If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Policy / Politique
The fee for tournament organizers advertising on ChessTalk is $20/event or $100/yearly unlimited for the year.
Les frais d'inscription des organisateurs de tournoi sur ChessTalk sont de 20 $/événement ou de 100 $/année illimitée.
You can etransfer to Henry Lam at chesstalkforum at gmail dot com
Transfér à Henry Lam à chesstalkforum@gmail.com
Dark Knight / Le Chevalier Noir
General Guidelines
---- Nous avons besoin d'un traduction français!
Some Basics
1. Under Board "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQs) there are 3 sections dealing with General Forum Usage, User Profile Features, and Reading and Posting Messages. These deal with everything from Avatars to Your Notifications. Most general technical questions are covered there. Here is a link to the FAQs. https://forum.chesstalk.com/help
2. Consider using the SEARCH button if you are looking for information. You may find your question has already been answered in a previous thread.
3. If you've looked for an answer to a question, and not found one, then you should consider asking your question in a new thread. For example, there have already been questions and discussion regarding: how to do chess diagrams (FENs); crosstables that line up properly; and the numerous little “glitches” that every new site will have.
4. Read pinned or sticky threads, like this one, if they look important. This applies especially to newcomers.
5. Read the thread you're posting in before you post. There are a variety of ways to look at a thread. These are covered under “Display Modes”.
6. Thread titles: please provide some details in your thread title. This is useful for a number of reasons. It helps ChessTalk members to quickly skim the threads. It prevents duplication of threads. And so on.
7. Unnecessary thread proliferation (e.g., deliberately creating a new thread that duplicates existing discussion) is discouraged. Look to see if a thread on your topic may have already been started and, if so, consider adding your contribution to the pre-existing thread. However, starting new threads to explore side-issues that are not relevant to the original subject is strongly encouraged. A single thread on the Canadian Open, with hundreds of posts on multiple sub-topics, is no better than a dozen threads on the Open covering only a few topics. Use your good judgment when starting a new thread.
8. If and/or when sub-forums are created, please make sure to create threads in the proper place.
Debate
9. Give an opinion and back it up with a reason. Throwaway comments such as "Game X pwnz because my friend and I think so!" could be considered pointless at best, and inflammatory at worst.
10. Try to give your own opinions, not simply those copied and pasted from reviews or opinions of your friends.
Unacceptable behavior and warnings
11. In registering here at ChessTalk please note that the same or similar rules apply here as applied at the previous Boardhost message board. In particular, the following content is not permitted to appear in any messages:
* Racism
* Hatred
* Harassment
* Adult content
* Obscene material
* Nudity or pornography
* Material that infringes intellectual property or other proprietary rights of any party
* Material the posting of which is tortious or violates a contractual or fiduciary obligation you or we owe to another party
* Piracy, hacking, viruses, worms, or warez
* Spam
* Any illegal content
* unapproved Commercial banner advertisements or revenue-generating links
* Any link to or any images from a site containing any material outlined in these restrictions
* Any material deemed offensive or inappropriate by the Board staff
12. Users are welcome to challenge other points of view and opinions, but should do so respectfully. Personal attacks on others will not be tolerated. Posts and threads with unacceptable content can be closed or deleted altogether. Furthermore, a range of sanctions are possible - from a simple warning to a temporary or even a permanent banning from ChessTalk.
Helping to Moderate
13. 'Report' links (an exclamation mark inside a triangle) can be found in many places throughout the board. These links allow users to alert the board staff to anything which is offensive, objectionable or illegal. Please consider using this feature if the need arises.
Advice for free
14. You should exercise the same caution with Private Messages as you would with any public posting.
When I picture you, Sid, I picture someone who acts like they are in a drug induced frenzy, banging away at your keyboard while talking to yourself. Someone who is desperate to be right about each and every tiny detail of this pandemic because, if you are not, your entire world view would crumble around you.
Your questions are extremely callous. If someone had asked you how old your relative was who died, and then blew off the death as expected as her age was greater than the average life expectancy, you would have lost your mind and threatened lawsuits. Fact: millions of people would be alive, right now, if there was no covid. Covid killed them.
You are pathetic.
Why don't you just answer the questions I posted? No one cares about what YOU think about me including me. Do you really believe the Sarscov2 virus was of natural origin and Moderna et al just happened to patent sequences for the cytotoxic spike protein in 2017 long before SarsCOV2 was considered a threat by coincidence?
Common Brain, Wake up!!!!! I posted absolute proof of that here already.
I could post a lot more but the only thing you seem interested in is showing us all what a clever, intelligent, witty, and insulting troll you are. Don't kid yourself that I have forgotten about the many libelous statements you have made in your zest to show everyone here how smart you are. You were already put on notice and I have seen no evidence that you have apologized or recanted your statements. Consider yourself notified.
I am not the only one who knows that we had a pandemic of malfeasance and maltreatment fueled by absolute corruption by pharma. That is what
has killed millions and continues to do so.
You might want to ask yourself this question. If your precious "vaccines" worked so well why is the COVID deathrate per 100,000 in countries like the UK and Scotland with clean data the highest in the fully boosted group, followed by the double vaccinated group with the lowest death rate in either the single dose or not vaccinated at all group?
In all, there were 5,084 Covid-19 deaths between 14th Feb and 13th March 22, and the triple vaccinated population accounted for 3,687 of them. Whilst the not-vaccinated population accounted for just 401.
Overall, the vaccinated population accounted for 92.2% of all Covid-19 deaths during these four weeks, with 4,683 recorded deaths.
Here is what is happening here in Canada.. Yes, the trend is clear in Canada by the third week of February the triple vax are five times as likely to die from COVID as the unvaxxed. Remember that pesky ADE problem I talked about and damage to the innate immune system with each jab? OI h, I forgot you don't look at data, only MSM pharma-sponsored propaganda. Better get your "fact-checkers" to debunk this.....good luck! Data talks, bullshit walks that you seem to have an endless supply of Brian.
You are the one that libeled me by posting "people like me are responsible for the increase in deaths". Well, genius? You know about as much about immunology and virology as I do about rope dancing! Yet you have sat here for almost two years handwaving and calling me every name under the sun! The worst thing is subjecting adolescents, children and even babies to these death shots. https://iceni.substack.com/p/covid-1...ii-vaccine?s=r Only Canada has a policy of "vaccinating" infants with unproven experimental inoculations.
Here is a paper I am a co-author of on the treatment of the pediatric population. It is very similar to the adult population,
The group of Dr's in the above paper has treated over 200,000 elderly high-risk COVID patients with zero deaths. Many run urgent care clinics. They dared go against the policy of not treating patients with anything and waiting until they are at death's door at the emergency room that was and is simply genocide, as is the policy of mandating an experimental injection that has proven to be utterly useless and dangerous.
Get on the right side of history Brian as you are on the wrong side as of now!
Yes you can thank toxic Remdesevir (Dr. Fraudski's "standard of care") and inappropriate intubation for hospitalized patients for that grim statistic. By the way, since you are so good at reciting these figures can you tell me how many died with COVID as opposed to from COVID?
Also, tell me the average age of someone that dies from COVID. Is the average age greater than the average life expectancy?.
Oh and please tell me what the excess death number in the US was between 2019-2020 and 2020-2021 2020 the pandemic year and 2021 the vaccination year roll out.
Cheers,
Sid
When I picture you, Sid, I picture someone who acts like they are in a drug induced frenzy, banging away at your keyboard while talking to yourself. Someone who is desperate to be right about each and every tiny detail of this pandemic because, if you are not, your entire world view would crumble around you.
Your questions are extremely callous. If someone had asked you how old your relative was who died, and then blew off the death as expected as her age was greater than the average life expectancy, you would have lost your mind and threatened lawsuits. Fact: millions of people would be alive, right now, if there was no covid. Covid killed them.
You are pathetic.
Yes you can thank toxic Remdesevir (Dr. Fraudski's "standard of care") and inappropriate intubation for hospitalized patients for that grim statistic. By the way, since you are so good at reciting these figures can you tell me how many died with COVID as opposed to from COVID?
Also, tell me the average age of someone that dies from COVID. Is the average age greater than the average life expectancy?.
Oh and please tell me what the excess death number in the US was between 2019-2020 and 2020-2021 2020 the pandemic year and 2021 the vaccination year roll out.
Cheers,
Sid
With COVID-19 restrictions lifting across the country, Canadians may be feeling as though aspects of their lives are starting to return to “normal.” But experts warn that ending long-standing practices such as physical distancing and masking will not only increase transmission, but raise the chances that a new COVID-19 variant will emerge.
For those of you that think that Pfizer has not promoted dangerous drugs and fraudulently claimed they are "safe and Effective" please check out this litany of crimes against humanity that Pfizer has been found guilty of and paid out billions of dollars in criminal fines since 2002.
This company is one of the largest most evil frauds in human history that has put profits first and could not give a damn about human lives and injuries their products cause.
With cases of potential medical fraud now identified, it is essential that access to patient-level databases be provided. If authors fail to provide these data, the study should be considered with a higher index of suspicion. Additionally, it should be mandatory that all registered trials report their findings. We understand that these are substantial changes to established procedures. However, the failure to recognize the potentially fraudulent studies, which led to multiple meta-analyses suggesting significant benefits of ivermectin for COVID-19, indicates that the tools currently used to evaluate the quality of clinical trials are insufficient. These events warrant our stringent recommendations.
I am well aware of this ass covering excersie that Andrew Hill recently published. He based his statement on several small flawed studies out of the middle East.
The reality is these days we can expect about 20 percent of papers in medicine to be outright fraudulent as per this opinion piece in the BMJ from a former editor
of the BMJ. The papers Andrew Hill refers to cover about 16% of IVM RCT studies.
With cases of potential medical fraud now identified, it is essential that access to patient-level databases be provided. If authors fail to provide these data, the study should be considered with a higher index of suspicion. Additionally, it should be mandatory that all registered trials report their findings. We understand that these are substantial changes to established procedures. However, the failure to recognize the potentially fraudulent studies, which led to multiple meta-analyses suggesting significant benefits of ivermectin for COVID-19, indicates that the tools currently used to evaluate the quality of clinical trials are insufficient. These events warrant our stringent recommendations.
Leave a comment: