If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Policy / Politique
The fee for tournament organizers advertising on ChessTalk is $20/event or $100/yearly unlimited for the year.
Les frais d'inscription des organisateurs de tournoi sur ChessTalk sont de 20 $/événement ou de 100 $/année illimitée.
You can etransfer to Henry Lam at chesstalkforum at gmail dot com
Transfér à Henry Lam à chesstalkforum@gmail.com
Dark Knight / Le Chevalier Noir
General Guidelines
---- Nous avons besoin d'un traduction français!
Some Basics
1. Under Board "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQs) there are 3 sections dealing with General Forum Usage, User Profile Features, and Reading and Posting Messages. These deal with everything from Avatars to Your Notifications. Most general technical questions are covered there. Here is a link to the FAQs. https://forum.chesstalk.com/help
2. Consider using the SEARCH button if you are looking for information. You may find your question has already been answered in a previous thread.
3. If you've looked for an answer to a question, and not found one, then you should consider asking your question in a new thread. For example, there have already been questions and discussion regarding: how to do chess diagrams (FENs); crosstables that line up properly; and the numerous little “glitches” that every new site will have.
4. Read pinned or sticky threads, like this one, if they look important. This applies especially to newcomers.
5. Read the thread you're posting in before you post. There are a variety of ways to look at a thread. These are covered under “Display Modes”.
6. Thread titles: please provide some details in your thread title. This is useful for a number of reasons. It helps ChessTalk members to quickly skim the threads. It prevents duplication of threads. And so on.
7. Unnecessary thread proliferation (e.g., deliberately creating a new thread that duplicates existing discussion) is discouraged. Look to see if a thread on your topic may have already been started and, if so, consider adding your contribution to the pre-existing thread. However, starting new threads to explore side-issues that are not relevant to the original subject is strongly encouraged. A single thread on the Canadian Open, with hundreds of posts on multiple sub-topics, is no better than a dozen threads on the Open covering only a few topics. Use your good judgment when starting a new thread.
8. If and/or when sub-forums are created, please make sure to create threads in the proper place.
Debate
9. Give an opinion and back it up with a reason. Throwaway comments such as "Game X pwnz because my friend and I think so!" could be considered pointless at best, and inflammatory at worst.
10. Try to give your own opinions, not simply those copied and pasted from reviews or opinions of your friends.
Unacceptable behavior and warnings
11. In registering here at ChessTalk please note that the same or similar rules apply here as applied at the previous Boardhost message board. In particular, the following content is not permitted to appear in any messages:
* Racism
* Hatred
* Harassment
* Adult content
* Obscene material
* Nudity or pornography
* Material that infringes intellectual property or other proprietary rights of any party
* Material the posting of which is tortious or violates a contractual or fiduciary obligation you or we owe to another party
* Piracy, hacking, viruses, worms, or warez
* Spam
* Any illegal content
* unapproved Commercial banner advertisements or revenue-generating links
* Any link to or any images from a site containing any material outlined in these restrictions
* Any material deemed offensive or inappropriate by the Board staff
12. Users are welcome to challenge other points of view and opinions, but should do so respectfully. Personal attacks on others will not be tolerated. Posts and threads with unacceptable content can be closed or deleted altogether. Furthermore, a range of sanctions are possible - from a simple warning to a temporary or even a permanent banning from ChessTalk.
Helping to Moderate
13. 'Report' links (an exclamation mark inside a triangle) can be found in many places throughout the board. These links allow users to alert the board staff to anything which is offensive, objectionable or illegal. Please consider using this feature if the need arises.
Advice for free
14. You should exercise the same caution with Private Messages as you would with any public posting.
After what I witnessed at the Canadian Open I thought that Toronto chess was well on the way up. Now I am far less certain. If anyone cannot keep his composure on a message board he should avoid it, especially someone involved in organizing and representing an organisation because he actually hurts that organisation.
Behind a wall of unpleasant (not the same as "unconstructive") criticism there is always something constructive to pick up by an open-minded person willing to learn. Is someone says that a particular tournament site is "the worst he has ever seen", it is certainly a legitimate opinion whose honesty we can be certain of. At least it means that not everyone liked that site, quite a useful information especially if no one else had the courage to say it, which is sometimes the case with chess players. Many simply prefer to quit silently, rather then express constructively :) their reasons for being unsatisfied. Consequently organizers have no clue about what could have been done better.
Would it be better if a bunch of people had hypocritically said: "the site was great" when they actually thought the opposite ? Is it what is meant by being "constructive" ?
Last edited by Jean Hébert; Wednesday, 3rd August, 2011, 03:17 PM.
After what I witnessed at the Canadian Open I thought that Toronto chess was well on the way up. Now I am far less certain. If anyone cannot keep his composure on a message board he should avoid it, especially someone involved in organizing and representing an organisation because he actually hurts that organisation.
Behind a wall of unpleasant (not the same as "unconstructive") criticism there is always something constructive to pick up by an open-minded person willing to learn. Is someone says that a particular tournament site is "the worst he has ever seen", it is certainly a legitimate opinion whose honesty we can be certain of. At least it means that not everyone liked that site, quite a useful information especially if no one else had the courage to say it, which is sometimes the case with chess players. Many simply prefer to quit silently, rather then express constructively :) their reasons for being unsatisfied. Consequently organizers have no clue about what could have been done better.
Would it be better if a bunch of people had hypocritically said: "the site was great" when they actually thought the opposite ? Is it what is meant by being "constructive" ?
I found the tournament site problematic because of the lack of air conditioning and the poor lighting. My understanding was that these concerns were addressed and corrected as early as the 2010 Toronto Thanksgiving tournament (though air conditioning might not have been a concern at that time of the year). I missed the 2010 Thanksgiving tournament because siblings were visiting from out of the area and they take precedence over chess on some occasions. :)
I also find that the quality of lighting at the Macedonian church basement playing hall of past tournaments was not the greatest though not as bad as the site in question for the Ontario Open last year. The 2010 Labour Day tournament conditions were fairly good for the top section at the same venue. I can live with extra heat if I know to wear shorts and a t-shirt but perhaps that prospect should be enough to convince organizers to use sites with air conditioning. I found the Westin Harbour Castle lighting and conditions to be excellent in every way.
I found the tournament site problematic because of the lack of air conditioning and the poor lighting. My understanding was that these concerns were addressed and corrected as early as the 2010 Toronto Thanksgiving tournament (though air conditioning might not have been a concern at that time of the year). I missed the 2010 Thanksgiving tournament because siblings were visiting from out of the area and they take precedence over chess on some occasions. :)
I also find that the quality of lighting at the Macedonian church basement playing hall of past tournaments was not the greatest though not as bad as the site in question for the Ontario Open last year. The 2010 Labour Day tournament conditions were fairly good for the top section at the same venue. I can live with extra heat if I know to wear shorts and a t-shirt but perhaps that prospect should be enough to convince organizers to use sites with air conditioning. I found the Westin Harbour Castle lighting and conditions to be excellent in every way.
Hi Vlad,
You are the kinda fellow I want at my event in the Laurentians next summer..
I love your attitude!
We spoke at the Canadian Open...through the good and bad times :).
Can I count on you to play next year at our event :)
I found the tournament site problematic because of the lack of air conditioning and the poor lighting. My understanding was that these concerns were addressed and corrected as early as the 2010 Toronto Thanksgiving tournament (though air conditioning might not have been a concern at that time of the year). I missed the 2010 Thanksgiving tournament because siblings were visiting from out of the area and they take precedence over chess on some occasions. :)
I also find that the quality of lighting at the Macedonian church basement playing hall of past tournaments was not the greatest though not as bad as the site in question for the Ontario Open last year. The 2010 Labour Day tournament conditions were fairly good for the top section at the same venue. I can live with extra heat if I know to wear shorts and a t-shirt but perhaps that prospect should be enough to convince organizers to use sites with air conditioning. I found the Westin Harbour Castle lighting and conditions to be excellent in every way.
Hi Vlad,
I've visited the ACC on a couple of occasions on Monday this year. The temperature with AC has definitely been installed and lighting improved. Not sure what's considered "optimal lighting" since it seems chess players always want more of it :)
You are the kinda fellow I want at my event in the Laurentians next summer..
I love your attitude!
We spoke at the Canadian Open...through the good and bad times :).
Can I count on you to play next year at our event :)
Larry
Larry, if I can possibly make it, I will. It is hard for me to plan out that far with my current situation which is a bit uncertain. I imagine that the best way would be to fly to Montreal from Windsor via Porter airlines which often has great seat sales and then to find a way to the site from there. I plan to use Porter for at least one of the Ottawa tournaments as well within the next year or so.
The prospects of paying on the order of $200 or $300 for round trip air fare instead of the $600 or more that the major Canadian Airline(s) like(s) to charge certainly opens up some possibilities that were not there before.
I've visited the ACC on a couple of occasions on Monday this year. The temperature with AC has definitely been installed and lighting improved. Not sure what's considered "optimal lighting" since it seems chess players always want more of it :)
Alex F.
I understood from comments by Bryan Lamb in advance of the Thanksgiving tournament, I believe, that all of the conditions had been improved. The lighting in that side room at the 2010 Labour Day tournament where the top section played was ideal as far as I could see.
I've got to thank John Brown, too. Even if much of his criticism is not constructive, or even coherent, it's been making for some lively discussion. He's the one provoking Hugh to the irate comedy that Aman, for one, is enjoying. If nothing else, at least our post is constantly getting bumped. :) You know, I think John actually wants to attend this event that he constantly maligns... Maybe he's hoping we'll throw him a prodigal son's banquet?
HI Marcus;
I always play except I think about 3 times. at Labour Day. It is the only time the old guard shows up. Some guys I have not seen for a year until Labour Day.
Whatever gave you and Hugh the idea I was not playing?
I'm sure by now you have heard on your website comments from some of those who don't use chess talk.
Personally, regardless of cost if you knew you could not have the whole weekend at the Annex Club then a more attractive draw with your high entry fee would have been the Westin.
I might also add that the High entry fee at Kitchener's Amateur Championship had a poor turnout. Was it because the fee went up $20 or was it the other events etc.? No one will speak up but the ones I spoke to who did not attend it was because of the fee increase. However, I got lucky in my last round game and netted a prize and a Trophy. Finally My Confidence is back!!!!
Splitting locations also may split your entry pool.
I have said it many times before. Throw out sectional tournaments have one Open section charge one fee and give the 20-25 Score Winning players the money in prizes. That way everyone has a chance to win one of 20-25 prizes.
If you compare 2010 CDN Open to 2011 the lighting was far better in 2010 upstairs. A few of us even went upstairs to the old room a floor above and the room was brighter. I check my self sometimes before I speak incoherently.
The biggest upset for me will be when I lose to a kid they won't be able to tell their friends the beat that Old woodpusher John Brown.
I'll have to go by my new title Old plastic pusher Charlie Brown. Well at least my body won't be molding in the Grave this time.
Re: 2011 Toronto Labour Day Tournament - Register Now
Originally posted by Jean Hébert
Behind a wall of unpleasant (not the same as "unconstructive") criticism there is always something constructive to pick up by an open-minded person willing to learn.
When people are working hard trying to organize an event do you think it's helpful for us to hear "the worst site I've ever seen" etc.. Such comments do not help in the least. How can we pick up something constructive from that? Good luck answering that one! Go on, be open-minded!
Originally posted by Jean Hébert
After what I witnessed at the Canadian Open I thought that Toronto chess was well on the way up. Now I am far less certain.
If you want to judge Toronto chess from what transpires on a message board maybe you need to get out a little more.
A proposal to Marcus and Hugh Siddley:
I'll make you both a bet. I believe you won't crack 150 players at Labour Day.
If I lose you get 2 beers each on me at Madisons I like their BEER.
If I win you gotta buy me 4 Beers each.
You game ?
I never back down on a Bet. So my word is my promise.
But you have to sit through me showing my wins and loses at Labour day with your analysis as a seal of approval.
So much shyte-talking about our tournament and you want us to sit down with you and have a beer after? What planet are you from?
And I don't recall it saying anywhere on the flyer that chess hobos are welcome. Go play in the park you monkey.
Personally, regardless of cost if you knew you could not have the whole weekend at the Annex Club then a more attractive draw with your high entry fee would have been the Westin.
I might also add that the High entry fee at Kitchener's Amateur Championship had a poor turnout. Was it because the fee went up $20 or was it the other events etc.? No one will speak up but the ones I spoke to who did not attend it was because of the fee increase.
Hi John (and in general),
The hike in entry fee is something that should be noted. But I think it's been about time. Chess has been done at a relatively amateur level, in my opinion, up until recently (initiatives of Brian Fiedler in my opinion which others have adopted) -- Sorry, I am speaking strictly in Toronto, hard for me to compare in other places.
As for the Kitchener I think it's important to mention that it was a 4-day tournament with 7 rounds. The fact that it took place after a rich Summer of chess, and that Toronto has gotten its act together, and Hamilton and other nearby places are booming, it may be that participation may be split a bit more overall.
If chess is to become more professional, with better sites, better service, better prizes, etc etc... then fees must go up. It's a bold initiative but long overdue. Chess as we've known it needs to adapt and evolve, I feel like we're actually falling behind, or have been. A $95 entry fee for a 6 rounder in a downtown premium location is not so unthinkable. And I think it'll be the way of the future, and go up. So the question is... from an organizational point of view, how to improve while hiking fees, how to professionalize it, and so on. Realistically, a hundred bucks for a weekend's entertainment, if this is our passion (and anyone willing to spend a weekend doing little else than playing chess, this is a passion) then it's a bargain.
Without trying to make it sound like all honey and roses or blindly support the organizers, I think the ACC has come a long way. And sure I think constructive criticism is important. Having said that, this group went from nothing to something quite stable and a driving force in Toronto chess, in less than a year. That ought to be worth something! These guys are doing things right (surely with improvements to be made as everyone who is starting out). It only makes sense to support the initiative, and see what they come up with, where they take us, and how this will enrich the community.
Barring any unforeseen situation, I will play in the Labour Day.
See you there,
Exactly man! These guys have no idea. Take a round of golf (which I doubt any of them have ever played). 150 bones for maybe 4 hours to complete a round. ZERO prizes. Chess tournament: $100 for 6 games (say you play six 4-hour games, that works out to just over $4/hr of playing time with chances to win a prize). Compare that to nearly $40/hr for playing golf with no chance of getting that back...
Here in Toronto we had an amazing site for many years, the Primrose Hotel. Why no more? The owner showed up one day and said it looked like a homeless convention, words from Mark Dutton! Primrose was history. We're trying to go up-market just fractionally and there's this huge outcry. It's the weeds, they might die. Can you blame us for trying?
I don't think the guys who got their cars broken into would agree about the Primrose.
I like to think that chess tournaments are to be for the enjoyment of all not just those who can afford to pay high rates. I guess that is one reason that the common person on fixed or limited incomes has to revert to playing putt-putt golf at amusement parks.
You want high entry fees to bring in top players yet who do you take the money from to get these top players?
It is fine to make the ones who want to play the top players pay more.
But let others pay a reasonable price to enjoy their hobby and the bonus is they may get some kind of Prize and watch the elite play. Plus they will support the Organizers by coming out.
But if you chip away at your base by causing more and more to not come then the Top will fall and it will fall in the organizers laps to pay the shoring up costs not the guys who stayed at home.
I know Bryan has lost money Organizing events so have I and many others before us have lost as well. But the entry fees were less and more people came out and played. But they always took from the bottom group when their top prizes were a little light.
As for Spassky Fischer match bringing me out to tournaments I must say that is wrong. Martin Bucholz went to my High School and I used to go to his home once in awhile and he showed me the beauty of what can be done with the chess pieces the reason he studied so much. The Central Peel Chess Club won that year In Peel County and our team after I graduated came second in Cevlend at the nationals.
No a common chess player who became great spurred my interest in chess.
Some the PEEL BOYS as we call ourselves still play in my tournaments. Chess should be for everyone not just the Elite.
Re: 2011 Toronto Labour Day Tournament - Register Now
And ff's sake change your avatar. I have nothing but respect for Doc Brown and good memories about that movie. Maybe a picture of a tombstone you crafty coffin-dodger.
The hike in entry fee is something that should be noted. But I think it's been about time. Chess has been done at a relatively amateur level, in my opinion, up until recently (initiatives of Brian Fiedler in my opinion which others have adopted) -- Sorry, I am speaking strictly in Toronto, hard for me to compare in other places.
As for the Kitchener I think it's important to mention that it was a 4-day tournament with 7 rounds. The fact that it took place after a rich Summer of chess, and that Toronto has gotten its act together, and Hamilton and other nearby places are booming, it may be that participation may be split a bit more overall.
If chess is to become more professional, with better sites, better service, better prizes, etc etc... then fees must go up. It's a bold initiative but long overdue. Chess as we've known it needs to adapt and evolve, I feel like we're actually falling behind, or have been. A $95 entry fee for a 6 rounder in a downtown premium location is not so unthinkable. And I think it'll be the way of the future, and go up. So the question is... from an organizational point of view, how to improve while hiking fees, how to professionalize it, and so on. Realistically, a hundred bucks for a weekend's entertainment, if this is our passion (and anyone willing to spend a weekend doing little else than playing chess, this is a passion) then it's a bargain.
Without trying to make it sound like all honey and roses or blindly support the organizers, I think the ACC has come a long way. And sure I think constructive criticism is important. Having said that, this group went from nothing to something quite stable and a driving force in Toronto chess, in less than a year. That ought to be worth something! These guys are doing things right (surely with improvements to be made as everyone who is starting out). It only makes sense to support the initiative, and see what they come up with, where they take us, and how this will enrich the community.
Barring any unforeseen situation, I will play in the Labour Day.
See you there,
Alex F.
Hi Alex I would not call the Bathurst Site a Quality site if you play in the big hall. Sure elite players get quiet well lit rooms. The U2000 except for maybe the top two boards play in the Darker areas.
Yes the club has done great. But what does this have to do with running quality Chess Tournaments.
I 'm not complaining about the Entry fees if I can afford them I go. But there also has to be a fair way of distributing prizes so that everyone has a chance to win . You say to run quality tournaments you have to raise entries yet you expect lower than U2000 players to pay higher entries and not get a shot at the First Prizes unless they even pay more to move up. Then you punish these lower rated players by saying you can't get top Prizes so settle with lower prizes because we did not get our entries and we need to pay the top group. Creating bigger and better tournaments is the way to go YES but you have to get rid of the Sections or the section players will not show up to shore up your foundations.If you charge them the same price but offer them a lower return for their money.
It's fine if you are above 2000 you get all the perks. But don't let the lower players play in the street.
I think that is what was the fuel for the French and Russian Revolutions poor wanted what the rich had and got tired of paying the shortfalls.
Comment