a garden hose pumping hydrogen sulfide into the upper atmosphere.
I would hate to look at the unintended consequences of a garden hose pumping hydrogen sulfide into the upper atmosphere either! But then, I am not promoting such a silly idea. The ocean tarp idea is far less silly. Image the winter cover on a backyard pool.:) There would obviously be technical and environment problems to overcome. It would be expensive, no doubt. But please don't compare it to far sillier ideas.
While researching the ice cap question, I came across another example of how the climate change deniers are distorting the facts. Listen to this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=khikoh3sJg8&NR=1
Re: ClimateGate - A Question for Ed Seedhouse and Paul Beckwith
Seriously, a tarp over the ocean? Isn't it obvious that's a bad idea? The ocean is alive, uses photosynthesis to convert CO2 to O2. You might as well put a tarp over the Amazon basin for all the harm being proposed.
Seriously, a tarp over the ocean? Isn't it obvious that's a bad idea? The ocean is alive, uses photosynthesis to convert CO2 to O2. You might as well put a tarp over the Amazon basin for all the harm being proposed.
Seriously, Yes! Not the entire ocean of course, but perhaps the size of the lost ice caps. The purpose is to mimic the sunlight reflective properties of the lost ice cap. Avoiding harm to the natural process of photosynthesis is one of those environmental challenges I mentioned.
A tarp over the Amazon basin? :( Really? That's as silly as the garden hose!
Do you think that ClimateGate (Climate Gate) has and/or will hurt the movement to do something about what many believe, i.e., Global Warming caused by man?
I already know you are strong believers, but, I am curious about the effects of the scandal, for lack of a better word.
Another point of view (from yesterday's -Dec 14th- National Post):
The problem is one does not know how much of this stuff was fudged on either side. That which one considers science, another could question. I saw a poll yesterday that said more than 50% of Americans no longer believe in "Global Warming" and another comment somewhere that one of the ice caps had made a comeback. Are they garbage or was the original science garbage. I doubt we will know for sure for a long time.
Last edited by Ken MacDonald; Tuesday, 15th December, 2009, 03:36 PM.
Comment