If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Policy / Politique
The fee for tournament organizers advertising on ChessTalk is $20/event or $100/yearly unlimited for the year.
Les frais d'inscription des organisateurs de tournoi sur ChessTalk sont de 20 $/événement ou de 100 $/année illimitée.
You can etransfer to Henry Lam at chesstalkforum at gmail dot com
Transfér à Henry Lam à chesstalkforum@gmail.com
Dark Knight / Le Chevalier Noir
General Guidelines
---- Nous avons besoin d'un traduction français!
Some Basics
1. Under Board "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQs) there are 3 sections dealing with General Forum Usage, User Profile Features, and Reading and Posting Messages. These deal with everything from Avatars to Your Notifications. Most general technical questions are covered there. Here is a link to the FAQs. https://forum.chesstalk.com/help
2. Consider using the SEARCH button if you are looking for information. You may find your question has already been answered in a previous thread.
3. If you've looked for an answer to a question, and not found one, then you should consider asking your question in a new thread. For example, there have already been questions and discussion regarding: how to do chess diagrams (FENs); crosstables that line up properly; and the numerous little “glitches” that every new site will have.
4. Read pinned or sticky threads, like this one, if they look important. This applies especially to newcomers.
5. Read the thread you're posting in before you post. There are a variety of ways to look at a thread. These are covered under “Display Modes”.
6. Thread titles: please provide some details in your thread title. This is useful for a number of reasons. It helps ChessTalk members to quickly skim the threads. It prevents duplication of threads. And so on.
7. Unnecessary thread proliferation (e.g., deliberately creating a new thread that duplicates existing discussion) is discouraged. Look to see if a thread on your topic may have already been started and, if so, consider adding your contribution to the pre-existing thread. However, starting new threads to explore side-issues that are not relevant to the original subject is strongly encouraged. A single thread on the Canadian Open, with hundreds of posts on multiple sub-topics, is no better than a dozen threads on the Open covering only a few topics. Use your good judgment when starting a new thread.
8. If and/or when sub-forums are created, please make sure to create threads in the proper place.
Debate
9. Give an opinion and back it up with a reason. Throwaway comments such as "Game X pwnz because my friend and I think so!" could be considered pointless at best, and inflammatory at worst.
10. Try to give your own opinions, not simply those copied and pasted from reviews or opinions of your friends.
Unacceptable behavior and warnings
11. In registering here at ChessTalk please note that the same or similar rules apply here as applied at the previous Boardhost message board. In particular, the following content is not permitted to appear in any messages:
* Racism
* Hatred
* Harassment
* Adult content
* Obscene material
* Nudity or pornography
* Material that infringes intellectual property or other proprietary rights of any party
* Material the posting of which is tortious or violates a contractual or fiduciary obligation you or we owe to another party
* Piracy, hacking, viruses, worms, or warez
* Spam
* Any illegal content
* unapproved Commercial banner advertisements or revenue-generating links
* Any link to or any images from a site containing any material outlined in these restrictions
* Any material deemed offensive or inappropriate by the Board staff
12. Users are welcome to challenge other points of view and opinions, but should do so respectfully. Personal attacks on others will not be tolerated. Posts and threads with unacceptable content can be closed or deleted altogether. Furthermore, a range of sanctions are possible - from a simple warning to a temporary or even a permanent banning from ChessTalk.
Helping to Moderate
13. 'Report' links (an exclamation mark inside a triangle) can be found in many places throughout the board. These links allow users to alert the board staff to anything which is offensive, objectionable or illegal. Please consider using this feature if the need arises.
Advice for free
14. You should exercise the same caution with Private Messages as you would with any public posting.
"Japan plans to launch a fresh round of COVID-19 vaccinations from May, starting with the most vulnerable members of society, health ministry officials said Wednesday.
The ministry’s plan, which also includes expanding inoculations to the rest of the public from September, was approved at a panel comprised of health experts, heads of local governments and others.
The fresh inoculation drive comes despite the government’s decision to downgrade the legal status of COVID-19 to the same category as common infectious diseases like seasonal flu. The downgrade takes effect May 8."
"Japan plans to launch a fresh round of COVID-19 vaccinations from May, starting with the most vulnerable members of society, health ministry officials said Wednesday.
The ministry’s plan, which also includes expanding inoculations to the rest of the public from September, was approved at a panel comprised of health experts, heads of local governments and others.
The fresh inoculation drive comes despite the government’s decision to downgrade the legal status of COVID-19 to the same category as common infectious diseases like seasonal flu. The downgrade takes effect May 8."
Information that is not covered by the mainstream media will be delivered by a reporter with a character, focusing on short videos. DM or short_short_news@protonmail.com for tips. Recruiting volunteers (reporters, translators, designers, video creators, etc.)
"A group of Japanese researchers led by Professor Fukushima file lawsuits against the government for hiding the vaccine harms. Judicial Press Conference:"
Video Clip: Laura Ingraham with California Dr.Michael Huang
‘I apologize on behalf of my profession for refusing to listen to patients with vax injuries’ - Dr.Michael Huang, physician who treated 4000 COVID patients says he’s seen hundreds of COVID-19 vaccine injuries, cancer, pregnancy loss, etc. Vaccine injured physicians are starting to speak out…
Dr. Melissa Halvorson Smith MD
Dr.Melissa Halvorson Smith is a gynecologist from North Dakota and heads the Women’s Health Center. She was injured by 2 doses of Pfizer COVID-19 mRNA vaccine. In her words (click here):
Dr.Smith has been shocked by the horrible treatment she has received from her physician colleagues as a COVID-19 vaccine injured patient. Dr. Shmuel Shapira MD
Dr.Shmuel Shapira MD MPH (Col) led Israel’s effort to develop a coronavirus vaccine and was the Head of the Department of Military Medicine of Hebrew University Faculty of Medicine and IDF Medical Corps(read more here):
“Professor Shmuel Shapira might be the most senior ranking medical-scientist in the world to openly criticize the COVID vaccines.”
On May 13, 2022, Dr.Shapira said: "I received 3 vaccinations (Pfizer), I was physically injured in a very significant way as many others were injured” Dr. Kerryn Phelps MD
Dr.Kerryn Phelps is the former President of the Australian Medical Association (AMA). She and her partner were COVID-19 vaccine injured. She is the highest ranking Australian medical doctor to admit to being COVID-19 vaccine injured (read more here):
“This is an issue that I have witnessed first-hand with my wife who suffered a severe neurological reaction to her first Pfizer vaccine within minutes, including burning face and gums, paraesethesiae, and numb hands and feet”
“I continue to observe the devastating effects a year-and-a-half later with the addition of fatigue and additional neurological symptoms including nerve pains, altered sense of smell, visual disturbance and musculoskeletal inflammation. The diagnosis and causation has been confirmed by several specialists who have told me that they have seen ‘a lot’ of patients in a similar situation.”
“Dr. Phelps revealed she was also diagnosed with a vaccine injury from her second dose of Pfizer in July 2021, “with the diagnosis and causation confirmed by specialist colleagues”.
“In my case the injury resulted in dysautonomia with intermittent fevers and cardiovascular implications including breathlessness, inappropriate sinus tachycardia and blood pressure fluctuations.”
“Dr. Phelps said both reactions were reported to the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) “but never followed up”.
“She revealed she had spoken with other doctors “who have themselves experienced a serious and persistent adverse event” but that “vaccine injury is a subject that few in the medical profession have wanted to talk about”. Dr. Danice Hertz MD
“Dr.Hertz, a gastroenterologist who retired in October, got her first and only dose of Pfizer’s vaccine on Dec. 23, 2020”
“Within 30 minutes, I started experiencing adverse effects”
“Hertz said within 24 hours she developed neurological symptoms, including severe paresthesias in her face, tongue, scalp, chest wall and limbs, as well as tremors, twitching, weakness, headaches, tinnitus and imbalance.”
“I saw six neurologists, five allergists, three rheumatologists, and no one had a clue,” Hertz said.”
“Dr. Danice Hertz said people like her who have been seriously injured by COVID vaccines are being dismissed or ignored, and because health officials won’t research their injuries and potential treatments, they have nowhere to turn.”
“After taking the Pfizer injection Danice got neuropathy, mast cell activation, pericarditis and many other symptoms. She has now seen 22 different doctors and still hasn't recovered.” (click here) Dr. Stephen Wright MD
Dr.Stephen Wright (UK) died at age 32, from blood clots caused by the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine.
Mark Steyn conducted several interviews with the family:
My Take…
It is crucial for doctors who have been COVID-19 vaccine injured to speak up and let the world know what has happened to them and how they have been treated by their colleagues and the medical establishment in general, once they became COVID-19 vaccine injured patients.
Last edited by Sid Belzberg; Thursday, 2nd March, 2023, 10:11 AM.
Fellow Chessplayers, I have never seen a peer-reviewed paper in Clinical &Experimental Immunology or any other reputable medical journal filled with as much rage as this. This is not some fly-by-night publication.
Clinical & Experimental Immunology is a peer-reviewed medical journal covering clinical and translational immunology. The editor-in-chief is Leonie Taams. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Immunology, of which it is the official journal.
1) "The mRNA vaccines are neither safe nor effective, but outright dangerous"
2) "A worldwide Bayesian causal Impact analysis suggests that COVID-19 gene therapy (mRNA vaccine) causes more COVID-19 cases per million and more non-Covid deaths per million than are associated with COVID-19"
3)"Never in Vaccine history have 57 leading scientists and policy experts released a report questioning the safety and efficacy of a vaccine.They not only questioned the safety of the current Covid-19 injections but were calling for an immediate end to all vaccination. Many doctors and scientists worldwide have voiced similar misgivings and warned of consequences due to long-term side effects. Yet there is no discussion or even mention of studies that do not follow the narrative on safety and efficacy of Covid-19 vaccines."
4)"Medicalexperts that have questioned the safety of these vaccines have been attacked and demonized, called conspiracy theorists, and have been threatened to be de-registered if they go against the narrative. Alternative treatments were prohibited, and people who never practiced medicine are telling experienced doctors how to do their job."
5)"As scientists, we put up hypotheses and test them using experiments. If a hypothesis is proven to be true according to current knowledge, it might still change over time when new evidence comes to light. Hence, sharing and accumulating knowledge is the most important part of science. The question arises when and why this process of science has been changed. No discussion of new knowledge disputing the safety of the COVID-19 vaccines is allowed."
"Who gave bureaucrats the means to destroy the fundaments of science and tell scientists not to argue the science?"
Last edited by Sid Belzberg; Saturday, 4th March, 2023, 01:27 AM.
Fellow Chessplayers, I have never seen a peer-reviewed paper in Clinical &Experimental Immunology or any other reputable medical journal filled with as much rage as this. This is not some fly-by-night publication.
Clinical & Experimental Immunology is a peer-reviewed medical journal covering clinical and translational immunology. The editor-in-chief is Leonie Taams. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Immunology, of which it is the official journal.
Hi Sid,
How could you fail to notice that the graphs & tables in this article do not make sense, as they do not include the percentage of the general population who were vaccinated vs non-vaccinated? The article also says that it got peer reviewed and accepted within 2 days only! If you have any connections with the journal, please let them know that they need to apologize to the scientific community for publishing this article in which the raw data is presented in a very deceptive way.
Kind regards,
D
Last edited by Dilip Panjwani; Saturday, 4th March, 2023, 05:52 PM.
Hi Sid,
How could you fail to notice that the graphs in this article do not make sense, as they do not include the percentage of the general population who were vaccinated vs non-vaccinated? The article also says that it got peer reviewed and accepted within 2 days only! If you have any connections with the journal, please let them know that they need to apologize to the scientific community for publishing this article in which the raw data is presented in a very deceptive way.
Kind regards,
D
Hi Dilip,
The few countries that did publish data by Vaccination status stopped doing so in mid-2022. Below is data by vaccination percentage status from Canada which was one of the last countries to do this. The reason governments stopped doing this is that it is clear that the "vaccines " were neither safe nor effective. The investigators are not to be blamed for data that does not exist.
The Governments owe the scientific community an apology and should be held legally accountable for the harm they have inflicted. You have it backward in who is "deceiving" who!
Originally posted by Dillip Panjwani
The article also says that it got peer reviewed and accepted within two days only! If you have any connections with the journal, please let them know that they need to apologize to the scientific community for publishing this article in which the raw data is presented in a very deceptive way.
Please let your governments worldwide know, including here in Canada, that this data should be made available to the scientific community so that
we are not accused of "deception" through no fault of our own. Here is what Canadian data looked like by percentage of vaccination status before they hid it from the world.
By mid-2022, the vaccines lost any semblance of efficacy, and this was when Canada stopped publishing the data.
To deceive the Canadian population, the government lumped in data by vaccination status in their weekly reports all the way back to December 2020, when no one was vaccinated. I had to retrieve weekly data from the internet archives and subtract earlier periods from the most recent to show the current percentage status of the vaccines, not only losing efficacy but negative efficacy as well.
The Government of Canada did not like this exposure, so since their first deception of lumping in old data with new data did not work thanks to retrieving deleted data from the internet archives, they got provinces like British Columbia and Alberta, etc., to omit data by vaccination status entirely as month by month it is evident that the so-called efficacy was wearing off very quickly, and as you see by March and April 2022 was in fact negative!
Last edited by Sid Belzberg; Sunday, 5th March, 2023, 02:04 AM.
Hi Dillip,
The few countries that did publish data by Vaccination status stopped doing so in mid-2022. Here is a post where I posted data by vaccination status from the Uk that was one of the last countries to do this. The reason governments stopped doing this is that it is clear that the "vaccines " were neither safe nor effective. The investigators are not to be blamed for data that does not exist.
The Governments owe the scientific community an apology and should be held legally accountable for the harm they have inflicted. You have it backwards in who is "deceiving" who!
Please let your governments worldwide know, including here in Canada, that this data should be made available to the scientific community so that
we are not accused of "deception" through no fault of our own. Here is what Canadian data looked like by vaccination status before they hid it from the world.
By mid-2022 the vaccines lost any semblance of efficacy and this was when Canada stopped publishing the data.
To deceive Canada, they lumped in data by vaccination status in their weekly reports all the way back to December 2020 when no one was vaccinated. I had to retrieve weekly data from the internet archives and subtract earlier time periods from the most recent to show the current status of the vaccines, not only losing efficacy but negative efficacy as well.
Of course the government had no business to force the vaccines on the public... they at best could just have disseminated all the information which was available, including all the details of the big pharma vaccine trials which they still hide. But then we do not have a Libertarian constitution, so the courts won't make them reimburse those harmed by them...
Update on Brook Jackson Pfizer Fraud Whistle Blower Case
For the first time, I am cautiously optimistic that justice will prevail! Please listen to this
important update from Brooke Jackson's legal counsel.
The “most rigorous clinical trials in history” were a sham.
"As Seth knows, when the pandemic happened Moderna made 100,000 doses in 2019 for the whole year.
“And I remember walking after that into the office of Moderna manufacturing and I say: “How we make a billion doses next year?” And [you/they] look at me a bit funny say: “What?” I said: “Yeah we need to make a billion doses next year, there’s going to be a pandemic.”
Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel World Economic Forum Davos 2023:
So you consider journalists at the NY TIMES a better health and science information source than the Cochrane Medical Database and other medical journals? Oh yeah, I forgot that only the MSM is a good source of information for you regarding data and science. Chess aims to improve your critical thinking skills, not abandon them entirely. Maybe for once in your life, read responses to your posts. https://forum.chesstalk.com/forum/ch...938#post224938
Gotta love this picture of Bill Gates getting off the plane with his masked slaves! Masks for thee, not for me!
Tweet
Comment