If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Policy / Politique
The fee for tournament organizers advertising on ChessTalk is $20/event or $100/yearly unlimited for the year.
Les frais d'inscription des organisateurs de tournoi sur ChessTalk sont de 20 $/événement ou de 100 $/année illimitée.
You can etransfer to Henry Lam at chesstalkforum at gmail dot com
Transfér à Henry Lam à chesstalkforum@gmail.com
Dark Knight / Le Chevalier Noir
General Guidelines
---- Nous avons besoin d'un traduction français!
Some Basics
1. Under Board "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQs) there are 3 sections dealing with General Forum Usage, User Profile Features, and Reading and Posting Messages. These deal with everything from Avatars to Your Notifications. Most general technical questions are covered there. Here is a link to the FAQs. https://forum.chesstalk.com/help
2. Consider using the SEARCH button if you are looking for information. You may find your question has already been answered in a previous thread.
3. If you've looked for an answer to a question, and not found one, then you should consider asking your question in a new thread. For example, there have already been questions and discussion regarding: how to do chess diagrams (FENs); crosstables that line up properly; and the numerous little “glitches” that every new site will have.
4. Read pinned or sticky threads, like this one, if they look important. This applies especially to newcomers.
5. Read the thread you're posting in before you post. There are a variety of ways to look at a thread. These are covered under “Display Modes”.
6. Thread titles: please provide some details in your thread title. This is useful for a number of reasons. It helps ChessTalk members to quickly skim the threads. It prevents duplication of threads. And so on.
7. Unnecessary thread proliferation (e.g., deliberately creating a new thread that duplicates existing discussion) is discouraged. Look to see if a thread on your topic may have already been started and, if so, consider adding your contribution to the pre-existing thread. However, starting new threads to explore side-issues that are not relevant to the original subject is strongly encouraged. A single thread on the Canadian Open, with hundreds of posts on multiple sub-topics, is no better than a dozen threads on the Open covering only a few topics. Use your good judgment when starting a new thread.
8. If and/or when sub-forums are created, please make sure to create threads in the proper place.
Debate
9. Give an opinion and back it up with a reason. Throwaway comments such as "Game X pwnz because my friend and I think so!" could be considered pointless at best, and inflammatory at worst.
10. Try to give your own opinions, not simply those copied and pasted from reviews or opinions of your friends.
Unacceptable behavior and warnings
11. In registering here at ChessTalk please note that the same or similar rules apply here as applied at the previous Boardhost message board. In particular, the following content is not permitted to appear in any messages:
* Racism
* Hatred
* Harassment
* Adult content
* Obscene material
* Nudity or pornography
* Material that infringes intellectual property or other proprietary rights of any party
* Material the posting of which is tortious or violates a contractual or fiduciary obligation you or we owe to another party
* Piracy, hacking, viruses, worms, or warez
* Spam
* Any illegal content
* unapproved Commercial banner advertisements or revenue-generating links
* Any link to or any images from a site containing any material outlined in these restrictions
* Any material deemed offensive or inappropriate by the Board staff
12. Users are welcome to challenge other points of view and opinions, but should do so respectfully. Personal attacks on others will not be tolerated. Posts and threads with unacceptable content can be closed or deleted altogether. Furthermore, a range of sanctions are possible - from a simple warning to a temporary or even a permanent banning from ChessTalk.
Helping to Moderate
13. 'Report' links (an exclamation mark inside a triangle) can be found in many places throughout the board. These links allow users to alert the board staff to anything which is offensive, objectionable or illegal. Please consider using this feature if the need arises.
Advice for free
14. You should exercise the same caution with Private Messages as you would with any public posting.
Honestly, this group of candidates isn't very impressive. CFC Governors are in general apathetic in nature and haven't said much of anything about the candidates, preferring it seems to expect ordinary CFC members ( and ex-members ) to voice an opinion. This is backwards the Governors are supposed to represent and be proactive, not the members they represent.
I am a somewhat reluctant governor in that no one else wanted the job of masters' representative at the Canadian Closed players meeting and I volunteered, (perhaps foolishly) thinking that I might be able to do something to slowly change the system from within.
Here is this governor's take on the election:
Both Serge and Pierre have responded to debate questions posted by Bob Armstrong and Fred McKim. Both have seemed reasonable and articulate in their responses. Both seem to be proposing status quo preserving platforms. Based only on that series of exchanges, either one or the other presents themselves as capable of serving as CFC president and not making a bigger mess of things.
However there are dark rumblings about both these candidates stemming from their times at the CFC (Serge as ED, and Pierre as treasurer). They will have to answer how things will be different now before I can in good conscience vote for either of them. Given that most of our recent presidents have been fairly good and promising (Hal Bond, David Lavin, Bob Gillanders) they have some big shoes to fill.
Pierre seems somewhat unclear in his thinking and even posted something about 49% of Quebec still wanting to seperate from Canada which I don't believe is all that up-to-date.
My impression is that he was talking about Quebec chessplayers and not Quebecers in general. I have met a number of Quebec chess players but haven't really discussed politics with any of them since about 1978 when the topic seemed more relevant. Clearly if he was talking about Quebecers in general the recent election results seem to contradict him.
He reminds me of Eric Van Dusen, probably a decent man but not the best leader. Serge, quite honestly, I don't buy his new "image". He's a lot more "old school" CFC then new. I could go further but basically, let's just say a lack of empathy for others might be a problem.
Eric Van Dusen for whatever reasons was not particularly effective. I think he underestimated the demands that would be placed upon him. I never communicated with him directly but when the google blacklist and website being hacked issues cropped up and his public statements painted him and the CFC as completely clueless (to put it charitably), I offered advice through my local governor and was rebuffed rudely. My impression was of someone who was haughty and arrogant and wasn't even smart enough to grab onto the life preserver that someone was trying to throw him as he was drowning.
As Springsteen wrote we are all "waiting for a savior to rise from these streets." Maybe he came and decided the CFC wasn't worth saving.
Maybe I should run on an anti-AGW platform and thus sucker Paul Beckwith into opposing me though if he won he might draft a motion to eject me from the CFC as a heretic for refusing to bow down to the new official CFC AGW religion. Hmmm.... both Pierre and Serge are looking better.
I see some decent chess projects in Canada, but its very unclear what role the CFC has in any of it anymore. There remains somewhat of an undercurrent in our area to avoid the CFC. Seems to be occurring in BC as well.
The CFC doesn't have to be involved in every chess project. Lets not choke the good seeds before they have a chance to grow.
It looks like Ottawa's Neil James Frarey is getting ready to officially jump into the presidential race. He has re-appeared, on the revived Ottawa Chess Club message board:
I would be more interested in this Kevin, if all of the cheers for him weren't coming from a mainly anoymous bulletin board. Does anybody even know who he is, outside of Ottawa ?
I would like to think that any potential candidate would be willing to show their "face" on either this bulletin board or the CFC Forum at least a few days before the election.
I think that one of the positives this year was the amount of time both Bob G and I were willing to spend on the boards answering questions, informing, taking flak, etc.
A lot of people here at CT seem to think that the CFC never changes, but I like to think we've taken some positive steps in communication this year. Also to be thanked is Bob A who has become the first ever PR Officer for the CFC.
I hear rumors that Atlantic Canada might produce a candidate as well.
Any truth to the rumours that Ben Daswani, Peter Stockhausen, and Barry Thorvardson are running as well ? Jon Stewart would love this election.
I've learned to expect the unexpected at the CFC. I remember when young Ben was up to no good ( as I experienced first hand, carelessly getting caught up in a web of lies ), the CFC soon after made him a CFC Governor. Serge Archambault also became a CFC Governor, even though he had been fired as ED. At that point, I realized the CFC was a political circus and anything was possible. Later on, I noted that Peter Stockhausen was a CFC Governor even though he was officially a missing man.
So it should come as no surprise given the past quality control on CFC Governors, that basically anything can happen when it is CFC Governors voting. I guess the best way to handle it is simply be entertained by the action, and not take it too seriously. For example, Van Dusen was certainly one of the funniest CFC Presidents ever. He ran on a platform emphasizing open communications, yet ended up being one of the most secretive CFC Presidents in recent memory. And he was great with a shredder to boot. Now that's funny !!!
So on that note, as much as I dislike Serge Archambault as a person, I think for entertainment value, he should be elected. Pierre seems dreadfully boring, and probably won't get much done at all. Serge will get some stuff done, and it may be entertaining seeing it all unfold. I can see Serge enrolling Kevin S. and Jean H. to help out, and while I have no idea how effective they will be, it sure as hell will be entertaining.
Maintaining a sense of humour about the CFC might be something I needed to discover ten years ago, but its pretty clear now.
The system of elections as it currently exists militates againts early declartaion. The whole election system needs to be over-hauled. It is a relic of a day and age of slow communication where meeting together once a year at a general meeting was important.
You and Bob G. made yourself available online, Fred.
Remind me how many members there are only the Board, Fred? Only 2?
The system of elections as it currently exists militates againts early declartaion. The whole election system needs to be over-hauled. It is a relic of a day and age of slow communication where meeting together once a year at a general meeting was important.
You and Bob G. made yourself available online, Fred.
Remind me how many members there are only the Board, Fred? Only 2?
In all seriousness, the benefits that Bob Gillanders seemed to be working towards as President seem incomplete. I'm not sure what the mandate of the CFC is, what it is trying to do. I can't see one year terms getting the job done on a position being filled by a volunteer.
It could be that no one wants to do this longer then a year. If so, the role has to be changed to be more effective. That way the President actually is there to improve chess and fulfill their stated mandate, not just hold a decorative title that looks good on their portfolio.
Last edited by Duncan Smith; Monday, 27th June, 2011, 01:57 PM.
I'm not sure what the mandate of the CFC is, what it is trying to do.
At the CFC site see the "About Us" section.
Also, see under Products and Services, the CFC Handbook. Then click on Section 2. The part which might help is III, which is, the Objects of the Corporation are:.
Hope this helps, or maybe someone else has a better reply.
The system of elections as it currently exists militates againts early declartaion. The whole election system needs to be over-hauled. It is a relic of a day and age of slow communication where meeting together once a year at a general meeting was important.
You and Bob G. made yourself available online, Fred.
Remind me how many members there are only the Board, Fred? Only 2?
Well, the proxy forms are being sent out very soon, so if someone wants to actually win rather than just run, they need to at least start privately talking to Governors if not publicly announce things.
I think that one of the positives this year was the amount of time both Bob G and I were willing to spend on the boards answering questions, informing, taking flak, etc.
Comment