COVID-19 ... how we cope :)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Possible toxicity of chronic carbon dioxide exposure associated with face mask use, particularly in pregnant women, children and adolescents – A scoping review Kai Kisielinski a,* , Susanne Wagner b , Oliver Hirsch c , Bernd Klosterhalfen d , Andreas Prescher e a Independent Researcher, Surgeon, P


    ABSTRACT Introduction: During the SARS-CoV-2-pandemic, face masks have become one of the most important ubiquitous factors affecting human breathing. It increases the resistance and dead space volume leading to a re-breathing of CO2. So far, this phenomenon and possible implications on early life has not been evaluated in depth. Method: As part of a scoping review, literature was systematically reviewed regarding CO2 exposure and facemask use.

    Results: Fresh air has around 0.04% CO2, while wearing masks more than 5 min bears a possible chronic exposure to carbon dioxide of 1.41% to 3.2% of the inhaled air. Although the buildup is usually within the short-term exposure limits, long-term exceedances and consequences must be considered due to experimental data. US Navy toxicity experts set the exposure limits for submarines carrying a female crew to 0.8% CO2 based on animal studies which indicated an increased risk for stillbirths. Additionally, mammals who were chronically exposed to 0.3% CO2 the experimental data demonstrate a teratogenicity with irreversible neuron damage in the offspring, reduced spatial learning caused by brainstem neuron apoptosis and reduced circulating levels of the insulin-like growth factor-1.

    With significant impact on three readout parameters (morphological, functional, marker) this chronic 0.3% CO2 exposure has to be defined as being toxic. Additional data exists on the exposure of chronic 0.3% CO2 in adolescent mammals causing neuron destruction, which includes less activity, increased anxiety and impaired learning and memory. There is also data indicating testicular toxicity in adolescents at CO2 inhalation concentrations above 0.5%.

    Discussion: There is a possible negative impact risk by imposing extended mask mandates especially for vulnerable subgroups. Circumstantial evidence exists that extended mask use may be related to current observations of stillbirths and to reduced verbal motor and overall cognitive performance in children born during the pandemic. A need exists to reconsider mask mandates.

    https://www.cell.com/heliyon/pdf/S24...23)01324-5.pdf

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Neil Frarey View Post
      This is YUUUGE ...

      Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced his presidential campaign on Wednesday ... built on re-litigating Covid-19 shutdowns and shaking Americans’ faith in science.

      ... just got interesting !!

      Comment


      • BREAKING: The US COVID mitigation measures resulted in 23X higher COVID deaths

        Click image for larger version  Name:	Screen Shot 2023-05-29 at 5.42.17 PM.png Views:	0 Size:	942.1 KB ID:	226983




        The unvaccinated Amish were the control group. Their infection fatality rate from COVID was 23X lower than the surrounding community. Their secret? They ignored ALL the CDC's recommendations.



        Executive summary


        On May 22, 2023, I offered a $2,500 reward for anyone to give me the names of more than 5 Amish people in Lancaster, PA (which is the world’s largest single community of Amish people with over 45,000 people) who died from COVID.

        Nobody could do that. I got a few names. And nobody could name anyone under 50 years old who was suspected of dying from COVID. The best anyone could do was come up with 5 names, 52 years of age and older, mostly very old people.

        In other words, the Amish didn’t do anything to protect against getting COVID: no lockdowns, no vaccinations, no masks, no social distancing, no mandates, no school closures, nothing. If they got sick, they used ivermectin and other methods that were not recommended by the CDC or FDA.

        90% of the Amish have been infected by COVID, yet only 5 of the Amish might have died from COVID.

        This means their overall COVID infection fatality rate (IFR) for all ages is .011% and for under 50, their IFR is 0%. For >60, their IFR=.044% which is 23X lower than the surrounding community.

        The US <60 IFR is .09% and <70 IFR is .18% from the Ioannidis paper.

        https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/b...vid-mitigation
        Last edited by Sid Belzberg; Monday, 29th May, 2023, 05:50 PM.

        Comment


        • Bobby Kennedy Jr is winning ...

          https://twitter.com/i/status/1672014260480901120

          https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/st...n%7Ctwcon%5Es1

          Tucker Carlson @TuckerCarlson

          https://tuckercarlson.com/

          Comment


          • The Handling of COVID-19

            Americas - USA

            "...the United States did not have to collapse into Covid partisanship, with citizen turning against citizen and each party vilifying the other as the source of ...national misery......


            This is one of the revelations of “Lessons From the Covid War, an Investigative Report,” by 34 experts, published in April by PublicAffairs."

            https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/28/o...d396a4debfd6ce

            Bob A (TS/P)

            Comment



            • Landmark Legislation Safeguarding the Use of Off-Label Drugs Passes the Ohio State House With Bipartisan Support

              June 24, 2023 • by Thomas Renz

              Originally Published on Tom Renz’s Newsletter



              Does anyone have the current weather in hell? I’m thinking it may have finally frozen over and am happy to report that the Ohio House of Representatives has passed HB73 on a BIPARTISAN basis!!! This bill passed by a huge margin even seeing some democrats support it. Could it be that we have finally found something that is so based on common sense that even Governor DeWine and I could find common ground? I guess we will see but let’s talk about HB73.

              Throughout the COVID nightmare, patients were denied access to treatments that their doctors wanted for them by bureaucrats at hospital that were focused on the bottom line rather than the interests of the patients. Doctors would prescribe Ivermectin or HCQ but the hospital would not allow the patient to have it. While this may well have constituted a tort in many states, that was not something a sick person being denied proper treatment had time to litigate. The result was the denial of effective treatment for COVID and the needless death of many thousands of people.

              I have been working with OAMF and Rep. Jennifer Gross on the language of this bill and believe it is good. The bill is 8 pages long you can see it here) and is an easy read. OAMF has provided these bullet points which do a good job summarizing. This legislation:
              • Protects against licensing boards and Ohio state and local health departments pursuing a disciplinary action against a prescriber, hospital or skilled nursing facility, for prescribing an off-label drug, or a pharmacist who dispenses it, unless there is gross negligence.
              • Says patients are not required to be tested or screened for or exposed to a particular disease, illness, or infection in order to get the off-label prescription from their prescriber filled for home or prophylactic use.
              • Requires a pharmacist, hospital, or inpatient facility to dispense the prescribed off-label drug, unless there is a religious/ethical objection or a life-threatening contraindication.
              • This legislation does NOT in any way prevent conversations regarding drug concerns between pharmacists and prescribers
                • In cases where a pharmacist, hospital, or inpatient facility has to fill a prescription that they are not religiously opposed to, and there is no life-threatening reason not to give it, but they have a good faith scientific objection to filling the drug prescribed by the doctor…. then the pharmacist, hospital or inpatient facility is immune from any harm that may come from the use of the drug, so long as the objection is documented in the patient’s record and also submitted by the pharmacist to the Board of Pharmacy or by the hospital or inpatient facility to the Ohio Department of Health. This provides documentation for lawyers to reference to see if immunity is in place for a particular off label drug when a patient or entity is considering a suit.
                • In cases where the hospital or inpatient facility doesn’t have the drug in stock, they have to attempt to locate it and offer to let the patient pay for it up front, out of pocket. If the hospital or facility cannot get the prescription, and the patient either has an outpatient pharmacy where they can get it, or they have it at home, then the hospital or inpatient facility must allow them t
              • https://dailyclout.io/landmark-legis...tisan-support/

              Comment


              • AARON SIRI GIVES TESTIMONY TO THE ARIZONA STATE SENATE

                Last week, Aaron Siri, the lead counsel for ICAN, delivered compelling testimony at the Arizona Novel COVID South Western Intergovernmental Committee (NCSWIC), an important platform dedicated to addressing the challenges and lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic, and charting a path forward.

                https://thehighwire.com/ark-videos/aaron-siri-gives-testimony-on-the-floor-of-arizona-state-senate/

                Click image for larger version  Name:	Screenshot 2023-07-03 at 6.48.06 AM.png Views:	0 Size:	1.42 MB ID:	227570

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Sid Belzberg View Post
                  AARON SIRI GIVES TESTIMONY TO THE ARIZONA STATE SENATE

                  Last week, Aaron Siri, the lead counsel for ICAN, delivered compelling testimony at the Arizona Novel COVID South Western Intergovernmental Committee (NCSWIC), an important platform dedicated to addressing the challenges and lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic, and charting a path forward.

                  https://thehighwire.com/ark-videos/aaron-siri-gives-testimony-on-the-floor-of-arizona-state-senate/

                  Click image for larger version Name:	Screenshot 2023-07-03 at 6.48.06 AM.png Views:	0 Size:	1.42 MB ID:	227570
                  Thanks, Sid. The CNN-believers and the 'pharma-controlled opinion-leader hype' worshippers should find this eye-opening.

                  And here is an example of how harmful (to patients and taxpayers) 'pharma-allied oncology opinion-leaders' can be: https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle...&impID=5587167
                  (One may need some familiarity with medical terminology and ability to read between the lines to grasp the very serious accusations the writer of this article is making)

                  Comment


                  • There is no scientific proof Vitamin D has a beneficial impact on Covid 19 positive patients:

                    Vitamin D, now conclusive that Dr John Campbell can’t critically assess a study - YouTube

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Patrick Gougeon View Post
                      There is no scientific proof Vitamin D has a beneficial impact on Covid 19 positive patients:

                      Vitamin D, now conclusive that Dr John Campbell can’t critically assess a study - YouTube
                      https://c19early.org/dmeta.html

                      Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot 2023-07-07 at 9.45.30 PM.png
Views:	58
Size:	564.3 KB
ID:	227639
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot 2023-07-07 at 9.45.54 PM.png
Views:	57
Size:	309.3 KB
ID:	227640
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot 2023-07-07 at 9.46.05 PM.png
Views:	54
Size:	114.0 KB
ID:	227641
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot 2023-07-07 at 9.46.20 PM.png
Views:	56
Size:	234.3 KB
ID:	227642​​​​​​​

                      Comment



                      • Privy Council advocated downplaying COVID vaccine injuries or deaths

                        "
                        The Privy Council memo was obtained under Access to Information Act.
                        “News reports of adverse events following immunization and the government’s response to them have strong potential to influence public confidence in vaccines and their safety.”

                        The memo also suggested skewing stats to minimize the impact of vaccine-related deaths or injuries, such as stating the “chance of it happening to me is one in a million” rather than “it has happened five times.”

                        The Public Health Agency said of the 97.6 million vaccine doses administered at the time of the report, and there were 20,428 “serious adverse event reports.”



                        https://torontosun.com/news/national...ries-or-deaths



                        Additional facts underline the long-term damage caused by these shots, including radically shortened lifespan, cognitive (intellectual) disability, spontaneous abortion, male and female infertility, turbo cancers, and other serious illnesses, including Myocarditis (heart damage) strokes, etc. The CPSO prohibits Dr's from diagnosing vaccine injuries or prescribing medications such as Ivermectin that can help treat these injuries.



                        THIS IS CRIMINAL ASSAULT AND MASS MURDER by the TRUDEAU CABINET AND THE PRIVY COUNCIL.

                        They must ALL be charged accordingly. They are NOT above the LAW.

                        See more here thereisnopandemic.net

                        Last edited by Sid Belzberg; Monday, 10th July, 2023, 09:04 AM.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Sid Belzberg View Post
                          ......
                          " ...... The Public Health Agency said of the 97.6 million vaccine doses administered at the time of the report, and there were 20,428 “serious adverse event reports."
                          .......
                          Based on that info, the adverse event rate looks to be about 1/50th of 1%. How does that compare to other vaccines?
                          "We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office." - Aesop
                          "Only the dead have seen the end of war." - Plato
                          "If once a man indulges himself in murder, very soon he comes to think little of robbing; and from robbing he comes next to drinking and Sabbath-breaking, and from that to incivility and procrastination." - Thomas De Quincey

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Peter McKillop View Post

                            Based on that info, the adverse event rate looks to be about 1/50th of 1%. How does that compare to other vaccines?
                            Serious side effects in traditional vaccines are very rare, typically less than one in a million. So, for example, in the United States, in any given year, one would expect 350 such cases. For all traditional vaccines! In Canada, we expect less than 35 serious adverse events from traditional vaccines annually. 20418 serious adverse events with life-threatening or changing injuries are unheard of. 2,000,000 people are injured and maimed for life if this is extrapolated World Wide.
                            Peer-reviewed papers show that less than 1 percent of these injuries are reported to the US VAERS system or Public Health Canada.
                            This does not even consider slow kill effects induced by those injections, including myocarditis, turbo cancers, prion-based diseases ALS, Alzheimer's, etc.

                            When 20417 events are reported in a single year, a major crime has been committed, while normally, 35 such reports come in a year.

                            https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data

                            Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot 2023-07-10 at 12.56.43 PM.png
Views:	50
Size:	73.1 KB
ID:	227673


                            .
                            Last edited by Sid Belzberg; Monday, 10th July, 2023, 01:17 PM.

                            Comment


                            • COVID-19 & Vaccines

                              "The official who had final authority to approve new vaccines in Canada says at no time was she pressured to authorize the COVID-19 shots, even though the prime minister had said vaccination was the only way to get back to normal.

                              “No one ever told me that the prime minister wants this to be done,” said Dr. Celia Lourenco, now acting associate assistant deputy minister with Health Canada and previously director general of the Biologic and Radiopharmaceutical Drugs Directorate in the department.

                              Dr. Lourenco was being cross-examined on July 13 as part of the first grievance against the federal vaccine mandate being adjudicated by the Federal Public Sector Labour Relations and Employment Board."

                              https://www.theepochtimes.com/canada...&utm_content=1

                              Bob A (Vaccine Supporter)

                              Comment


                              • COVID-19 & Vaccination

                                "One-in-Five Canadians Hesitant to Receive Further COVID-19 Boosters: Survey"

                                https://www.theepochtimes.com/one-in...&utm_content=3

                                Bob A (Vaccination Supporter)

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X