COVID-19 ... how we cope :)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Sid Belzberg
    replied
    Originally posted by Bob Gillanders View Post

    I have some good news for you Bob. Your rating decline is only 546 points and most of that is attributable to general rating deflation.
    It is simple demographics related to the severe shift to a younger pool of chess players. This began before COVID and was accelerated when play resumed after COVID.

    My decline was almost 700 points, and many others have similar stories.

    We are not mad cows.
    Really? I play online chess, and my rating fluctuates in the same tight range it has for years: expert-weak master. I haven't seen hoards of young ones
    clean my clock all of a sudden. please explain. I play mostly five-minute blitz.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bob Armstrong
    replied
    Bob Gillanders:

    Whew!!!

    Bob A

    Leave a comment:


  • Bob Gillanders
    replied
    Originally posted by Bob Armstrong View Post
    Reasons for Bob's Momentous Standard Chess Rating Plunge (CFC 1911 to 1365)

    Bob A (2024 Chess Goal - 1400! - ask the kids, though, if I still know how to play chess! )
    I have some good news for you Bob. Your rating decline is only 546 points and most of that is attributable to general rating deflation.
    It is simple demographics related to the severe shift to a younger pool of chess players. This began before COVID and was accelerated when play resumed after COVID.

    My decline was almost 700 points, and many others have similar stories.

    We are not mad cows.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bob Armstrong
    replied
    Sid - Thanks for taking the time to present what you know. It is concerning.

    Bob

    Leave a comment:


  • Sid Belzberg
    replied
    Originally posted by Bob Armstrong
    taking care of my health, as a senior with diabetes, by getting COVID-19 vaccine shots regularl
    Ironically, the older you are, the worse the shots are for you. Let's start with one of the deadliest Neurodegenerative diseases, Jacob Creutzedeld disease, aka Mad Cow disease, which has proven to be vax-induced. Before the vaccine rollout, this occurred in one in a million people, or 300 people a year in the US. Now it occurs in around 12 in 60000 people or around 70000(!) people a year in the US alone.

    How do I know this, Bob? Unlike you, I use scientific methods and investigate.

    I wrote an article about this back in August 2022. Besides the six cases of CJD reported, we received 60 cases of serious neurological diseases that would indicate close to 1,000,000 US cases a year of other neurological diseases like Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, etc. So yes, even though your rating plummeted before the pandemic, your decline in rating accelerated significantly post-vax.
    The good news is you are still alive, so hopefully, you were injected with a placebo, especially if you are part of a long-term study.
    If people like Dr. Francis Boyle are signing affidavits stating these are bioweapons, you had better believe it!

    New Data Confirms Injections Cause Previously Rare Creutzfeld Jacobs Disease

    By Sid Belzberg

    Last fall my colleagues Adam Gaertner and others hosted this website for a few months:

    https://prions.rip

    During those few months in the fall we received about 15,000 hits.

    We requested at the time that anyone who after the injection experienced serious neurological problems or their loved ones to submit a report to the site.

    We received 60 reports, including 6 cases of diagnosed Creutzfeld Jacobs Diseases (CJD). Normally this disease affects 1 in a 1,000,000 people. To get 6 cases you would need 6,000,000 hits to the site assuming everyone reports. The chances of getting 1 case in 15000 hits is 1 in 66. To see 6 cases in 1 group of 15000 is 1/66^6 or 1 in 82,000,000,000, or 20 times more likely to win a powerball lottery!

    We recently put the site back up, and again ask if anyone that has experienced serious neurological events post-vax to please submit a report here: https://prions.rip

    * * *

    "Fringe scientists" that supported our hypothesis last year included the late Dr. Luc Montagnier, Nobel laureate.

    To reiterate, CJD is an exceptionally rare disease that is now a known and established severe adverse reaction (SAE) from the DEATHVAX™. Injecting this slow kill bioweapon can cause ailments that are about as likely to develop in the real word as getting struck by lighting twice.

    The proof is now irrefutable.


    https://www.researchgate.net/publica...D-19_Injection

    https://www.researchgate.net/publica...-Jakob_disease

    https://www.researchgate.net/publica...m_source2Finbo
    Last edited by Sid Belzberg; Monday, 10th June, 2024, 03:08 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bob Armstrong
    replied
    Reasons for Bob's Momentous Standard Chess Rating Plunge (CFC 1911 to 1365)

    1. More stupid now.
    2. Move a bit slower with the 79th birthday next month.
    3. I am not techie and so can't take full advantage of all the new chess study aids.
    4. I am a very busy almost 79 year old (My friends tell me....even over-busy) and so can't take full advantage of all the new chess study aids.
    5. My sections that I play in are vast seas, containing little sharks, from 5 - 17 y.o.. They are taking full advantage of all the new chess study aids. They take no prisoners!
    6. Like with the Boomer's Wealth, we are now seeing the greatest generational transfer of rating points ever: from us Boomers to the newest generation that doesn't even yet have a name.

    [Note: Ageism is a prejudice.]

    Bob A (2024 Chess Goal - 1400! - ask the kids, though, if I still know how to play chess! )

    P.S. - Sid's allegation that it is due to my taking care of my health, as a senior with diabetes, by getting COVID-19 vaccine shots regularly is............
    FALSE! Don't believe him - his brain is addled by too much Quantum Physics Theory. My rating was plummeting long before the pandemic!
    Last edited by Bob Armstrong; Monday, 10th June, 2024, 10:16 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sid Belzberg
    replied
    Originally posted by Bob Armstrong View Post
    Definition of "Vaccine"

    Courts use language very carefully!

    9th Circuit Court of Appeals Ruling

    Very conservative, in my view: that Modified mRNA “vaccines” do not qualify under the existing definition of "vaccine" .

    Short & Sweet!

    Sid's Hyperbolic Extrapolation from this ruling: Modified mRNA "vaccines/whatever they are" are in fact "slow-kill bio-weapons".

    Sid - Please.........Don't hold your breath waiting for a second court hearing to extend the 9th Circuit Court of Appeal very technical ruling into your monumental statement......you can't hold your breath that long!

    Bob A




    Originally posted by Bob Armstrong View Post
    Sid's Hyperbolic Extrapolation
    My "extrapolation" is based on science, not just legal rulings, something your vax-induced demented brain can not comprehend. You
    wonder why your chess rating has plummeted to that of a beginner!

    As usual, Bob falls back on his trusted sword of ignorance.



    BMJ (Brit. Med. Journal): excess deaths in 47 Western countries (1/20 to 12/22

    https://bmjpublichealth.bmj.com/cont...00282.full.pdf.

    "Conclusions Excess mortality has remained high in the Western World for three consecutive years, despite the
    implementation of containment measures and COVID-19 vaccines. This raises serious concerns. Government leaders and policymakers need to thoroughly investigate underlying causes of persistent excess mortality."
    Last edited by Sid Belzberg; Monday, 10th June, 2024, 09:26 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bob Armstrong
    replied
    Definition of "Vaccine"

    Courts use language very carefully!

    9th Circuit Court of Appeals Ruling

    Very conservative, in my view: that Modified mRNA “vaccines” do not qualify under the existing definition of "vaccine" .

    Short & Sweet!

    Sid's Hyperbolic Extrapolation from this ruling: Modified mRNA "vaccines/whatever they are" are in fact "slow-kill bio-weapons".

    Sid - Please.........Don't hold your breath waiting for a second court hearing to extend the 9th Circuit Court of Appeal very technical ruling into your monumental statement......you can't hold your breath that long!

    Bob A

    Leave a comment:


  • Sid Belzberg
    replied
    Originally posted by Bob Armstrong View Post
    Appeals are tough..........

    Bob A (Have argued in a number of Appellate Courts & Tribunals)
    True, inch by inch even, legal victories on appeal are happening;

    .
    BOMBSHELL: 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Rules Modied mRNA "Vaccines" Are Slow Kill Bioweapons

    The "vaccine" makers are now stripped of Legal Liability Protection

    The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals did not exactly come to the obvious conclusion that these Modified mRNA “vaccines” are in fact slow kill bioweapons yet, but their monumental ruling that they do not qualify as vaccines proper does mean that at some point in the not so distant future (when the excess deaths and turbo cancers become even worse) they will ultimately rule that these gene altering “therapeutics” are a mass eugenics program.
    The PSYOP-19 DEATHVAX™ never prevented the spread of any “pandemic,” nor did it attenuate symptoms whatsoever; no, the “it would have been so much worse if I didn’t get vaccinated” excuse for those that contracted COVID post their poisonous injections was just more of the same “Trust the Science” reality inversion.

    The Intelligence Industrial Complex along with Fauci’s NIH and NIAID and BigPharma always knew that their DEATHVAX™ would be utterly unsafe and ineffective as per the ferret, mice and rat studies that they themselves funded decades ago — not a single animal fared well in any of the Modified mRNA trails, and this deadly platform could never ever get to human trials, which is precisely why they foisted their scamdemic to push through Emergency Use Authorization (EUA). In reality there was never any emergency; well, actually, the illegitimate and captured governments along with their partners-in-crime are the only true emergency, but we digress.

    Here, however, plaintiffs allege that the vaccine does not effectively prevent spread but only mitigates symptoms for the recipient and therefore is akin to a medical treatment, not a ‘traditional’ vaccine. Taking plaintiffs’ allegations as true at this stage of litigation, plaintiffs plausibly alleged that the COVID-19 vaccine does not effectively ‘prevent the spread’ of COVID-19. Thus, Jacobson does not apply.




    The Jacobson v. Massachusetts ruling that, “mandatory vaccinations were rationally related to “preventing the spread” of smallpox” remains wholly unconstitutional and is an egregious violation of all human rights. Jacobson should never apply in any case, even if there was some kind of legitimate Bubonic Plague 2.0 outbreak, but we digress yet again.

    The 9th Circuit ruled that the DEATHVAX™ cannot be considered a vaccine if the claim is that it does NOT prevent the spread; therefore, all Legal Liability Protections are now stripped, and major lawsuits may commence.

    And on October 22nd, 2014, during the Gain of Function (GoF) moratorium, Fauci authorized Ralph Baric at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill to continue his illegal bioweapon research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology:
    Hence, PSYOP-19 was always a U.S. made bioweapon as funded by the American tax slaves, and these “voluntarily” extorted Americans ended up paying for their very own demise given that the “free” EUA “vaccines” were always the primary payload, not the GoF virus.

    Now that this 9th Circuit ruling is in the books, the legal floodgates have been opened, and plaintiffs must go straight past the BigPharma assets, and directly sue the DEATHVAX™ patent holders in the DoD and Pentagon, as well as the various “nonprofit” coconspirators, and the criminal Federal agencies like the NIAID, NIH, CIA, et al.

    Time is of essence, because the next GoF “pandemic” in PSYOP-DISEASE-X is well underway:
    Yes, the same bioterrorists are at it again, yes bird flu is another GoF bioweapon, yes another deadly Modified mRNA vaccine has already been stockpiled, and yes they are escalating their takedown of the entire global food supply; to wit:

    Arkmedic's blog
    One Flew over the Chickens' Nest
    A private government report obtained this week in response to questions over the decision to kill over 500,000 chickens in Victoria, Australia shows that the people making the decision had no verifiable evidence of a high risk infectious outbreak. The chicken farms that were claimed to be infected were so distant from any possible bird source that it …
    Read more
    6 hours ago · 118 likes · 49 comments · Dr Ah Kahn Syed

    This 9th Circuit ruling represents a major turning point in not just all things scamdemic, but, also, in terms of the United Nations and their eugenics “health” node the World Health Organization attempting to subvert States’ Rights in America with their murderous “pandemic treaty” power grab.

    They want you dead.

    Do NOT comply.
    Last edited by Sid Belzberg; Monday, 10th June, 2024, 08:06 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bob Armstrong
    replied
    Appeals are tough..........

    Bob A (Have argued in a number of Appellate Courts & Tribunals)

    Leave a comment:


  • Sid Belzberg
    replied
    Breaking: Law Professor that Wrote 1989 Biological Weapons and Antiterrorism Act Provides Affidavit that COVID 19 mRNA nanoparticle injections are Biological Weapons and Weapons of Mass Destruction

    By Dr. Joseph Sansome

    Dr. Francis Boyle, the Harvard educated law professor that drafted the 1989 Biological Weapons and Antiterrorism Act, which passed both houses of Congress unanimously, provided an affidavit stating that Covid 19 injections and mRNA nanoparticle injections violate the law he wrote. Dr. Boyle asserted that ‘COVID 19 injections’, ‘COVID 19 nanoparticle injections’, and ‘mRNA nanoparticle injections’ are biological weapons and weapons of mass destruction and violate Biological Weapons 18 USC § 175; Weapons and Firearms § 790.166 Fla. Stat. (2023).

    Dr. Boyle provided this affidavit in a Florida case filed by Dr. Joseph Sansone involving an Emergency Petition for a Writ of Mandamus that seeks to compel Governor DeSantis to prohibit the distribution of ‘COVID 19 injections’, ‘COVID 19 nanoparticle injections’, and ‘mRNA nanoparticle injections’, in the state of Florida. It also seeks to compel Attorney General Ashley Moody to confiscate the vials.

    The original Emergency Petition for a Writ of Mandamus was filed on March 3rd, 2024, in the Florida Supreme Court. It was then transferred to the Circuit Court in Leon County on March 20th, 2024. On April 9th, 2024, the Circuit Court dismissed the case. The case is now in the appellate court. The Appellate Brief was filed on Memorial Day, May 27th, 2024.

    The pleadings assert that the distribution of ‘COVID 19 injections’, ‘COVID 19 nanoparticle injections’, and ‘mRNA nanoparticle injections’, violate - Biological Weapons 18 USC § 175; Weapons and Firearms § 790.166 Fla. Stat. (2023); Federal Crime of Treason 18 USC § 2381; Treason § 876.32 Fla. Stat. (2023); Domestic Terrorism, 18 USC § 2331; Terrorism § 775.30 Fla. Stat. (2023); Murder § 782.04 (1)(a) Fla. Stat. (2023); and Genocide 18 USC §1091; Florida Drugs and Cosmetic Act § 499.005 (2) Fla. Stat. (2023); Fraud § 817.034 Fla Stat. (2023); Accessory After the Fact § 777.03 Fla. Stat. (2023); and Florida Medical Consent Law § 766.103 Fla Stat. (2023).

    Dr. Boyle is considered one of the world’s leading legal experts on biological weapons. Dr. Boyle’s affidavit adds a tremendous amount of credibility to the case, which already has a tremendous body of evidence provided in the writ of mandamus. Affidavits stating that the injections are biological and technological weapons, were also provided by med legal advisor and biotech analyst Karen Kingston, who researched the evidence that makes of the Facts of the Case section of the Mandamus, and from Ana Mihalcea, M.D., PhD. Dr. Mihalcea’s research is included in the Mandamus. Dr. Mihalcea is one of the world’s leading researchers into the effects of self replicating nanotechnology in the blood of injected as well as the effects in the blood of the uninjected as a result of shedding.

    Dr. Boyle’s affidavit is below:

    Leave a comment:


  • Neil Frarey
    replied
    Yup, just getting started ... sigh.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sid Belzberg
    replied
    The Notice of Liability delivered to individuals at the W.H.O. this week

    Addressing both corporate and personal liability in wrongdoing


    DR TESS LAWRIE, MBBCH, PHD​
    MAY 07, 2024

    214

    55

    39
    Share

    Below you will find the text of the Notice of Liability delivered to Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Dr Maria van Kerkhove, Dr Janet Diaz and Jeremy Farrar this week. It was drafted with the help of specialist international lawyers and health scientists. Feel free to copy, paste and adapt for the purpose of notifying others of their liability in relation to the Covid-19 fraud.


    Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus: a man

    dba: Director General World Health Organisation (WHO)

    Office of the Director General

    Avenue Appia 20

    1202 Geneva - Switzerland       

    6th day in the month of May in the year 2024

    Dear Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus (hereafter ‘you’),
    Re: Notice upon Harm and to Cease and Desist


    On behalf of living men, women and all their sons and daughters living right now and those yet to be born on Earth, we hereby place you: a man: Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, doing business as the Director General of the World Health Organisation (hereafter W.H.O), on notice that:
    1. Your actions carried out in the capacity of Director General of the W.H.O during the Covid-19 chapter, principally consisting of falsely informing world governments of a so-called pandemic, thereby causing governments to declare non-existent medical emergencies, have been and are still an integral part of a chain of events that is resulting in mass loss of life, immense physical harm and untold psychological distress and trauma to the people on this planet;
    2. Said actions appear to have led to Governments deploying insufficiently tested SARS-CoV-2 genetically modified organisms (GMOs) falsely termed ‘vaccines’ being also gene therapies, mandating unscientific masking protocols, implementing inhumane and anti-scientific ‘social distancing’ measures, purchasing and deploying ineffective and fraudulent PCR tests subsequently used to create false ‘casedemics’ in order to justify unlawful ‘lockdowns’, business closures and house arrest;
    3. We demand that, with immediate effect, you cease and desist from taking further actions that would involve false and fraudulent communication to governments thereby causing or resulting in further instances of the kind of catastrophic outcomes outlined above.
    Notice upon Personal Liability

    We also put you on notice that failure to cease or desist from continued or repeated involvement or implication in the above harms shall render you liable both in your personal and corporate capacity. As a man, you shall be investigated for criminal conspiracy. As a corporate officer, you shall be investigated for gross negligence, serious misconduct in public office, corporate fraud and potentially even aiding and abetting corporate manslaughter.

    Further to the above Notices, and in order to clarify our position, may we take this opportunity respectfully to remind you of your own position and legal responsibilities.
    WHO Constitutional Obligation


    As early as 2021, international experts were cautioning against the novel Covid strategies recommended by the WHO Covid team, especially but not limited to the experimental modRNA medical technologies developed at ‘warp speed’ to function purportedly as vaccines.

    The WHO Constitution states in Article 67 that members of the WHO may enjoy ‘such privileges and immunities as may be necessary for the fulfilment of its objective and for the exercise of its functions.” Such privileges and immunity, whilst patently unfair, inequitable and dangerous, only apply when fulfilling the Article 1 objective.

    By your unilateral recommendation of harmful Covid strategies, The People, represented by the World Council for Health, do not believe that you acted in accordance with your constitutional obligations in Article 1. If your actions are found to be in contravention of Article 1, you will not be covered by Article 67 of the WHO Constitution that provides for the stated protection and immunity. In other words, you may be personally liable for the millions of deaths and immense suffering caused on account of your role in the unlawful authorisation of these harmful recommendations. Moreover, given the blatant conflicts of interest evident in the WHO’s activities, closely connected to commercial interests, immunity is not guaranteed when acting at the behest of those interests.
    Consequences of your WHO Covid Policies, Recommendations, Advice and Omissions

    1. Immeasurable suffering and death


    In the past four years, billions of people who trusted and complied with WHO-based country government advice have experienced ongoing physical and mental suffering, illness, disability, loss of income, poverty, child abuse, other violence, and even death as a result.
    2. Human rights violations


    Country governments worldwide implemented severe emergency measures directly based on WHO recommendations that consequently resulted in widespread violations of fundamental human rights. Boys, girls and babies were masked and injected. Living men and women expressing, or wishing to express their right to free speech, travel, bodily autonomy, and to choose, were threatened, intimidated, coerced, neglected, abused and in some cases assaulted, imprisoned or killed. The WHO did nothing to address the harm it caused.
    3. Failure to recommend inexpensive, safe and effective treatments and remedies for Covid-19

    Covid-19 can be effectively treated with safe and established multi-purpose generic medicines, including ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, in combination with zinc, vitamin D, vitamin C, and other immune-boosting, health-promoting and anti-coagulant treatments. Failure to disclose and raise awareness of these, and failure to recommend ivermectin widely in combination with zinc for early use, meant that millions of people suffered and many died as a result of not being offered effective early and late treatments.

    By recommending ivermectin only in the context of clinical trials and omitting sound and practical advice on how to attain the highest level of health during the Covid-19 scare, ivermectin and other effective treatments were withheld in many countries in favour of expensive GMO drugs, emergency-authorized patented pharmaceutical drugs without safety records. Thus, in your personal capacity, the world’s people may hold you responsible for the consequences of serious omissions related to safe, effective treatments for Covid-19, in preference for undisclosed .



    Leave a comment:


  • Neil Frarey
    replied
    CDC redacts every single word of 148 page study on Myocarditis after Covid Vaccination ...

    https://twitter.com/RobertKennedyJr/...76567678017604

    ... who ordered the destruction of this myocarditis data.

    ...

    So how many Covid19 booster shots have been injected into you all by now?

    5? 6? ... 9?

    I seriously don't know.
    Thankfully, I still don't have this experimental mRNA technology injected into my body.


    .

    Leave a comment:


  • Neil Frarey
    replied
    To maim and kill people ... deliberately.
    https://twitter.com/i/status/1757008739733770419

    Former VP of Pfizer.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X