COVID-19 ... how we cope :)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Neil Frarey
    replied
    As someone who is STILL unvaccinated ... and has the independent strength not to trust your modRNA ... your tech mRNA invention / manipulations ... I am so very concerned for ALL your long term health.

    Hope those those myocarditis numbers stop increasing. Hope the cancer numbers begin to level off.

    Accountability is coming.

    Albeit, incredibly slowly.
    Last edited by Neil Frarey; Thursday, 10th August, 2023, 03:13 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sid Belzberg
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • Sid Belzberg
    replied
    Here is an excellent article for the layperson to understand how the experimental genetic injections AKA "vaccines," work.

    Health Viewpoints

    For the first time in human history, the gene regulatory program of healthy people has been manipulated on a massive scale.

    Despite everything we’ve been told, RNA-based COVID-19 injections were manufactured with modified RNA—not messenger RNA (mRNA).

    Modified RNA (modRNA) poses substantial risks to our health.

    These risks come not only from COVID-19 injections and boosters but—unless we speak up now—also from all future RNA-based vaccines.
    mRNA and modRNA Are Not the Same


    The two—mRNA and modRNA—are completely different.

    mRNA occurs naturally, lives in our cells for only a short time, and is relatively fragile. It is a specific type of RNA that carries instructions or “messages” from our genes to help make proteins, the building blocks of our cells. It is constantly produced as part of normal cellular processes. Once mRNA delivers the messages, its work is done, and it is broken down in the body.

    When RNA from another source enters our cells—virus RNA, for example—these cells can generate virus proteins.

    We have been told that COVID-19 injections are made with mRNA. However, a vaccine using “natural” mRNA would not last long enough to initiate an immune response before being destroyed by our immune system.

    To make mRNA useful for routine medicine, scientists had to artificially modify mRNA to increase both its efficiency and lifetime. The result: modRNA.



    modRNA is created in a laboratory.

    The therapeutic application of modRNA in humans presents challenges and dangers.

    Alarmingly, modRNA contains a viral gene sequence. Upon entering a cell, modRNA takes control of the cell machinery and reprograms it to produce a viral protein—for example, spike protein.

    Perhaps most astonishing is that, when creating the COVID-19 vaccines and boosters, scientists already knew that targeted delivery of modRNA was impossible. modRNA cannot be targeted to specific cells. As such, it attacks perfectly healthy cells—even beyond natural barriers like the blood-brain barrier.

    The continuous production of an artificial viral protein robs the cell of energy, disrupts its metabolism, and leads to the cell no longer being able to perform its vital task for the organism as a whole.

    What’s worse, with virus proteins generated in them, those cells are subsequently destroyed by our immune system.

    Despite these dire shortcomings, Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna launched a large-scale production of COVID-19 “vaccines” using modRNA.
    The Body Responds Differently to Natural Infection Versus modRNA Injection


    Spike protein is well known to represent a poison for our body.

    In the case of natural infection, our immune system will prevent the virus from infecting our body cells by neutralizing it via specific antibodies, with the possibility of cross-immunity being effective also against virus variants.

    With the modRNA injection, our immune system does not have a chance to prevent the lipid nanoparticles from transferring modRNA into our cells—all cells, not just some cells with the appropriate receptor for binding of the virus (as would be the case in natural infection).
    The Virus and the Vaccine Are Not the Same


    Though some have argued that the body’s response to the modRNA vaccine is similar to a response to the actual virus, this is not true.

    First, let us look at the natural virus and our body’s response to it:
    • The virus RNA is like a blueprint. It contains instructions for all the parts needed (not just for spike protein) to make a new virus.
    • The virus RNA exists within a protein envelope. Our immune system would build various antibodies (not just against spike protein), thus building some degree of cross-immunity to deal with virus variants.
    • The majority of respiratory viruses are prevented from entering our body by the immune system located in the oral and nasal mucosa. The virus does not inject its RNA into blood vessels but binds to a specific receptor on the cell surface and then directly injects RNA into the cell.

    It must be emphasized that only specific cells (namely those carrying the appropriate receptor on the cell surface) can be infected.

    Our immune system’s job is to destroy a cell that has been infected with a virus to prevent replication of the virus and subsequent infection of new cells. Notably, our immune system will stop the process once that battle is won (typically, within a few days).

    Next, let us examine the body’s response to the modRNA injection (“the vaccine”):
    • The vaccine contains modRNA for only the spike protein; therefore, vaccination provides no cross-immunity.
    • The vaccine-modRNA has no protein envelope but is instead wrapped by a lipid nanoparticle.
    • Lipid nanoparticles will not need receptors to enter a cell. Lipid nanoparticles are built of lipids, as is the cell membrane; therefore, both lipid membranes will simply merge.
    • The immune system generates antibodies to combat antigens, which could include pathogens (viruses, bacteria), foreign particles (fungal spores, allergens), or any substances that provoke a specific immune response. However, the lipid nanoparticles that transport modRNA are devoid of these antigens, enabling them to bypass the specific immune system unnoticed and induce nonspecific inflammation. This dynamic triggers an escalation in the immune system’s activity, leading to the production of an increasing quantity of antibodies against the spike protein. Each subsequent booster dose of lipid nanoparticles delivers an escalating quantity of modRNA. This, in turn, prompts an uninterrupted production of new spike proteins.
    • Vaccines are injected into muscle. However, it is nearly impossible to inject directly into a muscle cell (large syringe versus small cell). As muscles are strongly supplied with blood, very often, syringes will violate blood vessels. The normal situation will be that the vaccine will be placed between the muscle cells, the so-called intercellular space. Fluid in the intercellular space will be collected as lymph fluid, finally merging with the blood.
    • The vaccine and booster modRNA will continue to produce spike protein (for weeks or even months, which is entirely different from a natural infection), as our cell machinery (e.g., the enzyme RNase) cannot destroy the artificial modRNA. Researchers have found that some severe cases of COVID-19 were not due to the presence of the virus but to a dysregulation of the immune system (called a “cytokine storm”).
    Research Reveals modRNA’s Poor Safety Profile

    The focus shifted to modRNA.

    Injected modRNA can result in thrombosis followed by stroke, myocardial infarction, or pulmonary embolism and can promote the formation of blood clots inside blood vessels.

    Studying the open-access databases—including those in the United States, Europe, and the UK—on COVID-19 vaccine adverse effects, one can see that these risks have become real-life side effects for people who received the COVID-19 injections.
    Just Released: Previously Confidential Report on COVID-19-Related Fatalities


    In June 2023, in response to a Freedom of Information Act request, some of these adverse effects were made public when previously confidential reports by BioNTech to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) were released. The reports included data collected during a six-month period from December 2021 to June 2022 and cumulative data beginning December 2020 (pdf).

    The data revealed 3,280 fatalities among a group of 508,351 individuals receiving the vaccine during a combined period that included clinical trials and postmarketing. These deaths, and tens of thousands of serious adverse events, happened during a period when the vaccine makers insisted the modRNA-based injections were safe.
    Natural mRNA and synthetic modRNA are not the same. (The Epoch Times)

    It is nonsensical that any cell in our body would be programmed to produce as much of a viral protein as possible for as long as possible. This is highly contrary to natural viral infection and will result in hyperactivation of the immune system.

    Forcing perfectly healthy people to take a gene-based modRNA injection—sold as a vaccine—is both unethical and dangerous.


    Leave a comment:


  • Bob Armstrong
    replied
    COVID-19 & Vaccination

    "One-in-Five Canadians Hesitant to Receive Further COVID-19 Boosters: Survey"

    https://www.theepochtimes.com/one-in...&utm_content=3

    Bob A (Vaccination Supporter)

    Leave a comment:


  • Bob Armstrong
    replied
    COVID-19 & Vaccines

    "The official who had final authority to approve new vaccines in Canada says at no time was she pressured to authorize the COVID-19 shots, even though the prime minister had said vaccination was the only way to get back to normal.

    “No one ever told me that the prime minister wants this to be done,” said Dr. Celia Lourenco, now acting associate assistant deputy minister with Health Canada and previously director general of the Biologic and Radiopharmaceutical Drugs Directorate in the department.

    Dr. Lourenco was being cross-examined on July 13 as part of the first grievance against the federal vaccine mandate being adjudicated by the Federal Public Sector Labour Relations and Employment Board."

    https://www.theepochtimes.com/canada...&utm_content=1

    Bob A (Vaccine Supporter)

    Leave a comment:


  • Sid Belzberg
    replied
    Originally posted by Peter McKillop View Post

    Based on that info, the adverse event rate looks to be about 1/50th of 1%. How does that compare to other vaccines?
    Serious side effects in traditional vaccines are very rare, typically less than one in a million. So, for example, in the United States, in any given year, one would expect 350 such cases. For all traditional vaccines! In Canada, we expect less than 35 serious adverse events from traditional vaccines annually. 20418 serious adverse events with life-threatening or changing injuries are unheard of. 2,000,000 people are injured and maimed for life if this is extrapolated World Wide.
    Peer-reviewed papers show that less than 1 percent of these injuries are reported to the US VAERS system or Public Health Canada.
    This does not even consider slow kill effects induced by those injections, including myocarditis, turbo cancers, prion-based diseases ALS, Alzheimer's, etc.

    When 20417 events are reported in a single year, a major crime has been committed, while normally, 35 such reports come in a year.

    https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot 2023-07-10 at 12.56.43 PM.png
Views:	37
Size:	73.1 KB
ID:	227673


    .
    Last edited by Sid Belzberg; Monday, 10th July, 2023, 01:17 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Peter McKillop
    replied
    Originally posted by Sid Belzberg View Post
    ......
    " ...... The Public Health Agency said of the 97.6 million vaccine doses administered at the time of the report, and there were 20,428 “serious adverse event reports."
    .......
    Based on that info, the adverse event rate looks to be about 1/50th of 1%. How does that compare to other vaccines?

    Leave a comment:


  • Sid Belzberg
    replied

    Privy Council advocated downplaying COVID vaccine injuries or deaths

    "
    The Privy Council memo was obtained under Access to Information Act.
    “News reports of adverse events following immunization and the government’s response to them have strong potential to influence public confidence in vaccines and their safety.”

    The memo also suggested skewing stats to minimize the impact of vaccine-related deaths or injuries, such as stating the “chance of it happening to me is one in a million” rather than “it has happened five times.”

    The Public Health Agency said of the 97.6 million vaccine doses administered at the time of the report, and there were 20,428 “serious adverse event reports.”



    https://torontosun.com/news/national...ries-or-deaths



    Additional facts underline the long-term damage caused by these shots, including radically shortened lifespan, cognitive (intellectual) disability, spontaneous abortion, male and female infertility, turbo cancers, and other serious illnesses, including Myocarditis (heart damage) strokes, etc. The CPSO prohibits Dr's from diagnosing vaccine injuries or prescribing medications such as Ivermectin that can help treat these injuries.



    THIS IS CRIMINAL ASSAULT AND MASS MURDER by the TRUDEAU CABINET AND THE PRIVY COUNCIL.

    They must ALL be charged accordingly. They are NOT above the LAW.

    See more here thereisnopandemic.net

    Last edited by Sid Belzberg; Monday, 10th July, 2023, 09:04 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sid Belzberg
    replied
    Originally posted by Patrick Gougeon View Post
    There is no scientific proof Vitamin D has a beneficial impact on Covid 19 positive patients:

    Vitamin D, now conclusive that Dr John Campbell can’t critically assess a study - YouTube
    https://c19early.org/dmeta.html

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot 2023-07-07 at 9.45.30 PM.png
Views:	47
Size:	564.3 KB
ID:	227639
    Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot 2023-07-07 at 9.45.54 PM.png
Views:	45
Size:	309.3 KB
ID:	227640
    Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot 2023-07-07 at 9.46.05 PM.png
Views:	43
Size:	114.0 KB
ID:	227641
    Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot 2023-07-07 at 9.46.20 PM.png
Views:	45
Size:	234.3 KB
ID:	227642​​​​​​​

    Leave a comment:


  • Patrick Gougeon
    replied
    There is no scientific proof Vitamin D has a beneficial impact on Covid 19 positive patients:

    Vitamin D, now conclusive that Dr John Campbell can’t critically assess a study - YouTube

    Leave a comment:


  • Dilip Panjwani
    replied
    Originally posted by Sid Belzberg View Post
    AARON SIRI GIVES TESTIMONY TO THE ARIZONA STATE SENATE

    Last week, Aaron Siri, the lead counsel for ICAN, delivered compelling testimony at the Arizona Novel COVID South Western Intergovernmental Committee (NCSWIC), an important platform dedicated to addressing the challenges and lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic, and charting a path forward.

    https://thehighwire.com/ark-videos/aaron-siri-gives-testimony-on-the-floor-of-arizona-state-senate/

    Click image for larger version Name:	Screenshot 2023-07-03 at 6.48.06 AM.png Views:	0 Size:	1.42 MB ID:	227570
    Thanks, Sid. The CNN-believers and the 'pharma-controlled opinion-leader hype' worshippers should find this eye-opening.

    And here is an example of how harmful (to patients and taxpayers) 'pharma-allied oncology opinion-leaders' can be: https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle...&impID=5587167
    (One may need some familiarity with medical terminology and ability to read between the lines to grasp the very serious accusations the writer of this article is making)

    Leave a comment:


  • Sid Belzberg
    replied
    AARON SIRI GIVES TESTIMONY TO THE ARIZONA STATE SENATE

    Last week, Aaron Siri, the lead counsel for ICAN, delivered compelling testimony at the Arizona Novel COVID South Western Intergovernmental Committee (NCSWIC), an important platform dedicated to addressing the challenges and lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic, and charting a path forward.

    https://thehighwire.com/ark-videos/aaron-siri-gives-testimony-on-the-floor-of-arizona-state-senate/

    Click image for larger version  Name:	Screenshot 2023-07-03 at 6.48.06 AM.png Views:	0 Size:	1.42 MB ID:	227570

    Leave a comment:


  • Sid Belzberg
    replied

    Landmark Legislation Safeguarding the Use of Off-Label Drugs Passes the Ohio State House With Bipartisan Support

    June 24, 2023 • by Thomas Renz

    Originally Published on Tom Renz’s Newsletter



    Does anyone have the current weather in hell? I’m thinking it may have finally frozen over and am happy to report that the Ohio House of Representatives has passed HB73 on a BIPARTISAN basis!!! This bill passed by a huge margin even seeing some democrats support it. Could it be that we have finally found something that is so based on common sense that even Governor DeWine and I could find common ground? I guess we will see but let’s talk about HB73.

    Throughout the COVID nightmare, patients were denied access to treatments that their doctors wanted for them by bureaucrats at hospital that were focused on the bottom line rather than the interests of the patients. Doctors would prescribe Ivermectin or HCQ but the hospital would not allow the patient to have it. While this may well have constituted a tort in many states, that was not something a sick person being denied proper treatment had time to litigate. The result was the denial of effective treatment for COVID and the needless death of many thousands of people.

    I have been working with OAMF and Rep. Jennifer Gross on the language of this bill and believe it is good. The bill is 8 pages long you can see it here) and is an easy read. OAMF has provided these bullet points which do a good job summarizing. This legislation:
    • Protects against licensing boards and Ohio state and local health departments pursuing a disciplinary action against a prescriber, hospital or skilled nursing facility, for prescribing an off-label drug, or a pharmacist who dispenses it, unless there is gross negligence.
    • Says patients are not required to be tested or screened for or exposed to a particular disease, illness, or infection in order to get the off-label prescription from their prescriber filled for home or prophylactic use.
    • Requires a pharmacist, hospital, or inpatient facility to dispense the prescribed off-label drug, unless there is a religious/ethical objection or a life-threatening contraindication.
    • This legislation does NOT in any way prevent conversations regarding drug concerns between pharmacists and prescribers
      • In cases where a pharmacist, hospital, or inpatient facility has to fill a prescription that they are not religiously opposed to, and there is no life-threatening reason not to give it, but they have a good faith scientific objection to filling the drug prescribed by the doctor…. then the pharmacist, hospital or inpatient facility is immune from any harm that may come from the use of the drug, so long as the objection is documented in the patient’s record and also submitted by the pharmacist to the Board of Pharmacy or by the hospital or inpatient facility to the Ohio Department of Health. This provides documentation for lawyers to reference to see if immunity is in place for a particular off label drug when a patient or entity is considering a suit.
      • In cases where the hospital or inpatient facility doesn’t have the drug in stock, they have to attempt to locate it and offer to let the patient pay for it up front, out of pocket. If the hospital or facility cannot get the prescription, and the patient either has an outpatient pharmacy where they can get it, or they have it at home, then the hospital or inpatient facility must allow them t
    • https://dailyclout.io/landmark-legis...tisan-support/

    Leave a comment:


  • Bob Armstrong
    replied
    The Handling of COVID-19

    Americas - USA

    "...the United States did not have to collapse into Covid partisanship, with citizen turning against citizen and each party vilifying the other as the source of ...national misery......


    This is one of the revelations of “Lessons From the Covid War, an Investigative Report,” by 34 experts, published in April by PublicAffairs."

    https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/28/o...d396a4debfd6ce

    Bob A (TS/P)

    Leave a comment:


  • Neil Frarey
    replied
    Bobby Kennedy Jr is winning ...

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1672014260480901120

    https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/st...n%7Ctwcon%5Es1

    Tucker Carlson @TuckerCarlson

    https://tuckercarlson.com/

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X