Originally posted by Neil Frarey
View Post
COVID-19 ... how we cope :)
Collapse
X
-
And now barely there Biden has caught what is known as Rebound COVID.
So ... you take how many pfizer shots and booster shots to prevent COVID-19? And then when you do catch COVID-19 you take pfizer's paxlovid to 'cure' COVID-19 ... and then when pfizer's paxlovid doesn't work then what? Another pfizer booster shot?? Perhaps a booster shot of pfizer's paxlovid?
EPIC pfizer business model!!!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Bob Armstrong View PostSocial Distancing and Lockdowns were not new........we saw them in earlier world pandemics (Spanish Flu, etc.). The medical experts of 2020 and onward were building on what had gone before (It's just that many of us didn't know it, until the historian types started posting all these old photos and newspaper clippings).
~ Bob A (T-S/P)
"The detection rate of asymptomatic positive cases was very low, and there was no evidence of transmission from asymptomatic positive persons to traced close contacts."
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19802-w
Leave a comment:
-
Social Distancing and Lockdowns were not new........we saw them in earlier world pandemics (Spanish Flu, etc.). The medical experts of 2020 and onward were building on what had gone before (It's just that many of us didn't know it, until the historian types started posting all these old photos and newspaper clippings).
~ Bob A (T-S/P)
Leave a comment:
-
Dr. Birx ... Trump's former Covid-19 adviser
Admits She And Fauci Made Up ‘The Science’ On Lockdowns, Social Distancing
https://invesbrain.com/dr-birx-admit...al-distancing/
"I knew these vaccines were not going to protect against infection and I think we overplayed the vaccines ..."
https://twitter.com/SKMorefield/stat...86541239635969
LOOL!
Leave a comment:
-
Over the years Sen. Rand Paul seems to really enjoy his exchanges with Dr. Fauci, ha!
Relentless!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Neil Frarey View PostEvery time Joe Biden said vaccines prevent COVID-19
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nTlxpxdH3Yk
Pandemic of misinformation!
LOOL!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Dilip Panjwani View Post
It is not absolute numbers; it is per 100,000.
My question to Sid is whether what is true for the 3 week period shown also holds for much larger periods...
What we did is we went to the Wayback machine and recovered the deleted files and then subtracted those numbers from the current files to break out whatever time slice we want. I have the spreadsheets and links with the calculations if you are interested..
Bottomline since around March 2022 the injections have shown negative efficacy. They do more harm than good, and that is not taking into account their horrific safety profile myocarditis etc.
The injections are neither safe nor effective, and Pfizer et al knew that from the start.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9012513/Last edited by Sid Belzberg; Saturday, 23rd July, 2022, 11:58 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Peter McKillop View Post
Interesting! Thank you for posting that graphic, Sid. A couple of questions for you:
- It would be interesting to see some age data with the bar graphs. For example, could it be the case that the triple vaccinated group contains a higher proportion of people with an age vulnerability than the unvaccinated group, thereby skewing the numbers?
Leave a comment:
-
Every time Joe Biden said vaccines prevent COVID-19
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nTlxpxdH3Yk
Pandemic of misinformation!
LOOL!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Bob Armstrong View PostHi Sid:
The problem with the graph, in my opinion, is that it is using absolute numbers. If the triple vaccinated group has the most no. of people in it (I'm not saying it does; just as an explanation), then obviously it is going to have the greatest number of cases.
The graph we need is # of cases per 1000 persons, so that we can compare the percentages for each separate group.
For transparency, I am certainly no stats expert; but this does seem logical to me.
~ Bob A (T-S/P)
My question to Sid is whether what is true for the 3 week period shown also holds for much larger periods...
Leave a comment:
-
Hi Sid:
The problem with the graph, in my opinion, is that it is using absolute numbers. If the triple vaccinated group has the most no. of people in it (I'm not saying it does; just as an explanation), then obviously it is going to have the greatest number of cases.
The graph we need is # of cases per 1000 persons, so that we can compare the percentages for each separate group.
For transparency, I am certainly no stats expert; but this does seem logical to me.
~ Bob A (T-S/P)
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Sid Belzberg View Post
Not according to the epidemiology reports from the Gov't of Canada The more doses, the more the immune system gets destroyed. Greatest Crime against humanity ever perpetrated in history.
- It would be interesting to see some age data with the bar graphs. For example, could it be the case that the triple vaccinated group contains a higher proportion of people with an age vulnerability than the unvaccinated group, thereby skewing the numbers?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Neil Frarey View PostDr. Rochelle Walensky
We have a COVID-19 variant playbook to rapidly assess a variant’s transmissibility and severity, and its potential impact on vaccines and treatment.
Press Briefing by White House March 2 2022
...
Oopsy oops!
LOOL!
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: