If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Policy / Politique
The fee for tournament organizers advertising on ChessTalk is $20/event or $100/yearly unlimited for the year.
Les frais d'inscription des organisateurs de tournoi sur ChessTalk sont de 20 $/événement ou de 100 $/année illimitée.
You can etransfer to Henry Lam at chesstalkforum at gmail dot com
Transfér à Henry Lam à chesstalkforum@gmail.com
Dark Knight / Le Chevalier Noir
General Guidelines
---- Nous avons besoin d'un traduction français!
Some Basics
1. Under Board "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQs) there are 3 sections dealing with General Forum Usage, User Profile Features, and Reading and Posting Messages. These deal with everything from Avatars to Your Notifications. Most general technical questions are covered there. Here is a link to the FAQs. https://forum.chesstalk.com/help
2. Consider using the SEARCH button if you are looking for information. You may find your question has already been answered in a previous thread.
3. If you've looked for an answer to a question, and not found one, then you should consider asking your question in a new thread. For example, there have already been questions and discussion regarding: how to do chess diagrams (FENs); crosstables that line up properly; and the numerous little “glitches” that every new site will have.
4. Read pinned or sticky threads, like this one, if they look important. This applies especially to newcomers.
5. Read the thread you're posting in before you post. There are a variety of ways to look at a thread. These are covered under “Display Modes”.
6. Thread titles: please provide some details in your thread title. This is useful for a number of reasons. It helps ChessTalk members to quickly skim the threads. It prevents duplication of threads. And so on.
7. Unnecessary thread proliferation (e.g., deliberately creating a new thread that duplicates existing discussion) is discouraged. Look to see if a thread on your topic may have already been started and, if so, consider adding your contribution to the pre-existing thread. However, starting new threads to explore side-issues that are not relevant to the original subject is strongly encouraged. A single thread on the Canadian Open, with hundreds of posts on multiple sub-topics, is no better than a dozen threads on the Open covering only a few topics. Use your good judgment when starting a new thread.
8. If and/or when sub-forums are created, please make sure to create threads in the proper place.
Debate
9. Give an opinion and back it up with a reason. Throwaway comments such as "Game X pwnz because my friend and I think so!" could be considered pointless at best, and inflammatory at worst.
10. Try to give your own opinions, not simply those copied and pasted from reviews or opinions of your friends.
Unacceptable behavior and warnings
11. In registering here at ChessTalk please note that the same or similar rules apply here as applied at the previous Boardhost message board. In particular, the following content is not permitted to appear in any messages:
* Racism
* Hatred
* Harassment
* Adult content
* Obscene material
* Nudity or pornography
* Material that infringes intellectual property or other proprietary rights of any party
* Material the posting of which is tortious or violates a contractual or fiduciary obligation you or we owe to another party
* Piracy, hacking, viruses, worms, or warez
* Spam
* Any illegal content
* unapproved Commercial banner advertisements or revenue-generating links
* Any link to or any images from a site containing any material outlined in these restrictions
* Any material deemed offensive or inappropriate by the Board staff
12. Users are welcome to challenge other points of view and opinions, but should do so respectfully. Personal attacks on others will not be tolerated. Posts and threads with unacceptable content can be closed or deleted altogether. Furthermore, a range of sanctions are possible - from a simple warning to a temporary or even a permanent banning from ChessTalk.
Helping to Moderate
13. 'Report' links (an exclamation mark inside a triangle) can be found in many places throughout the board. These links allow users to alert the board staff to anything which is offensive, objectionable or illegal. Please consider using this feature if the need arises.
Advice for free
14. You should exercise the same caution with Private Messages as you would with any public posting.
So your proposition is that an influx of highly skilled youth has captured rating points, leading to significant rating deflation of the older generation of chess players? I am not sure if online ratings are a completely different animal. Youth are more into online chess, and hence I would expect that they would float to the top of the ratings and someone like me would get beaten down to the level of a beginner based on the lurid descriptions of rating declines of Bob A and yourself. Bob A was not much different than me at around 1900.
I don't see any evidence of anything like that happening to me.
This would make an interesting study: vax versus unwaxed chess player rating evolution post-vax. It would factor out the "more skilled young chess players stealing the rating points theory" or prove your hypothesis correct if vax status makes no difference.
Oh Sid, that really does not describe accurately my comments. It has been discussed previously here and on CFC forum. If you want to research that yourself, great.
The 2 Bob's and others brought up this issue years ago, and we struggled to gain wide spread acceptance that rating deflation was real, not a hoax.
But then the mathematicians at FIDE came to the same conclusion. So much so that they did a rating adjustment upward as of March 1, 2024.
You could review their findings as well. Again, we are talking about OTB ratings only, not online ratings.
Of course, the ratings decline of the Bob's is a combination of numerous factors, including aging etc. we acknowledge that.
Yes, really. But I speak only of OTB rating systems. Online ratings are a completely different animal
So your proposition is that an influx of highly skilled youth has captured rating points, leading to significant rating deflation of the older generation of chess players? I am not sure if online ratings are a completely different animal. Youth are more into online chess, and hence I would expect that they would float to the top of the ratings and someone like me would get beaten down to the level of a beginner based on the lurid descriptions of rating declines of Bob A and yourself. Bob A was not much different than me at around 1900.
I don't see any evidence of anything like that happening to me.
This would make an interesting study: vax versus unwaxed chess player rating evolution post-vax. It would factor out the "more skilled young chess players stealing the rating points theory" or prove your hypothesis correct if vax status makes no difference.
Really? I play online chess, and my rating fluctuates in the same tight range it has for years: expert-weak master. I haven't seen hoards of young ones
clean my clock all of a sudden. please explain. I play mostly five-minute blitz.
Yes, really. But I speak only of OTB rating systems. Online ratings are a completely different animal.
Really? I play online chess, and my rating fluctuates in the same tight range it has for years: expert-weak master. I haven't seen hoards of young ones
clean my clock all of a sudden. please explain. I play mostly five-minute blitz.
5 minute blitz is all about cheapos.
Try 40 moves in 2 hours against the youngsters to see where you really are.
I have some good news for you Bob. Your rating decline is only 546 points and most of that is attributable to general rating deflation.
It is simple demographics related to the severe shift to a younger pool of chess players. This began before COVID and was accelerated when play resumed after COVID.
My decline was almost 700 points, and many others have similar stories.
I have some good news for you Bob. Your rating decline is only 546 points and most of that is attributable to general rating deflation.
It is simple demographics related to the severe shift to a younger pool of chess players. This began before COVID and was accelerated when play resumed after COVID.
My decline was almost 700 points, and many others have similar stories.
We are not mad cows.
Really? I play online chess, and my rating fluctuates in the same tight range it has for years: expert-weak master. I haven't seen hoards of young ones
clean my clock all of a sudden. please explain. I play mostly five-minute blitz.
Reasons for Bob's Momentous Standard Chess Rating Plunge (CFC 1911 to 1365)
Bob A (2024 Chess Goal - 1400! - ask the kids, though, if I still know how to play chess! )
I have some good news for you Bob. Your rating decline is only 546 points and most of that is attributable to general rating deflation.
It is simple demographics related to the severe shift to a younger pool of chess players. This began before COVID and was accelerated when play resumed after COVID.
My decline was almost 700 points, and many others have similar stories.
taking care of my health, as a senior with diabetes, by getting COVID-19 vaccine shots regularl
Ironically, the older you are, the worse the shots are for you. Let's start with one of the deadliest Neurodegenerative diseases, Jacob Creutzedeld disease, aka Mad Cow disease, which has proven to be vax-induced. Before the vaccine rollout, this occurred in one in a million people, or 300 people a year in the US. Now it occurs in around 12 in 60000 people or around 70000(!) people a year in the US alone.
How do I know this, Bob? Unlike you, I use scientific methods and investigate.
I wrote an article about this back in August 2022. Besides the six cases of CJD reported, we received 60 cases of serious neurological diseases that would indicate close to 1,000,000 US cases a year of other neurological diseases like Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, etc. So yes, even though your rating plummeted before the pandemic, your decline in rating accelerated significantly post-vax.
The good news is you are still alive, so hopefully, you were injected with a placebo, especially if you are part of a long-term study.
If people like Dr. Francis Boyle are signing affidavits stating these are bioweapons, you had better believe it!
New Data Confirms Injections Cause Previously Rare Creutzfeld Jacobs Disease
By Sid Belzberg
Last fall my colleagues Adam Gaertner and others hosted this website for a few months:
During those few months in the fall we received about 15,000 hits.
We requested at the time that anyone who after the injection experienced serious neurological problems or their loved ones to submit a report to the site.
We received 60 reports, including 6 cases of diagnosed Creutzfeld Jacobs Diseases (CJD). Normally this disease affects 1 in a 1,000,000 people. To get 6 cases you would need 6,000,000 hits to the site assuming everyone reports. The chances of getting 1 case in 15000 hits is 1 in 66. To see 6 cases in 1 group of 15000 is 1/66^6 or 1 in 82,000,000,000, or 20 times more likely to win a powerball lottery!
We recently put the site back up, and again ask if anyone that has experienced serious neurological events post-vax to please submit a report here: https://prions.rip
* * *
"Fringe scientists" that supported our hypothesis last year included the late Dr. Luc Montagnier, Nobel laureate.
To reiterate, CJD is an exceptionally rare disease that is now a known and established severe adverse reaction (SAE) from the DEATHVAX™. Injecting this slow kill bioweapon can cause ailments that are about as likely to develop in the real word as getting struck by lighting twice.
Reasons for Bob's Momentous Standard Chess Rating Plunge (CFC 1911 to 1365)
1. More stupid now.
2. Move a bit slower with the 79th birthday next month.
3. I am not techie and so can't take full advantage of all the new chess study aids.
4. I am a very busy almost 79 year old (My friends tell me....even over-busy) and so can't take full advantage of all the new chess study aids.
5. My sections that I play in are vast seas, containing little sharks, from 5 - 17 y.o.. They are taking full advantage of all the new chess study aids. They take no prisoners!
6. Like with the Boomer's Wealth, we are now seeing the greatest generational transfer of rating points ever: from us Boomers to the newest generation that doesn't even yet have a name.
[Note: Ageism is a prejudice.]
Bob A (2024 Chess Goal - 1400! - ask the kids, though, if I still know how to play chess! )
P.S. - Sid's allegation that it is due to my taking care of my health, as a senior with diabetes, by getting COVID-19 vaccine shots regularly is............
FALSE! Don't believe him - his brain is addled by too much Quantum Physics Theory. My rating was plummeting long before the pandemic!
Last edited by Bob Armstrong; Monday, 10th June, 2024, 10:16 AM.
Very conservative, in my view: that Modified mRNA “vaccines” do not qualify under the existing definition of "vaccine" .
Short & Sweet!
Sid's Hyperbolic Extrapolation from this ruling: Modified mRNA "vaccines/whatever they are" are in fact "slow-kill bio-weapons".
Sid - Please.........Don't hold your breath waiting for a second court hearing to extend the 9th Circuit Court of Appeal very technical ruling into your monumental statement......you can't hold your breath that long!
My "extrapolation" is based on science, not just legal rulings, something your vax-induced demented brain can not comprehend. You
wonder why your chess rating has plummeted to that of a beginner!
As usual, Bob falls back on his trusted sword of ignorance.
BMJ (Brit. Med. Journal): excess deaths in 47 Western countries (1/20 to 12/22
"Conclusions Excess mortality has remained high in the Western World for three consecutive years, despite the implementation of containment measures and COVID-19 vaccines. This raises serious concerns. Government leaders and policymakers need to thoroughly investigate underlying causes of persistent excess mortality."
Last edited by Sid Belzberg; Monday, 10th June, 2024, 09:26 AM.
Very conservative, in my view: that Modified mRNA “vaccines” do not qualify under the existing definition of "vaccine" .
Short & Sweet!
Sid's Hyperbolic Extrapolation from this ruling: Modified mRNA "vaccines/whatever they are" are in fact "slow-kill bio-weapons".
Sid - Please.........Don't hold your breath waiting for a second court hearing to extend the 9th Circuit Court of Appeal very technical ruling into your monumental statement......you can't hold your breath that long!
Bob A (Have argued in a number of Appellate Courts & Tribunals)
True, inch by inch even, legal victories on appeal are happening;
.
BOMBSHELL: 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Rules Modied mRNA "Vaccines" Are Slow Kill Bioweapons
The "vaccine" makers are now stripped of Legal Liability Protection
The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals did not exactly come to the obvious conclusion that these Modified mRNA “vaccines” are in fact slow kill bioweapons yet, but their monumental ruling that they do not qualify as vaccines proper does mean that at some point in the not so distant future (when the excess deaths and turbo cancers become even worse) they will ultimately rule that these gene altering “therapeutics” are a mass eugenics program.
The PSYOP-19 DEATHVAX™ never prevented the spread of any “pandemic,” nor did it attenuate symptoms whatsoever; no, the “it would have been so much worse if I didn’t get vaccinated” excuse for those that contracted COVID post their poisonous injections was just more of the same “Trust the Science” reality inversion.
The Intelligence Industrial Complex along with Fauci’s NIH and NIAID and BigPharma always knew that their DEATHVAX™ would be utterly unsafe and ineffective as per the ferret, mice and rat studies that they themselves funded decades ago — not a single animal fared well in any of the Modified mRNA trails, and this deadly platform could never ever get to human trials, which is precisely why they foisted their scamdemic to push through Emergency Use Authorization (EUA). In reality there was never any emergency; well, actually, the illegitimate and captured governments along with their partners-in-crime are the only true emergency, but we digress.
Here, however, plaintiffs allege that the vaccine does not effectively prevent spread but only mitigates symptoms for the recipient and therefore is akin to a medical treatment, not a ‘traditional’ vaccine. Taking plaintiffs’ allegations as true at this stage of litigation, plaintiffs plausibly alleged that the COVID-19 vaccine does not effectively ‘prevent the spread’ of COVID-19. Thus, Jacobson does not apply.
The Jacobson v. Massachusetts ruling that, “mandatory vaccinations were rationally related to “preventing the spread” of smallpox” remains wholly unconstitutional and is an egregious violation of all human rights. Jacobson should never apply in any case, even if there was some kind of legitimate Bubonic Plague 2.0 outbreak, but we digress yet again.
The 9th Circuit ruled that the DEATHVAX™ cannot be considered a vaccine if the claim is that it does NOT prevent the spread; therefore, all Legal Liability Protections are now stripped, and major lawsuits may commence.
And on October 22nd, 2014, during the Gain of Function (GoF) moratorium, Fauci authorized Ralph Baric at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill to continue his illegal bioweapon research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology:
Hence, PSYOP-19 was always a U.S. made bioweapon as funded by the American tax slaves, and these “voluntarily” extorted Americans ended up paying for their very own demise given that the “free” EUA “vaccines” were always the primary payload, not the GoF virus.
Now that this 9th Circuit ruling is in the books, the legal floodgates have been opened, and plaintiffs must go straight past the BigPharma assets, and directly sue the DEATHVAX™ patent holders in the DoD and Pentagon, as well as the various “nonprofit” coconspirators, and the criminal Federal agencies like the NIAID, NIH, CIA, et al.
Time is of essence, because the next GoF “pandemic” in PSYOP-DISEASE-X is well underway:
Yes, the same bioterrorists are at it again, yes bird flu is another GoF bioweapon, yes another deadly Modified mRNA vaccine has already been stockpiled, and yes they are escalating their takedown of the entire global food supply; to wit:
Arkmedic's blog One Flew over the Chickens' Nest
A private government report obtained this week in response to questions over the decision to kill over 500,000 chickens in Victoria, Australia shows that the people making the decision had no verifiable evidence of a high risk infectious outbreak. The chicken farms that were claimed to be infected were so distant from any possible bird source that it … Read more
6 hours ago · 118 likes · 49 comments · Dr Ah Kahn Syed
This 9th Circuit ruling represents a major turning point in not just all things scamdemic, but, also, in terms of the United Nations and their eugenics “health” node the World Health Organization attempting to subvert States’ Rights in America with their murderous “pandemic treaty” power grab.
They want you dead.
Do NOT comply.
Last edited by Sid Belzberg; Monday, 10th June, 2024, 08:06 AM.
Leave a comment: