If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Policy / Politique
The fee for tournament organizers advertising on ChessTalk is $20/event or $100/yearly unlimited for the year.
Les frais d'inscription des organisateurs de tournoi sur ChessTalk sont de 20 $/événement ou de 100 $/année illimitée.
You can etransfer to Henry Lam at chesstalkforum at gmail dot com
Transfér à Henry Lam à chesstalkforum@gmail.com
Dark Knight / Le Chevalier Noir
General Guidelines
---- Nous avons besoin d'un traduction français!
Some Basics
1. Under Board "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQs) there are 3 sections dealing with General Forum Usage, User Profile Features, and Reading and Posting Messages. These deal with everything from Avatars to Your Notifications. Most general technical questions are covered there. Here is a link to the FAQs. https://forum.chesstalk.com/help
2. Consider using the SEARCH button if you are looking for information. You may find your question has already been answered in a previous thread.
3. If you've looked for an answer to a question, and not found one, then you should consider asking your question in a new thread. For example, there have already been questions and discussion regarding: how to do chess diagrams (FENs); crosstables that line up properly; and the numerous little “glitches” that every new site will have.
4. Read pinned or sticky threads, like this one, if they look important. This applies especially to newcomers.
5. Read the thread you're posting in before you post. There are a variety of ways to look at a thread. These are covered under “Display Modes”.
6. Thread titles: please provide some details in your thread title. This is useful for a number of reasons. It helps ChessTalk members to quickly skim the threads. It prevents duplication of threads. And so on.
7. Unnecessary thread proliferation (e.g., deliberately creating a new thread that duplicates existing discussion) is discouraged. Look to see if a thread on your topic may have already been started and, if so, consider adding your contribution to the pre-existing thread. However, starting new threads to explore side-issues that are not relevant to the original subject is strongly encouraged. A single thread on the Canadian Open, with hundreds of posts on multiple sub-topics, is no better than a dozen threads on the Open covering only a few topics. Use your good judgment when starting a new thread.
8. If and/or when sub-forums are created, please make sure to create threads in the proper place.
Debate
9. Give an opinion and back it up with a reason. Throwaway comments such as "Game X pwnz because my friend and I think so!" could be considered pointless at best, and inflammatory at worst.
10. Try to give your own opinions, not simply those copied and pasted from reviews or opinions of your friends.
Unacceptable behavior and warnings
11. In registering here at ChessTalk please note that the same or similar rules apply here as applied at the previous Boardhost message board. In particular, the following content is not permitted to appear in any messages:
* Racism
* Hatred
* Harassment
* Adult content
* Obscene material
* Nudity or pornography
* Material that infringes intellectual property or other proprietary rights of any party
* Material the posting of which is tortious or violates a contractual or fiduciary obligation you or we owe to another party
* Piracy, hacking, viruses, worms, or warez
* Spam
* Any illegal content
* unapproved Commercial banner advertisements or revenue-generating links
* Any link to or any images from a site containing any material outlined in these restrictions
* Any material deemed offensive or inappropriate by the Board staff
12. Users are welcome to challenge other points of view and opinions, but should do so respectfully. Personal attacks on others will not be tolerated. Posts and threads with unacceptable content can be closed or deleted altogether. Furthermore, a range of sanctions are possible - from a simple warning to a temporary or even a permanent banning from ChessTalk.
Helping to Moderate
13. 'Report' links (an exclamation mark inside a triangle) can be found in many places throughout the board. These links allow users to alert the board staff to anything which is offensive, objectionable or illegal. Please consider using this feature if the need arises.
Advice for free
14. You should exercise the same caution with Private Messages as you would with any public posting.
Hi Bob
This is the pathogenic cytotoxic spike protein component, It is fused to a regular Coronavirus. it has Modernas patents all over it. It is impossible for this to be a coincidence.
Hamsters had COVID-19 illness (Not sure if this is the technical way to say it; I understand that this sickness is caused by a specific virus).
Are you suggesting that the virus that got the hamsters sick, was not "natural" (Natural would mean that their virus had NO Moderna pathogenic cytotoxic spike protein) ?
If the hamster virus is not natural, are you then saying that the hamsters caught COVID from sick human handlers, who were themselves sick with the Petri Dish variant (Read Moderna & pathogenic cytotoxic spike protein)?
Online gaming describes any computer game that gives on-line interactions with different players. Video games accustomed be classified by {an on-line|a web|an internet} Content PEGI descriptor to indicate whether or not they were online or not. However, as most games currently give on-line interactions this distinction is not any longer used
Hamsters had COVID-19 illness (Not sure if this is the technical way to say it; I understand that this sickness is caused by a specific virus).
Are you suggesting that the virus that got the hamsters sick, was not "natural" (Natural would mean that their virus had NO Moderna pathogenic cytotoxic spike protein) ?
If the hamster virus is not natural, are you then saying that the hamsters caught COVID from sick human handlers, who were themselves sick with the Petri Dish variant (Read Moderna & pathogenic cytotoxic spike protein)?
~ Bob A (T-S/P)
Hi Bob ,
there are thousands of types of viruses that infect animals. There is no animal reservoir of the Sarscov2 virus. The spike protein in the diagram is very specific to the Sarscov2 virus and has never been found in nature and has never been recorded in gene banks as being found in nature.. However, it is definitely known ib the Patent database with the Moderna being the patent owner, and, long before the pandemic of 2020.
This documentary perhaps provides clarity of my view of this entire situation as per your earlier post.
But first - my analysis is maybe somewhat simple re the Hamsters.
The Hamsters had SARS-Cov-2 Virus (The virus alleged to have been hatched in the Petri Dish and not appearing in Nature).
Why do I say this?
The 2 pet store staff got sick with human COVID-19. This was confirmed by normal human testing. So the humans clearly had the SARS-Cov-2 Virus.
The medical establishment suspected it came from the Hamsters (Proximate Origin), rather than from another human.. They checked and the hamsters were all sick with animal COVID.
So the spiked virus WAS in the hamsters! So it is in nature.
Or are you saying that since the pet handlers had the Petri Dish Virus, then it could only have come from the hamsters IF the hamsters got it originally from sick humans?
I would note that my link re the lions/puma the animals got the alleged Petri Dish virus from humans. So it can exist in animals.
~ Bob A (T-S/P)
Last edited by Bob Armstrong; Saturday, 22nd January, 2022, 11:28 AM.
But first - my analysis is maybe somewhat simple re the Hamsters.
The Hamsters had SARS-Cov-2 Virus (The virus alleged to have been hatched in the Petri Dish and not appearing in Nature).
Why do I say this?
The 2 pet store staff got sick with human COVID-19. This was confirmed by normal human testing. So the humans clearly had the SARS-Cov-2 Virus.
The medical establishment suspected it came from the Hamsters (Proximate Origin), rather than from another human.. They checked and the hamsters were all sick with animal COVID.
So the spiked virus WAS in the hamsters! So it is in nature.
Or are you saying that since the pet handlers had the Petri Dish Virus, then it could only have come from the hamsters IF the hamsters got it originally from sick humans?
I would note that my link re the lions/puma the animals got the alleged Petri Dish virus from humans. So it can exist in animals.
~ Bob A (T-S/P)
Bob,
The question is the origin of the virus and more specifically the original Sarscov2 from early 2020. Omicron, for example, is a very different virus than the original Sarscov2.
It seems that the original SARS-Cov-2 virus is considered somewhat unique. It has this pathogenic cytotoxic spike protein. Some theorize that this virus is unique because it is not natural. it is a hybrid of some type developed in a lab. Moderna has been considered as the main target as to doing the experimenting in the Petri Dish.
Has Moderna ever admitted in public that it has carried out such research and that they "own" this particular virus?
I expect not given possible legal liability, but I'll ask anyway since I don't know.
I understand that there are many types of corona virus in nature. But Sid maintains that this particular protein has not been recorded previously as being associated with any of the natural corona viruses studied. But I thought (Not sure) Egis presented some link to a source that claimed that this particularly spiked virus DOES exist naturally.
Has anyone got any citations on this, that counter Sid's opinion that it is NOT found in nature?
It seems that the original SARS-Cov-2 virus is considered somewhat unique. It has this pathogenic cytotoxic spike protein. Some theorize that this virus is unique because it is not natural. it is a hybrid of some type developed in a lab. Moderna has been considered as the main target as to doing the experimenting in the Petri Dish.
Has Moderna ever admitted in public that it has carried out such research and that they "own" this particular virus?
I expect not given possible legal liability, but I'll ask anyway since I don't know.
I understand that there are many types of corona virus in nature. But Sid maintains that this particular protein has not been recorded previously as being associated with any of the natural corona viruses studied. But I thought (Not sure) Egis presented some link to a source that claimed that this particularly spiked virus DOES exist naturally.
Has anyone got any citations on this, that counter Sid's opinion that it is NOT found in nature?
~ Bob A (T-S/P)
Hi Bob,
This article gives a step by step approach that shows you how to use the NIH government gene and protein database https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast...ST_PAGE=blastn to determine if certain genetic sequences or protein sequences have ever been recorded in nature, or have been recorded in published literature (sequenced in a lab) or indeed registered with the patent office. https://archive.is/18Ho4
You can cite whatever you want and indeed Dr. Fauci was caught trying to create pseudoscientific papers about a natural origin to cover up his funding of Gain of function research through the ECO health alliance that subcontracted Wuhan to create this thing. The blunt fact is that data talks and bullshit walks. What you have here is the two links that show you the data and the article that shows you how to use the site to get the data.
Another poster here tried unsuccessfully to refute said article and find a citation that says otherwise.
Last edited by Sid Belzberg; Saturday, 22nd January, 2022, 03:36 PM.
Natural genetic or protein sequences
Man- created (In a lab) genetic or protein sequences (And whether patented or not).
Thanks. I was not aware of this.
So I'll take your word that the SARS-Cov-2 virus' sequences (with the pathogenic cytotoxic spike protein) are not in the "natural" database.
Prior to the appearance of COVIID-19, had this virus ever been put into the lab-created database previously, even before it had caused any human illness, or animal illness?
If yes, who entered it and was any "owner" identified?
Hi Bob,
These three serious criminal complaints filed with the ICC (Internation Criminal Court Hague) (currently under investigation in the UK) and one case recently filed with the State Attorney General Texas outline their case and include the answers to the questions you seek.
Here is additional downloadable information from bioweapons researcher and US biowepan consultant to the Congress Dr. David Martin. that gives you all the details you are requesting
Prior to the appearance of COVIID-19, had this virus ever been put into the lab-created database previously, even before it had caused any human illness, or animal illness?
If yes, who entered it and was any "owner" identified?
To answer your other questions the answer is yes and the name is Ralph Baric, a researcher who works at a level 4 bioweapons lab in Fort Detrick Maryland in conjunction with the University of North Carolina. He is named all over the above documents I cited.
Last edited by Sid Belzberg; Sunday, 23rd January, 2022, 12:27 PM.
I'm still trying to sort this out, to make sure I understand.
1. There are many types of corona viruses in nature. When one species transfers theirs to another animal (Proximate Origin), the recipient gets sick because it has no immunity to this particular coronavirus.
2. The human SARS-Cov-2 virus, which caused humans to get sick in late 2019, apparently in Wuhan China, is unique. It is not found in animals. The uniqueness is that it contains a pathogenic cytotoxic spike protein not found in the natural coronavirus. For this reason, the 'Proximate Origin" theory of man getting COVID-19 from an animal (Pangolins, bats,etc.) MUST be wrong.
3. Humans can transfer their unique corona virus to animals - my lions/pumas (Private zoo in South Africa) example earlier (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...UFBfaNSqk5Gevk). So, besides catching natural corona viruses from other animals, animals can have transferred to them the human COVID-19 virus, and they get sick (No immunity).
4. Humans can get sick from the transfer of corona virus from animals: The hamsters in a Hong Kong pet store, imported from the Netherlands, referred to earlier (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...bloombergdaily). Though it is somewhat ambiguous, the article says that the two staff had COVID-19, it seems the Delta Variant (It implies they had the unique human virus, not one naturally found in animals). They searched for the transmitter of the virus. It seems they could find no human transfer. So they examined the imported hamsters.
5. The hamsters had the Delta Variant of the SARS-Cov-2 virus. The conclusion was that the virus making the staff sick was transferred to them from the hamsters. China closed down all the Hong Kong pet stores selling the Netherlands hamsters.
6. As I understand the Petri Dish argument, the hamsters, likely in Netherlands, could NOT have gotten the Delta variant virus from another animal, because SARS-Cov-2 does NOT exist in nature; it is the unique result of a Petri Dish hybridization of some corona virus. The only conclusion can be that the hamsters got the virus when it was transferred to them by some sick human staff in the Netherlands..
Have I now got right the hamster case explanation, from the Petri Dish argument point of view?
~ Bob A (T-S/P)
Last edited by Bob Armstrong; Sunday, 23rd January, 2022, 01:13 PM.
I'm still trying to sort this out, to make sure I understand.
1. There are many types of corona viruses in nature. When one species transfers theirs to another animal (Proximate Origin), the recipient gets sick because it has no immunity to this particular coronavirus.
2. The human SARS-Cov-2 virus, which caused humans to get sick in late 2019, apparently in Wuhan China, is unique. It is not found in animals. The uniqueness is that it contains a pathogenic cytotoxic spike protein not found in the natural coronavirus. For this reason, the 'Proximate Origin" theory of man getting COVID-19 from an animal (Pangolins, bats,etc.) MUST be wrong.
3. Humans can transfer their unique corona virus to animals - my lions/pumas (Private zoo in South Africa) example earlier (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...UFBfaNSqk5Gevk). So, besides catching natural corona viruses from other animals, animals can have transferred to them the human COVID-19 virus, and they get sick (No immunity).
4. Humans can get sick from the transfer of corona virus from animals: The hamsters in a Hong Kong pet store, imported from the Netherlands, referred to earlier (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...bloombergdaily). Though it is somewhat ambiguous, the article says that the two staff had COVID-19, it seems the Delta Variant (It implies they had the unique human virus, not one naturally found in animals). They searched for the transmitter of the virus. It seems they could find no human transfer. So they examined the imported hamsters.
5. The hamsters had the Delta Variant of the SARS-Cov-2 virus. The conclusion was that the virus making the staff sick was transferred to them from the hamsters. China closed down all the Hong Kong pet stores selling the Netherlands hamsters.
6. As I understand the Petri Dish argument, the hamsters, likely in Netherlands, could NOT have gotten the Delta variant virus from another animal, because SARS-Cov-2 does NOT exist in nature; it is the unique result of a Petri Dish hybridization of some corona virus. The only conclusion can be that the hamsters got the virus when it was transferred to them by some sick human staff in the Netherlands..
Have I now got right the hamster case explanation, from the Petri Dish argument point of view?
The human SARS-Cov-2 virus, which caused humans to get sick in late 2019, apparently in Wuhan China, is unique. It is not found in animals. The uniqueness is that it contains a pathogenic cytotoxic spike protein not found in the natural coronavirus. For this reason, the 'Proximate Origin" theory of man getting COVID-19 from an animal (Pangolins, bats,etc.) MUST be wrong.
Hi Bob,
No, a virus that has many parts of the critical pathogenic part of it patented by a company that benefits from selling a vaccine that turns your body into a factory that makes the identical pathogenic protein and this patent was registered years before the virus was released to the world is the thrust of the argument. As the diagram points out the probability of this particular virus not coming from this group but just occurring in nature coincidentally is less than 1 in 4*10 to the 66th power. In short, it is statically impossible.
Furthermore the totality of the circumstances as per the criminal lawsuits I posted present a very clear and unequivocal picture of what happened. Please read them before commenting on this.
Last edited by Sid Belzberg; Sunday, 23rd January, 2022, 04:25 PM.
Comment